The Texas lawsuit and the possible end of our republic.

[Remodeling Maidiac]

This really isn't going to happen.

You guys really need to calm down. Go out and get some air. Spend the day in a forest with no cell phone.

Can't since the leftist governors closed all the parks.

 

[westwall]

So you want the court to hand over the election to trump correct? Not a redo, no chance for the other side. I am soooooooooooooo happy I don't align myself with either party. It feels soooo patriotic.

No, we want them to force a revote in the fraudulent States. A vote watched veeeery carefully where no bullshit is allowed to happen.

 

[bripat9643]

What's unconstitutional about the SC moving the date because of wholesale election fraud?

The fact that the Constitution does not give them the authority to do that.

and the constitution does not give one man or one woman the authority to change election law.

Depends on what precisely you mean by change election law. Because sometimes the legislatures has given governors the authority to change laws in settings of emergencies and that's what a lot of governs did in some circumstances.

The Constitution doesn't give governors authority to change election law, ever. Furthermore, this whole "state of emergency" thing is a flagrant violation of the Constitution. Where does the Constitution authorize it?

 

[bripat9643]

It proves nothing of the sort.

Do you even know what I'm referring to? If so, how does it not prove anything of the sort? The constitution isn't ambiguous here.

Where does the Constitution say that the SC cannot override a law passed by Congress?

 

[Toro]

He's a lying piece of shit. For one thing, he claims the obervers were not sent home. We can see on the video that they were. We can also see that they pulled boxes of ballots out from under a table where they were hidden.

Only a POS would dispute it.

They were NOT sent home briptard.

A group of workers went home, and they followed.

Nobody told them to do so.

 

[Toro]

No, we want them to force a revote in the fraudulent States. A vote watched veeeery carefully where no bullshit is allowed to happen.

Nobody cares what you want.

 

[Invisibleflash]

The United States has existed for 244 years. If the Texas lawsuit challenging the results of the 2020 presidential election fails, the United States will cease to exist. The US came to be as a result of a people wanting to be free of elite government power. The founders that created the United states realized that individual liberty was so important that a life-risking break with traditional aristocratic control was the only way to fashion a truly free society.

There is an evil in this world that will always be with us. Certain aspects of all societies will always rise to power and when that evil gets power it will never willingly relent to the will of the people because the people are regarded as inferior and unfit to choose their own destiny. When Benjamin Franklin was asked if we have a republic or a monarchy he is purported to have said: “A republic if we can keep it.” Whether he actually uttered those exact words is less important than their meaning.

Franklin knew full well that the minds and hearts of the people could be tricked and swindled by clever power merchants appealing to fear and personal greed. But he like the founders had faith that the people would recognize the power they held with their votes. Rank and file citizens have a collective common sense, and they cannot be fooled indefinitely. They can vote out the power if they choose. This is the golden difference the US possesses as opposed to the rest of the world.

This golden difference became manifest when Donald Trump gained access to the White House by virtue of the vote in the wake of an awakening that government was acting on its own behalf not in the best interest of the people. The people had been tricked and fooled once but not again.

The wickedness of the 2020 election became clear when the vote was tainted and manipulated with fraud. Joe Biden was “selected” with votes, not elected by voters. The hearts and minds of the people were supplanted with mountains of paper ballots rising out of last-minute unconstitutional changes by state actors skirting any actual legislative process. It was brazenly done in broad daylight; it was the raw power that Franklin warned about.

Seventeen states have joined Texas in this lawsuit to save our republic. Let us hope the Supreme Court comes to our rescue.

The writing is on the proverbial wall...break the USA into 2 or lose it all.

 

[colfax_m]

Where does the Constitution say that the SC cannot override a law passed by Congress?

Can the SC override a law passed by Congress for any reason they chose?

 

[justoffal]

I have faith in our Conservative court to not only reject this ridiculous claim but to admonish EVERY Republican who endorses it.

Why should Republicans be "admonished" for protesting against stolen elections? There is really little point in spending the time or money to run for office if you are going to be swindled.

Further, no one will contribute to an election campaign that has no chance of succeeding because of fraud.

Because it wasn't stolen. For the first time in many election cycles, the Republican tactic of voter suppression was largely removed. Granted, it was because of the pandemic (which I'd like to point out was made worse by the lack of response from the WH and impeded by the Republican party). Individual states made their own election rules. It is up to the state to set those rules. If you truly believe in the Constitution, then you believe in state's rights. If not, it's just bullshit talk. You believe in selective interpretation. For the SC to rule in Texas favor, it would have to throw out and invalidate millions of legally cast votes. Straight up voter disenfranchisement. It's bad enough that the Republican party engages in voter suppression and gerrymandering, but this?...is straight up theft..and sedition.

How is making a person vote in person and prove they are eligible to vote voter surpression?

States made the election rules. There are states that have used mail in voting for years without incident. The military has used it for decades.
Voting in person (especially during a pandemic) may not be possible for everyone. Hence, a way for Republicans to practice voter suppression.
Everyone who cast a vote was eligible. 73 million of the morons voted for Trump.

Your man lost. And you're pissed. I get it. But this behavior is just un-American.

You just like mail in voting because it makes it easier to cheat, and you know your side has no issues with cheating.

Maybe you can explain how it is possible to cheat in a mail in ballot?

Do millions of soldiers and sailors cheat every year when they vote by mail?

harvesting is the biggest one.

Usually mail in ballots are requested, which allows for tracing.

It adds also the chance for stuffing in the counting rooms, by increasing the paper count.

harvesting is the biggest one.

Usually mail in ballots are requested, which allows for tracing.

It adds also the chance for stuffing in the counting rooms, by increasing the paper count.

Which states sent ballots to every voter without a request?

What makes mail in ballots untraceable?

NJ for one sent out plenty.

How about we match every ballot to every shipped envelope, and do check to see if those people actually mailed the ballots?

NJ for one sent out plenty.

How about we match every ballot to every shipped envelope, and do check to see if those people actually mailed the ballots?

Yes, one.
Not one in question or contested in any Trump lawsuits.

So what are you arguing then?

I am arguing that I don't trust the election results and want full investigations.

Yeah....no matter who ends up in the white house the nation is irreversibly changed....people are not going to vote into a fixed system and I don't think it is possible to restore that faith....before the next major set of elections there will be a total departure from the selection process.

Nah, those on the left will continue to "trust" the system because they are used to people thinking for them.

IT is not possible to coexist with a party that codifies deception and theft....there will always be cheating in the system from here on out. Like I said before....the two nations have already begun....Trump will continue to be the leader of the other nation that will no longer cooperate with the one that was in effect stolen. The left has made it clear that they are no longer interested in fair play only in power play....and that have become exceptionally good at that.

JO

JO

 

[Toro]

Holy Retard Batman! Two new states have been created and added to the Texas Rube Lawsuit - New California and New Nevada!

rofl

 

[colfax_m]

What's unconstitutional about the SC moving the date because of wholesale election fraud?

The fact that the Constitution does not give them the authority to do that.

and the constitution does not give one man or one woman the authority to change election law.

Depends on what precisely you mean by change election law. Because sometimes the legislatures has given governors the authority to change laws in settings of emergencies and that's what a lot of governs did in some circumstances.

The Constitution doesn't give governors authority to change election law, ever. Furthermore, this whole "state of emergency" thing is a flagrant violation of the Constitution. Where does the Constitution authorize it?

Does the constitution give Trump authority to change the law?

 

[bripat9643]

He's a lying piece of shit. For one thing, he claims the obervers were not sent home. We can see on the video that they were. We can also see that they pulled boxes of ballots out from under a table where they were hidden.

Only a POS would dispute it.

They were NOT sent home briptard.

A group of workers went home, and they followed.

Nobody told them to do so.

That is an obvious lie, turd. Why would they all get up and leave at the same exact time? The fake news even said they were told to go home because of a water main break

Stuff like this is how we know Dims are all lying pieces of shit.

 

[bripat9643]

What's unconstitutional about the SC moving the date because of wholesale election fraud?

The fact that the Constitution does not give them the authority to do that.

and the constitution does not give one man or one woman the authority to change election law.

Depends on what precisely you mean by change election law. Because sometimes the legislatures has given governors the authority to change laws in settings of emergencies and that's what a lot of governs did in some circumstances.

The Constitution doesn't give governors authority to change election law, ever. Furthermore, this whole "state of emergency" thing is a flagrant violation of the Constitution. Where does the Constitution authorize it?

Does the constitution give Trump authority to change the law?

Trump didn't change the law.

 

[colfax_m]

Trump didn't change the law.

No. He wrote a brand new law.

He decided to spend money on a border wall which was not appropriated by Congress.

The appropriations clause clearly say that's unconstitutional. The power of the purse belongs with Congress.

 

[bripat9643]

Where does the Constitution say that the SC cannot override a law passed by Congress?

Can the SC override a law passed by Congress for any reason they chose?

Supposedly they have to follow the Constitution, but they have simply ignored it numerous times.

 

[bripat9643]

Trump didn't change the law.

No. He wrote a brand new law.

He decided to spend money on a border wall which was not appropriated by Congress.

The appropriations clause clearly say that's unconstitutional. The power of the purse belongs with Congress.

You're changing the subject.

 

[colfax_m]

Where does the Constitution say that the SC cannot override a law passed by Congress?

Can the SC override a law passed by Congress for any reason they chose?

Supposedly they have to follow the Constitution, but they have simply ignored it numerous times.

The Constitution gives Congress the ability to set the date of voting for the electoral college.

Does the constitution given SCOTUS the authority to change it?

 

[colfax_m]

You're changing the subject.

It's illustrative.

Trump wrote a law, against the constitution, based on emergency authority. That was found constitutional by SCOTUS.

So did the governors of the states.

 

[westwall]

No, we want them to force a revote in the fraudulent States. A vote watched veeeery carefully where no bullshit is allowed to happen.

Nobody cares what you want.

And nobody will care when you get strung up either, chinese stooge.

 

[colfax_m]

And nobody will care when you get strung up either, chinese stooge.

Are you saying this poster is going to be hanged?

What is with you guys and your violent fantasies?