Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, there is no public plan on paper because it is being developed. Big fucking deal. You made a stupid statement and spent the last few posts contradicting yourself, so if you need to lean on this paper thing to think you won some kind of fictitious argument then go right ahead. I'm out of respect and patience for you so unless you have anything intelligent of substance to say, i'll be going my own way.Wtf are you talking about? My position on their plan is the same as your position. You are arguing against yourself again. This is the most idiotic debate I’ve heard in a long time.Im talking off the same points you are. I never said I had a paper to refer to, I don't need one. Multiple people have stated what the key ideas of their plan are. They brought it to Trump to negotiate and finalize, so I don't know what the fuck you are bitching about. You can't deny the fact that they had a plan and then dog on their talking points in your next breath. If you don't believe they have a plan then you can't have an opinion on talking points you argue don't exist. Do you not understand that? You sound like you are very confused.I'm going off the same accounts that you are. The points of the plan have been verified by both sides of the aisle so I don't think there is much controversy that there was a plan presented. Since you are referencing the talking points of the plan then it is rather pointless and contradictory for you to also make the point that there is no actual plan. What are you missing here?
The accounts I'm going off of say there was no agreement on paper. If there were such a document, you should be able to include a copy of it in your post. Obviously you can't.
The so-called "talking points" are the points that people are talking about. It doesn't mean that's what this fictional version of the plan said. You'll have to excuse me if I don't believe a thing lying Dirty Durbin or Lindsey Grahamnesty have to say about it. Their credibility is zero.
The "multiple people" you refer to are Lying Dirty Durbin and Lindsey Grahamnesty. You entire positions rests on the assumption that these two are credible sources.
Here's a hint for you: no one with a brain believes a thing they say.
You obvioiusly lack the capacity to commit logic. You keep telling me I should believe what Lying Dirty Durbin and Lindsey Grahamnesty say even after I've made it plain that I don't believe a thing they say.
Bottom line: There is no plan on paper. There is only bullshit from two notorious liars.
Every debate with you is idiotic because you're an idiot.
Please do. I'm tired of your obsession with this point. It's a trivial point.Yeah, there is no public plan on paper because it is being developed. Big fucking deal. You made a stupid statement and spent the last few posts contradicting yourself, so if you need to lean on this paper thing to think you won some kind of fictitious argument then go right ahead. I'm out of respect and patience for you so unless you have anything intelligent of substance to say, i'll be going my own way.Wtf are you talking about? My position on their plan is the same as your position. You are arguing against yourself again. This is the most idiotic debate I’ve heard in a long time.Im talking off the same points you are. I never said I had a paper to refer to, I don't need one. Multiple people have stated what the key ideas of their plan are. They brought it to Trump to negotiate and finalize, so I don't know what the fuck you are bitching about. You can't deny the fact that they had a plan and then dog on their talking points in your next breath. If you don't believe they have a plan then you can't have an opinion on talking points you argue don't exist. Do you not understand that? You sound like you are very confused.The accounts I'm going off of say there was no agreement on paper. If there were such a document, you should be able to include a copy of it in your post. Obviously you can't.
The so-called "talking points" are the points that people are talking about. It doesn't mean that's what this fictional version of the plan said. You'll have to excuse me if I don't believe a thing lying Dirty Durbin or Lindsey Grahamnesty have to say about it. Their credibility is zero.
The "multiple people" you refer to are Lying Dirty Durbin and Lindsey Grahamnesty. You entire positions rests on the assumption that these two are credible sources.
Here's a hint for you: no one with a brain believes a thing they say.
You obvioiusly lack the capacity to commit logic. You keep telling me I should believe what Lying Dirty Durbin and Lindsey Grahamnesty say even after I've made it plain that I don't believe a thing they say.
Bottom line: There is no plan on paper. There is only bullshit from two notorious liars.
Every debate with you is idiotic because you're an idiot.
Actually , we agree to disagree. We don't need a border wall. We need to enforce immigration laws and punish businesses those that use, exploit , hire or otherwise choose to hire illegals over and above Legal imigrants or American workers. THAT seems more practical and to the point.I love it when I see this crap. You all know it will work and very effectively
Border Wall Models Thwart US Commandos In Tests
Recent assaults by tactical teams on prototypes of President Donald Trump’s proposed wall with Mexico indicate their imposing heights should stop border crossers, a U.S. official with direct knowledge of the rigorous assessment told The Associated Press
The highly trained testers scaled 16 to 20 feet (4.9 to 6.1 meters) unassisted but needed help after that, said the official who described the assaults on the wall prototypes to the AP. Testers also expressed safety concerns about getting down from 30 feet
That fall is a doozey...and they need help to scale to 30 feet as special forces......it's gonna work and that's why people don't like it.
We already have laws on the books against hiring illegals. How is that working out?Actually , we agree to disagree. We don't need a border wall. We need to enforce immigration laws and punish businesses those that use, exploit , hire or otherwise choose to hire illegals over and above Legal imigrants or American workers. THAT seems more practical and to the point.I love it when I see this crap. You all know it will work and very effectively
Border Wall Models Thwart US Commandos In Tests
Recent assaults by tactical teams on prototypes of President Donald Trump’s proposed wall with Mexico indicate their imposing heights should stop border crossers, a U.S. official with direct knowledge of the rigorous assessment told The Associated Press
The highly trained testers scaled 16 to 20 feet (4.9 to 6.1 meters) unassisted but needed help after that, said the official who described the assaults on the wall prototypes to the AP. Testers also expressed safety concerns about getting down from 30 feet
That fall is a doozey...and they need help to scale to 30 feet as special forces......it's gonna work and that's why people don't like it.
Yup, you are double scoop stupid, maroon!
Why didn't you say I was "to stupid?"
[/QUOTE
Because you're a buffoon!
You can't figure out how to use the quote function, eh Einstein?
Why, I'm sure even you can follow along. And I am not making a quote. I am stating a fact!
You're not making a quote even though you have quotes from about 7 previous posts?
Illegals aren't equipped with tanks and artillary, moron.
Thought those big, bad drug cartels eere though maroon!
Try that gain in English please!
We might GAIN less cartels? Is that what you believe?
What does "eere though maroon" mean, dumb ass?
What does try that gain in English mean maroon?
You have no clue about the Maginot line, dumbass!
You are the greatest failure ever!
So the line worked then, most have it all wrong.
There is a difference in fixed fortifications and a wall. In WWII. the Germans went around just as the French envisioned. it worked!
So, how are the illegals going to go around a wall that reaches from the beach in San Diego to the beach on the north side of the Rio Grande on the Gulf of Mexico?
Over or under, it just ain't that tough. Like the tunnels they have found under the pieces of wall that Boooosh the dumber already built!
Your claims fail to explain why the walls that Israel and Austria built have a better than 95% success rate.
Because I don't care about Israel and Austria! I am all for the wall that Mexico is going to pay for, just not the one the American taxpayer is going to pay for!
I don't was my time debating imbeciles like you who only want to troll.I understand that you're a douchebag.Who do you think you're fooling, douchebag?
Not trying to fool anybody, if Mexico is going to fund the building and maintenance of the wall build it. Even a witwant like you should understand that!
I understand you're a giant pussy!
You cannot debate, you're to dumb.
I don't was my time debating imbeciles like you who only want to troll.
You cannot debate, you're to dumb.
That's "too dumb," idiot.
Yup, you are double scoop stupid, maroon!
Why didn't you say I was "to stupid?"
[/QUOTE
Because you're a buffoon!
What idiot ever thought a wall is such a bright idea, in the first place?
Donald Trump was the dumbest goddamn student I ever had.
-- William T. Kelley, one of Trump's professors at U. Penn
You cannot debate, you're to [too] dumb.
Brilliant, you try and starve them out, get 1 out of 10 to self deport and then increase poverty and crime for the 9 that stay. A real genius plan you got thereSo the line worked then, most have it all wrong.
There is a difference in fixed fortifications and a wall. In WWII. the Germans went around just as the French envisioned. it worked!
So, how are the illegals going to go around a wall that reaches from the beach in San Diego to the beach on the north side of the Rio Grande on the Gulf of Mexico?
Over or under, it just ain't that tough. Like the tunnels they have found under the pieces of wall that Boooosh the dumber already built!
Your claims fail to explain why the walls that Israel and Austria built have a better than 95% success rate.
Because I don't care about Israel and Austria! I am all for the wall that Mexico is going to pay for, just not the one the American taxpayer is going to pay for!
If we can just get about 1 in 10 illegals to self-deport, we will save that much!
Thought those big, bad drug cartels eere though maroon!
Try that gain in English please!
We might GAIN less cartels? Is that what you believe?
What does "eere though maroon" mean, dumb ass?
What does try that gain in English mean maroon?
again
Please excuse my typo.
Are you going to decipher your bullshit, or let it stand up for ridicule?
So the line worked then, most have it all wrong.
There is a difference in fixed fortifications and a wall. In WWII. the Germans went around just as the French envisioned. it worked!
So, how are the illegals going to go around a wall that reaches from the beach in San Diego to the beach on the north side of the Rio Grande on the Gulf of Mexico?
Over or under, it just ain't that tough. Like the tunnels they have found under the pieces of wall that Boooosh the dumber already built!
Your claims fail to explain why the walls that Israel and Austria built have a better than 95% success rate.
Because I don't care about Israel and Austria! I am all for the wall that Mexico is going to pay for, just not the one the American taxpayer is going to pay for!
If we can just get about 1 in 10 illegals to self-deport, we will save that much!
I don't was my time debating imbeciles like you who only want to troll.I understand that you're a douchebag.Not trying to fool anybody, if Mexico is going to fund the building and maintenance of the wall build it. Even a witwant like you should understand that!
I understand you're a giant pussy!
You cannot debate, you're to dumb.
to dumb?
too dumb?
two dumb?
Which is correct?
You cannot debate, you're to dumb.
That's "too dumb," idiot.
Yup, you are double scoop stupid, maroon!
Why didn't you say I was "to stupid?"
[/QUOTE
Because you're a buffoon!
... says someone who cannot quote correctly
So all the millions of illegals will all know which border patrol agent to bribe and have the money to make it worth while?
ARe you smoking crack again?
I said the military as in the Army and Marines for land based border patrols and the Navy for sea based.
There is a difference in fixed fortifications and a wall. In WWII. the Germans went around just as the French envisioned. it worked!
So, how are the illegals going to go around a wall that reaches from the beach in San Diego to the beach on the north side of the Rio Grande on the Gulf of Mexico?
"Highly trained testers"? How many commandos are there among the rag-tag border crossers? If the wall stops 98% of illegal entries into the U.S. electronic surveillance will capture the rest. It's beyond belief that the angry and crazy left would rather throw up their hands and whine and surrender to illegal aliens rather than doing something about it
The border guard have trucks, and they can drive up to the guy with the ladder in a couple of minutes. They'll be waiting for him when he comes down the other side. How do you get around that little problem? Or do you just stupidly assume the government will build a $20 billion dollar will without having anyone guard it?
You're the one who doesn't know the difference between "to" and "too."I don't was my time debating imbeciles like you who only want to troll.I understand that you're a douchebag.
I understand you're a giant pussy!
You cannot debate, you're to dumb.
to dumb?
too dumb?
two dumb?
Which is correct?
Admiral Rockwell Tory!
In which case it would be 2 dumbs!
