The US has spent nearly $6,000,000,000,000 on wars that have killed over 500,000 people.

[Slyhunter]

So you're going on record that you were and still are in favor of the invasion of Iraq?

Unquestionably one of the best thing the United States has ever done. Saddam Hussein was a maniac and should have been removed decades earlier.

I don't care if he tortured puppies, removing him was one of the biggest mistakes this country ever made. Name 1 benefit to the American people that resulted from that war.

He dared us to do something about him. He thumbed his noes at us. He should've surrendered the wmd's.

 

[P@triot]

Name 1 benefit to the American people that resulted from that war.

The removal of Saddam Hussein. Duh.

 

[P@triot]

I don't care if he tortured puppies

Of course you don’t. The passivist crowd only cares about avoiding conflict. Rational people, however, care about ridding the world of maniacs. Rational people learned the horrific lesson of “it’s none of our business” from Adolf Hitler and WWII.

The one lesson that’s been repeated over and over and over was “Hitler should have been stopped sooner”. Those that refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

 

[impuretrash]

I don't care if he tortured puppies

Of course you don’t. The passivist crowd only cares about avoiding conflict. Rational people, however, care about ridding the world of maniacs. Rational people learned the horrific lesson of “it’s none of our business” from Adolf Hitler and WWII.

The one lesson that’s been repeated over and over and over was “Hitler should have been stopped sooner”. Those that refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

If we were rational, we would have invaded Saudi Arabia in retaliation for 9/11 instead of two countries that had nothing to do with it. If we were rational, we'd admit that muslim countries need to be ruled by tyrants because their people tend to be ungovernable. We'd let them sort out their own problems instead of pretending we can fix them like women who shack up with violent ex convicts who ends up getting her throat slashed.

 

[Slyhunter]

I don't care if he tortured puppies

Of course you don’t. The passivist crowd only cares about avoiding conflict. Rational people, however, care about ridding the world of maniacs. Rational people learned the horrific lesson of “it’s none of our business” from Adolf Hitler and WWII.

The one lesson that’s been repeated over and over and over was “Hitler should have been stopped sooner”. Those that refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

If we were rational, we would have invaded Saudi Arabia in retaliation for 9/11 instead of two countries that had nothing to do with it. If we were rational, we'd admit that muslim countries need to be ruled by tyrants because their people tend to be ungovernable. We'd let them sort out their own problems instead of pretending we can fix them like women who shack up with violent ex convicts who ends up getting her throat slashed.

If they didn't have all that oil we could wall them in.

 

[impuretrash]

I don't care if he tortured puppies

Of course you don’t. The passivist crowd only cares about avoiding conflict. Rational people, however, care about ridding the world of maniacs. Rational people learned the horrific lesson of “it’s none of our business” from Adolf Hitler and WWII.

The one lesson that’s been repeated over and over and over was “Hitler should have been stopped sooner”. Those that refuse to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

If we were rational, we would have invaded Saudi Arabia in retaliation for 9/11 instead of two countries that had nothing to do with it. If we were rational, we'd admit that muslim countries need to be ruled by tyrants because their people tend to be ungovernable. We'd let them sort out their own problems instead of pretending we can fix them like women who shack up with violent ex convicts who ends up getting her throat slashed.

If they didn't have all that oil we could wall them in.

The US has a lot better track record of defending borders in the middle east than we do our own.

 

[P@triot]

If we were rational, we would have invaded Saudi Arabia in retaliation for 9/11 instead of two countries that had nothing to do with it.

Man...that is astoundingly stupid. Al Qaeda was given safe-haven in Afghanistan. They lived there and had their training camps there. Only a fuck’n idiot would claim that Afghanistan had “nothing” to do with it and that we should have invaded our ally who had absolutely nothing to do with it.

 

[P@triot]

If we were rational, we'd admit that muslim countries need to be ruled by tyrants because their people tend to be ungovernable.

The Dumbocrats in the U.S. are completely “ungovernable”. Should we oppress them? Torture them? Execute them?

 

[impuretrash]

If we were rational, we would have invaded Saudi Arabia in retaliation for 9/11 instead of two countries that had nothing to do with it.

Man...that is astoundingly stupid. Al Qaeda was given safe-haven in Afghanistan. They lived there and had their training camps there. Only a fuck’n idiot would claim that Afghanistan had “nothing” to do with it and that we should have invaded our ally who had absolutely nothing to do with it.

Ok. What about the rest of what I said? Are muslims good people eager to embrace western values and freedom or are they tribal savages who behead infidels and mutilate little girls?

 

[impuretrash]

If we were rational, we'd admit that muslim countries need to be ruled by tyrants because their people tend to be ungovernable.

The Dumbocrats in the U.S. are completely “ungovernable”. Should we oppress them? Torture them? Execute them?

Yes.

 

[P@triot]

If we were rational, we'd admit that muslim countries need to be ruled by tyrants because their people tend to be ungovernable.

The Dumbocrats in the U.S. are completely “ungovernable”. Should we oppress them? Torture them? Execute them?

Yes.

Well the U.S. Constitution vehemently disagrees with you. I find it fascinating that you’re all for executing U.S. citizens but are broken-hearted over Saddam being removed from power.

 

[impuretrash]

If we were rational, we'd admit that muslim countries need to be ruled by tyrants because their people tend to be ungovernable.

The Dumbocrats in the U.S. are completely “ungovernable”. Should we oppress them? Torture them? Execute them?

Yes.

Well the U.S. Constitution vehemently disagrees with you. I find it fascinating that you’re all for executing U.S. citizens but are broken-hearted over Saddam being removed from power.

I was not being serious. Not exactly, anyway.

You talk to these leftist people on a regular basis. You know what they represent. There's no depth they won't sink to, no depravity they won't excuse. They're scum and they are destroying this country. They think its funny.

 

[buttercup]

Don't blame me, I didn't support any of the warmongering presidents. And I have to say, it's sad to see so many blind, duped people who actually believe whatever their corrupt government tells them in regard to why we go to war. Actually, I take that back....they believe it if those 'leaders' happen to have the right letter by their name. When in reality, the letter doesn't matter, nothing changes much in terms of foreign policy and the nonstop wars. They're all globalist, warmongering corrupt sellouts.

 

[Likkmee]

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

That's trillion with a T kids and just since 9/11.*
The United States has spent nearly $6 trillion on wars that directly contributed to the deaths of around 500,000 people since the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs published its annual "Costs of War" report Wednesday, taking into consideration the Pentagon's spending and its Overseas Contingency Operations account, as well as "war-related spending by the Department of State, past and obligated spending for war veterans’ care, interest on the debt incurred to pay for the wars, and the prevention of and response to terrorism by the Department of Homeland Security."

The final count revealed, "The United States has appropriated and is obligated to spend an estimated $5.9 trillion (in current dollars) on the war on terror through Fiscal Year 2019, including direct war and war-related spending and obligations for future spending on post 9/11 war veterans."

"In sum, high costs in war and war-related spending pose a national security concern because they are unsustainable," the report concluded. "The public would be better served by increased transparency and by the development of a comprehensive strategy to end the wars and deal with other urgent national security priorities."

U.S. has spent $6 trillion on wars that killed 500,000 people since 9/11, a report says

I believe those are conservative numbers.

Incorrectly reported on purpose.

*

Remember the old TV commercial slogan: That's Italian? Well, my internet friend, That's Empire. Right or wrong, part of the cost of holding together a planet full of shit civilizations made of toilet paper and duct tape, for America, is becoming El Capo De Tutti Capi of historical human empires. Like, what are ya gonna do? Shiite happens.

It’s not our responsibility nor our obligation to hold those other nations together and as you can tell by your national debt we don’t have the money to.

 

[sparky]

That's trillion with a T kids and just since 9/11.*
The United States has spent nearly $6 trillion on wars that directly contributed to the deaths of around 500,000 people since the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs published its annual "Costs of War" report Wednesday, taking into consideration the Pentagon's spending and its Overseas Contingency Operations account, as well as "war-related spending by the Department of State, past and obligated spending for war veterans’ care, interest on the debt incurred to pay for the wars, and the prevention of and response to terrorism by the Department of Homeland Security."

The final count revealed, "The United States has appropriated and is obligated to spend an estimated $5.9 trillion (in current dollars) on the war on terror through Fiscal Year 2019, including direct war and war-related spending and obligations for future spending on post 9/11 war veterans."

"In sum, high costs in war and war-related spending pose a national security concern because they are unsustainable," the report concluded. "The public would be better served by increased transparency and by the development of a comprehensive strategy to end the wars and deal with other urgent national security priorities."

U.S. has spent $6 trillion on wars that killed 500,000 people since 9/11, a report says

I believe those are conservative numbers.

Incorrectly reported on purpose.

*

Remember the old TV commercial slogan: That's Italian? Well, my internet friend, That's Empire. Right or wrong, part of the cost of holding together a planet full of shit civilizations made of toilet paper and duct tape, for America, is becoming El Capo De Tutti Capi of historical human empires. Like, what are ya gonna do? Shiite happens.

It’s not our responsibility nor our obligation to hold those other nations together and as you can tell by your national debt we don’t have the money to.

Viewing our national debt and foriegn policies in lockstep helps explain American exceptionalism , along with undertones of extortion....

~S~

 

[P@triot]

You talk to these leftist people on a regular basis. You know what they represent. There's no depth they won't sink to, no depravity they won't excuse. They're scum and they are destroying this country. They think its funny.

Oh I agree 100%. They need to be completely defeated. It just has to be done constitutionally. Let’s expose their criminal actions, let’s shine a light on their twisted ideology, and then let’s obliterate them on the battlefield of ideas.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

That's trillion with a T kids and just since 9/11.*
The United States has spent nearly $6 trillion on wars that directly contributed to the deaths of around 500,000 people since the 9/11 attacks of 2001.

Brown University's Watson Institute for International and Public Affairs published its annual "Costs of War" report Wednesday, taking into consideration the Pentagon's spending and its Overseas Contingency Operations account, as well as "war-related spending by the Department of State, past and obligated spending for war veterans’ care, interest on the debt incurred to pay for the wars, and the prevention of and response to terrorism by the Department of Homeland Security."

The final count revealed, "The United States has appropriated and is obligated to spend an estimated $5.9 trillion (in current dollars) on the war on terror through Fiscal Year 2019, including direct war and war-related spending and obligations for future spending on post 9/11 war veterans."

"In sum, high costs in war and war-related spending pose a national security concern because they are unsustainable," the report concluded. "The public would be better served by increased transparency and by the development of a comprehensive strategy to end the wars and deal with other urgent national security priorities."

U.S. has spent $6 trillion on wars that killed 500,000 people since 9/11, a report says

I believe those are conservative numbers.

Incorrectly reported on purpose.

*

Remember the old TV commercial slogan: That's Italian? Well, my internet friend, That's Empire. Right or wrong, part of the cost of holding together a planet full of shit civilizations made of toilet paper and duct tape, for America, is becoming El Capo De Tutti Capi of historical human empires. Like, what are ya gonna do? Shiite happens.

But just think how nice the world would be today if Amerikkka never existed!!

We would all be German socialists and Bernie would be in hog heaven

Nope. Bernie would have been sent to a concentration camp along with every other Jew!

 

[initforme]

This country is as strong, if not stronger than ever. The most educated, productive, hard working generation ever in this nations history is entering the workforce and will continue the greatness. The so called destruction is simply nonexistent. We're in the best shape ever.

 

[P@triot]

This country is as strong, if not stronger than ever. The most educated, productive, hard working generation ever in this nations history is entering the workforce and will continue the greatness. The so called destruction is simply nonexistent. We're in the best shape ever.

LMAO!!!

The Greatest Generation is rolling on the floor of their nursing homes, laughing their asses off right now. The generation “entering the workforce” needs safe spaces from different views and cry closets for final exams. They are the laziest, dumbest, pussies to ever step on U.S. soil.