There Are No 'Coincidences.'

[Moonglow]

The regressives were in love with hitler and mussolini in the 1920's and 30's also, it took a conflict with stalin before they rejected fascism.

Pretending fascism is a "right wing" system is just part of the left's delusions.

Strange though, because hitler and mussolini were choir boys compared to stalin or mao.

Yup.

Having control of the schools and the media allowed them to do that.
That, and the fact that their acolytes have been trained not to think, or do their own research.


5. " The People's Republic of China under Mao exhibited the oppressive tendencies that were discernible in all the major absolutist regimes of the twentieth century. There are obvious parallels between Mao's China, Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Each of these regimes witnessed deliberately ordered mass 'cleansing' and extermination."
Mao Zedong - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

"...all the major absolutist regimes of the twentieth century" are what made same the century of genocide.



The above description should not end with the communists and Nazis.



To lesser degrees....but with the same overall expectations for overarching governance, we should include socialists, Liberals, and Progressives.


a. "Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right. WORLD Let s admit who we are Marvin Olasky July 17 2010


Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism

Nazism


Which are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom?

Ghangis Kahn did the same, according to your definitions, he would have been a leftist....

 

[Moonglow]

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Liar.

"Actually, it is in the Bible. Proverbs 13:22 says, "A good man leaves an inheritance to his children's children." Numbers 36:8 says, "Every one of the people of Israel may possess the inheritance of his fathers." Ezekiel 46:18 says that the state has no right to interfere: "The prince shall not take any of the inheritance of the people, thrusting them out of their property."

However, the most emphatic repudiation of wealth redistribution appears in Luke 12:13, in which Jesus acknowledges the value of wealthy people to society as a whole: "The land of a rich man brought forth plentifully." Echoing Ezekiel, he said, "Man, who made me a judge or divider over you?" In other words, it is up to each individual to decide how to distribute his wealth -- in life or at death -- not the state. Taking the wealth of rich men by force is neither moral nor efficient."
Ending the death tax - Bruce Bartlett - Page full

Yet Christ advocated paying taxes, which is not stealing, it is a basis of all govts. ability to exist....
How much have you been forced to give up? I bet none..

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Left’s concept of materialism broadens into the overarching desire to see every individual materially equal. The Left has been far more interested in fighting material inequality than tyranny, which is why Lenin, Mao, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, etc., tend to have the support of Leftists around the world.

In many significant ways, all Leftists are connected.....
....it would be a grave error to imagine that said connections are coincidental.



1. "Mao Zedong was well protected. The famed Forbidden City, under Mao Zedong was no less prohibited and protected than in Imperial times. "...surveillance cameras, microwave dishes, and radio transmitters. The armed men in green uniforms at the gates be longed to he Central Guards Regiment, once known as the legendary unit 8341, which had protected China's leaders since the Revolution. Their success record was remarkable for such a turbulent country. The unit of more than 8,000 men secured the secretes of the Communist Party.

For Western intelligence, this was one of the least penetrable centers of power in the world. Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated and were ususally from peasant families in remote mountainous ares."
From the novel "Dragonstrike," by Humphrey Hawksley.

a. "The Central Security Bureau(Chinese:中央警卫局, also calledUnit 8341, and less commonly,Unit 57001) orThe Central Guard Unit(sometimes as theCentral Guard Regiment) is the chief Security Detail military bureau responsible for the security of senior Chinese government, Communist Party, and military leaders.."
Central Security Bureau of the Communist Party of China - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia



2. "The regimental code of "8341" has inspired a number of stories about why it was chosen. One such tale is that in 1948, when Mao Zedong and the other leaders of the Chinese Communist Party first moved to Beijing, Mao talked with a monk of Tayuan Temple, at Mount Wutai, Shanxi Province. The monk gave him this number, which meant that Mao Zedong would live to be 83 years old and would lead the CCP for 41 years (from Zunyi Conferenceto his death)." 61889 Regiment - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


a. Mao Zedong....(December 26, 1893 – September 9, 1976), " Mao Zedong - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia




3. There are no coincidences.
For example, there was Anita Dunn, carefully chosen by Barack Obama...no coincidence that he selected her.


"Anita Dunn is an American political strategist who served as White House Communications Director from April through November 2009. ... She was hired by then-Senator Barack Obama in 2006 to direct communications and strategy for his political action committee, ... "
Anita Dunn - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia


Who was Anita Dunn's hero?





"It's insanity. This is her hero's work," he said. "She thinks of this man's work all the time?
"It would be like me saying to you, 'you know who my favorite political philosopher is? Adolf Hitler.' Have you read Mein Kampf? [She wants to] fight your fight like Hitler did,..."
Glenn Beck


Her other hero, it seems, was Barack Obama.

Another pack of lies from Political Chick...must be a weekday (or a weekend)

Hey....when are you gonna put back the avi that I had sooooo much fun slapping around?

C'mon......why did you throw Sandra Slut....er, I mean Fluke, under the bus???

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Wrong. It is clearly up to the Believer what he shall give to others - this is stated in Scripture by Peter when he addressed Ananais and Saphira for holding back what they had already said they would give. It was completely up to them what they would give - not the State - not the Church. They lied to the Holy Spirit and were struck dead. Both of them. (one at a time)

Communism believes in taking and redistributing by force. While the people live under their rule live equally as paupers the Communist leaders live like kings. (see North Korea for example of life under communist rule)

This is not a New Testament Teaching. The Apostle Paul had one coat - Peter was not a wealthy man - none of the Apostles lived lavishly. The Bible is clear - if a man will not work - neither will he eat - each man is to plant his "own vineyard" .....build "his own house"........ this is not the case in Communism. Which is why Communism is doomed to failure whereas Christianity is not.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The regressives were in love with hitler and mussolini in the 1920's and 30's also, it took a conflict with stalin before they rejected fascism.

Pretending fascism is a "right wing" system is just part of the left's delusions.

Strange though, because hitler and mussolini were choir boys compared to stalin or mao.

Yup.

Having control of the schools and the media allowed them to do that.
That, and the fact that their acolytes have been trained not to think, or do their own research.


5. " The People's Republic of China under Mao exhibited the oppressive tendencies that were discernible in all the major absolutist regimes of the twentieth century. There are obvious parallels between Mao's China, Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Each of these regimes witnessed deliberately ordered mass 'cleansing' and extermination."
Mao Zedong - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

"...all the major absolutist regimes of the twentieth century" are what made same the century of genocide.



The above description should not end with the communists and Nazis.



To lesser degrees....but with the same overall expectations for overarching governance, we should include socialists, Liberals, and Progressives.


a. "Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right. WORLD Let s admit who we are Marvin Olasky July 17 2010


Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism

Nazism


Which are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom?

Ghangis Kahn did the same, according to your definitions, he would have been a leftist....

You can run, but you can't hide.

 

[Marxist]

American leftists have supported fascists/communists for 100 years. They thrilled to Mussolini. They embraced Hitler initially. They loved Lenin and then Stalin. They hailed Castro. They lionized Mao. They thrilled for Chavez. The record here is crystal clear.

Bullshit.

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Liar.

"Actually, it is in the Bible. Proverbs 13:22 says, "A good man leaves an inheritance to his children's children." Numbers 36:8 says, "Every one of the people of Israel may possess the inheritance of his fathers." Ezekiel 46:18 says that the state has no right to interfere: "The prince shall not take any of the inheritance of the people, thrusting them out of their property."

However, the most emphatic repudiation of wealth redistribution appears in Luke 12:13, in which Jesus acknowledges the value of wealthy people to society as a whole: "The land of a rich man brought forth plentifully." Echoing Ezekiel, he said, "Man, who made me a judge or divider over you?" In other words, it is up to each individual to decide how to distribute his wealth -- in life or at death -- not the state. Taking the wealth of rich men by force is neither moral nor efficient."
Ending the death tax - Bruce Bartlett - Page full

Yet Christ advocated paying taxes, which is not stealing, it is a basis of all govts. ability to exist....
How much have you been forced to give up? I bet none..

Politicalchic claims anyone who disagrees with her has a mental disorder.. Careful now.

 

[Moonglow]

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Liar.

"Actually, it is in the Bible. Proverbs 13:22 says, "A good man leaves an inheritance to his children's children." Numbers 36:8 says, "Every one of the people of Israel may possess the inheritance of his fathers." Ezekiel 46:18 says that the state has no right to interfere: "The prince shall not take any of the inheritance of the people, thrusting them out of their property."

However, the most emphatic repudiation of wealth redistribution appears in Luke 12:13, in which Jesus acknowledges the value of wealthy people to society as a whole: "The land of a rich man brought forth plentifully." Echoing Ezekiel, he said, "Man, who made me a judge or divider over you?" In other words, it is up to each individual to decide how to distribute his wealth -- in life or at death -- not the state. Taking the wealth of rich men by force is neither moral nor efficient."
Ending the death tax - Bruce Bartlett - Page full

Then why did Christ advocate that wealth accumulation is a deciding premise to get into Heaven? That in itself was a forced idea for wealth distribution..

 

[Marxist]

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Wrong. It is clearly up to the Believer what he shall give to others - this is stated in Scripture by Peter when he addressed Ananais and Saphira for holding back what they had already said they would give. It was completely up to them what they would give - not the State - not the Church. They lied to the Holy Spirit and were struck dead. Both of them. (one at a time)

Communism believes in taking and redistributing by force. While the people live under their rule live equally as paupers the Communist leaders live like kings. (see North Korea for example of life under communist rule)

This is not a New Testament Teaching. The Apostle Paul had one coat - Peter was not a wealthy man - none of the Apostles lived lavishly. The Bible is clear - if a man will not work - neither will he eat - each man is to plant his "own vineyard" .....build "his own house"........ this is not the case in Communism. Which is why Communism is doomed to failure whereas Christianity is not.

More bullshit about communism... Ugh.

 

[Moonglow]

The regressives were in love with hitler and mussolini in the 1920's and 30's also, it took a conflict with stalin before they rejected fascism.

Pretending fascism is a "right wing" system is just part of the left's delusions.

Strange though, because hitler and mussolini were choir boys compared to stalin or mao.

Yup.

Having control of the schools and the media allowed them to do that.
That, and the fact that their acolytes have been trained not to think, or do their own research.


5. " The People's Republic of China under Mao exhibited the oppressive tendencies that were discernible in all the major absolutist regimes of the twentieth century. There are obvious parallels between Mao's China, Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia. Each of these regimes witnessed deliberately ordered mass 'cleansing' and extermination."
Mao Zedong - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

"...all the major absolutist regimes of the twentieth century" are what made same the century of genocide.



The above description should not end with the communists and Nazis.



To lesser degrees....but with the same overall expectations for overarching governance, we should include socialists, Liberals, and Progressives.


a. "Liberals claim the center by placing socialism on the left and national socialism on the right, even though Lenin/Stalin and Hitler/other Nazis had much in common as they centralized power and preached hatred.

A more accurate spectrum would place totalitarians of many stripes on the left and defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom on the right. WORLD Let s admit who we are Marvin Olasky July 17 2010


Communism

Socialism

Fascism

Progressivism

Liberalism

Nazism


Which are defenders of religious, political, and economic freedom?

Ghangis Kahn did the same, according to your definitions, he would have been a leftist....

You can run, but you can't hide.

Can't answer the question, I get it..

 

[Moonglow]

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Wrong. It is clearly up to the Believer what he shall give to others - this is stated in Scripture by Peter when he addressed Ananais and Saphira for holding back what they had already said they would give. It was completely up to them what they would give - not the State - not the Church. They lied to the Holy Spirit and were struck dead. Both of them. (one at a time)

Communism believes in taking and redistributing by force. While the people live under their rule live equally as paupers the Communist leaders live like kings. (see North Korea for example of life under communist rule)

This is not a New Testament Teaching. The Apostle Paul had one coat - Peter was not a wealthy man - none of the Apostles lived lavishly. The Bible is clear - if a man will not work - neither will he eat - each man is to plant his "own vineyard" .....build "his own house"........ this is not the case in Communism. Which is why Communism is doomed to failure whereas Christianity is not.

More bullshit about communism... Ugh.

It's all they have, a scary boogeyman from the past...

 

[Marxist]

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Wrong. It is clearly up to the Believer what he shall give to others - this is stated in Scripture by Peter when he addressed Ananais and Saphira for holding back what they had already said they would give. It was completely up to them what they would give - not the State - not the Church. They lied to the Holy Spirit and were struck dead. Both of them. (one at a time)

Communism believes in taking and redistributing by force. While the people live under their rule live equally as paupers the Communist leaders live like kings. (see North Korea for example of life under communist rule)

This is not a New Testament Teaching. The Apostle Paul had one coat - Peter was not a wealthy man - none of the Apostles lived lavishly. The Bible is clear - if a man will not work - neither will he eat - each man is to plant his "own vineyard" .....build "his own house"........ this is not the case in Communism. Which is why Communism is doomed to failure whereas Christianity is not.

You show me one stateless, classless, moneyless society without private ownership of production and I'll believe you've seen communism. Idiot.

 

[Moonglow]

Communism didn't stop the Koch family from earning money in Soviet Russia...

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. Every post I construct is linked, documented, sources.

2. I provided the actual words of the Mainline Protestant elites.

I try to teach you....but you are immune to learning.
Seems to be a ubiquitous characteristic of Leftists.

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

1. Every post I construct is linked, documented, sources.

2. I provided the actual words of the Mainline Protestant elites.

I try to teach you....but you are immune to learning.
Seems to be a ubiquitous characteristic of Leftists.

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Wait....you can't stupid enough to claim an avi 'Marxist' and talk about 'millions starving'?????



Yes you can.


What a moron.

 

[Marxist]

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Wait....you can't stupid enough to claim an avi 'Marxist' and talk about 'millions starving'?????



Yes you can.


What a moron.

I can barely understand this post, but I don't support Stalin or Mao..

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

you really should teach yourself a better garden variety of right wing ditto points on the meaning of progressive....especially when it comes to progressive ideals in Christianity..
Even Christ was a progressive....for he fed the masses the bread of god to feed their ailing spirit to give them hope of a better world..

1. Every post I construct is linked, documented, sources.

2. I provided the actual words of the Mainline Protestant elites.

I try to teach you....but you are immune to learning.
Seems to be a ubiquitous characteristic of Leftists.

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

you really should teach yourself a better garden variety of right wing ditto points on the meaning of progressive....especially when it comes to progressive ideals in Christianity..
Even Christ was a progressive....for he fed the masses the bread of god to feed their ailing spirit to give them hope of a better world..

1. Every post I construct is linked, documented, sources.

2. I provided the actual words of the Mainline Protestant elites.

I try to teach you....but you are immune to learning.
Seems to be a ubiquitous characteristic of Leftists.

Absolutely - the people Moonglow is trying to call "Protestant Christians" are nothing of the sort - the false preachers who preach money do not preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ - they teach error and their agenda is clearly not the same as the disciples of Christ as seen in the Bible. Jesus had no place to lay his head! The Apostle Paul had one coat!

Joel Osteen, Rick Warren, Kenneth Copeland and Joseph Prince with their false grace message would accuse Jesus Christ and the Apostles of being legalists and not "walking in love" were they here today.

Indeed if these men had the opportunity they'd crucify Jesus rather than for people to learn how far removed they are from the true church. But the day is coming when the entire world will know it - at the Judgment seat of Christ - again what they offer is not church - it's a circus and the people pay big for the "entertainment"!

Anyone that does not think that after 2000 years of Christianity that manipulation of the rites and teachings of Christ has not been perverted to their own cause is a fool....Which is why I stepped away from the church and sought out God and his son on my own...

So sorry.

Try as you may, you will not be able to move this issue from the malevolence of Leftism, the connections between all those who support and/or espouse same, to some twisting of religion.

You must imagine that those reading the thread are not insightful enough to see what you are doing...and why.

You believe others to be stupid.
Another case of only being able to judge others by oneself.

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Wrong. The reason Jesus told the rich young ruler to sell all he had and give it to the poor and follow Him was to show him his own heart. The rich young ruler asked what he must do to inherit the kingdom of heaven. Jesus told him, you know the commandments. The Rich young ruler said, I have kept all these since childhood (I'm paraphrasing) and when he said that? Jesus knew he lied. He had not loved God with all his heart, mind, soul and strength and he had not loved his neighbor as himself. Had he loved his neighbor as himself he would have shared with his neighbor as the LORD led him. He didn't. So by telling him to give away all he had - the LORD showed him his own heart. You see the Rich young Rulers own heart had deceived him. Just as your own heart has deceived you, Moonglow.

 

[Wry Catcher]

American Progressives are very similar to Mao's imperial guards and for the same reasons. They're only marginally intelligent and have been so thoroughly trained to embrace Communism and Communist leaders its impossible to get them to turn away. Pointing out that their heroes Stalin and Mao were history's most prolific mass murderers gets a shrug -- at best

"only marginally intelligent"? You should be so lucky.

That truth written, you have yet to offer any evidence to support your opinions. It's why I laugh at you, and classified your posts as Idiot-Grams.

But let's see if you can provide one, just one, example of Communism in America? Not words parsed, or the liberal use of the pejorative "Commie" by others like you, but a practice of communism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When Christ told the rich guy that he could not follow him unless he gave away all his wealth, according to you he was espousing leftist ideals, so Jesus was really a communist..Ha!

Yeah, Jesus didn't really like those who didn't want to help the poor or hoarded wealth while millions starved..

Even in the old testament it is a given that wealth should be shared since it is a gift from God...

Wrong. It is clearly up to the Believer what he shall give to others - this is stated in Scripture by Peter when he addressed Ananais and Saphira for holding back what they had already said they would give. It was completely up to them what they would give - not the State - not the Church. They lied to the Holy Spirit and were struck dead. Both of them. (one at a time)

Communism believes in taking and redistributing by force. While the people live under their rule live equally as paupers the Communist leaders live like kings. (see North Korea for example of life under communist rule)

This is not a New Testament Teaching. The Apostle Paul had one coat - Peter was not a wealthy man - none of the Apostles lived lavishly. The Bible is clear - if a man will not work - neither will he eat - each man is to plant his "own vineyard" .....build "his own house"........ this is not the case in Communism. Which is why Communism is doomed to failure whereas Christianity is not.

More bullshit about communism... Ugh.

It's all they have, a scary boogeyman from the past...

"Fifty years of liberal propaganda got people to thinking of Communist Party members as lovable idealists and the urge to fire them from their government jobs as an irrational anachronistic prejudice. Allowing card-carrying members of the Communist Party to handle classified material after the Alger Hiss case would be like encouraging al-Qaeda members to carry box cutters on airplanes after 9-11. "
Coulter



Looks like she nailed you, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

American Progressives are very similar to Mao's imperial guards and for the same reasons. They're only marginally intelligent and have been so thoroughly trained to embrace Communism and Communist leaders its impossible to get them to turn away. Pointing out that their heroes Stalin and Mao were history's most prolific mass murderers gets a shrug -- at best

"only marginally intelligent"? You should be so lucky.

That truth written, you have yet to offer any evidence to support your opinions. It's why I laugh at you, and classified your posts as Idiot-Grams.

But let's see if you can provide one, just one, example of Communism in America? Not words parsed, or the liberal use of the pejorative "Commie" by others like you, but a practice of communism.

Do you need a license to be this stupid???

How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.


......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.



3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.



4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.



5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.



6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.



7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.



8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."



9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."



10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.



11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."


12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.



13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



...all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders.

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.


10 planks of Communist manifesto

Communist Manifesto 10 Planks


1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.


2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.


3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains Inheritance And Wall Street FDL News Desk




And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....



You've served your purpose....dismissed.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

A few facts I wanted to share with you about Mao, Political Chic. There is a little book called Kings of the East by Chick publications which shares the following facts:

In 1949 after WWII China went into civil war - the pro-Communists won - Mao became the Chairman of the People's Republic. In the purges that followed, an estimated 60 million Chinese people were killed.

The information for this was reported in the US Senate 63-549-0 Human Cost of Communism. 2 years later - Mao's plan of aggression began. China helped engineer an invasion of Korea and after 3 bloody years a truce was signed.

Tibet falls, no one cares including the United Nations. What did the Chinese Reds do?

According to Readers Digest issue February 1970 page 214:

In the village of Ba-Jeaba the inhabitants were forced to watch the crucifixion of 25 wealthy people. In the same village men and women were forced to watch 24 parents having nails driven through their eyes - because they refused to send their children to Chinese schools.

In March 1972, Nixon flew to Red China opening the doors to the "Kings of the East". The Barrier keeping Red China from world recognition was then removed.

next...........

On October 21,1972, the pro-communists inside the U.N. voted Red China into the U.N. This was a great victory because now China had the right to send her ambassadors and undercover agents throughout the world.

next...........

U.S. pulls out of Vietnam and Cambodia and eventually out of all of Asia. (* my own comment to you - according to high level govt. officials in office at the time - America won the Vietnam war because N.Vietnam contacted the White House issuing a surrender - upon this news the White House announced it was withdrawing from Vietnam and made sure the American people were not told about this victory against Communist North Vietnam - the surrender was kept top secret)

next............
this announcement was read in Newsweek issue April 14th, 1975 -page 19 by Tran Kim Phuong, Vietnamese Ambassador to U.S.A. :

It is safer to be an ally of the Communists and, it looks like it is fatal to be an ally of the U.S.
-Tran Kim Phuong, Vietnamese Ambassador to USA
Quoted in Newsweek April 14th, 1975 page 19

Then we witnessed a domino effect and today - only 43 years later we have such words being used from the White House as "normalization" of relations with Cuba (a communist term) - citizens of America (such as Moonglow) giving a pseudo definition of communism (which simply does not exist) the intentional dumb down of American citizens who are being fed communist propaganda (and they prefer to believe it!) while stepping blindly over every piece of concrete evidence of the past which tells us that America is on a collision course with disaster.

 

[Marxist]

American Progressives are very similar to Mao's imperial guards and for the same reasons. They're only marginally intelligent and have been so thoroughly trained to embrace Communism and Communist leaders its impossible to get them to turn away. Pointing out that their heroes Stalin and Mao were history's most prolific mass murderers gets a shrug -- at best

"only marginally intelligent"? You should be so lucky.

That truth written, you have yet to offer any evidence to support your opinions. It's why I laugh at you, and classified your posts as Idiot-Grams.

But let's see if you can provide one, just one, example of Communism in America? Not words parsed, or the liberal use of the pejorative "Commie" by others like you, but a practice of communism.

Do you need a license to be this stupid???

How about you take a look at the aims of the Communist Party, USA, and the aims of the modern Democrat Party.


......it is ...extraordinary.....the correspondence between the aims of the communist party and the aims of the Democrats.....

1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.



3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.



4. . Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.



5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.



6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.



7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.



8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."



9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."



10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.



11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."


12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.



13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce



...all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders.

I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals
The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals



You might take a look at this one, too.


10 planks of Communist manifesto

Communist Manifesto 10 Planks


1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.


2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.


3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
"Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains, Inheritance, And Wall Street"
Obama Set To Propose Taxes On Capital Gains Inheritance And Wall Street FDL News Desk




And this:

"Government control of private sector activity...is aptly described as Bolshevik- or Marxist, socialist, collectivist, statist, or, for that matter, fascist, too.Indeed, nationalized health care was one of the first programs enacted by the Bolsheviks after they seized power in 1917(Banks, insurance companies and means of communications were also taken over by Soviet authorities immediately."
Dziewanowski, "A History of Soviet Russia," p. 107.


They didn't call it ObamaCare....



You've served your purpose....dismissed.

I've never seen such an idiotic post.