There is no evidence Joe Biden took a bribe.

Which is why the evidence matters:

- Hunter's Laptop e-mails
Nothing in the emails implicate Joe Biden
- The financial documents showing the money being deposited at the time this happened
Nothing in the documents implicate Joe Biden
- The whistleblower / Burisma Exec who paid the bribe
The same exec Biden got Shokin fired for not investigating yeah, his word is spit. Let's see his evidence.
- The audiotapes he recorded
OAN played one, and it didn't implicate Joe Biden. Why didn't they play the one that did? Answer: It doesn't exist.
- The videotape of Biden bragging how he did exactly what he was paid to do - extort the Ukraine PM into firing the prosecutor investigating Burisma and Hunter Biden
Debunked. Debunking the Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory
'Fake News'
-- 1 maybe

All of the evidence considered?
-- Irrational partisan denial

All of what evidence? There is no evidence.
 
The 1023 form is NOT proof of squat, says so right on the FBI website:

...the FD-1023 is the form our special agents use to record raw, unverified reporting from confidential human sources (CHSs). FD-1023s merely document that information; they do not reflect the conclusions of investigators based on a fuller context or understanding. Recording this information does not validate it, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information known or developed by the FBI in our investigations.

You can repeat your lies as many times as you want doesn't make them true.
 
You hope like hell they aren’t real…But, not to worry, more evidence is being gathered as we type…

You think that after all these months and the right exclaiming 'evidence' they would have produced it by now.

The only evidence they come up with is the kind that will NOT prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

Innuendo won't prove it

Affidavits won't prove it.

Documents that don't implicate Joe Biden won't prove it

Emails that do not implicate Joe Biden will not prove it.

Joe's Ukraine video only proves he was engaging in foreign policy.

Photos of Joe with Hunter's biz associates doesn't prove anything more than photos of Trump and Epstein prove that Trump is a pedophile.

Testimonies without corroborative evidence by disgruntled business associates do not prove it.

Where are the copies of bank documents to accounts that Joe Biden's is signatory? There are none
Where are the copies of tapes of Joe Biden admitting to bribes? There are none.
 
You think that after all these months and the right exclaiming 'evidence' they would have produced it by now.

The only evidence they come up with is the kind that will NOT prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

Innuendo won't prove it

Affidavits won't prove it.

Documents that don't implicate Joe Biden won't prove it

Emails that do not implicate Joe Biden will not prove it.

Joe's Ukraine video only proves he was engaging in foreign policy.

Photos of Joe with Hunter's biz associates doesn't prove anything more than photos of Trump and Epstein prove that Trump is a pedophile.

Testimonies without corroborative evidence by disgruntled business associates do not prove it.

Where are the copies of bank documents to accounts that Joe Biden's is signatory? There are none
Where are the copies of tapes of Joe Biden admitting to bribes? There are none.
It's only been about four months of investigations........started just about the same time you suddenly showed up here.
 
You're cherry picking parts to conveniently believe.

The fact if the matter is a vice president does not have the authority to withhold such aid, approved by the Congress and the president, without the president's consent and approval.
True.

Who said he was able to do it?
 
You think that after all these months and the right exclaiming 'evidence' they would have produced it by now.

The only evidence they come up with is the kind that will NOT prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

Innuendo won't prove it

Affidavits won't prove it.

Documents that don't implicate Joe Biden won't prove it

Emails that do not implicate Joe Biden will not prove it.

Joe's Ukraine video only proves he was engaging in foreign policy.

Photos of Joe with Hunter's biz associates doesn't prove anything more than photos of Trump and Epstein prove that Trump is a pedophile.

Testimonies without corroborative evidence by disgruntled business associates do not prove it.

Where are the copies of bank documents to accounts that Joe Biden's is signatory? There are none
Where are the copies of tapes of Joe Biden admitting to bribes? There are none.
Lots to go through there.....But I guess when the FBI, and DoJ is totally corrupt, things like this happen, and people like you excuse it because it's your favored politician....That's disgusting.
 
What a shame neither of your links say any money from the Chinese went to the Penn-Biden Center.

:itsok:
Laughing%20at%20you-S.jpg
 
You think that after all these months and the right exclaiming 'evidence' they would have produced it by now.

The only evidence they come up with is the kind that will NOT prove 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.

Innuendo won't prove it

Affidavits won't prove it.

Documents that don't implicate Joe Biden won't prove it

Emails that do not implicate Joe Biden will not prove it.

Joe's Ukraine video only proves he was engaging in foreign policy.

Photos of Joe with Hunter's biz associates doesn't prove anything more than photos of Trump and Epstein prove that Trump is a pedophile.

Testimonies without corroborative evidence by disgruntled business associates do not prove it.

Where are the copies of bank documents to accounts that Joe Biden's is signatory? There are none
Where are the copies of tapes of Joe Biden admitting to bribes? There are none.
Democrats are burnt toast in America, fuck off with your bullshit. Who fucked up 99.9% of Americans' lives? Democrats.

NOW GO FUCK YOURSELF WITH A CACTUS.
 
Nothing in the emails implicate Joe Biden

Nothing in the documents implicate Joe Biden

The same exec Biden got Shokin fired for not investigating yeah, his word is spit. Let's see his evidence.

OAN played one, and it didn't implicate Joe Biden. Why didn't they play the one that did? Answer: It doesn't exist.

Debunked. Debunking the Biden-Ukraine conspiracy theory

All of what evidence? There is no evidence.
Laughing%20at%20you-S.jpg
 
What a shame neither of your links say any money from the Chinese went to the Penn-Biden Center.

:itsok:
What part of this didn't you understand?

$54M in Chinese gifts donated to UPenn, home of Biden Center


How much of a dumbfuck are?
 
Lots to go through there.....But I guess when the FBI, and DoJ is totally corrupt, things like this happen, and people like you excuse it because it's your favored politician....That's disgusting.

Your reply contains nothing substantive.

Vacuous claims are not competent arguments.
 
It's only been about four months of investigations........started just about the same time you suddenly showed up here.
after 5 years all Weiss came up with are 2 misdemeanors. After 4 years all Durham got was, squat.
My appearance is irrelevant.
 

Burisma execs set up bank account for Hunter Biden that was shut down for money laundering violations: report​


There is no proof in that article that Hunter was part of the money laundering.

You come to my bank. I give you an account.

My bank is investigated and your account is closed.

Does that prove you committed a crime?

No. it doesn't. But, mindless dumbass republicans will see the article and assume they are complicit.

You guys really do not know what the difference between innuendo and hard evidence is.

Rumpole queries AI:
Is there anything in this article that implicates, with direct evidence, Hunter or Joe Biden? (I quote the full article).

ChatGPT-4 responds:
Based on the information provided in the article, there is no direct evidence implicating Hunter or Joe Biden in any illegal activities related to the bank account set up by Burisma executives or the subsequent money laundering investigations.

The article mentions that emails from Hunter Biden's laptop reveal his involvement in setting up a bank account with Satabank, and it suggests that the bank later faced money laundering investigations. However, there is no direct evidence presented in the article that connects the Bidens to the alleged money laundering violations or implicates them in any wrongdoing.

Senator Ron Johnson's comments mentioned in the article express his suspicions about the Bidens' associations with alleged money launderers and raise questions about the FBI's knowledge and actions. However, suspicions and questions do not constitute direct evidence of wrongdoing.

It's important to approach such claims with critical thinking and evaluate the credibility of the sources.
 

Forum List

Back
Top