The Unfathomable Depths of Leftists

[Correll]

You're too stupid to understand why it's relevant.

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

List the flaws.

 

[bripat9643]

You're too stupid to understand why it's relevant.

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

In other words, guilty until proven innocent - the battle cry of the leftwing douchebag.

 

[bripat9643]

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

List the flaws.

He's a Republican.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

'Guilty until proven innocent': life after a false rape accusation

Wrongfully Convicted of Rape, a New Jersey Man Finds More Punishment After Prison

Now, I am not making light of what Ford has said, however we should call a man guilty just by the accusations, we need more.

Yeah, the justice system is fallible. And the minuscule number of falsely accused and convicted men determine your thinking, not the millions of women failed by that same justice system, so much so that the conviction rate for rape ranges in the low single digits. It so frightens you, you cannot even independently make up your mind to assess the veracity of competing claims, which, quite obviously, doesn't get anyone into prison.

SMH.

I have independently made up my mind. I don't know her motivations, I don't know her, I don't know Kavanaugh. When there are two people and one said it happened and one said t didn't happen, and I don't know their motivations, why would I believe one over the other?

There are many more now. No longer one on one. People who do not know each other are painting a very similar picture.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

In my circle, sexual assault had been and is extremely uncommon. If your world looks different, you need to hang out with a better class of people.

That is what that individualism does. It alienates people from society.

Just ignore it then.

Individualism does not alienate people from society.

And I am not calling to ignore sexual harassment. I just don't support false accusations.

Yes it does alienate people. You just proved it by saying that sexual assault does not exist in your world. Yet, clearly it exists in our society.

There is no objective reason to claim the accusation false.

There is no objective reason to claim the accusation false.

Exactly. Not a minute of testimony has been heard by anyone. There are actually more reasons as to why it may be credible. Liars don't typically ask for their allegations to be scrutinized.

Name the reasons to think it credible.

I just did in the very post you responded to.

Liars don't typically ask for their allegations to be scrutinized.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

List the flaws.

The allegations, his history with drinking is all a dark cloud of uncertainty.
The very argument raging at this moment, fool.

I doubt there are even 50 votes to be had for this guy at this time and that is before testimony. Surely a day of sordid details doesn't help.

They should have bailed on Kavanaugh last week.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

In other words, guilty until proven innocent - the battle cry of the leftwing douchebag.

Point out where I said he's guilty, dope.

Politically problematic for Republicans and getting worse by the day.

 

[Papageorgio]

'Guilty until proven innocent': life after a false rape accusation

Wrongfully Convicted of Rape, a New Jersey Man Finds More Punishment After Prison

Now, I am not making light of what Ford has said, however we should call a man guilty just by the accusations, we need more.

Yeah, the justice system is fallible. And the minuscule number of falsely accused and convicted men determine your thinking, not the millions of women failed by that same justice system, so much so that the conviction rate for rape ranges in the low single digits. It so frightens you, you cannot even independently make up your mind to assess the veracity of competing claims, which, quite obviously, doesn't get anyone into prison.

SMH.

I have independently made up my mind. I don't know her motivations, I don't know her, I don't know Kavanaugh. When there are two people and one said it happened and one said t didn't happen, and I don't know their motivations, why would I believe one over the other?

There are many more now. No longer one on one. People who do not know each other are painting a very similar picture.

Kavanaugh will not be appointed, Trump should nominate someone more conservative, let the Dems whine and cry, then after that person is not confirmed put up an even more conservative judge, by that time the majority of Americans will see the Democrats as the party of no.

And we’ll be back to the old saying “be careful of what you wish for.”

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them.

 

[Faun]

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

It's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

You mean like the right did to Bill Clinton?

You can't get better evidence that what Ken Starr had on Clinton.

There was no evidence of sexual assault, only consensual sex.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

'Guilty until proven innocent': life after a false rape accusation

Wrongfully Convicted of Rape, a New Jersey Man Finds More Punishment After Prison

Now, I am not making light of what Ford has said, however we should call a man guilty just by the accusations, we need more.

Yeah, the justice system is fallible. And the minuscule number of falsely accused and convicted men determine your thinking, not the millions of women failed by that same justice system, so much so that the conviction rate for rape ranges in the low single digits. It so frightens you, you cannot even independently make up your mind to assess the veracity of competing claims, which, quite obviously, doesn't get anyone into prison.

SMH.

I have independently made up my mind. I don't know her motivations, I don't know her, I don't know Kavanaugh. When there are two people and one said it happened and one said t didn't happen, and I don't know their motivations, why would I believe one over the other?

There are many more now. No longer one on one. People who do not know each other are painting a very similar picture.

Kavanaugh will not be appointed, Trump should nominate someone more conservative, let the Dems whine and cry, then after that person is not confirmed put up an even more conservative judge, by that time the majority of Americans will see the Democrats as the party of no.

And we’ll be back to the old saying “be careful of what you wish for.”

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them.

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them

Where did the"Democrats" do that?

Can you show where Dems made these allegations happen?

 

[Faun]

I'm afraid you're right, the conservitards are gonna short circuit the process. Oh well, we will just have to impeach him later.

It's he said, she said, 30 years after the facts, this is not about conservative doing anything, other than refusing to let themselves be pressured into destroying an innocent man.

You are an asshole.

How does not appointing him to the supreme Court destroy him?

It's not just having his career ruined, but being branded as a rapist in the Public Eye, and made into a target to the vile dregs of society, ie liberals.

You mean like the right did to Bill Clinton?

Wow. Everything in that statement was wrong.


Bill Clinton was not innocent, and his career was not ruined, and he is still a hero to the dregs of society, ie liberals.

Clinton was not innocent? Who did he rape? Who did he sexually assault?

 

[hadit]

You're too stupid to understand why it's relevant.

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

You're automatically assuming the accusations have merit. By all accounts, Kav is a very good judge.

 

[Papageorgio]

'Guilty until proven innocent': life after a false rape accusation

Wrongfully Convicted of Rape, a New Jersey Man Finds More Punishment After Prison

Now, I am not making light of what Ford has said, however we should call a man guilty just by the accusations, we need more.

Yeah, the justice system is fallible. And the minuscule number of falsely accused and convicted men determine your thinking, not the millions of women failed by that same justice system, so much so that the conviction rate for rape ranges in the low single digits. It so frightens you, you cannot even independently make up your mind to assess the veracity of competing claims, which, quite obviously, doesn't get anyone into prison.

SMH.

I have independently made up my mind. I don't know her motivations, I don't know her, I don't know Kavanaugh. When there are two people and one said it happened and one said t didn't happen, and I don't know their motivations, why would I believe one over the other?

There are many more now. No longer one on one. People who do not know each other are painting a very similar picture.

Kavanaugh will not be appointed, Trump should nominate someone more conservative, let the Dems whine and cry, then after that person is not confirmed put up an even more conservative judge, by that time the majority of Americans will see the Democrats as the party of no.

And we’ll be back to the old saying “be careful of what you wish for.”

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them.

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them

Where did the"Democrats" do that?

Can you show where Dems made these allegations happen?

Lol!

 

[Faun]

Yeah, the justice system is fallible. And the minuscule number of falsely accused and convicted men determine your thinking, not the millions of women failed by that same justice system, so much so that the conviction rate for rape ranges in the low single digits. It so frightens you, you cannot even independently make up your mind to assess the veracity of competing claims, which, quite obviously, doesn't get anyone into prison.

SMH.

I have independently made up my mind. I don't know her motivations, I don't know her, I don't know Kavanaugh. When there are two people and one said it happened and one said t didn't happen, and I don't know their motivations, why would I believe one over the other?

There are many more now. No longer one on one. People who do not know each other are painting a very similar picture.

Kavanaugh will not be appointed, Trump should nominate someone more conservative, let the Dems whine and cry, then after that person is not confirmed put up an even more conservative judge, by that time the majority of Americans will see the Democrats as the party of no.

And we’ll be back to the old saying “be careful of what you wish for.”

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them.

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them

Where did the"Democrats" do that?

Can you show where Dems made these allegations happen?

Lol!

That would be a, “no.”

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Lol, nope. You just run out of arguments.

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

You're automatically assuming the accusations have merit. By all accounts, Kav is a very good judge.

You're automatically assuming the accusations have merit. By all accounts, Kav is a very good judge.

You're automatically assuming they have no merit at all. There seems to be quite a few now.

Kavanaugh can both be a very good and competent judge and have a very problematic history as a young man. Both can be true.

The point is, why elevate a man with such questions surrounding him when there are many others with equal qualifications without such questions surrounding them?

The point of this process is to shake out his past and see what comes out. We've seen what comes out. What else will fall out maybe later?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yeah, the justice system is fallible. And the minuscule number of falsely accused and convicted men determine your thinking, not the millions of women failed by that same justice system, so much so that the conviction rate for rape ranges in the low single digits. It so frightens you, you cannot even independently make up your mind to assess the veracity of competing claims, which, quite obviously, doesn't get anyone into prison.

SMH.

I have independently made up my mind. I don't know her motivations, I don't know her, I don't know Kavanaugh. When there are two people and one said it happened and one said t didn't happen, and I don't know their motivations, why would I believe one over the other?

There are many more now. No longer one on one. People who do not know each other are painting a very similar picture.

Kavanaugh will not be appointed, Trump should nominate someone more conservative, let the Dems whine and cry, then after that person is not confirmed put up an even more conservative judge, by that time the majority of Americans will see the Democrats as the party of no.

And we’ll be back to the old saying “be careful of what you wish for.”

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them.

Also, the Democrats have used the rape issue and it will come back to bite them

Where did the"Democrats" do that?

Can you show where Dems made these allegations happen?

Lol!

That's it?

 

[hadit]

Hmmmmm, nope. Watch the video of the douchebag Hirono from Hawaii.

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

You're automatically assuming the accusations have merit. By all accounts, Kav is a very good judge.

You're automatically assuming the accusations have merit. By all accounts, Kav is a very good judge.

You're automatically assuming they have no merit at all. There seems to be quite a few now.

Kavanaugh can both be a very good and competent judge and have a very problematic history as a young man. Both can be true.

The point is, why elevate a man with such questions surrounding him when there are many others with equal qualifications without such questions surrounding them?

The point of this process is to shake out his past and see what comes out. We've seen what comes out. What else will fall out maybe later?

And it means nothing to you that, even if he had problems as a boy, by all accounts he's been an exemplary adult? You're determined that things you're accused of at 17 are to forever dog you and you can never overcome them, no matter what? If that's the standard you want, Obama should never have been president, given his life as a young man.

 

[EverCurious]

Aye, it's time to ditch the "tried as a minor" bit. Throw all the kids in jail - no more excuses.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Right, because she's lying and it never happened.

And if it did it happen it wasn't that bad.

But if it was that bad it's not a big deal because everybody does it.

You kids should step back and listen to this pathetic weaseling.

You do, though, have to take the entire picture into consideration. If the incident really did happen, it happened when Kavenaugh was a minor, and we have a strong tradition of clearing the slate when a kid becomes an adult. Are we willing to set that on its head just for this one occasion? "Sorry, Mister Brown, your exemplary life as an adult simply doesn't matter. The fact that you robbed a gas station when you were 17 disqualifies you for this job. We simply can't have violent thugs like you stocking our shelves".

To say that he is a dangerous sexual predator is fallacious because he's been a model citizen for a very long time. Let's let his accuser testify and see if her story holds up. If not, let it go.

Not a "dangerous sexual predator" but a man with disqualifying flaws.

There are many other eminently qualified candidates who have no such flaws.

You're automatically assuming the accusations have merit. By all accounts, Kav is a very good judge.

You're automatically assuming the accusations have merit. By all accounts, Kav is a very good judge.

You're automatically assuming they have no merit at all. There seems to be quite a few now.

Kavanaugh can both be a very good and competent judge and have a very problematic history as a young man. Both can be true.

The point is, why elevate a man with such questions surrounding him when there are many others with equal qualifications without such questions surrounding them?

The point of this process is to shake out his past and see what comes out. We've seen what comes out. What else will fall out maybe later?

And it means nothing to you that, even if he had problems as a boy, by all accounts he's been an exemplary adult? You're determined that things you're accused of at 17 are to forever dog you and you can never overcome them, no matter what? If that's the standard you want, Obama should never have been president, given his life as a young man.

I would never hire someone to represent me or my business with questions like this surrounding them. Too many unknowns.

Obama never had questions like this surrounding his youth.

 

[blastoff]

I seriously don't know how any person of integrity can admit to being a Democrat these days.

Every day, there are new revelations about how base, unethical, dastardly, immoral, and profoundly untruthful the whole lot of them (you) are.

This WHOLE Kavanaugh caper is nothing but lies piled upon more lies, distortions, misrepresentations, and fantasies. Democrat politicians, lawyers, and operatives go on the screen night after night, claiming that they are only seeking "the truth" about what happened that night so many decades ago, and the truth is the farthest thing from their minds...and EVERYONE LISTENING TO THEM KNOWS IT! It is all about delaying the confirmation of this spectacularly-qualified judge, and ultimately overturning the results of the 2016 election, by which the American people emphatically stated that they wanted to reverse the Leftist, anti-Constitutional tidal wave in the Supreme Court.

The daily slanders against our admittedly-flawed President grow more and more absurd. Major "news" outlets repeat eminently dubious rumors and hearsay as though it were brought down from the Mountain by Moses. The good economic news is confined to Conservative-leaning websites, while the MSM either ignores or downplays a cornucopia of new jobs opening up, dramatic increases in American wealth (mainly through investments and 401k plans), remarkable diplomatic achievements, and a President who is doing more to keep his campaign promises than anyone in human memory.

Democrat initiatives that would legalize tens of millions of uneducated, government-dependent border jumpers, cripple our power and energy sectors, compromise 80% of our institutions of "higher learning", and bankrupt the country through asininities like "Medicare for All," are treated as serious policy proposals, to be considered by the unwitting masses.

The Media is wholly vested in the Democrat-Leftist program for a "soft coup", with the result that those who only loosely follow the news (read the headlines and little more) have slowly been convinced to believe the lies and distortions, thus pointing to a potentially-disastrous Democrat takeover of Congress in January. As recently pointed out by noted conservative Historian Victor Davis Hanson, we are closer to a bloody civil war than we have been since 1864.

Don't say nobody told you.

The dimocrats are like a good NFL team. They gameplan and follow a playbook.