They Don't Care Who They Defame

[otto105]

Another failed wingnut conspiracy sold to the alt-white minions.

I always get a kick out of the sort of moron who links to a post, knows it irritates him, but can't quite figure out how to refute it, dispute it, or even disagree with it.


Love gettin' under their skin....truth does that.

What truth are you actually posting?

The Democrats.....the Liberals/Progressives.

In his book written about Bill 'the rapist' Clinton, author James Stewart referred to their version of politics as a "Blood Sport."

1. As I write this, Historian/academic Svetlana Lokhova is being interviewed on the Dennis Prager radio show, and her story is just one more revelation about how low the Democrat Party has sunk.

In there attempt to reverse the 2016 election, the Left formulated the Deep State FBI/CIA assault on our democracy. One attack was against then-Defense Intelligence Agency Director Michael Flynn, using a Cambridge dinner party during which Ms Lokhova was asked to explain her research into Russian intelligence agencies to Flynn.

2. "...the Russian-born academic soon found herself, in her words, "collateral damage" in the controversies surrounding the Trump administration and the swirl of allegations about Russian espionage.

The claims revolved around her contact with Gen Michael Flynn in Cambridge in 2014. Flynn resigned after just 24 days as US National Security Adviser after allegations he had failed to be honest about contacts with the Russian Ambassador to the US during the transition to the Trump administration.

After his resignation in February, there were reports in the US and UK media about Lokhova, including the claim that Flynn's contact with Lokhova "troubled" US intelligence officials. On social media, the suggestion was that she was some kind of Russian spy or honeytrap.
At the dinner she was seated a fair distance away from Flynn. After more senior officials had talked, junior members were asked to talk about their research.

As an expert on Soviet intelligence in the 1930s, Lokhova says she was asked to present some of her research."
A Russian honeytrap for Gen Flynn? Not me...




3. Lokhova sued FBI informant Stephen Halper for originating and spreading the rumor at the behest of those out to damage Flynn, and by extension, Trump.

4. "Intelligence scholar sues Cambridge academic, U.S. news outlets over reports on Flynn links
“Stefan Halper is a ratf----- and a spy, who embroiled an innocent woman in a conspiracy to undo the 2016 Presidential election and topple the President of the United States of America,” Lokhova alleges in the 66-page complaint."
Intelligence scholar sues Cambridge academic, U.S. news outlets over reports on Flynn links



5."A Defense Department audit earlier this year revealed more than $1 million in contracts awarded to Halper between 2012 and 2018, with the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment unable to provide “sufficient” documentation of whether Halper was doing the research work he’d been hired to do. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is continuing to push for answers."
FBI spy Stefan Halper wants case dismissed after being called a 'rat f---er'


6. "Stefan Halper, the shadowy Cambridge academic who may have helped the FBI spy on the Trump campaign, was paid more than $1 million by a U.S. agency ....Halper managed to collect $1.05 million from the office over four years for work that appears to be barely supervised and of dubious value."
The Labyrinthine Ways and Wages of Stefan Halper | RealClearPolitics



Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.




Good that you've admitted that reading is not your forte.

Confession is good for the soul.

This has absolutely nothing to do with Flynn's lies about his contacts with the Russian Ambassador.

What you have presented is misdirection bullshit.

I've proven that the Deep State set Flynn up by bribing Stephen Halper to start a rumor that had not the slightest bit of truth in it.


You've proven that morons cannot admit the truth irks them, and cannot hide the juvenile vulgarity that proves it.

You haven't proven the "Deep State" exists nor that it set Flynn up.

What makes you think that?

 

[PoliticalChic]

I always get a kick out of the sort of moron who links to a post, knows it irritates him, but can't quite figure out how to refute it, dispute it, or even disagree with it.


Love gettin' under their skin....truth does that.

What truth are you actually posting?

The Democrats.....the Liberals/Progressives.

In his book written about Bill 'the rapist' Clinton, author James Stewart referred to their version of politics as a "Blood Sport."

1. As I write this, Historian/academic Svetlana Lokhova is being interviewed on the Dennis Prager radio show, and her story is just one more revelation about how low the Democrat Party has sunk.

In there attempt to reverse the 2016 election, the Left formulated the Deep State FBI/CIA assault on our democracy. One attack was against then-Defense Intelligence Agency Director Michael Flynn, using a Cambridge dinner party during which Ms Lokhova was asked to explain her research into Russian intelligence agencies to Flynn.

2. "...the Russian-born academic soon found herself, in her words, "collateral damage" in the controversies surrounding the Trump administration and the swirl of allegations about Russian espionage.

The claims revolved around her contact with Gen Michael Flynn in Cambridge in 2014. Flynn resigned after just 24 days as US National Security Adviser after allegations he had failed to be honest about contacts with the Russian Ambassador to the US during the transition to the Trump administration.

After his resignation in February, there were reports in the US and UK media about Lokhova, including the claim that Flynn's contact with Lokhova "troubled" US intelligence officials. On social media, the suggestion was that she was some kind of Russian spy or honeytrap.
At the dinner she was seated a fair distance away from Flynn. After more senior officials had talked, junior members were asked to talk about their research.

As an expert on Soviet intelligence in the 1930s, Lokhova says she was asked to present some of her research."
A Russian honeytrap for Gen Flynn? Not me...




3. Lokhova sued FBI informant Stephen Halper for originating and spreading the rumor at the behest of those out to damage Flynn, and by extension, Trump.

4. "Intelligence scholar sues Cambridge academic, U.S. news outlets over reports on Flynn links
“Stefan Halper is a ratf----- and a spy, who embroiled an innocent woman in a conspiracy to undo the 2016 Presidential election and topple the President of the United States of America,” Lokhova alleges in the 66-page complaint."
Intelligence scholar sues Cambridge academic, U.S. news outlets over reports on Flynn links



5."A Defense Department audit earlier this year revealed more than $1 million in contracts awarded to Halper between 2012 and 2018, with the Pentagon’s Office of Net Assessment unable to provide “sufficient” documentation of whether Halper was doing the research work he’d been hired to do. Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, is continuing to push for answers."
FBI spy Stefan Halper wants case dismissed after being called a 'rat f---er'


6. "Stefan Halper, the shadowy Cambridge academic who may have helped the FBI spy on the Trump campaign, was paid more than $1 million by a U.S. agency ....Halper managed to collect $1.05 million from the office over four years for work that appears to be barely supervised and of dubious value."
The Labyrinthine Ways and Wages of Stefan Halper | RealClearPolitics



Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.




Good that you've admitted that reading is not your forte.

Confession is good for the soul.

This has absolutely nothing to do with Flynn's lies about his contacts with the Russian Ambassador.

What you have presented is misdirection bullshit.

I've proven that the Deep State set Flynn up by bribing Stephen Halper to start a rumor that had not the slightest bit of truth in it.


You've proven that morons cannot admit the truth irks them, and cannot hide the juvenile vulgarity that proves it.

You haven't proven the "Deep State" exists nor that it set Flynn up.

What makes you think that?

I always get a kick out of the sort of moron who links to a post, knows it irritates him, but can't quite figure out how to refute it, dispute it, or even disagree with it.


Love gettin' under their skin....truth does that.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When it became evident that a coterie of career government officials was out to form a coup, and depose a duly elected President......remember all the fools who denied that there is a Deep State????


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily

 

[otto105]

When it became evident that a coterie of career government officials was out to form a coup, and depose a duly elected President......remember all the fools who denied that there is a Deep State????


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily

The "deep state" is a libertarian myth.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When it became evident that a coterie of career government officials was out to form a coup, and depose a duly elected President......remember all the fools who denied that there is a Deep State????


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily

The "deep state" is a libertarian myth.

The only myth in evidence is the claim that your IQ is beyond single digits.





Turns out there is a Deep State….


There is that aroma of irony around the topic: the same folks who rant that there is no God, are the very same ranting that there is no 'Deep State'.....while big government and its Deep State IS their god!


1." I know opponents of President Donald Trump roll their eyes in ridicule at the mere suggestion of a deep state committed to undermining Trump's agenda. That's the stuff of paranoid conspiracy theorists or unhinged Trumpublican tribalists, they say.

2. Well, James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, has shown, again, that there is a "there" there.

3. ...unelected leftist bureaucrats embedded in the bowels of the federal government have been lawlessly targeting conservatives and abusing their power to thwart the agenda of duly elected Republican policymakers. The proof keeps pouring in.




4. The Obama administration's IRS deliberately discriminated against conservative groups in their applications for tax-exempt status. This isn't an empty partisan allegation from an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy." In 2013, an IRS official admitted scrutinizing groups with right wing identifying names, such as "Tea Party" and "patriots." An inspector general's report that year confirmed this nefarious practice.

5. At least two groups of cases were settled in 2017 with the IRS agreeing to a "substantial financial settlement" in one and expressing "its sincere apology" in another. This is the kind of tyrannical behavior that liberals used to care about.

6. In a case involving the Linchpins of Liberty and some 40 other conservative organizations, the IRS confessed that it used "heighted scrutiny and inordinate delays" and required unnecessary information in its review of applications for tax-exemptions.

7. In the NorCal Tea Party Patriots case, involving more than 400 groups, plaintiffs contended the IRS used their tax information for improper purposes.



8. ...James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, ....recently released secret videotapes in which some of these boorish bureaucrats brazenly admit their chicanery, and even brag about it.

9. On Tuesday, Project Veritas released the first of its tapes unmasking these proud pinheads boasting of sabotaging the Trump agenda. The video features State Department employee Stuart Karaffa, a smarmy, self-proclaimed socialist using his government position to resist official Trump administration policies. Karaffa is a member of the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America...

10. He admits to drafting DSA communications at his worksite. "I'm careful about it," says Karaffa. "I don't leave a paper trail, like I leave emails, and like any press s--- that comes up, I leave that until after 5:30. But as soon as 5:31 hits, got my like draft messages ready to send out." Precious."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded

11. "Karaffa's arrogance is astounding. He says he doesn't believe he'll be caught and punished, saying, "Maybe someday I'll go to board of elections jail, probably not." But what comes next is way worse and ought to infuriate all federal taxpayers. "I have nothing to lose," he adds. "It's impossible to fire federal employees." He also expresses confidence that none of his superiors will detect his conflicts of interest even though he openly discloses them on his required forms. "Somebody just rubber stamps and it goes forward ... I don't know if (the ethics officer is) is all there. He's so checked out." Well, that's comforting.

Most outrageous was Karaffa's description of his objective toward the administration's official policies: "Resist everything ... Every level. F--- s--- up."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



12. "...Project Veritas exposes Department of Justice paralegal Allison Hrabar reportedly using government hardware and software as part of her socialist activism, and Jessica Schubel, former chief of staff for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under the Obama administration, attempting to thwart Trump's agenda.

Hrabar, also a member of Metro DC DSA, was supposedly one of those who chased Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen from a D.C.-area restaurant. That was beyond despicable. Hrabar allegedly uses the LexisNexis search engine on her work computer to find home addresses for DSA protests, such as that of D.C. lobbyist Jeremy Wiley. She reportedly ran his license plate to help locate his home. Hrabar smugly brags that as an employee of the DOJ, "We can't like get fired."


Schubel admits on the tape to the existence of "a little resistance movement" within the federal government, and says that her friends at the Department of Health and Human Services give her confidential information before it is officially released. "Yeah. It's kind of like the Nixon, deep throat type of thing," she gloats. She further admits, "There's a lot of talk about how we can like, resist from inside (the Justice Department)."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



13. So....there certainly is a Deep State......and the Deep State, is populated by Obamunists....

Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



The vote by the public is meaningless as long as these curs abound.



Not that there should be any doubt of my pronouncements,...e.g., that there is a Deep State of agency officials tied to the Democrats, the Left....proof has just been provided


"Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump’s campaign.

Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm.

That’s the firm used by the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign to secretly pay research firmFusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election."
Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant



Turns out I'm right again.....

....and I'm not getting tired of winning.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
• The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
• The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

 

[OldLady]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• 
  
  
  • Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
  • The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
  • The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• 
  
  
  • Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
  • The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
  • The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

The Republicans are strongly focused on winning the 2020 election.
The Democrats are strongly focused on winning the 2016 election.


It is the Obamunist's attempt at a coup.

 

[MeBelle]

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Link to your assertion, please?

I've never heard this theory before.

 

[iceberg]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• 
  
  
  • Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
  • The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
  • The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Then why did this person call ot a coup LONG BEFORE trump said that infamous line on the phone?

Would seem that they have been lookong fkr reaso s since then to IMPEACH 45, making them once again likely pulli g a kavanaugh.

 

[OldLady]

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Link to your assertion, please?

I've never heard this theory before.

Good one.

 

[OldLady]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• 
  
  
  • Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
  • The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
  • The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Then why did this person call ot a coup LONG BEFORE trump said that infamous line on the phone?

Would seem that they have been lookong fkr reaso s since then to IMPEACH 45, making them once again likely pulli g a kavanaugh.

No, this is not a tsk tsk tsk Kavanaugh misbehaved in high school ad hominem attack. You truly can't see the difference?
Why do Trump supporters call us Nazi's? Communists? That isn't true, either. Do you take everything people say when they're dribbling political rah-rah seriously?
All I see is his one tweet, not the context he was responding to. A lot of tweets can conveniently be taken out of context and twisted to fit a conspiracy theorists' mad dreams.
I'm not convinced. I was convinced that Pelosi unethically used the Kavanaugh complaint like a cat dragging home a dead mole, but I am not at all convinced that is what the whistleblower was about. What he said has been confirmed by diplomats in Trump's own administration. How much more do you need to be convinced?

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Link to your assertion, please?

I've never heard this theory before.

Good one.

So MeBelle has established that you have no such link, and you simply made up the charge out of a fevered imagination.

Excellent.


Dismissed.

 

[MeBelle]

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Link to your assertion, please?

I've never heard this theory before.

Good one.

Thank you...

No link?

OK...

 

[PoliticalChic]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• 
  
  
  • Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
  • The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
  • The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Then why did this person call ot a coup LONG BEFORE trump said that infamous line on the phone?

Would seem that they have been lookong fkr reaso s since then to IMPEACH 45, making them once again likely pulli g a kavanaugh.

No, this is not a tsk tsk tsk Kavanaugh misbehaved in high school ad hominem attack. You truly can't see the difference?
Why do Trump supporters call us Nazi's? Communists? That isn't true, either. Do you take everything people say when they're dribbling political rah-rah seriously?
All I see is his one tweet, not the context he was responding to. A lot of tweets can conveniently be taken out of context and twisted to fit a conspiracy theorists' mad dreams.
I'm not convinced. I was convinced that Pelosi unethically used the Kavanaugh complaint like a cat dragging home a dead mole, but I am not at all convinced that is what the whistleblower was about. What he said has been confirmed by diplomats in Trump's own administration. How much more do you need to be convinced?

"Why do Trump supporters call us Nazi's? Communists?"

Because it is true....Democrats stand for the very same aims as the communists, and Nazis took their doctrines from Marx just as Communists do.



These were listed as the aims of the communist party, (CPUSA) after the war, and, to an almost 100% extent, they the same as today's Liberals/Progressives/Democrats.



1. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.


2. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.


3. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.





4. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.


5. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.


6. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.





7. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.


8. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."





9. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."







10. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.


11. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

12. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.


13. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce


Now....wouldn't an honest appraisal agree that all or almost all are clearly the aims and direction of Democrats/Liberals/Progressive leaders?



I got 'em from a website of declared communist goals...

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals

The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals





I consider you to be proof of reincarnation. No one could possibly get to be so stupid in just one lifetime.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• 
  
  
  • Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
  • The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
  • The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Then why did this person call ot a coup LONG BEFORE trump said that infamous line on the phone?

Would seem that they have been lookong fkr reaso s since then to IMPEACH 45, making them once again likely pulli g a kavanaugh.

No, this is not a tsk tsk tsk Kavanaugh misbehaved in high school ad hominem attack. You truly can't see the difference?
Why do Trump supporters call us Nazi's? Communists? That isn't true, either. Do you take everything people say when they're dribbling political rah-rah seriously?
All I see is his one tweet, not the context he was responding to. A lot of tweets can conveniently be taken out of context and twisted to fit a conspiracy theorists' mad dreams.
I'm not convinced. I was convinced that Pelosi unethically used the Kavanaugh complaint like a cat dragging home a dead mole, but I am not at all convinced that is what the whistleblower was about. What he said has been confirmed by diplomats in Trump's own administration. How much more do you need to be convinced?

Wrong.


Document reveals Ukraine had already reopened probe of Hunter Biden-linked firm months before Trump phone call
Document reveals Ukraine had already reopened probe of Hunter Biden-linked firm months before Trump phone call


Sooo….there could not have been either quid pro quo, or pressure put on Urkainian president.

 

[iceberg]

"It’s always been a “coup” attempt,...
When Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the so-called “whistleblower,” tweeted on January 30, 2017, that the “#coup has started,” he was telling the truth.

On December 12, 2016, a month after the presidential election and a month before Trump’s Inauguration, I called the attempt to nullify the 2016 election a “coup” attempt.

The issue at that time was the interference with the Electoral College by intimidating Electors into changing their votes using the now-debunked claim of Russia collusion as the excuse, The one thing you must understand about the unfolding media-Democrat Electoral College coup attempt:

We are witnessing nothing short of an attempt to steal the election by some Democrats and a very supportive mainstream and leftwing media, by causing Electors in the Electoral College to go rogue and vote for Hillary, or at least not vote for Trump.

Since then as attempts to unseat Trump by any excuse and means possible developed, we used that C-word numerous times and noted the use of the term by others:

• 
  
  
  • Some dare call the anti-Trump feeding frenzy a “coup” attempt (May 18, 2017)
  • The Slow-Motion Coup d’Etat picks up steam (August 3, 2017)
  • The coup has failed, but continues (March 24, 2019)

So when Mark Zaid, a lawyer for the “whistleblower” was revealed to have described the efforts to unseat Trump as a coup soon after the Inauguration, consider me not shocked. On January 30, 2017, he tweeted:

#coup has started

It's always been a "coup" attempt, so let's stop shying away from that C-word

It's not a coup. It is people trying to stop a President from abusing his authority using the tax payers' money for personal gain.

Then why did this person call ot a coup LONG BEFORE trump said that infamous line on the phone?

Would seem that they have been lookong fkr reaso s since then to IMPEACH 45, making them once again likely pulli g a kavanaugh.

No, this is not a tsk tsk tsk Kavanaugh misbehaved in high school ad hominem attack. You truly can't see the difference?
Why do Trump supporters call us Nazi's? Communists? That isn't true, either. Do you take everything people say when they're dribbling political rah-rah seriously?
All I see is his one tweet, not the context he was responding to. A lot of tweets can conveniently be taken out of context and twisted to fit a conspiracy theorists' mad dreams.
I'm not convinced. I was convinced that Pelosi unethically used the Kavanaugh complaint like a cat dragging home a dead mole, but I am not at all convinced that is what the whistleblower was about. What he said has been confirmed by diplomats in Trump's own administration. How much more do you need to be convinced?

kavanaugh didn't misbehave however. he was just accused of rape and sexual assault. are you actually calling their accusations "misbehaving"? that would seem, to me, to greatly minimize what they did to the man because they in the end didn't like his "potential" stance against abortions. do you not see this difference?

why do any of the vast majority of people name call? i try to NOT do the nazi / communist thing so when i happen to do it, call me on it. but please don't ask me to defend people who do in fact go ape-shit batty at the name calling. i do however see a TON of the left do the mysoginist, nazi, facist, white supremecist on a daily basis. can you tell me why the left does this to the right so quickly and often? their behavior isn't something you can control either so i wouldn't put that on you.

now, the left and kavanaugh - they lied. they made up the entire sexual assault story to get what they wanted. once i see people so willing to do this to others, why should i believe this is not another "lie" to get what they want? this seems to be how they do things, justified by their emotional wants at the time.

 

[otto105]

When it became evident that a coterie of career government officials was out to form a coup, and depose a duly elected President......remember all the fools who denied that there is a Deep State????


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily

The "deep state" is a libertarian myth.

The only myth in evidence is the claim that your IQ is beyond single digits.





Turns out there is a Deep State….


There is that aroma of irony around the topic: the same folks who rant that there is no God, are the very same ranting that there is no 'Deep State'.....while big government and its Deep State IS their god!


1." I know opponents of President Donald Trump roll their eyes in ridicule at the mere suggestion of a deep state committed to undermining Trump's agenda. That's the stuff of paranoid conspiracy theorists or unhinged Trumpublican tribalists, they say.

2. Well, James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, has shown, again, that there is a "there" there.

3. ...unelected leftist bureaucrats embedded in the bowels of the federal government have been lawlessly targeting conservatives and abusing their power to thwart the agenda of duly elected Republican policymakers. The proof keeps pouring in.




4. The Obama administration's IRS deliberately discriminated against conservative groups in their applications for tax-exempt status. This isn't an empty partisan allegation from an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy." In 2013, an IRS official admitted scrutinizing groups with right wing identifying names, such as "Tea Party" and "patriots." An inspector general's report that year confirmed this nefarious practice.

5. At least two groups of cases were settled in 2017 with the IRS agreeing to a "substantial financial settlement" in one and expressing "its sincere apology" in another. This is the kind of tyrannical behavior that liberals used to care about.

6. In a case involving the Linchpins of Liberty and some 40 other conservative organizations, the IRS confessed that it used "heighted scrutiny and inordinate delays" and required unnecessary information in its review of applications for tax-exemptions.

7. In the NorCal Tea Party Patriots case, involving more than 400 groups, plaintiffs contended the IRS used their tax information for improper purposes.



8. ...James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, ....recently released secret videotapes in which some of these boorish bureaucrats brazenly admit their chicanery, and even brag about it.

9. On Tuesday, Project Veritas released the first of its tapes unmasking these proud pinheads boasting of sabotaging the Trump agenda. The video features State Department employee Stuart Karaffa, a smarmy, self-proclaimed socialist using his government position to resist official Trump administration policies. Karaffa is a member of the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America...

10. He admits to drafting DSA communications at his worksite. "I'm careful about it," says Karaffa. "I don't leave a paper trail, like I leave emails, and like any press s--- that comes up, I leave that until after 5:30. But as soon as 5:31 hits, got my like draft messages ready to send out." Precious."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded

11. "Karaffa's arrogance is astounding. He says he doesn't believe he'll be caught and punished, saying, "Maybe someday I'll go to board of elections jail, probably not." But what comes next is way worse and ought to infuriate all federal taxpayers. "I have nothing to lose," he adds. "It's impossible to fire federal employees." He also expresses confidence that none of his superiors will detect his conflicts of interest even though he openly discloses them on his required forms. "Somebody just rubber stamps and it goes forward ... I don't know if (the ethics officer is) is all there. He's so checked out." Well, that's comforting.

Most outrageous was Karaffa's description of his objective toward the administration's official policies: "Resist everything ... Every level. F--- s--- up."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



12. "...Project Veritas exposes Department of Justice paralegal Allison Hrabar reportedly using government hardware and software as part of her socialist activism, and Jessica Schubel, former chief of staff for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under the Obama administration, attempting to thwart Trump's agenda.

Hrabar, also a member of Metro DC DSA, was supposedly one of those who chased Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen from a D.C.-area restaurant. That was beyond despicable. Hrabar allegedly uses the LexisNexis search engine on her work computer to find home addresses for DSA protests, such as that of D.C. lobbyist Jeremy Wiley. She reportedly ran his license plate to help locate his home. Hrabar smugly brags that as an employee of the DOJ, "We can't like get fired."


Schubel admits on the tape to the existence of "a little resistance movement" within the federal government, and says that her friends at the Department of Health and Human Services give her confidential information before it is officially released. "Yeah. It's kind of like the Nixon, deep throat type of thing," she gloats. She further admits, "There's a lot of talk about how we can like, resist from inside (the Justice Department)."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



13. So....there certainly is a Deep State......and the Deep State, is populated by Obamunists....

Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



The vote by the public is meaningless as long as these curs abound.



Not that there should be any doubt of my pronouncements,...e.g., that there is a Deep State of agency officials tied to the Democrats, the Left....proof has just been provided


"Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump’s campaign.

Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm.

That’s the firm used by the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign to secretly pay research firmFusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election."
Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant



Turns out I'm right again.....

....and I'm not getting tired of winning.

You have neither won or proved anything.


You have merely bored the living shit out of anyone who reads your BS.

 

[PoliticalChic]

When it became evident that a coterie of career government officials was out to form a coup, and depose a duly elected President......remember all the fools who denied that there is a Deep State????


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily

The "deep state" is a libertarian myth.

The only myth in evidence is the claim that your IQ is beyond single digits.





Turns out there is a Deep State….


There is that aroma of irony around the topic: the same folks who rant that there is no God, are the very same ranting that there is no 'Deep State'.....while big government and its Deep State IS their god!


1." I know opponents of President Donald Trump roll their eyes in ridicule at the mere suggestion of a deep state committed to undermining Trump's agenda. That's the stuff of paranoid conspiracy theorists or unhinged Trumpublican tribalists, they say.

2. Well, James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, has shown, again, that there is a "there" there.

3. ...unelected leftist bureaucrats embedded in the bowels of the federal government have been lawlessly targeting conservatives and abusing their power to thwart the agenda of duly elected Republican policymakers. The proof keeps pouring in.




4. The Obama administration's IRS deliberately discriminated against conservative groups in their applications for tax-exempt status. This isn't an empty partisan allegation from an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy." In 2013, an IRS official admitted scrutinizing groups with right wing identifying names, such as "Tea Party" and "patriots." An inspector general's report that year confirmed this nefarious practice.

5. At least two groups of cases were settled in 2017 with the IRS agreeing to a "substantial financial settlement" in one and expressing "its sincere apology" in another. This is the kind of tyrannical behavior that liberals used to care about.

6. In a case involving the Linchpins of Liberty and some 40 other conservative organizations, the IRS confessed that it used "heighted scrutiny and inordinate delays" and required unnecessary information in its review of applications for tax-exemptions.

7. In the NorCal Tea Party Patriots case, involving more than 400 groups, plaintiffs contended the IRS used their tax information for improper purposes.



8. ...James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, ....recently released secret videotapes in which some of these boorish bureaucrats brazenly admit their chicanery, and even brag about it.

9. On Tuesday, Project Veritas released the first of its tapes unmasking these proud pinheads boasting of sabotaging the Trump agenda. The video features State Department employee Stuart Karaffa, a smarmy, self-proclaimed socialist using his government position to resist official Trump administration policies. Karaffa is a member of the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America...

10. He admits to drafting DSA communications at his worksite. "I'm careful about it," says Karaffa. "I don't leave a paper trail, like I leave emails, and like any press s--- that comes up, I leave that until after 5:30. But as soon as 5:31 hits, got my like draft messages ready to send out." Precious."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded

11. "Karaffa's arrogance is astounding. He says he doesn't believe he'll be caught and punished, saying, "Maybe someday I'll go to board of elections jail, probably not." But what comes next is way worse and ought to infuriate all federal taxpayers. "I have nothing to lose," he adds. "It's impossible to fire federal employees." He also expresses confidence that none of his superiors will detect his conflicts of interest even though he openly discloses them on his required forms. "Somebody just rubber stamps and it goes forward ... I don't know if (the ethics officer is) is all there. He's so checked out." Well, that's comforting.

Most outrageous was Karaffa's description of his objective toward the administration's official policies: "Resist everything ... Every level. F--- s--- up."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



12. "...Project Veritas exposes Department of Justice paralegal Allison Hrabar reportedly using government hardware and software as part of her socialist activism, and Jessica Schubel, former chief of staff for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under the Obama administration, attempting to thwart Trump's agenda.

Hrabar, also a member of Metro DC DSA, was supposedly one of those who chased Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen from a D.C.-area restaurant. That was beyond despicable. Hrabar allegedly uses the LexisNexis search engine on her work computer to find home addresses for DSA protests, such as that of D.C. lobbyist Jeremy Wiley. She reportedly ran his license plate to help locate his home. Hrabar smugly brags that as an employee of the DOJ, "We can't like get fired."


Schubel admits on the tape to the existence of "a little resistance movement" within the federal government, and says that her friends at the Department of Health and Human Services give her confidential information before it is officially released. "Yeah. It's kind of like the Nixon, deep throat type of thing," she gloats. She further admits, "There's a lot of talk about how we can like, resist from inside (the Justice Department)."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



13. So....there certainly is a Deep State......and the Deep State, is populated by Obamunists....

Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



The vote by the public is meaningless as long as these curs abound.



Not that there should be any doubt of my pronouncements,...e.g., that there is a Deep State of agency officials tied to the Democrats, the Left....proof has just been provided


"Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump’s campaign.

Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm.

That’s the firm used by the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign to secretly pay research firmFusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election."
Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant



Turns out I'm right again.....

....and I'm not getting tired of winning.

You have neither won or proved anything.


You have merely bored the living shit out of anyone who reads your BS.

So sorry....but those who cannot eschew the childish vulgarity are excluded.


Please don't come back.

 

[otto105]

When it became evident that a coterie of career government officials was out to form a coup, and depose a duly elected President......remember all the fools who denied that there is a Deep State????


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump"
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily

The "deep state" is a libertarian myth.

The only myth in evidence is the claim that your IQ is beyond single digits.





Turns out there is a Deep State….


There is that aroma of irony around the topic: the same folks who rant that there is no God, are the very same ranting that there is no 'Deep State'.....while big government and its Deep State IS their god!


1." I know opponents of President Donald Trump roll their eyes in ridicule at the mere suggestion of a deep state committed to undermining Trump's agenda. That's the stuff of paranoid conspiracy theorists or unhinged Trumpublican tribalists, they say.

2. Well, James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, has shown, again, that there is a "there" there.

3. ...unelected leftist bureaucrats embedded in the bowels of the federal government have been lawlessly targeting conservatives and abusing their power to thwart the agenda of duly elected Republican policymakers. The proof keeps pouring in.




4. The Obama administration's IRS deliberately discriminated against conservative groups in their applications for tax-exempt status. This isn't an empty partisan allegation from an imaginary "right-wing conspiracy." In 2013, an IRS official admitted scrutinizing groups with right wing identifying names, such as "Tea Party" and "patriots." An inspector general's report that year confirmed this nefarious practice.

5. At least two groups of cases were settled in 2017 with the IRS agreeing to a "substantial financial settlement" in one and expressing "its sincere apology" in another. This is the kind of tyrannical behavior that liberals used to care about.

6. In a case involving the Linchpins of Liberty and some 40 other conservative organizations, the IRS confessed that it used "heighted scrutiny and inordinate delays" and required unnecessary information in its review of applications for tax-exemptions.

7. In the NorCal Tea Party Patriots case, involving more than 400 groups, plaintiffs contended the IRS used their tax information for improper purposes.



8. ...James O'Keefe, and his Project Veritas, ....recently released secret videotapes in which some of these boorish bureaucrats brazenly admit their chicanery, and even brag about it.

9. On Tuesday, Project Veritas released the first of its tapes unmasking these proud pinheads boasting of sabotaging the Trump agenda. The video features State Department employee Stuart Karaffa, a smarmy, self-proclaimed socialist using his government position to resist official Trump administration policies. Karaffa is a member of the Metro DC Democratic Socialists of America...

10. He admits to drafting DSA communications at his worksite. "I'm careful about it," says Karaffa. "I don't leave a paper trail, like I leave emails, and like any press s--- that comes up, I leave that until after 5:30. But as soon as 5:31 hits, got my like draft messages ready to send out." Precious."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded

11. "Karaffa's arrogance is astounding. He says he doesn't believe he'll be caught and punished, saying, "Maybe someday I'll go to board of elections jail, probably not." But what comes next is way worse and ought to infuriate all federal taxpayers. "I have nothing to lose," he adds. "It's impossible to fire federal employees." He also expresses confidence that none of his superiors will detect his conflicts of interest even though he openly discloses them on his required forms. "Somebody just rubber stamps and it goes forward ... I don't know if (the ethics officer is) is all there. He's so checked out." Well, that's comforting.

Most outrageous was Karaffa's description of his objective toward the administration's official policies: "Resist everything ... Every level. F--- s--- up."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



12. "...Project Veritas exposes Department of Justice paralegal Allison Hrabar reportedly using government hardware and software as part of her socialist activism, and Jessica Schubel, former chief of staff for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services under the Obama administration, attempting to thwart Trump's agenda.

Hrabar, also a member of Metro DC DSA, was supposedly one of those who chased Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen from a D.C.-area restaurant. That was beyond despicable. Hrabar allegedly uses the LexisNexis search engine on her work computer to find home addresses for DSA protests, such as that of D.C. lobbyist Jeremy Wiley. She reportedly ran his license plate to help locate his home. Hrabar smugly brags that as an employee of the DOJ, "We can't like get fired."


Schubel admits on the tape to the existence of "a little resistance movement" within the federal government, and says that her friends at the Department of Health and Human Services give her confidential information before it is officially released. "Yeah. It's kind of like the Nixon, deep throat type of thing," she gloats. She further admits, "There's a lot of talk about how we can like, resist from inside (the Justice Department)."
Project Veritas Catches Deep State Redhanded



13. So....there certainly is a Deep State......and the Deep State, is populated by Obamunists....

Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump



The vote by the public is meaningless as long as these curs abound.



Not that there should be any doubt of my pronouncements,...e.g., that there is a Deep State of agency officials tied to the Democrats, the Left....proof has just been provided


"Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant
Congressional investigators have confirmed that a top FBI official met with Democratic Party lawyers to talk about allegations of Donald Trump-Russia collusion weeks before the 2016 election, and before the bureau secured a search warrant targeting Trump’s campaign.

Former FBI general counsel James Baker met during the 2016 season with at least one attorney from Perkins Coie, the Democratic National Committee’s private law firm.

That’s the firm used by the DNC and Hillary Clinton’s campaign to secretly pay research firmFusion GPS and Christopher Steele, a former British intelligence operative, to compile a dossier of uncorroborated raw intelligence alleging Trump and Moscow were colluding to hijack the presidential election."
Collusion bombshell: DNC lawyers met with FBI on Russia allegations before surveillance warrant



Turns out I'm right again.....

....and I'm not getting tired of winning.

You have neither won or proved anything.


You have merely bored the living shit out of anyone who reads your BS.

So sorry....but those who cannot eschew the childish vulgarity are excluded.


Please don't come back.

Well thanks for the heads up that more boring shit from you is on the way.