There Are No 'Coincidences.'

[Pete7469]

Liberals are congenital liars....

I get that regularly, too..."I didn't read..."

Clearly you caught the dolt in a lie....but....for them, it results simply in a shrug.

They're stupid too, not that it's a news flash.


When someone's entire world view is based on lies, fantasy and moral turpitude it's sort of impossible to have any respect for truth. When they're here day after day regurgitating democrook underground drivel, defending the indefensible corrupt political whores they vote for, and attempting to marginalize and subjugate opinions, arguments, and facts without ever considering the consequences of their actions could lead to yet another despotic regime taking power, you know you're either dealing with a complete blithering idiot, or a criminally insane authoritarian sociopath.


At least the bed wetter admitted he agrees that public funded educational resources have to be rationed, just like EVERYTHING funded by the public. Of course he denied being an "elitist", and probably doesn't even consider that Wilson was exactly the sort of elitist pig he would hate had Wilson been a republicrat. He calls it spin when it's pointed out that indeed elitist regressive pigs have always viewed the laborers of the world as a "human resource" to be grown or culled depending on the needs of the elite. They need to be trained like monkeys to perform mundane repetitive tasks in order to manufacture or otherwise perform services that enrich the elite.


There's no room for an ordinary person to be innovative, because they may challenge and compete with an established member of the elite. It would be counterproductive to the regressive to have a well informed public that understands civics, pays attention to important current events, makes political decisions based on critical analysis, and has a sense of independence. The left has deliberately destroyed the educational system in this country. They've ripped out any sense of discipline, made traditional religion illegal while celebrating ridiculous concepts such as wicca, saturated the districts with useless bureaucrooks and administrators, dumbed down the subject matter and created unions that protect criminally incompetent teachers.


Of course regressives destroy everything they touch. I enjoy shoving their noses in it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. The thread began with this feature on Mao Zedong's guards...

" The armed men in green uniforms at the gates be longed to he Central Guards Regiment, once known as the legendary unit 8341, which had protected China's leaders since the Revolution. Their success record was remarkable for such a turbulent country. The unit of more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

For Western intelligence, this was one of the least penetrable centers of power in the world. Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated and were ususally from peasant families in remote mountainous ares."
From the novel "Dragonstrike," by Humphrey Hawksley.




Would a free nation require a huge battalion of illiterate devotees surrounding the leader?

Consider the reasons behind "Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated...."

Why would a leader want his personal guards to be 'illiterate or barely educated"?

Would that suggest that he/she was secure in the rectitude of his administration?

Hardly.


Take a look at the product of government schools since Liberals took control of 'em....

See the similarity to above?










There are no coincidences.

 

[Wry Catcher]

6. Pointing out the similarities between of communists, Nazis, socialists, Liberals, and Progressives, does not mean that all use the same methods to attain them.....that is often the argument designed to derail the comparison.

But that defense fall short , as the argument is not based on point-for-point comparison....



"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Goldberg



And this is how the American Left managed that 'flip:'

a. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.
After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

Jonah Goldbergen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg

An appeal to authority? LOL, he's Hannity but with an infamous mom.

1. Have you read Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism"?

Of course you haven't.

It was thoroughly sourced.


2.How often must everyone be exposed to the imbecility of folks like you who attack the messenger because you cannot, as much as you yearn to, deny the truth of what is said?

Not doubt you are a government school dropout.

Half-truth, as usual. Graduated from CAL, Master's Degree from San Francisco St. U.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Pointing out the similarities between of communists, Nazis, socialists, Liberals, and Progressives, does not mean that all use the same methods to attain them.....that is often the argument designed to derail the comparison.

But that defense fall short , as the argument is not based on point-for-point comparison....



"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Goldberg



And this is how the American Left managed that 'flip:'

a. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.
After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

Jonah Goldbergen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg

An appeal to authority? LOL, he's Hannity but with an infamous mom.

1. Have you read Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism"?

Of course you haven't.

It was thoroughly sourced.


2.How often must everyone be exposed to the imbecility of folks like you who attack the messenger because you cannot, as much as you yearn to, deny the truth of what is said?

Not doubt you are a government school dropout.

Half-truth, as usual. Graduated from CAL, Master's Degree from San Francisco St. U.

Copy some of your posts, have someone with a real education author a nice cover letter suggesting that your will keep said Alma mater a secret....

...and I'll bet they offer to return every cent of tuition.

 

[NYcarbineer]

7. The thread began with this feature on Mao Zedong's guards...

" The armed men in green uniforms at the gates be longed to he Central Guards Regiment, once known as the legendary unit 8341, which had protected China's leaders since the Revolution. Their success record was remarkable for such a turbulent country. The unit of more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

For Western intelligence, this was one of the least penetrable centers of power in the world. Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated and were ususally from peasant families in remote mountainous ares."
From the novel "Dragonstrike," by Humphrey Hawksley.




Would a free nation require a huge battalion of illiterate devotees surrounding the leader?

Consider the reasons behind "Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated...."

Why would a leader want his personal guards to be 'illiterate or barely educated"?

Would that suggest that he/she was secure in the rectitude of his administration?

Hardly.


Take a look at the product of government schools since Liberals took control of 'em....

See the similarity to above?










There are no coincidences.

Did FEMA Create a Youth Army

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. The thread began with this feature on Mao Zedong's guards...

" The armed men in green uniforms at the gates be longed to he Central Guards Regiment, once known as the legendary unit 8341, which had protected China's leaders since the Revolution. Their success record was remarkable for such a turbulent country. The unit of more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

For Western intelligence, this was one of the least penetrable centers of power in the world. Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated and were ususally from peasant families in remote mountainous ares."
From the novel "Dragonstrike," by Humphrey Hawksley.




Would a free nation require a huge battalion of illiterate devotees surrounding the leader?

Consider the reasons behind "Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated...."

Why would a leader want his personal guards to be 'illiterate or barely educated"?

Would that suggest that he/she was secure in the rectitude of his administration?

Hardly.


Take a look at the product of government schools since Liberals took control of 'em....

See the similarity to above?










There are no coincidences.

Did FEMA Create a Youth Army

The pertinent query is whether or not the petit mal President stated that he needed one.....

...one just like the one dear ol' dad...er, Mao Zedong, had:

"...the legendary unit 8341,which had protected China's [Communist, pathological] leaders since the Revolution. .... more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

...Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated [i.e., government school grads]..."



Did he demand same or not?

 

[NYcarbineer]

7. The thread began with this feature on Mao Zedong's guards...

" The armed men in green uniforms at the gates be longed to he Central Guards Regiment, once known as the legendary unit 8341, which had protected China's leaders since the Revolution. Their success record was remarkable for such a turbulent country. The unit of more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

For Western intelligence, this was one of the least penetrable centers of power in the world. Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated and were ususally from peasant families in remote mountainous ares."
From the novel "Dragonstrike," by Humphrey Hawksley.




Would a free nation require a huge battalion of illiterate devotees surrounding the leader?

Consider the reasons behind "Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated...."

Why would a leader want his personal guards to be 'illiterate or barely educated"?

Would that suggest that he/she was secure in the rectitude of his administration?

Hardly.


Take a look at the product of government schools since Liberals took control of 'em....

See the similarity to above?










There are no coincidences.

Did FEMA Create a Youth Army

The pertinent query is whether or not the petit mal President stated that he needed one.....

...one just like the one dear ol' dad...er, Mao Zedong, had:

"...the legendary unit 8341,which had protected China's [Communist, pathological] leaders since the Revolution. .... more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

...Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated [i.e., government school grads]..."



Did he demand same or not?

I gave you the answer. Do I have to cut it in little pieces and feed it to you?

This email is the most recent incarnation of a claim we debunked in 2008 and 2010. The conspiracy theory stems from a 2008 speech that then-candidate Obama gave in Colorado. He talked about building up “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military force.

But the doomsayers leave out the context: Obama was proposing strengthening civilian programs such as the State Department’s foreign service, the Peace Corps and AmeriCorps. Not surprisingly, this latest claim describes FEMA Corps, a new unit of AmeriCorps, as an “army.”

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. The thread began with this feature on Mao Zedong's guards...

" The armed men in green uniforms at the gates be longed to he Central Guards Regiment, once known as the legendary unit 8341, which had protected China's leaders since the Revolution. Their success record was remarkable for such a turbulent country. The unit of more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

For Western intelligence, this was one of the least penetrable centers of power in the world. Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated and were ususally from peasant families in remote mountainous ares."
From the novel "Dragonstrike," by Humphrey Hawksley.




Would a free nation require a huge battalion of illiterate devotees surrounding the leader?

Consider the reasons behind "Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated...."

Why would a leader want his personal guards to be 'illiterate or barely educated"?

Would that suggest that he/she was secure in the rectitude of his administration?

Hardly.


Take a look at the product of government schools since Liberals took control of 'em....

See the similarity to above?










There are no coincidences.

Did FEMA Create a Youth Army

The pertinent query is whether or not the petit mal President stated that he needed one.....

...one just like the one dear ol' dad...er, Mao Zedong, had:

"...the legendary unit 8341,which had protected China's [Communist, pathological] leaders since the Revolution. .... more than 8,000 men secured the secrets of the Communist Party.

...Recruits to the Guards Regiment had to be illiterate or barely educated [i.e., government school grads]..."



Did he demand same or not?

I gave you the answer. Do I have to cut it in little pieces and feed it to you?

This email is the most recent incarnation of a claim we debunked in 2008 and 2010. The conspiracy theory stems from a 2008 speech that then-candidate Obama gave in Colorado. He talked about building up “a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded” as our military force.

But the doomsayers leave out the context: Obama was proposing strengthening civilian programs such as the State Department’s foreign service, the Peace Corps and AmeriCorps. Not surprisingly, this latest claim describes FEMA Corps, a new unit of AmeriCorps, as an “army.”

I asked you if the idea came from your hero....

Lots of verbiage when "yes" would do.
Are you afraid of the answer?


Reminder:

 

[Wry Catcher]

6. Pointing out the similarities between of communists, Nazis, socialists, Liberals, and Progressives, does not mean that all use the same methods to attain them.....that is often the argument designed to derail the comparison.

But that defense fall short , as the argument is not based on point-for-point comparison....



"The excesses of the European versions of fascism were mitigated by the specific history and culture of America, Jeffersonian individualism, heterogeneity of the population, but the central theme is still an all-encompassing state that centralizes power to perfect human nature by controlling every aspect of life., albeit at the loss of what had hitherfore been accepted as ‘inalienable human rights.’

The dichotomy that is today’s political reality is based on this retreat, as the American left simply flipped from the brown-shirt utopians to the red-flag utopians, parroting Stalin’s rhetoric: anything objectionable is fascist."
Goldberg



And this is how the American Left managed that 'flip:'

a. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II.
After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.

“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism



b. " Fascism did not acquire an evil name in Washington until Hitler became a menace to·the Soviet Union."
Manly, "The Twenty Year Revolution," p. 48

Jonah Goldbergen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonah_Goldberg

An appeal to authority? LOL, he's Hannity but with an infamous mom.

1. Have you read Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism"?

Of course you haven't.

It was thoroughly sourced.


2.How often must everyone be exposed to the imbecility of folks like you who attack the messenger because you cannot, as much as you yearn to, deny the truth of what is said?

Not doubt you are a government school dropout.

Half-truth, ^^^ as usual. Graduated from CAL, Master's Degree from San Francisco St. U.

Copy some of your posts, have someone with a real education author a nice cover letter suggesting that your will keep said Alma mater a secret....

...and I'll bet they offer to return every cent of tuition.

Scholarship bimbo, Scholarship.

Tell me why you are so filled with hate by anyone who disagrees and (like me) also laughs at your obsessive and narcissistic borrowed musings? Understanding others is a professional attribute of street cops, and other members of the law enforcement community - like me - who have academic and practical experience in such studies.

Those who don't - like Zimmerman, and the cops of late who have killed needlessly or acted with wanton disregard for other human beings, are not much different than the callous conservatives, and of course narcissists, for each individual who acts in such a manner lacks empathy. Empathy is common trait among those who commit crimes against a person, and those who support government policies which will harm the poor, the working poor and those who receive government benefits.

I find your threads all the same, too many words, supported by too many obscure authorities. You might as well post comments by Palin, Beck, Bachmann or Trump; Homer Simpson is much more sagacious than that foursome.

And BTW, I don't recall you posting anything which resembled a solution to the many problems which face our nation, other than your usual RED SCARE theme. "Ain't it awful" is a bit more than a whine, it is your genre of choice and described in detail in Eric Berne's "Games People Play"; read it, you'll find many more of the games you play therein.