The Unfathomable Depths of Leftists

[hadit]

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

That's nothing compared to the real damage done. No matter what happens, his kids will have to deal with idiots and their children calling their dad a rapist, even though he's not even been accused of that. That's just one thing.

I call bullshit.

Then you're nuts. We already have idiots on this board calling him a rapist.

 

[bripat9643]

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

By looking at his rulings from the bench, that's how. Kavenaugh won praise from both sides of the aisle for his qualifications. If we can't trust him to respect the rights of all women, it would show in his rulings. Go ahead, look through them. There are lots of them over a long time, so show us where he showed contempt for women. If you can't/won't, I really think you have nothing to complain about and we're right back where we started, at partisan politics.

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

Those aren't rulings. His decisions are available for all to see. You're worried about his rulings? Check them out. As far as I can tell, judges' decisions are public.

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

Requesting millions of documents is a classic legal scam. By participating in the scam you are showing the forum that you're a sleazy lying douchebag. All you leftwing pieces of shit believe your fooling people, but everyone knows what you're up to.

 

[Crepitus]

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

We know Kavanaugh is telling the truth, and we know the sleazy mentally deranged slut is lying. Every single witness she named said it never happened. She can't remember any details, like where it happened or when it happened. Only the brain damaged, or Democrats, could possibly believe she's telling the truth. Actually even Democrats know she's lying.

No, we don't. It's just that simple.

 

[Crepitus]

We aren't talking about a job at the 7-11 here son. This is a lifetime appointment to the supreme Court.

How can we expect this douchebag to rule fairly on the rights of all women if he has a history of being unable to respect the rights of even even one?

By looking at his rulings from the bench, that's how. Kavenaugh won praise from both sides of the aisle for his qualifications. If we can't trust him to respect the rights of all women, it would show in his rulings. Go ahead, look through them. There are lots of them over a long time, so show us where he showed contempt for women. If you can't/won't, I really think you have nothing to complain about and we're right back where we started, at partisan politics.

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

Those aren't rulings. His decisions are available for all to see. You're worried about his rulings? Check them out. As far as I can tell, judges' decisions are public.

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

Do you really think that papers from the Bush administration are going to give you a treasure trove of evidence that he hates women? The clock is ticking and something tells me you haven't looked at any of his rulings.

We don't need evidence that he hates women. They are coming forward to demonstrate that already.

 

[Correll]

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

It's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

 

[Lesh]

t's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

Maybe... he shouldn't tried to rape that girl or dangled his dingle in that girl's face or joined in on that train they pulled on that girl or spent his entire youth black out drunk

Ya think?

 

[Correll]

That never happened, you sleazy lying dirt bag. We aren't required to pretend that your absurd accusations have any basis in fact. It's obvious that the stories of the two lying pussy-hat-wearing sluts are not credible.

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

She has the opportunity to testify. If she doesn't, it's not the Republican's fault. And I will remind you, as democrats seem to be incapable of learning, look beyond a month and realize that if you impeach a justice for no good reason beyond irrational hatred, it will happen to yours. It's inevitable.

No investigation, nothing but a buncha hostile and none too bright republicans blasting questions at her.

Sure, that's gonna tell us what we need to know.

There is nothing to investigate. No evidence and 30 years after a drunken party, no one is going to remember shit, and if they claim they do, they are likely to be wrong.

 

[Correll]

t's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

Maybe... he shouldn't tried to rape that girl or dangled his dingle in that girl's face or joined in on that train they pulled on that girl or spent his entire youth black out drunk

Ya think?

There is no reason to think that actually happened.


You willingness to see people destroyed, based on unsupported and very weak accusations, makes you a vile person.

 

[Faun]

How do you know they don't? Don't you think we need to find out?

You wanting to believe Bart O'Kavanaugh is telling the truth isn't enough

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

It's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

You mean like the right did to Bill Clinton?

 

[Lesh]

Or AL Franken more recently

 

[hadit]

By looking at his rulings from the bench, that's how. Kavenaugh won praise from both sides of the aisle for his qualifications. If we can't trust him to respect the rights of all women, it would show in his rulings. Go ahead, look through them. There are lots of them over a long time, so show us where he showed contempt for women. If you can't/won't, I really think you have nothing to complain about and we're right back where we started, at partisan politics.

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

Those aren't rulings. His decisions are available for all to see. You're worried about his rulings? Check them out. As far as I can tell, judges' decisions are public.

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

Do you really think that papers from the Bush administration are going to give you a treasure trove of evidence that he hates women? The clock is ticking and something tells me you haven't looked at any of his rulings.

We don't need evidence that he hates women. They are coming forward to demonstrate that already.

We don't need no stinkin' evidence to condemn someone. We are democrats. Obviously, you didn't read any of his rulings or even have your favorite hate merchant tell you what to be upset at.

 

[bripat9643]

Or AL Franken more recently

The right didn't do anything to Al Franken, moron. He did it to himself. He posed for the photo and actually sent it to his victim. You can't get dumber than that.

 

[bripat9643]

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

It's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

You mean like the right did to Bill Clinton?

You can't get better evidence that what Ken Starr had on Clinton.

 

[P@triot]

The unfathomable depths of the leftists continue...

The New York Times published a piece that cast serious doubt on the accuracy of one of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s accusers on Monday. Later, the same piece was heavily edited to remove any language that weakened the arguments against Kavanaugh, and the original version was nowhere to be found.

Nobody who is serious about being informed turns to the mainstream media. Only those who were brainwashed with the left-wing ideology and are looking to support what they were already conditioned to believe, do.

BOMBSHELL: Stunning exposé uncovers deception and blatant bias at the New York Times

 

[Crepitus]

His rulings from.the bench? What about all those millions of pages of stuff they refuse to release?

Those aren't rulings. His decisions are available for all to see. You're worried about his rulings? Check them out. As far as I can tell, judges' decisions are public.

Every Single one of those millions of unreleased papers represents a decision he made. All of them are relevant.

Also, if they had nothing to hide we would be looking at them right now.

Do you really think that papers from the Bush administration are going to give you a treasure trove of evidence that he hates women? The clock is ticking and something tells me you haven't looked at any of his rulings.

We don't need evidence that he hates women. They are coming forward to demonstrate that already.

We don't need no stinkin' evidence to condemn someone. We are democrats. Obviously, you didn't read any of his rulings or even have your favorite hate merchant tell you what to be upset at.

Let's inbeinvesti and see if there is any evidence.

Doesn't that make sense?

 

[Correll]

There is obviously no way to definitively find out. That is not going to happen.

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

It's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

You mean like the right did to Bill Clinton?

Wow. Everything in that statement was wrong.


Bill Clinton was not innocent, and his career was not ruined, and he is still a hero to the dregs of society, ie liberals.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I seriously don't know how any person of integrity can admit to being a Democrat these days.

Every day, there are new revelations about how base, unethical, dastardly, immoral, and profoundly untruthful the whole lot of them (you) are.

This WHOLE Kavanaugh caper is nothing but lies piled upon more lies, distortions, misrepresentations, and fantasies. Democrat politicians, lawyers, and operatives go on the screen night after night, claiming that they are only seeking "the truth" about what happened that night so many decades ago, and the truth is the farthest thing from their minds...and EVERYONE LISTENING TO THEM KNOWS IT! It is all about delaying the confirmation of this spectacularly-qualified judge, and ultimately overturning the results of the 2016 election, by which the American people emphatically stated that they wanted to reverse the Leftist, anti-Constitutional tidal wave in the Supreme Court.

The daily slanders against our admittedly-flawed President grow more and more absurd. Major "news" outlets repeat eminently dubious rumors and hearsay as though it were brought down from the Mountain by Moses. The good economic news is confined to Conservative-leaning websites, while the MSM either ignores or downplays a cornucopia of new jobs opening up, dramatic increases in American wealth (mainly through investments and 401k plans), remarkable diplomatic achievements, and a President who is doing more to keep his campaign promises than anyone in human memory.

Democrat initiatives that would legalize tens of millions of uneducated, government-dependent border jumpers, cripple our power and energy sectors, compromise 80% of our institutions of "higher learning", and bankrupt the country through asininities like "Medicare for All," are treated as serious policy proposals, to be considered by the unwitting masses.

The Media is wholly vested in the Democrat-Leftist program for a "soft coup", with the result that those who only loosely follow the news (read the headlines and little more) have slowly been convinced to believe the lies and distortions, thus pointing to a potentially-disastrous Democrat takeover of Congress in January. As recently pointed out by noted conservative Historian Victor Davis Hanson, we are closer to a bloody civil war than we have been since 1864.

Don't say nobody told you.

IOW, they bested us yet again.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The "giant social problem" is the Democrat party and all the sleazy lying dirtbags that infest it.

The problem isn't rooted in politics. Politics is just the form that the problem manifests itself in this particular case.

We have a society where what has been alleged isn't uncommon. And it is not uncommon for women to repress what has happened to them. And so here we are. The problem has manifested itself once again in the political arena. And since what has been alleged is not entirely unbelievable it cannot be dismissed as callously as partisans would wish for it to be. And so the resentment grows.

Wouldn't it be more reasonable to address the real problem outside of the politics?

In my circle, sexual assault had been and is extremely uncommon. If your world looks different, you need to hang out with a better class of people.

That is what that individualism does. It alienates people from society.

Just ignore it then.

Individualism does not alienate people from society.

And I am not calling to ignore sexual harassment. I just don't support false accusations.

Yes it does alienate people. You just proved it by saying that sexual assault does not exist in your world. Yet, clearly it exists in our society.

There is no objective reason to claim the accusation false.

There is no objective reason to claim the accusation false.

Exactly. Not a minute of testimony has been heard by anyone. There are actually more reasons as to why it may be credible. Liars don't typically ask for their allegations to be scrutinized.

 

[Correll]

The problem isn't rooted in politics. Politics is just the form that the problem manifests itself in this particular case.

We have a society where what has been alleged isn't uncommon. And it is not uncommon for women to repress what has happened to them. And so here we are. The problem has manifested itself once again in the political arena. And since what has been alleged is not entirely unbelievable it cannot be dismissed as callously as partisans would wish for it to be. And so the resentment grows.

Wouldn't it be more reasonable to address the real problem outside of the politics?

In my circle, sexual assault had been and is extremely uncommon. If your world looks different, you need to hang out with a better class of people.

That is what that individualism does. It alienates people from society.

Just ignore it then.

Individualism does not alienate people from society.

And I am not calling to ignore sexual harassment. I just don't support false accusations.

Yes it does alienate people. You just proved it by saying that sexual assault does not exist in your world. Yet, clearly it exists in our society.

There is no objective reason to claim the accusation false.

There is no objective reason to claim the accusation false.

Exactly. Not a minute of testimony has been heard by anyone. There are actually more reasons as to why it may be credible. Liars don't typically ask for their allegations to be scrutinized.

Name the reasons to think it credible.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Non sequitur.

Try again please.

You're too stupid to understand why it's relevant.

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.