Theowl32
Diamond Member
- Dec 8, 2013
- 22,911
- 17,312
- 2,415
- Thread starter
- #21
Lol, the classic bait and switch. Anyone making "10 million?"You need to calm down or at least get your facts straight. No one thinks she should be taxed at 70%, not even her. Her plan would set the rate of 70% on annual income over $10 million. She doesn't earn over $10 million so she would not be paying 70%.Oh, so you think she should taxed 70% of her money then, like all of you fucking losers yell about?$174K sounds like a lot but in NYC or DC it won't go very far as it would in Iowa.
Well, considering 174k is the upper 15% of all wage earners, how much do YOOOOOU think she should be taxed.
As for what I think we should pay in taxes? I think it's a stupid question. The question is what do we want the federal gov't to pay for? Once we can agree on that, we can look at the options for raising the money. If the gov't paid for all my room and board, healthcare, retirement, clothes, cars, travel, and beer, I'd happily pay 70% of my income.
Good Lord you people are ridiculous.