They’re Not Even Hiding It Anymore, They Want Us Dead

Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
So, if you're going to throw me in with this nut-job then it's ok with you if I put you in with the Nazis because you're both on the right?
Nazi stands for socialist workers party, comrade.
No comrade it stands for National Socialist Workers Party. See that first word you conveniently left out? It denotes that they were Nationalists before they were Socialists. They considered Communism their ideological enemies and some of the leading industrialists of the age ( capitalist ) were members. They had great big rallies proclaiming Germans to be superior to other humans and they blamed all the societal problems they had on what they considered outsiders.Does this sounds in any way familiar?
You are one stupid mother fucker...Socialism is socialism, it can either be FAR RIGHT Socialism (NAZI/FASCIST) or FAR LEFT Socialism (COMMUNISM) but both are government control of the people. Cant get more stupid than a worthless excrement liberal.

The Road to Serfdom - Wikipedia
the abandonment of individualism and classical liberalism inevitably leads to a loss of freedom, the creation of an oppressive society, the tyranny of a dictator, and the serfdom of the individual. Hayek challenged the general view among British academics that fascism (including National Socialism) was a capitalist reaction against socialism. He argued that fascism, National Socialism and socialism had common roots in central economic planning and empowering the state over the individual.

obama-and-hitler-comparisons.jpg
The term "far right socialism" is an oxymoron.
So is "intelligent conservatism". You kids are just fulla contradictions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top