Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, pecuniary interests.
Like the oil and coal lobbyists that drive the global warming deniers....
MMGW is the greatest scientific fraud in human history.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh163n1lJ4M"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sh163n1lJ4M[/ame]Yes, pecuniary interests.
now it's Rush vs the majortiy of the worlds scientists!
[SIZE=+1]Junkie named top conservative[/SIZE]
The vulgar Pigboy "most influential" Rethug
Link Excerpt:
By a wide margin, Americans consider Rush Limbaugh the nation's most influential conservative voice. Those are the results of a poll conducted by "60 Minutes" and Vanity Fair magazine and issued Sunday. The radio whore was picked by 26 percent of those who responded, followed by Glenn Beck at 11 percent. Actual politicians - Cheney and Palin - were the choice of 10 percent each. Asked to choose from among seven presidents, Americans tapped John F. Kennedy as the one they'd like to see added to Mount Rushmore. Kennedy polled 29 percent, with Ronald Reagan second at 20 percent.
Did you miss the whole "Phil Jones resigned" thingy?
Competitive Enterprise Institute Petitions EPA to Suspend Proposed CO2 Regs
Posted By Marlo Lewis On December 2, 2009 @ 2:48 pm In . Column1 02, Environment, Politics, Science, Science & Technology, US News, Uncategorized | 3 Comments
In light of the Climategate fraud scandal, the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) on Wednesday filed a petition [1] asking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to suspend its plans to regulate greenhouse gas emissions using the Clean Air Act, pending a thorough investigation of and public comment on the newly released information.
The still unfolding Climategate scandal produced by the release of thousands of emails and documents from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) of East Anglia University in the UK raises new questions and doubts about the scientific basis for the Kyoto climate treaty, the successor treaty to be negotiated later this month in Copenhagen, the Waxman-Markey and Kerry-Boxer climate bills, the EPAs proposed finding that greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions endanger public health and welfare, and other EPA regulatory proposals related to the endangerment determination.
For those who havent been following the scandal, on Thursday, November 19, several thousand emails and documents from the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University became available for download from the Internet.
The released information is voluminous. It consists of more than 157 megabytes of data, including over 1,000 emails and 3,400 other documents. Its contents are still being analyzed, and will be for some time to come, but a number of things are apparent. There were conscious efforts by leading climate scientists to misrepresent or falsify data, to evade Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and to inject intentional bias into the scientific peer review process. There were also admissions in these emails that global warming largely ceased in the last decade, and that leading climate scientists cannot explain why.
In addition to the emails, sections of annotated computer code from programs used to process climate data were among the revealed documents. The annotations by programmers indicate that the programs were written in such a way as to artificially adjust the data to increase the apparent rate of global warming.
On October 5, CEI petitioned [2] EPA to reopen its Endangerment Proceeding because of a disclosure by the CRU that it had destroyed the raw data for its data set of global surface temperatures. In our view, this destruction of data was a major breach of scientific standards. It warranted a reexamination of the studies based on that data, and a reopening of the comment period to allow public response to this issue.
In the past two weeks, however, new information has surfaced which casts far greater doubt on the validity of CRUs work. In the view of many, this information destroys CRUs reputation entirely. Yesterday, CRU announced that its director, Dr. Phil Jones, was stepping down from his position temporarily while the university conducts an investigation of the released material. If the new material is serious enough to have led to the departure, at least temporarily, of CRUs director, then for that same reason it justifies EPA calling a regulatory time-out.
In a separate action today, several members of Congress Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-WI), ranking member of the House Select Committee on Global Warming and Energy Independence, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wy.), and Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) wrote to EPA administrator Lisa Jackson urging her to withdraw the Proposed Endangerment Finding, the Light Duty Vehicle Rule, and the Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule until the agency can demonstrate the science underlying these regulatory decisions has not been compromised. The members of Congress also noted that EPA had relied heavily on CRUs research in the development of the endangerment determination.
It’s been nearly two weeks since a scandal shook many people’s faith in the scientists behind global warming alarmism. The scandal forced the University of East Anglia (UK) to divulge that it threw away raw temperature data and prompted the temporary resignation of Phil Jones of the university’s Climate Research Unit.
Despite that resignation and calls by a U.S. senator to investigate the matter, ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news programming has remained silent – not mentioning a word about the scandal since it broke on Nov. 20, even as world leaders including President Barack Obama prepare to meet in Copenhagen, Denmark next week to promote a pact to reduce greenhouse gases.
Ame®icano;1775231 said:Its been nearly two weeks since a scandal shook many peoples faith in the scientists behind global warming alarmism. The scandal forced the University of East Anglia (UK) to divulge that it threw away raw temperature data and prompted the temporary resignation of Phil Jones of the universitys Climate Research Unit.
Despite that resignation and calls by a U.S. senator to investigate the matter, ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening news programming has remained silent not mentioning a word about the scandal since it broke on Nov. 20, even as world leaders including President Barack Obama prepare to meet in Copenhagen, Denmark next week to promote a pact to reduce greenhouse gases.
12 Days, 3 Networks and No Mention of ClimateGate Scandal
Well, there's soooo much more important news out there, like Merideth Baxter Birney being a lezbo.
