ChrisL
Diamond Member
What Jews invaded Palestine then monti, or are you talking about the legal land owners coming and evicting the squatters from their land. At no time was any part of Palestine bequeathed to the arab muslims by its legal owners, so were was this fictional land ?
There were no "squatters".
They were never land owners and were just travelling nomadic farm workers in the main. They acted just like the muslims of old and took what land they wanted until they had worn it out and then discarded it and moved on. 3 Times they stole Hebron from the Jews and 3 times they destroyed the land through lack of intelligence and laziness.
Now produce the treaty by the ottomans or LoN that gives the land of Palestine to the arab muslims..............
For all practical purposes they were landowners and many of them were indiginous to the area. As you may recall, even though there was an indiginous Jewish population in Palestine prior to immigration, there was a larger Arab population.
Land has shifted back and forth over the centuries if you have to attempt to go back that far it's meaningless. If people have been living on land for generations - it is theirs for all effective purposes.
No they refused to become land owners under the Ottomans as it meant paying taxes and being conscripted into the army. So they just ignored the requests and carried on being tenants or nomadic farm workers.
Then because the Jews had been living on the land for 4,500 years by your criteria they have a more valid claim than the arab muslims who can only go back 1400 years with gaps when they were driven out by invaders. Now back to International law that you don't like when it comes down in Israel's favour the LEGAL LAND OWNERS GAVE THE LAND TO THE JEWS BACK IN 1924 THEY DID NOT GIVE ANY TO THE ARAB MUSLIMS APART FROM JORDAN, SYRIA AND IRAQ.
By my criteria?
A handful of jews....somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000. Attempting to go back thousands of years is blatently ridiculous - land and property rights varied considerably. For example - in some regions all land belonged to a ruler, and the people were tenants. Do you see how silly this is?
I support International Law. It states that West Bank and Gaza are occupied territories and it recognizes Israel's right to exist. Sounds good enough.
They were given the land by the British. If you want to argue that point, you can argue it all day long. It doesn't change the facts.