They’re Not Even Hiding It Anymore, They Want Us Dead

Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
So, if you're going to throw me in with this nut-job then it's ok with you if I put you in with the Nazis because you're both on the right?

The nazis weren't on the right. They were fascists who wanted to combine communism and capitalism with govt controls over private enterprise. Thats not the right. Those are historical leftist attributes. You can deny it all you want....but you're simply wrong.
1a154b2971b7de2fbe4b1fb2d47b5a89.jpg
Just because you made up a chart doesn't change reality kiddo.

Nice work tho.
 
Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
So, if you're going to throw me in with this nut-job then it's ok with you if I put you in with the Nazis because you're both on the right?
Nazi stands for socialist workers party, comrade.
 
Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
So, if you're going to throw me in with this nut-job then it's ok with you if I put you in with the Nazis because you're both on the right?
Nazi's were never on the right. but alas, more deflection from a kkk demoloser. always deflecting to something other than themselves. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
Wow..... I mean just WOW... .. The level of dishonesty/stupidity contained in this OP truly is...... I mean Wow!! So to you an opinion piece examining the by your own admission philosophical examination of the impact
the human race has on this planet equals the left wanting everyone dead? And all those people answering with outrage at the supposedly left wing immorality because they believe you made an astute observation. While you didn't even make a coherent point. Like a bunch of trained seals doing tricks for their handler to get some fish.


They constantly accuse "the left" (which includes everyone who isn't hard core right wing) of their own crimes!......are they do it full of hate......These moronicons are dangerously deranged.
 
Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
Wow..... I mean just WOW... .. The level of dishonesty/stupidity contained in this OP truly is...... I mean Wow!! So to you an opinion piece examining the by your own admission philosophical examination of the impact
the human race has on this planet equals the left wanting everyone dead? And all those people answering with outrage at the supposedly left wing immorality because they believe you made an astute observation. While you didn't even make a coherent point. Like a bunch of trained seals doing tricks for their handler to get some fish.


They constantly accuse "the left" (which includes everyone who isn't hard core right wing) of their own crimes!......are they do it full of hate......These moronicons are dangerously deranged.
Tell us again how wonderful it is that babies can legally have their limbs ripped off to murder them.
 
Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
So, if you're going to throw me in with this nut-job then it's ok with you if I put you in with the Nazis because you're both on the right?
Nazi stands for socialist workers party, comrade.
No comrade it stands for National Socialist Workers Party. See that first word you conveniently left out? It denotes that they were Nationalists before they were Socialists. They considered Communism their ideological enemies and some of the leading industrialists of the age ( capitalist ) were members. They had great big rallies proclaiming Germans to be superior to other humans and they blamed all the societal problems they had on what they considered outsiders.Does this sounds in any way familiar?
 
Wow..... I mean just WOW... .. The level of dishonesty/stupidity contained in this OP truly is...... I mean Wow!! So to you an opinion piece examining the by your own admission philosophical examination of the impact
the human race has on this planet equals the left wanting everyone dead? And all those people answering with outrage at the supposedly left wing immorality because they believe you made an astute observation. While you didn't even make a coherent point. Like a bunch of trained seals doing tricks for their handler to get some fish.

Pieces of shit like you are the reason I no longer oppose abortion. You should have been swallowed or blown into a rectal cavity. Failing that Kermit Gosnell's toilet would have sufficed to prevent genetic garbage like you from lowering the collective intellectual value of society.

You stupid, serville, nanny state parasites deliberately ignore the brutal history of every regressive marxist government and the millions killed by the despotic "great leaders". You deliberately ignore the failed states that still exist but barely function and are so oppressive they have to build walls to keep people IN. On top of that, real world present conditions in the most recent state to adopt the sort of insane regressive bullshit you demand, venezuela, are so atrocious people were reported to have been eating their pets.

Then you have the gall to imply those of us who oppose your stupidity are the drones? There aren't words strong enough to articulate how hard you can go fuck yourself you malignant piece of shit.

I truly do wish you had been eaten by a rat in a dumpster behind a Planned Unparenthood Clinic.


.
 
Wow..... I mean just WOW... .. The level of dishonesty/stupidity contained in this OP truly is...... I mean Wow!! So to you an opinion piece examining the by your own admission philosophical examination of the impact
the human race has on this planet equals the left wanting everyone dead? And all those people answering with outrage at the supposedly left wing immorality because they believe you made an astute observation. While you didn't even make a coherent point. Like a bunch of trained seals doing tricks for their handler to get some fish.

Pieces of shit like you are the reason I no longer oppose abortion. You should have been swallowed or blown into a rectal cavity. Failing that Kermit Gosnell's toilet would have sufficed to prevent genetic garbage like you from lowering the collective intellectual value of society.

You stupid, serville, nanny state parasites deliberately ignore the brutal history of every regressive marxist government and the millions killed by the despotic "great leaders". You deliberately ignore the failed states that still exist but barely function and are so oppressive they have to build walls to keep people IN. On top of that, real world present conditions in the most recent state to adopt the sort of insane regressive bullshit you demand, venezuela, are so atrocious people were reported to have been eating their pets.

Then you have the gall to imply those of us who oppose your stupidity are the drones? There aren't words strong enough to articulate how hard you can go fuck yourself you malignant piece of shit.

I truly do wish you had been eaten by a rat in a dumpster behind a Planned Unparenthood Clinic.


.
At least you came to your senses on abortion. You're welcome.
 
Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

There are stirrings of discussion these days in philosophical circles about the prospect of human extinction. This should not be surprising, given the increasingly threatening predations of climate change. In reflecting on this question, I want to suggest an answer to a single question, one that hardly covers the whole philosophical territory but is an important aspect of it. Would human extinction be a tragedy?

I’m not asking whether the experience of humans coming to an end would be a bad thing. […] I am also not asking whether human beings as a species deserve to die out. That is an important question, but would involve different considerations. Those questions, and others like them, need to be addressed if we are to come to a full moral assessment of the prospect of our demise. Yet what I am asking here is simply whether it would be a tragedy if the planet no longer contained human beings. And the answer I am going to give might seem puzzling at first. I want to suggest, at least tentatively, both that it would be a tragedy and that it might just be a good thing.

Opinion | Would Human Extinction Be a Tragedy?

Who said the Left were Demonic? Let’s begin with the extinction of the New York Times and then pause to assess if the world is a better place for it. It’s behind a paywall, so you can begin the process by hitting the ‘esc’ key as it loads and read the vile, silly thing and not pay them for it.
So, if you're going to throw me in with this nut-job then it's ok with you if I put you in with the Nazis because you're both on the right?
Nazi stands for socialist workers party, comrade.
No comrade it stands for National Socialist Workers Party. See that first word you conveniently left out? It denotes that they were Nationalists before they were Socialists. They considered Communism their ideological enemies and some of the leading industrialists of the age ( capitalist ) were members. They had great big rallies proclaiming Germans to be superior to other humans and they blamed all the societal problems they had on what they considered outsiders.Does this sounds in any way familiar?
You are one stupid mother fucker...Socialism is socialism, it can either be FAR RIGHT Socialism (NAZI/FASCIST) or FAR LEFT Socialism (COMMUNISM) but both are government control of the people. Cant get more stupid than a worthless excrement liberal.

The Road to Serfdom - Wikipedia
the abandonment of individualism and classical liberalism inevitably leads to a loss of freedom, the creation of an oppressive society, the tyranny of a dictator, and the serfdom of the individual. Hayek challenged the general view among British academics that fascism (including National Socialism) was a capitalist reaction against socialism. He argued that fascism, National Socialism and socialism had common roots in central economic planning and empowering the state over the individual.

obama-and-hitler-comparisons.jpg
 
ipzfde.jpg

You DID NOT just dis Obama! Tell me you did not go there or I'm coming over there to kick your ass, you right wing piece of trash!
 
That is the point when I saw two dangers approaching. Previously, I did not truly understand their names or their importance to the German people’s existence. Their names were Marxism and Jewry. - Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf
 

Forum List

Back
Top