The Unenforceability of abortion bans

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Joe, you ignorant slut. Just quit your bitching. All this Supreme Court decision means is that now abortion will be treated like almost all other issues and will be up to the discretion of the States and Locals.

If a woman wants to kill her child for birth control all she will have to do is go to one of the Commie states. The Commie states love killing children.

This is a lie.

No children are being killed.

It is neither the role nor responsibly of government to dictate to citizens whether they may have a child or not - Federal, state, or local.

 

[Nostra]

This is a lie.

No children are being killed.

It is neither the role nor responsibly of government to dictate to citizens whether they may have a child or not - Federal, state, or local.

Another Baby Killer Cultist science denier.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Another Baby Killer Cultist science denier.

The neo-fascist authoritarian right seeks only more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty.

 

[Flash]

This is a lie.

No children are being killed.

It is neither the role nor responsibly of government to dictate to citizens whether they may have a child or not - Federal, state, or local.

You Liberals are just as ignorant of Biology as you are of Economics, History, Climate Science, Ethics and the Constitution.

You also deny that they are children for the same reasons the Nazis denied that Jews were human. To justify the killing.

 

[Nostra]

The neo-fascist authoritarian right seeks only more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty.

It sure is fun watching the Baby Killer Cultists have their meltdowns.

 

[rightwinger]

Link us up to him telling Collins that.

Provide a link to YOU?

 

[Bob Blaylock]

The Constitution does not consider the unborn to be persons therefore they do not have constitutionally protected rights and SCOTUS has affirmed this

Once again, the same was once true of black people.

That was wrong, too.

 

[BackAgain]

Since they would have been BORN to US citizens they BORN children would be US citizens by existing law.

If you think anchor babies are a problem just wait until you get anchor fetuses

No problem. We just need to make a clear definition of who qualifies as a citizen. That one clause (owing allegiance) gets short shrift. Nothin’ that can’t be fixed.

 

[BackAgain]

Once again, the same was once true of black people.

That was wrong, too.

Exactly. It can be fixed.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

You Liberals are just as ignorant of Biology as you are of Economics, History, Climate Science, Ethics and the Constitution.

Keep in mind that many of them believe that Bruce Jenner is a woman.

 

[Nostra]

Provide a link to YOU?

Too easy to expose your lies.

Run along, Troll.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Well, it's a bogus charge because Peterson didn't do it. He was convicted purely on the emotion he was cheating on his pregnant wife.

And like an innocent person, he didn't bother to challenge a bullshit law he was charged with... because he's maintaining his innocence.

The question was not directed to you. If it was a bogus charge why is the law still standing in California? He challenged it dumbass he claimed he was innocent.

 

[Blues Man]

Once again, the same was once true of black people.

That was wrong, too.

Then change the Constitution as we did for all races of BORN people.

I hope you are ready to live with those consequences

 

[Blues Man]

Exactly. It can be fixed.

Try getting that amendment passed

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The law.

The Constitution does not consider the unborn to be persons therefore they do not have constitutionally protected rights and SCOTUS has affirmed this

California law charged and convicted him.

 

[Blues Man]

California law charged and convicted him.

CA law is unconstitutional in that instance.

If this was ever brought through the courts SCOTUS would have to strike it down

 

[BackAgain]

Try getting that amendment passed

actually, it’s simply a law.

 

[Blues Man]

actually, it’s simply a law.

No it would have to fall under the Equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment

 

[Nostra]

CA law is unconstitutional in that instance.

If this was ever brought through the courts SCOTUS would have to strike it down

It isn't unconstitutional if the SC hasn't ruled on it, Stupid.

 

[Blues Man]

It isn't unconstitutional if the SC hasn't ruled on it, Stupid.

It hasn't been brought up the chain yet has it Asshole? And FYI any lower court can stop a law from being enforced until it is heard by the SC this particular law just hasn;t been challenged yet.

That lack of challenge in no way implies constitutionality