The Unfathomable Depths of Leftists

[hadit]

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

She has the opportunity to testify. If she doesn't, it's not the Republican's fault. And I will remind you, as democrats seem to be incapable of learning, look beyond a month and realize that if you impeach a justice for no good reason beyond irrational hatred, it will happen to yours. It's inevitable.

 

[hadit]

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

That's nothing compared to the real damage done. No matter what happens, his kids will have to deal with idiots and their children calling their dad a rapist, even though he's not even been accused of that. That's just one thing.

 

[P@triot]

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

Look at that. The vintage left-wing lunatic has already predetermined that a Supreme Court Justice with an impeccable record should be “impeached” if and when the Dumbocrats get the power necessary to achieve that.

No grounds for impeachment, mind you. No laws broken or ethics violated. Nope! The radical left-wing lunatic is just furious that his side didn’t win and like all oppressive marxists, he’s unwilling to accept the will of the American people.

Thank you Crappy Tush, for proving the premise of this thread.

 

[P@triot]

There is nothing more regressive than progressives. They have set this nation back centuries with their old and outdated views. Take the latest left-wing nightmare...

In the last week, this pious new mantra of the left has been used to completely dismantle an honorable man’s reputation. It’s incredible really, the idea that, in the year 2018, your biological makeup entitles you to be believed even in the absence of one shred of evidence.

One of the most basic tenets of America was the belief that all citizens are “innocent until proven guilty”. But once again, the left want to take us back to the 1600’s and the Salem Witch Trials where people are burned at the stake, absent due process.

But the idea that we should believe all women simply because they have a different set of genitalia is utterly ridiculous.

Further still, they want to base their regressive views and policies for this particular issue on a person’s gender. That is, of course, after declaring that gender is “fluid” and a “social construct”. Uh.....ok. Then we certain shouldn’t use gender as the basis for whether or not a person should automatically be believed.

Commentary: I am a sexual assault survivor. No, we should not ‘believe all women’

 

[Crepitus]

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

By looking at his rulings from the bench, that's how. Kavenaugh won praise from both sides of the aisle for his qualifications. If we can't trust him to respect the rights of all women, it would show in his rulings. Go ahead, look through them. There are lots of them over a long time, so show us where he showed contempt for women. If you can't/won't, I really think you have nothing to complain about and we're right back where we started, at partisan politics.

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

Those aren't rulings. His decisions are available for all to see. You're worried about his rulings? Check them out. As far as I can tell, judges' decisions are public.

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

 

[Crepitus]

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

She has the opportunity to testify. If she doesn't, it's not the Republican's fault. And I will remind you, as democrats seem to be incapable of learning, look beyond a month and realize that if you impeach a justice for no good reason beyond irrational hatred, it will happen to yours. It's inevitable.

No investigation, nothing but a buncha hostile and none too bright republicans blasting questions at her.

Sure, that's gonna tell us what we need to know.

 

[Votto]

I seriously don't know how any person of integrity can admit to being a Democrat these days.

Every day, there are new revelations about how base, unethical, dastardly, immoral, and profoundly untruthful the whole lot of them (you) are.

This WHOLE Kavanaugh caper is nothing but lies piled upon more lies, distortions, misrepresentations, and fantasies. Democrat politicians, lawyers, and operatives go on the screen night after night, claiming that they are only seeking "the truth" about what happened that night so many decades ago, and the truth is the farthest thing from their minds...and EVERYONE LISTENING TO THEM KNOWS IT! It is all about delaying the confirmation of this spectacularly-qualified judge, and ultimately overturning the results of the 2016 election, by which the American people emphatically stated that they wanted to reverse the Leftist, anti-Constitutional tidal wave in the Supreme Court.

The daily slanders against our admittedly-flawed President grow more and more absurd. Major "news" outlets repeat eminently dubious rumors and hearsay as though it were brought down from the Mountain by Moses. The good economic news is confined to Conservative-leaning websites, while the MSM either ignores or downplays a cornucopia of new jobs opening up, dramatic increases in American wealth (mainly through investments and 401k plans), remarkable diplomatic achievements, and a President who is doing more to keep his campaign promises than anyone in human memory.

Democrat initiatives that would legalize tens of millions of uneducated, government-dependent border jumpers, cripple our power and energy sectors, compromise 80% of our institutions of "higher learning", and bankrupt the country through asininities like "Medicare for All," are treated as serious policy proposals, to be considered by the unwitting masses.

The Media is wholly vested in the Democrat-Leftist program for a "soft coup", with the result that those who only loosely follow the news (read the headlines and little more) have slowly been convinced to believe the lies and distortions, thus pointing to a potentially-disastrous Democrat takeover of Congress in January. As recently pointed out by noted conservative Historian Victor Davis Hanson, we are closer to a bloody civil war than we have been since 1864.

Don't say nobody told you.

It's called a fascist coup, courtesy of an endless array of baseless accusations and a lap dog media.

 

[Crepitus]

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

That's nothing compared to the real damage done. No matter what happens, his kids will have to deal with idiots and their children calling their dad a rapist, even though he's not even been accused of that. That's just one thing.

I call bullshit.

 

[Crepitus]

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

Look at that. The vintage left-wing lunatic has already predetermined that a Supreme Court Justice with an impeccable record should be “impeached” if and when the Dumbocrats get the power necessary to achieve that.

No grounds for impeachment, mind you. No laws broken or ethics violated. Nope! The radical left-wing lunatic is just furious that his side didn’t win and like all oppressive marxists, he’s unwilling to accept the will of the American people.

Thank you Crappy Tush, for proving the premise of this thread.

All these allegations don't equal an "impeccable record".

 

[bripat9643]

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

We know Kavanaugh is telling the truth, and we know the sleazy mentally deranged slut is lying. Every single witness she named said it never happened. She can't remember any details, like where it happened or when it happened. Only the brain damaged, or Democrats, could possibly believe she's telling the truth. Actually even Democrats know she's lying.

 

[bripat9643]

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

Look at that. The vintage left-wing lunatic has already predetermined that a Supreme Court Justice with an impeccable record should be “impeached” if and when the Dumbocrats get the power necessary to achieve that.

No grounds for impeachment, mind you. No laws broken or ethics violated. Nope! The radical left-wing lunatic is just furious that his side didn’t win and like all oppressive marxists, he’s unwilling to accept the will of the American people.

Thank you Crappy Tush, for proving the premise of this thread.

All these allegations don't equal an "impeccable record".

Baseless allegations don't have the slightest affect on his record, moron. Once again the leftwing idiot chimes in with their favorite nomination meme: Guilty until proven innocent. Most people abandoned that kind of thinking 500 years ago.

 

[bripat9643]

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

We already know. All the witnesses have shot down her story. She's told numerous obvious lies, like she's afraid of flying. It's lie, lie, lie. There's no justice in giving her the benefit of doubt. There is no doubt.

 

[bripat9643]

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

By looking at his rulings from the bench, that's how. Kavenaugh won praise from both sides of the aisle for his qualifications. If we can't trust him to respect the rights of all women, it would show in his rulings. Go ahead, look through them. There are lots of them over a long time, so show us where he showed contempt for women. If you can't/won't, I really think you have nothing to complain about and we're right back where we started, at partisan politics.

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

They have released a million and a half pages, moron.

 

[caddo kid]

I seriously don't know how any person of integrity can admit to being a Democrat these days.

Every day, there are new revelations about how base, unethical, dastardly, immoral, and profoundly untruthful the whole lot of them (you) are.

This WHOLE Kavanaugh caper is nothing but lies piled upon more lies, distortions, misrepresentations, and fantasies. Democrat politicians, lawyers, and operatives go on the screen night after night, claiming that they are only seeking "the truth" about what happened that night so many decades ago, and the truth is the farthest thing from their minds...and EVERYONE LISTENING TO THEM KNOWS IT! It is all about delaying the confirmation of this spectacularly-qualified judge, and ultimately overturning the results of the 2016 election, by which the American people emphatically stated that they wanted to reverse the Leftist, anti-Constitutional tidal wave in the Supreme Court.

The daily slanders against our admittedly-flawed President grow more and more absurd. Major "news" outlets repeat eminently dubious rumors and hearsay as though it were brought down from the Mountain by Moses. The good economic news is confined to Conservative-leaning websites, while the MSM either ignores or downplays a cornucopia of new jobs opening up, dramatic increases in American wealth (mainly through investments and 401k plans), remarkable diplomatic achievements, and a President who is doing more to keep his campaign promises than anyone in human memory.

Democrat initiatives that would legalize tens of millions of uneducated, government-dependent border jumpers, cripple our power and energy sectors, compromise 80% of our institutions of "higher learning", and bankrupt the country through asininities like "Medicare for All," are treated as serious policy proposals, to be considered by the unwitting masses.

The Media is wholly vested in the Democrat-Leftist program for a "soft coup", with the result that those who only loosely follow the news (read the headlines and little more) have slowly been convinced to believe the lies and distortions, thus pointing to a potentially-disastrous Democrat takeover of Congress in January. As recently pointed out by noted conservative Historian Victor Davis Hanson, we are closer to a bloody civil war than we have been since 1864.

Don't say nobody told you.

after reading that partisan diatribe it is obvious to see not one but two chips on both of your shoulders.

 

[hadit]

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

By looking at his rulings from the bench, that's how. Kavenaugh won praise from both sides of the aisle for his qualifications. If we can't trust him to respect the rights of all women, it would show in his rulings. Go ahead, look through them. There are lots of them over a long time, so show us where he showed contempt for women. If you can't/won't, I really think you have nothing to complain about and we're right back where we started, at partisan politics.

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

Those aren't rulings. His decisions are available for all to see. You're worried about his rulings? Check them out. As far as I can tell, judges' decisions are public.

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

Do you really think that papers from the Bush administration are going to give you a treasure trove of evidence that he hates women? The clock is ticking and something tells me you haven't looked at any of his rulings.

 

[hadit]

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

By looking at his rulings from the bench, that's how. Kavenaugh won praise from both sides of the aisle for his qualifications. If we can't trust him to respect the rights of all women, it would show in his rulings. Go ahead, look through them. There are lots of them over a long time, so show us where he showed contempt for women. If you can't/won't, I really think you have nothing to complain about and we're right back where we started, at partisan politics.

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

Those aren't rulings. His decisions are available for all to see. You're worried about his rulings? Check them out. As far as I can tell, judges' decisions are public.

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

Except you wouldn't be looking at them. You'd be waiting for somebody to tell you what to be mad about.

 

[P@triot]

All these allegations don't equal an "impeccable record".

Want to bet? Read this and tell me that again.

 

[P@triot]

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

Except you wouldn't be looking at them. You'd be waiting for somebody to tell you what to be mad about.

 

[hadit]

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

She has the opportunity to testify. If she doesn't, it's not the Republican's fault. And I will remind you, as democrats seem to be incapable of learning, look beyond a month and realize that if you impeach a justice for no good reason beyond irrational hatred, it will happen to yours. It's inevitable.

No investigation, nothing but a buncha hostile and none too bright republicans blasting questions at her.

Sure, that's gonna tell us what we need to know.

It's her chance to tell her story. They've bent over backwards to accommodate her demands, even going so far as to bring a female lawyer in so she wouldn't feel intimidated by a bunch of men. Fragile things, these liberal women. And there will even be democrats there to ask her what kind of handbag she likes to take on an evening out when the questions get too hard. Remember them? They're on the committee too. Obviously, you forgot they were there too.

 

[P@triot]

We already know. All the witnesses have shot down her story. She's told numerous obvious lies, like she's afraid of flying. It's lie, lie, lie.

Let me get this straight...she claims that the fate of the free world hangs in the balance. And while men and women have sacrificed their lives for this nation, she’s such a selfish dirt-bag that she won’t even face a simple fear for her nation?

Wow. Honestly, I don’t even care if she is telling the truth now. Anyone who would allow a rapist to roam free (not to mention be appointed to the Supreme Court) because they are “afraid to fly” deserves what they get. She’s too selfish to even make a small sacrifice to stop a rapist? Fuck her.