The unspoken moral dilemma of socialists

Once again the socialists in this thread are clueless.

But that's not a surprise, if they weren't they would not be socialists.
 
If your reference is to Hobbes book, I agree with the concept of a Social Contract and disagree absolutely with the concept of an absolute Sovereign.

Social contract theory is applied to justify the sovereignty of a non-inclusive minority.

Since Rousseau invented it, the theory itself has been hypocritical to the beliefs of those that maintain it. The liberal state is contradictory with social contract theory.
 
Then stop vomitimg propaganda.....

Let's put this to rest, shall we?

Whose propaganda am I "vomiting." Where is it descending from, and who initially spoke of it?
 
But that's not a surprise, if they weren't they would not be socialists.

Bripat is the only non-socialist in this thread, with myself excluded.

If you believe in any government spending, regulation, or intervention into the social economy, then you are a socialist.

The only question is what scale of socialism you support.
 
But that's not a surprise, if they weren't they would not be socialists.

Bripat is the only non-socialist in this thread, with myself excluded.

If you believe in any government spending, regulation, or intervention into the social economy, then you are a socialist.

The only question is what scale of socialism you support.
I would say you're fascist....
 
Yours...
Post #118.....
You....

My own propaganda?

According to Owebo, demonstrating free thought is self propagation and therefore intellectually dishonest.

I have to give him credit, that is both stupid and original.
 
I would say you're fascist....

Shows a major lack of understanding of what I advocate for, or overwhelming ignorance on political sciences.

Please justify how the person that advocates abolishing the state is fascist.

You do realize the basis for fascism was "Everything for the state! Nothing against the state," right?
 
I would say you're fascist....

Shows a major lack of understanding of what I advocate for, or overwhelming ignorance on political sciences.

Please justify how the person who advocates for abolishing the state is fascist.

You do realize the basis for fascism was "Everything for the state! Nothing against the state," right?
Not at all....your words are quite predictable and are a dead giveaway....
 
Not at all....your words are quite predictable and are a dead giveaway....

Of what?

As much as I enjoy your vague one liners, they really do not go anywhere important.

Explain how self propagation is intellectually dishonest? It practically implies that unless you are a hack that rehashes political rhetoric, you are immoral within the realms of a scholarly discussion.
 
Not at all....your words are quite predictable and are a dead giveaway....

Of what?

As much as I enjoy your vague one liners, they really do not go anywhere important.

Explain how self propagation is intellectually dishonest? It practically implies that unless you are a hack that rehashes political rhetoric, you are immoral within the realms of a scholarly discussion.
Of your fascism....

Your propaganda goes nowhere important with educated people....I enjoy the entertainment....it's fascinating seeing how clueless you are of yourself.....
 
Of your fascism....

Define fascism.

Based on your misconceived words, you appear to be conflating fascism with libertarianism.

Your propaganda goes nowhere important with educated people...

Really, and where did you receive your education?

Trump University?

I enjoy the entertainment....it's fascinating seeing how clueless you are of yourself.....

Likewise.
 
Of your fascism....

Define fascism.

Based on your misconceived words, you appear to be conflating fascism with libertarianism.

Your propaganda goes nowhere important with educated people...

Really, and where did you receive your education?

Trump University?

I enjoy the entertainment....it's fascinating seeing how clueless you are of yourself.....

Likewise.
See....
 

Forum List

Back
Top