kaz
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 78,025
- 22,327
I thought that was just implicit... Yes, if your a private, non-commercial, property owner... 'carte blanche' on making it 'whatever zone' that floats your boat... like for instance, a 'progressive free zone'..Legislate that all 'gun free zones' have armed professionals guarding them. This would be cost prohibitive, discouraging 'GFZ's' in the first place, which is the best thing that we could hope for... legally armed citizenry free to carry in those "zones".I'm a 'gun rights' guy... I think it's time for new laws.... of the top of my head I think the 'reciprocity carry' legislation is spot on... I can give you a few more that I'd love to talk about if your so inclined...No one is pumping fists over kids dying.
The problem is, when one of these events happens gun rights people say it isn't the time to talk about new laws... but when is? Next week when the next shooting happens? Or the week after that? Or maybe the week after that?
Congress won't even pass a law to prevent people on terrorist watch lists from buying guns.
I would be. I started a thread to get ideas like that. Would love to hear yours.
Keeping guns from criminals - liberals, what is your plan?
I agree with that on public property. Private property should be the rules of the owner
I didn't mean it as disputing you, only clarifying. I'm all for a good progressive free zone