This ad just made black democrats look really stupid

[Picaro]

Let’s go Kim! I just donated

All democrats look stupid. But then there is the other side of the coin: who is killing most of these people? Other blacks. Who destroyed most of these communities? Blacks who live there.

The Democrats don't kill the blacks, they don't tear down their communities, but destroyed communities don't pay much in tax revenue and without that tax base, the money isn't there either to rebuild it.

The real problem comes from education and opportunity. You can't give opportunity to people without job skills. And it takes education to acquire skills.

Either Blacks are a victim of generational environmental and social bias and neglect, or,

Blacks really are less smart, harder to educate, and with greater behavioral problems.

Which are you willing to accept?

Well, the latter part of what you are saying (blacks being victims of neglect AND harder to educate, in some cases) holds some merit.
When you have a political party that continually claims you are a victim, over time you come to believe it, whether it's true....or not. When black students have had trouble with subjects in school, the Democrat solution was to "dumb down" the material. In essence, the "bigotry of low expectations." It further doesn't help when there are good black students trying to study hard and achieve their goals and among them are students insulting them and saying that "the student is trying to be white." So, are blacks harder to educate? Possibly. Then again, when students live in single parent homes and primarily learn their behavior from their peers, they are not in an ideal situation for accomplishing goals. But if harder to teach is true, you don't "dumb down" the material, you find another method of teaching the students so that they can indeed learn the material. You can't standardize individuals in education. Everyone is different and individuals learn differently.

You offered no policy solutions. You just restated the problems. How will tax cuts for the wealthy, repealing the ACA, militarizing the police and gentrification solve problems for Black Americans?

Obviously some 60 years of Democrat policy 'solutions' haven't worked, and in fact made them far worse off than they were in the 1950's, when all that 'racism' was allegeldy holding them back n stuff. Why not admit your idiotic pandering to left wing fashions have screwed over several generations of school children, and you're now promoting sick stupid crap like Drag Queen Story Times to kids in grade school?

Well, actually, some Democrats told the truth and made real policy solutions available, but they got tossed under the bus; Patrick Moynihan and a few others pointed out the problems in detail, but of course got vilified by the commies and hippies for telling the truth.

You have no clue about the conditions of poverty in the 1950s. Don't say "the fact is" while you know nothing of the facts.

Actually I do, and I'm also familiar with the hyper inflation of the 1970's, and many many other historical facts. Too bad you went to Indoctrination Camp and learned nothing but how to chant 'Hillary!' and let the Camp Councilers play in your pants.

 

[Picaro]

Let’s go Kim! I just donated

All democrats look stupid. But then there is the other side of the coin: who is killing most of these people? Other blacks. Who destroyed most of these communities? Blacks who live there.

The Democrats don't kill the blacks, they don't tear down their communities, but destroyed communities don't pay much in tax revenue and without that tax base, the money isn't there either to rebuild it.

The real problem comes from education and opportunity. You can't give opportunity to people without job skills. And it takes education to acquire skills.

Either Blacks are a victim of generational environmental and social bias and neglect, or,

Blacks really are less smart, harder to educate, and with greater behavioral problems.

Which are you willing to accept?

Well, the latter part of what you are saying (blacks being victims of neglect AND harder to educate, in some cases) holds some merit.
When you have a political party that continually claims you are a victim, over time you come to believe it, whether it's true....or not. When black students have had trouble with subjects in school, the Democrat solution was to "dumb down" the material. In essence, the "bigotry of low expectations." It further doesn't help when there are good black students trying to study hard and achieve their goals and among them are students insulting them and saying that "the student is trying to be white." So, are blacks harder to educate? Possibly. Then again, when students live in single parent homes and primarily learn their behavior from their peers, they are not in an ideal situation for accomplishing goals. But if harder to teach is true, you don't "dumb down" the material, you find another method of teaching the students so that they can indeed learn the material. You can't standardize individuals in education. Everyone is different and individuals learn differently.

You offered no policy solutions. You just restated the problems. How will tax cuts for the wealthy, repealing the ACA, militarizing the police and gentrification solve problems for Black Americans?

Obviously some 60 years of Democrat policy 'solutions' haven't worked, and in fact made them far worse off than they were in the 1950's, when all that 'racism' was allegeldy holding them back n stuff. Why not admit your idiotic pandering to left wing fashions have screwed over several generations of school children, and you're now promoting sick stupid crap like Drag Queen Story Times to kids in grade school?

Well, actually, some Democrats told the truth and made real policy solutions available, but they got tossed under the bus; Patrick Moynihan and a few others pointed out the problems in detail, but of course got vilified by the commies and hippies for telling the truth.

You have no clue about the conditions of poverty in the 1950s. Don't say "the fact is" while you know nothing of the facts.

We know blacks owned way more business in the 1950s compared to today

Literacy rates among blacks were much higher as well. They began serious declines when Nixon turned over the urban public school systems to black radicals and pols in the late 1960's early 1970's, and got worse worse ever since, despite massive increases in spending per student. Black pols and 'administrators' made themselves rich off of their own kids.

 

[Picaro]

Let’s go Kim! I just donated

Baltimore?

She has no chance, but the Republicans need to start somewhere in these urban areas. They shouldn't be conceding these places to the Democrats. It would take years of consistent time and effort into these places in order to flip them.

Trump will get around 20% of the black vote, breaking his record breaking 15% in 2016, and could easily get close to 30% if the looting keeps up. No other GOP establishment hack can get near the 15% of 2016. And, the GOP won't waste money on lost cause districts run by corrupt political machines, since Trump votes will magically totally disappear in all those 'minority' precincts with thousands of votes more than they have residents actually living there. Gou Pi Biden is also busy handing black voters over to Trump as well.

 

[Nosmo King]

Let’s go Kim! I just donated

All democrats look stupid. But then there is the other side of the coin: who is killing most of these people? Other blacks. Who destroyed most of these communities? Blacks who live there.

The Democrats don't kill the blacks, they don't tear down their communities, but destroyed communities don't pay much in tax revenue and without that tax base, the money isn't there either to rebuild it.

The real problem comes from education and opportunity. You can't give opportunity to people without job skills. And it takes education to acquire skills.

Either Blacks are a victim of generational environmental and social bias and neglect, or,

Blacks really are less smart, harder to educate, and with greater behavioral problems.

Which are you willing to accept?

Well, the latter part of what you are saying (blacks being victims of neglect AND harder to educate, in some cases) holds some merit.
When you have a political party that continually claims you are a victim, over time you come to believe it, whether it's true....or not. When black students have had trouble with subjects in school, the Democrat solution was to "dumb down" the material. In essence, the "bigotry of low expectations." It further doesn't help when there are good black students trying to study hard and achieve their goals and among them are students insulting them and saying that "the student is trying to be white." So, are blacks harder to educate? Possibly. Then again, when students live in single parent homes and primarily learn their behavior from their peers, they are not in an ideal situation for accomplishing goals. But if harder to teach is true, you don't "dumb down" the material, you find another method of teaching the students so that they can indeed learn the material. You can't standardize individuals in education. Everyone is different and individuals learn differently.

You offered no policy solutions. You just restated the problems. How will tax cuts for the wealthy, repealing the ACA, militarizing the police and gentrification solve problems for Black Americans?

Obviously some 60 years of Democrat policy 'solutions' haven't worked, and in fact made them far worse off than they were in the 1950's, when all that 'racism' was allegeldy holding them back n stuff. Why not admit your idiotic pandering to left wing fashions have screwed over several generations of school children, and you're now promoting sick stupid crap like Drag Queen Story Times to kids in grade school?

Well, actually, some Democrats told the truth and made real policy solutions available, but they got tossed under the bus; Patrick Moynihan and a few others pointed out the problems in detail, but of course got vilified by the commies and hippies for telling the truth.

You have no clue about the conditions of poverty in the 1950s. Don't say "the fact is" while you know nothing of the facts.

Actually I do, and I'm also familiar with the hyper inflation of the 1970's, and many many other historical facts. Too bad you went to Indoctrination Camp and learned nothing but how to chant 'Hillary!' and let the Camp Councilers play in your pants.

Were you alive in the 1950s?

 

[22lcidw]

I noticed she didn't mention a single thing repubs are willing to do for black people. I wonder why?

As the businesses and people who can leave the cities you will see what Progs do. The call in reality for "more with less" will shrill around all urban areas. If only all those social programs had true verification and discipline applied to them. Same with the schools.

 

[BULLDOG]

I noticed she didn't mention a single thing repubs are willing to do for black people. I wonder why?

As the businesses and people who can leave the cities you will see what Progs do. The call in reality for "more with less" will shrill around all urban areas. If only all those social programs had true verification and discipline applied to them. Same with the schools.

You wanna try that again? Try to make sense this time.

 

[IM2]

This is the type of thing the democrats fear the most.... People of color thinking for themselves.... They are just waking up and its scaring the hell out of dimwits..

We've been thinking for ourselves since we got here. Some of us have been murdered by whites because we think for ourselves. We are not republicans because we think for ourselves. Klacik is a known sellout. Black sellouts don't think for themselves. They think the way whites want them to think because they want whites to like them.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is the type of thing the democrats fear the most.... People of color thinking for themselves.... They are just waking up and its scaring the hell out of dimwits..

We've been thinking for ourselves since we got here. Some of us have been murdered by whites because we think for ourselves. We are not republicans because we think for ourselves. Klacik is a known sellout. Black sellouts don't think for themselves. They think the way whites want them to think because they want whites to like them.

LMFAO 90% of blacks vote for high taxes, high cost of living, high crime rates and you have the balls to tell us they think for themselves?



.

 

[Marion Morrison]

This is the type of thing the democrats fear the most.... People of color thinking for themselves.... They are just waking up and its scaring the hell out of dimwits..

We've been thinking for ourselves since we got here. Some of us have been murdered by whites because we think for ourselves. We are not republicans because we think for ourselves. Klacik is a known sellout. Black sellouts don't think for themselves. They think the way whites want them to think because they want whites to like them.

"Uncle Tom" hollerin' noted, racist.

What good has black Democrat government done to those areas, hmm?

 

[IM2]

This is why blacks are not republicans.

The party of Lincoln wanted to free blacks and in return we were to be moved back to Africa or somewhere in South America. So let’s drop the lie about the republican party and face the fact that republicans were just as racist and now today the republicans party is the racist party while democrats have become more diverse.

While the far right and some black and non white stooges try pushing the slavery ended then Martin Luther King showed up and finally ended racism fairy tale, the fact is that republicans lost blacks because of their actions after slavery. During reconstruction initially it looked like blacks and whites would be able to get beyond slavery as a nation and perhaps unite. But it did not happen because of a republican backlash to black progress called the lily-white movement.

“The lily-white movement was an all-white faction of the Republican Party in the Southern United States in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. It battled and usually defeated the biracial element called the Black-and-tan faction.

During Reconstruction, following the U.S. Civil War, black leaders in Texas and around the country gained increasing influence in the Republican Party by organizing blacks as an important voting bloc. Conservative whites attempted to eliminate this influence and recover white voters who had defected to the Democratic Party. The effort was largely successful in eliminating African-American influence in the Republican Party leading to black voters predominantly migrating to the Democratic Party for much of the 20th century.

The term lily-white movement was coined by Texas Republican leader Norris Wright Cuney, who used the term in an 1888 Republican convention to describe efforts by white conservatives to oust blacks from positions of Texas party leadership and incite riots to divide the party.[1] The term came to be used nationally to describe this ongoing movement as it further developed in the early 20th century,[2] including through the administration of Herbert Hoover. Localized movements began immediately after the war but by the beginning of the 20th century the effort had become national.” “This movement is largely credited with driving blacks out of the Republican party during the early 20th century, setting the stage for their eventual support of the Democrats.”

Michael K. Fauntroy - Republicans and the Black vote​

The racism inherent in much of the current republican base allows a failure to understand that blacks are able to think critically and make decisions without white input. We know what republicans have done. Lincoln signed the Emancipation Proclamation. Rutherford Hayes, a republican, ended reconstruction. We had the republican lily white movement to purge blacks from the party. Republicans endorsed separate but equal, every republican administration in the early to mid 1900's broke promises made to blacks, most notably during the Great Mississippi flood, which resulted in massive black casualties, displacement and basically returning southern blacks back to slave status.

The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 was the most destructive river flood in the history of the United States. Twenty-seven thousand square miles of the United States was under water up to 30 feet deep. Because of this flood, the federal government built the system of levees and floodways we see along the Mississippi River today. More than 200,000 African Americans were displaced from their homes along the Mississippi and had to live for lengthy periods in “relief camps.” Calling them relief camps is overly kind as supplies and means of evacuation after flooding were given to primarily to whites. Blacks got whatever was left. African Americans could not receive supplies without providing the name of a white employer or a voucher from somebody white. Blacks were made to work against their will and were not allowed to leave. In some discussions it has been said that blacks were put in concentration camps. Whether or not that is true, blacks were subject to dangerous and inhumane conditions.

Walter White, then the president of the NAACP visited the Mississippi delta. When he returned to New York he had some very choice words for the conditions he saw that blacks had to endure. “Negroes in hundreds of cases were forced to work at the point of guns on the levees long after it was certain that the levees would break. Conscripted Negro labor did practically all of the hard and dangerous work in fighting the flood. Harrowing as many of these stories are, they are the almost inevitable products of a gigantic catastrophe and are part of the normal picture of the industrial and race situation in certain parts of the South. The greatest and most significant injustice is in the denial to Negroes of the right of free movement and of the privilege of selling their services to the highest bidder. That, if persisted in, would recreate and crystallize a new slavery almost as miserable as the old.” White called the facilities the federal troops used to hold until their employers could claim them concentration camps.

Whites report as well as others caught the attention of Herbert Hoover who was serving as Secretary of Commerce. Hoover was charged with the responsibility of flood relief. In classic racist fashion without white oversight, the report from a black person on the condition they saw other blacks enduring would not be good enough for the whites in charge. So Hoover decided he needed to create a Colored Advisory Committee. This committee was appointed to investigate the NAACP’s complaints. The Colored Advisory Committee was chaired by Tuskegee Institute president Robert Moton, with eleven other people from Tuskegee serving as as committee members. Hoover was using black conservatives in hopes that what the came from the Booker T Washington side would be less critical and could be used to discredit the drilling the federal government took from the NAACP. Once again, the Washington philosophy failed black Americans in spectacular fashion.

Before we go further, I think it’s important to know who Robert Moton is. Moton is a very consequential figure in black political history. His political story is a cautionary tale for current blacks who call themselves conservative but whose beliefs align with right wing white racial extremists. His life story shows a fact of slavery that some whites purposefully leave out of the tale of how blacks sold each other into slavery.

Moton was born in 1867. His father had been a wealthy African Cheiftain that got rich by selling slaves. That is until he was sold into slavery. Moton graduated from Hampton Institute in 1890. When Booker T. Washington died in 1915, Moton succeeded Washington as President of Tuskegee. During his time at Tuskegee, Moton expanded the curriculum at Tuskegee to include liberal arts. However, during his time Moton allowed the Tuskegee Experiment to be conducted. Moton by all standards was an impressive man, but he had one flaw, his belief in accommodation.

Like Washington, Moton believed that the best way to advance the cause of African Americans was to convince white people of black people's worth through their exemplary behavior. He didn't fight segregation or challenge white authority. Moton sat on the boards of major philanthropies with the likes of Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller Jr. It is not overstating that Moton held great influence in the America of that period. Such is why Hoover used him to Chair the Colored Advisory Committee. I describe this as using because that’s exactly what Hoover did.

After the NAACP roasted the government, Hoover who had his eye on the presidency, was told by advisors to get “the big negroes” in to quiet the criticism. Hoover then appoints Moton. The Committee goes to investigate the situation in Mississippi. Members of the committee returned with a very detailed report for Moton on the conditions blacks endured including the things detailed by the NAACP. From The Final Report of the Colored Advisory Commission: "The camps in which we found the most satisfactory conditions were those where the local colored people have had an opportunity to assist in the administration of affairs. The camps which were found to be especially good were: Baton Rouge, Lafayette, and Natchez . . . In the camps at Greenville, Sicily Island and Opelousas, the colored people had practically no part in the activities of the colored refugees."

The commission reported that at Greenville whites came and went at will without passes while blacks were not given the same freedom. Blacks also told the commission about rough treatment along with discrimination regarding labor conditions and the ability to get food. Moton presented the findings of the commission to Hoover and advocated for immediate assistance to those most in need. Hoover asked Moton to not let information contained in the commission report be leaked to the public. So Moton kept the findings from the public In return for doing that, Hoover hinted to Moton that if he get elected president, Moton and his people would be part of the Hoover administration. Hoover also implied that as president he would to divide the land of planters bankrupted from the flood into African American-owned farms.

Because of these promises, Moton made sure that Commission did not leak the full story of what they saw and were told by blacks who were suffering mightily in the Mississippi delta. Moton then pumped up the Hoover's candidacy in the African American community. Once he was elected President in 1928, Hoover turned into Sgt. Schultz and knew nothing about the promises he made to Moton and the black community. To quote Ice Cube, Moton got, “fucked out of his green by a white boy with no Vaseline.” In 1932 Moton ended being accommodating and when he finished, the damage he did to the republican party has lasted to this very day. Moton withdrew his support for Hoover and switched to the Democratic Party. His move created a historic shift as African Americans began to abandon the Republicans Party, the party of Lincoln, the party of the Emancipation Proclamation, and turned to the Democratic Party.

But a few stragglers stayed faithful to the Republican party still after 70 years of the party ignoring blacks and breaking promises. Until 1964. That was when a democrat that signed what amounted to our second Emancipation Proclamation when President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act. Members of todays republican party spin a disingenuous tale about republican support for the Civil Rights and voting rights act. They tell about a democratic filibuster and will tell us that more democrats opposed these bills than republicans. These things are true. But they only tell part of the story. According to Merriam-Webster the definition of disingenuous is, “lacking in candor: giving a false appearance of simple frankness.” In the house, 221 democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, 112 republicans did. In the senate, 47 democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, 30 republicans did.

1964 Republican presidential candidate Barry Goldwater voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act. By 1964 there were blacks whose families had been republicans for almost 100 years. The Goldwater nomination was a slap in the face of black people. When we got civil rights, republicans decided that extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, turned their backs on us and began letting southern white racists become part of the party. So just cut the crap. The history of the republican party is one of broken promises to black people. All today’s republican establishment does for blacks is throw out Uncle Toms or Aunties and tell us they are the ones we should listen to. Black republicans that do not deny that racism exists are part of the party, but you will not see them on Fox News. We are not republicans because republicans took a knee on us. Now they want us to come back so they can implement policies that will put a chokehold on us. The republican party is anti-affirmative action, anti-civil rights, anti-voting rights, pro maintenance of the memory of the confederacy but we are supposed to run to the republican party because Abraham Lincoln freed slaves from the same confederacy republicans defend today.

 

[Marion Morrison]

^And yet it was a black man that convinced me to become Republican. And he broke it down so good! He was a very smart and wise man.
PS:

Plantation Politics and Black Republicanism

The photo of the men above illustrate part of the reason I made my transition from the plantation of the Democratic Party on which many Black Americans continue to languish. These men elected durin…

theblackcommenter.wordpress.com

A) IM2 doesn't have the right to speak for blacks. Nobody elected his ass.
B) TL; DR, you're just trying to dazzle with bullshit.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

Let’s go Kim! I just donated

ooh no she "talks to white "

 

[Marion Morrison]

Let’s go Kim! I just donated

ooh no she "talks to white "

Last time I saw a black woman that hot was 8th grade, and she was hotter than that!

Sharp as a tack, too! Yeah, she was really something. A great teacher as well.
She dealt with unruly students, no problem.
Blue Chiffon dress, omg! So long legs..She could have been a supermodel.
I remember we watched a video of what the Nazis did in her class.
It was hard to even guess her age. You could tell she was seasoned, but looked so young.
That Kim Klacik is a very pretty girl, though.
For some reason she reminds me of my next door neighbor. That's what it is.

 

[Jitss617]

She had 5 million more views than monkey Obama

 

[BULLDOG]

This is the type of thing the democrats fear the most.... People of color thinking for themselves.... They are just waking up and its scaring the hell out of dimwits..

We've been thinking for ourselves since we got here. Some of us have been murdered by whites because we think for ourselves. We are not republicans because we think for ourselves. Klacik is a known sellout. Black sellouts don't think for themselves. They think the way whites want them to think because they want whites to like them.

LMFAO 90% of blacks vote for high taxes, high cost of living, high crime rates and you have the balls to tell us they think for themselves?



.

Your absurd remark isn't surprising from a right winger, but that doesn't matter anyway. It's enough for you to understand that more than 90% of blacks oppose what you and your orange idiot advocate. You can explain that to yourself any way you want.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is the type of thing the democrats fear the most.... People of color thinking for themselves.... They are just waking up and its scaring the hell out of dimwits..

We've been thinking for ourselves since we got here. Some of us have been murdered by whites because we think for ourselves. We are not republicans because we think for ourselves. Klacik is a known sellout. Black sellouts don't think for themselves. They think the way whites want them to think because they want whites to like them.

LMFAO 90% of blacks vote for high taxes, high cost of living, high crime rates and you have the balls to tell us they think for themselves?



.

Your absurd remark isn't surprising from a right winger, but that doesn't matter anyway. It's enough for you to understand that more than 90% of blacks oppose what you and your orange idiot advocate. You can explain that to yourself any way you want.

Blacks oppose low taxes, low cost of living, walking in the middle of the night with out getting robbed, raped and killed?

Who would of thought

 

[BULLDOG]

This is the type of thing the democrats fear the most.... People of color thinking for themselves.... They are just waking up and its scaring the hell out of dimwits..

We've been thinking for ourselves since we got here. Some of us have been murdered by whites because we think for ourselves. We are not republicans because we think for ourselves. Klacik is a known sellout. Black sellouts don't think for themselves. They think the way whites want them to think because they want whites to like them.

LMFAO 90% of blacks vote for high taxes, high cost of living, high crime rates and you have the balls to tell us they think for themselves?



.

Your absurd remark isn't surprising from a right winger, but that doesn't matter anyway. It's enough for you to understand that more than 90% of blacks oppose what you and your orange idiot advocate. You can explain that to yourself any way you want.

Blacks oppose low taxes, low cost of living, walking in the middle of the night with out getting robbed, raped and killed?

Who would of thought

As I said, you can make up any story you want to explain it to yourself. The bottom line is black folk just don't like republican goals. Perhaps you should make an effort try to find out why.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is the type of thing the democrats fear the most.... People of color thinking for themselves.... They are just waking up and its scaring the hell out of dimwits..

We've been thinking for ourselves since we got here. Some of us have been murdered by whites because we think for ourselves. We are not republicans because we think for ourselves. Klacik is a known sellout. Black sellouts don't think for themselves. They think the way whites want them to think because they want whites to like them.

LMFAO 90% of blacks vote for high taxes, high cost of living, high crime rates and you have the balls to tell us they think for themselves?



.

Your absurd remark isn't surprising from a right winger, but that doesn't matter anyway. It's enough for you to understand that more than 90% of blacks oppose what you and your orange idiot advocate. You can explain that to yourself any way you want.

Blacks oppose low taxes, low cost of living, walking in the middle of the night with out getting robbed, raped and killed?

Who would of thought

As I said, you can make up any story you want to explain it to yourself. The bottom line is black folk just don't like republican goals. Perhaps you should make an effort try to find out why.

I gave you three of them and you're full of shit if 99% of blacks don't agree with me and the local Republicans.

 

[IM2]

"LMFAO 90% of blacks vote for high taxes, high cost of living, high crime rates and you have the balls to tell us they think for themselves?"

Republican policies increase crime, taxes and the cost of living. On top of that, republican policies want to roll back or get rid of civil rights and equal rights policies.

 

[IM2]

Let’s go Kim! I just donated

ooh no she "talks to white "

She talks stupid. If you guys support a black person, I would never vote for them.