Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where did the Penn Biden center come from? Who paid for it?
$54M in Chinese gifts donated to UPenn, home of Biden Center
The University of Pennsylvania raked in a total of $54.6 million from 2014 through June 2019 in donations from China.nypost.com
The shell game....So you say.
The shell game....
President Biden voluntarily releases his tax returns and other financial disclosure reports that are required by law. But members of elected officials’ families are not required to disclose anything, leaving a very easy way for any deep-pocketed individual or institution to purchase a friendship with someone who has the politician’s ear.
One or more of the committee members made a comment about the shell companies where it was stated by Hunter, I think, that it will take 10 years to figure out the shell companies. Interesting.
Are they done with the investigation?And still... no proof.
How sad.
Are they done with the investigation?
I must have missed it.
Posting what has been publicly released so far. You don't like it, don't read it.They haven't. Still, why are you posting as though they've proven anything yet?
Yeah. Allegations and accusations.Posting what has been publicly released so far. You don't like it, don't read it.
Just like the Trump case.Yeah. Allegations and accusations.
What about it?So you don't believe him when he said at the same time, he would withhold the aid??
They lie, like they always do.No, not like that. In this case, the DoJ says they have the goods and indicted Trump.
What about it?
They lie, like they always do.
It's always interesting to watch. They'll take one fact, add in some assumptions and some blog posts and "this could have happened", and draw a final conclusion that always fits their ideology. It can actually START with a fact, but the rest is fantasy.And still... no proof.
How sad.
The 1023 says otherwise
As usual, no proof of squat, just empty ad homs which have no argumentative value.
just like the Steele dossier.The 1023 form is NOT proof of squat, says so right on the FBI website:
...the FD-1023 is the form our special agents use to record raw, unverified reporting from confidential human sources (CHSs). FD-1023s merely document that information; they do not reflect the conclusions of investigators based on a fuller context or understanding. Recording this information does not validate it, establish its credibility, or weigh it against other information known or developed by the FBI in our investigations.
The 1023 form is NOT proof of squat, says so right on the FBI website:
As usual, no proof of squat, just empty ad homs which have no argumentative value.
And you won't until the committee makes public their findings.
It's that simple.
