This Is Why I Call Them 'Disgusting Filth'

[Correll]

The question of whether the media is biased or not is a very serious one.

If you need it explained why, then you are a moron.

it only concerns asshats like you when the bias in not on your side ,
you could give a fuck about objectivity .

And what do you base that belief system on?

it not a belief system it's fact ,
one day when you grow you might learn the difference

Objectivity
Philosophy
Objectivity is a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings.

That in no way supports your claim that I only care about it, when the bias in not on my side.

denial! your post prove objectivity is a alien concept to you.

No, it does not.

I think you are suffering from Confirmation Bias.

 

[Manchester]

Because they are. They are the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media. They are NOT what the Founders had in mind when they wrote the 1st Amendment. They would no more have approved of a complicit and dishonest media completely in one corner of the political spectrum any more than they would have approved of King George.

Except King George was honest about what he was. the DISGUSTING FILTH is not

NBC Reporter Tips Off Hillary Spokeswoman To Questions Before Live Interview

Naturally.

Via Daily Caller:

After Sunday’s Democratic debate, NBC News reporter Kristen Welker tipped Hillary Clinton’s communications director Jen Palmieri off to questions before conducting an interview in the spin room.

As host Ari Melber finished his interview with Bernie Sanders’ senior adviser Tad Devine, the MSNBC shot cut to Welker, and she is heard telling Palmieri, “And I’m going to ask you about Flint.”

Melber tried to speak over Welker saying, “Kristen, go ahead, you’re live.”

Then the shot went back to Melber, who was in the studio and he reiterated, “Kristen Welker in the spin room, I believe she has Clinton communications director with her, go ahead Kristen.”

Keep reading…

I think that if the only thing that you've got to get upset about that degree then maybe you need to pull your head out of your ass, watch 60 minutes and realise that there are a whole heap of people in the world with problems that makes yours pale in to insignificance.

And while you're at it stop pretending that A, You know what the founding fathers were thinking and B that the sun shone so bright out of their asses that everything they did was sacred. They were politicans same as the rest and they will have taken bribes and tip offs just as ours do now. Aint nothing changed but now we have a big electric world to bleat like a pussy on. Man up.

Shut up, bitch.

With such a humiliating and withing putdown however will I show my face at the country club again!

Yep that's me the bitch. The one telling the big bag of piss and wind (who is crying his little eyes out because a politican he doesn't like got an easy ride in an interview as if he lost his favourite ranbow pony doll) to go to his Doctor and get a pescription for Groacet. Yeah, me a bitch.

You earthshattering knobwomble. Go to your bathroom, stand in front of your mirror and take a long hard look at yourself.

The question of whether the media is biased or not is a very serious one.

If you need it explained why, then you are a moron.

Maybe there are morons reading that you could explain it to?

 

[Arizona Willie]

Lets be honest the media thrives and continues to flourish on sensationalism over content. The days of reporting the news vanished when news directors opted to interject their political opinion in the selection of stories covered with a bias toward reporting the angle that supported their beliefs. The current Nielson ratings validate and support the disgust of viewers with irresponsible agenda based news reporting. Possibly the hat trick was the hypocrisy exhibited by the press in their handling of the players in the news over the past thirty years commencing with the treatment of Senator Bob Packwood.

=======
Allowing 90% of the media to be bought up and merged into six corporations spelled the end of the 4th Estate.

Ratings and money became the prime movers for the media and pulling more viewers enables them to charge more for ads.

Follow the money === always.

the media no matter what side it claims to be on will do and have always done what will bring in the most viewers, viewers = money .

Bullshit.

Fox exploded out of nowhere because the rest of the media was ignoring a great niche market.

Half the country.

And they ignored them, because they wanted and still do want, to marginalize conservatives.

=======
Conservatives should be sterilized and incarcerated.

 

[daws101]

Lets be honest the media thrives and continues to flourish on sensationalism over content. The days of reporting the news vanished when news directors opted to interject their political opinion in the selection of stories covered with a bias toward reporting the angle that supported their beliefs. The current Nielson ratings validate and support the disgust of viewers with irresponsible agenda based news reporting. Possibly the hat trick was the hypocrisy exhibited by the press in their handling of the players in the news over the past thirty years commencing with the treatment of Senator Bob Packwood.

=======
Allowing 90% of the media to be bought up and merged into six corporations spelled the end of the 4th Estate.

Ratings and money became the prime movers for the media and pulling more viewers enables them to charge more for ads.

Follow the money === always.

the media no matter what side it claims to be on will do and have always done what will bring in the most viewers, viewers = money .

Bullshit.

Fox exploded out of nowhere because the rest of the media was ignoring a great niche market.

Half the country.

And they ignored them, because they wanted and still do want, to marginalize conservatives.

fox did not explode out of no where .
Rupert Murdoch was looking for untapped or under performing markets fox was carefully crafted to be what it is to draw that demographic .
you are a prime example of that strategy.
how do I know this? I've made my living in the biz,

That's my point.

You claimed the media was motivated by money.

Yet, they were ignoring half the freaking country, putting ideology ahead of making money.

false ! they were ignoring no one they were crafting a strategy and programing to exploit that myth ..
you don't understand the first thing about show business,
what's happening is called playing to the house or you might know it as give the people what they want , even thought it's bullshit .

 

[Arizona Willie]

Lets be honest the media thrives and continues to flourish on sensationalism over content. The days of reporting the news vanished when news directors opted to interject their political opinion in the selection of stories covered with a bias toward reporting the angle that supported their beliefs. The current Nielson ratings validate and support the disgust of viewers with irresponsible agenda based news reporting. Possibly the hat trick was the hypocrisy exhibited by the press in their handling of the players in the news over the past thirty years commencing with the treatment of Senator Bob Packwood.

=======
Allowing 90% of the media to be bought up and merged into six corporations spelled the end of the 4th Estate.

Ratings and money became the prime movers for the media and pulling more viewers enables them to charge more for ads.

Follow the money === always.

the media no matter what side it claims to be on will do and have always done what will bring in the most viewers, viewers = money .

Bullshit.

Fox exploded out of nowhere because the rest of the media was ignoring a great niche market.

Half the country.

And they ignored them, because they wanted and still do want, to marginalize conservatives.

fox did not explode out of no where .
Rupert Murdoch was looking for untapped or under performing markets fox was carefully crafted to be what it is to draw that demographic .
you are a prime example of that strategy.
how do I know this? I've made my living in the biz,

That's my point.

You claimed the media was motivated by money.

Yet, they were ignoring half the freaking country, putting ideology ahead of making money.

========
By spewing hate talk / video they appealed to the masses of uneducated low information people who think life shit on them and they use the tactics of divide and conquer to enrage those people who have not done well in life.

And that's probably about half the population.

 

[Correll]

Because they are. They are the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media. They are NOT what the Founders had in mind when they wrote the 1st Amendment. They would no more have approved of a complicit and dishonest media completely in one corner of the political spectrum any more than they would have approved of King George.

Except King George was honest about what he was. the DISGUSTING FILTH is not

NBC Reporter Tips Off Hillary Spokeswoman To Questions Before Live Interview

Naturally.

Via Daily Caller:

After Sunday’s Democratic debate, NBC News reporter Kristen Welker tipped Hillary Clinton’s communications director Jen Palmieri off to questions before conducting an interview in the spin room.

As host Ari Melber finished his interview with Bernie Sanders’ senior adviser Tad Devine, the MSNBC shot cut to Welker, and she is heard telling Palmieri, “And I’m going to ask you about Flint.”

Melber tried to speak over Welker saying, “Kristen, go ahead, you’re live.”

Then the shot went back to Melber, who was in the studio and he reiterated, “Kristen Welker in the spin room, I believe she has Clinton communications director with her, go ahead Kristen.”

Keep reading…

I think that if the only thing that you've got to get upset about that degree then maybe you need to pull your head out of your ass, watch 60 minutes and realise that there are a whole heap of people in the world with problems that makes yours pale in to insignificance.

And while you're at it stop pretending that A, You know what the founding fathers were thinking and B that the sun shone so bright out of their asses that everything they did was sacred. They were politicans same as the rest and they will have taken bribes and tip offs just as ours do now. Aint nothing changed but now we have a big electric world to bleat like a pussy on. Man up.

Shut up, bitch.

With such a humiliating and withing putdown however will I show my face at the country club again!

Yep that's me the bitch. The one telling the big bag of piss and wind (who is crying his little eyes out because a politican he doesn't like got an easy ride in an interview as if he lost his favourite ranbow pony doll) to go to his Doctor and get a pescription for Groacet. Yeah, me a bitch.

You earthshattering knobwomble. Go to your bathroom, stand in front of your mirror and take a long hard look at yourself.

The question of whether the media is biased or not is a very serious one.

If you need it explained why, then you are a moron.

Maybe there are morons reading that you could explain it to?

Sure.

THe media is how most people still perceive reality.

If the media is lying to those people is will effect policy, and policy based on lies and not the reality of the situation will be bad policy.

Bad policy hurts people on a very large scale.

The OP is an fine example of a deep bias. The matter of factness suggests that the bias is widespread.

 

[daws101]

it only concerns asshats like you when the bias in not on your side ,
you could give a fuck about objectivity .

And what do you base that belief system on?

it not a belief system it's fact ,
one day when you grow you might learn the difference

Objectivity
Philosophy
Objectivity is a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings.

That in no way supports your claim that I only care about it, when the bias in not on my side.

denial! your post prove objectivity is a alien concept to you.

No, it does not.

I think you are suffering from Confirmation Bias.

false ! you lack the objectivity to see the lack of it in your own words .
put another way, it's a discipline you'll never acquire.

 

[daws101]

Lets be honest the media thrives and continues to flourish on sensationalism over content. The days of reporting the news vanished when news directors opted to interject their political opinion in the selection of stories covered with a bias toward reporting the angle that supported their beliefs. The current Nielson ratings validate and support the disgust of viewers with irresponsible agenda based news reporting. Possibly the hat trick was the hypocrisy exhibited by the press in their handling of the players in the news over the past thirty years commencing with the treatment of Senator Bob Packwood.

=======
Allowing 90% of the media to be bought up and merged into six corporations spelled the end of the 4th Estate.

Ratings and money became the prime movers for the media and pulling more viewers enables them to charge more for ads.

Follow the money === always.

the media no matter what side it claims to be on will do and have always done what will bring in the most viewers, viewers = money .

Bullshit.

Fox exploded out of nowhere because the rest of the media was ignoring a great niche market.

Half the country.

And they ignored them, because they wanted and still do want, to marginalize conservatives.

=======
Conservatives should be sterilized and incarcerated.

 

[Correll]

=======
Allowing 90% of the media to be bought up and merged into six corporations spelled the end of the 4th Estate.

Ratings and money became the prime movers for the media and pulling more viewers enables them to charge more for ads.

Follow the money === always.

the media no matter what side it claims to be on will do and have always done what will bring in the most viewers, viewers = money .

Bullshit.

Fox exploded out of nowhere because the rest of the media was ignoring a great niche market.

Half the country.

And they ignored them, because they wanted and still do want, to marginalize conservatives.

fox did not explode out of no where .
Rupert Murdoch was looking for untapped or under performing markets fox was carefully crafted to be what it is to draw that demographic .
you are a prime example of that strategy.
how do I know this? I've made my living in the biz,

That's my point.

You claimed the media was motivated by money.

Yet, they were ignoring half the freaking country, putting ideology ahead of making money.

false ! they were ignoring no one they were crafting a strategy and programing to exploit that myth ..
you don't understand the first thing about show business,
what's happening is called playing to the house or you might know it as give the people what they want , even thought it's bullshit .

Except they were not doing that.

They were not giving conservatives what they wanted.

Thus Fox got to move in on a large and long ignored market. Money that could have been made, that was left lying on the ground for decades by the media that you claim is not biased.

That was my point. That you still have not addressed, because you insist on not understanding it.

 

[daws101]

I think that if the only thing that you've got to get upset about that degree then maybe you need to pull your head out of your ass, watch 60 minutes and realise that there are a whole heap of people in the world with problems that makes yours pale in to insignificance.

And while you're at it stop pretending that A, You know what the founding fathers were thinking and B that the sun shone so bright out of their asses that everything they did was sacred. They were politicans same as the rest and they will have taken bribes and tip offs just as ours do now. Aint nothing changed but now we have a big electric world to bleat like a pussy on. Man up.

Shut up, bitch.

With such a humiliating and withing putdown however will I show my face at the country club again!

Yep that's me the bitch. The one telling the big bag of piss and wind (who is crying his little eyes out because a politican he doesn't like got an easy ride in an interview as if he lost his favourite ranbow pony doll) to go to his Doctor and get a pescription for Groacet. Yeah, me a bitch.

You earthshattering knobwomble. Go to your bathroom, stand in front of your mirror and take a long hard look at yourself.

The question of whether the media is biased or not is a very serious one.

If you need it explained why, then you are a moron.

Maybe there are morons reading that you could explain it to?

Sure.

THe media is how most people still perceive reality.

If the media is lying to those people is will effect policy, and policy based on lies and not the reality of the situation will be bad policy.

Bad policy hurts people on a very large scale.

The OP is an fine example of a deep bias. The matter of factness suggests that the bias is widespread.

bahhahhhhhh!
there's that lack of seeing again the op bias is no deeper that yours .

 

[daws101]

the media no matter what side it claims to be on will do and have always done what will bring in the most viewers, viewers = money .

Bullshit.

Fox exploded out of nowhere because the rest of the media was ignoring a great niche market.

Half the country.

And they ignored them, because they wanted and still do want, to marginalize conservatives.

fox did not explode out of no where .
Rupert Murdoch was looking for untapped or under performing markets fox was carefully crafted to be what it is to draw that demographic .
you are a prime example of that strategy.
how do I know this? I've made my living in the biz,

That's my point.

You claimed the media was motivated by money.

Yet, they were ignoring half the freaking country, putting ideology ahead of making money.

false ! they were ignoring no one they were crafting a strategy and programing to exploit that myth ..
you don't understand the first thing about show business,
what's happening is called playing to the house or you might know it as give the people what they want , even thought it's bullshit .

Except they were not doing that.

They were not giving conservatives what they wanted.

Thus Fox got to move in on a large and long ignored market. Money that could have been made, that was left lying on the ground for decades by the media that you claim is not biased.

That was my point. That you still have not addressed, because you insist on not understanding it.

bullshit ! conservatives got just what they wanted .
the media all of it left or right is bias but only for profits.
the supposed philosophical differences are an illusion own it.
fox moved in on nothing they created a market
your point is meaningless, so there is no reason to address it.

 

[Correll]

And what do you base that belief system on?

it not a belief system it's fact ,
one day when you grow you might learn the difference

Objectivity
Philosophy
Objectivity is a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings.

That in no way supports your claim that I only care about it, when the bias in not on my side.

denial! your post prove objectivity is a alien concept to you.

No, it does not.

I think you are suffering from Confirmation Bias.

false ! you lack the objectivity to see the lack of it in your own words .
put another way, it's a discipline you'll never acquire.

Mmm, and what do you base that assumption of your on? I ask again.

 

[Correll]

Shut up, bitch.

With such a humiliating and withing putdown however will I show my face at the country club again!

Yep that's me the bitch. The one telling the big bag of piss and wind (who is crying his little eyes out because a politican he doesn't like got an easy ride in an interview as if he lost his favourite ranbow pony doll) to go to his Doctor and get a pescription for Groacet. Yeah, me a bitch.

You earthshattering knobwomble. Go to your bathroom, stand in front of your mirror and take a long hard look at yourself.

The question of whether the media is biased or not is a very serious one.

If you need it explained why, then you are a moron.

Maybe there are morons reading that you could explain it to?

Sure.

THe media is how most people still perceive reality.

If the media is lying to those people is will effect policy, and policy based on lies and not the reality of the situation will be bad policy.

Bad policy hurts people on a very large scale.

The OP is an fine example of a deep bias. The matter of factness suggests that the bias is widespread.

bahhahhhhhh!
there's that lack of seeing again the op bias is no deeper that yours .

Errr, how so?

 

[Correll]

Bullshit.

Fox exploded out of nowhere because the rest of the media was ignoring a great niche market.

Half the country.

And they ignored them, because they wanted and still do want, to marginalize conservatives.

fox did not explode out of no where .
Rupert Murdoch was looking for untapped or under performing markets fox was carefully crafted to be what it is to draw that demographic .
you are a prime example of that strategy.
how do I know this? I've made my living in the biz,

That's my point.

You claimed the media was motivated by money.

Yet, they were ignoring half the freaking country, putting ideology ahead of making money.

false ! they were ignoring no one they were crafting a strategy and programing to exploit that myth ..
you don't understand the first thing about show business,
what's happening is called playing to the house or you might know it as give the people what they want , even thought it's bullshit .

Except they were not doing that.

They were not giving conservatives what they wanted.

Thus Fox got to move in on a large and long ignored market. Money that could have been made, that was left lying on the ground for decades by the media that you claim is not biased.

That was my point. That you still have not addressed, because you insist on not understanding it.

bullshit ! conservatives got just what they wanted .
the media all of it left or right is bias but only for profits.
the supposed philosophical differences are an illusion own it.
fox moved in on nothing they created a market.

Sure. After decades of being ignored.

And were was the supposedly profit driven media before FOx that was ignoring such a huge audience?

This is a very simple point that you are some how missing.

And yet you accuse me of being biased.

LOL!

 

[daws101]

it not a belief system it's fact ,
one day when you grow you might learn the difference

Objectivity
Philosophy
Objectivity is a central philosophical concept, related to reality and truth, which has been variously defined by sources. Generally, objectivity means the state or quality of being true even outside of a subject's individual biases, interpretations, feelings, and imaginings.

That in no way supports your claim that I only care about it, when the bias in not on my side.

denial! your post prove objectivity is a alien concept to you.

No, it does not.

I think you are suffering from Confirmation Bias.

false ! you lack the objectivity to see the lack of it in your own words .
put another way, it's a discipline you'll never acquire.

Mmm, and what do you base that assumption of your on? I ask again.

it not an assumption. you yourself have proven it to be fact.

 

[Correll]

That in no way supports your claim that I only care about it, when the bias in not on my side.

denial! your post prove objectivity is a alien concept to you.

No, it does not.

I think you are suffering from Confirmation Bias.

false ! you lack the objectivity to see the lack of it in your own words .
put another way, it's a discipline you'll never acquire.

Mmm, and what do you base that assumption of your on? I ask again.

it not an assumption. you yourself have proven it to be fact.

All you just did there to "support" your opinion was to state it more strongly.

That you think that can work, shows that you are the one who is "lacking objectivity" here.

 

[daws101]

fox did not explode out of no where .
Rupert Murdoch was looking for untapped or under performing markets fox was carefully crafted to be what it is to draw that demographic .
you are a prime example of that strategy.
how do I know this? I've made my living in the biz,

That's my point.

You claimed the media was motivated by money.

Yet, they were ignoring half the freaking country, putting ideology ahead of making money.

false ! they were ignoring no one they were crafting a strategy and programing to exploit that myth ..
you don't understand the first thing about show business,
what's happening is called playing to the house or you might know it as give the people what they want , even thought it's bullshit .

Except they were not doing that.

They were not giving conservatives what they wanted.

Thus Fox got to move in on a large and long ignored market. Money that could have been made, that was left lying on the ground for decades by the media that you claim is not biased.

That was my point. That you still have not addressed, because you insist on not understanding it.

bullshit ! conservatives got just what they wanted .
the media all of it left or right is bias but only for profits.
the supposed philosophical differences are an illusion own it.
fox moved in on nothing they created a market.

Sure. After decades of being ignored.

And were was the supposedly profit driven media before FOx that was ignoring such a huge audience?

This is a very simple point that you are some how missing.

And yet you accuse me of being biased.

LOL!

they were not ignored and the audience was not huge at all. and still isn't
fox news was for a niche audience and still is
as I said you have no point .

 

[daws101]

denial! your post prove objectivity is a alien concept to you.

No, it does not.

I think you are suffering from Confirmation Bias.

false ! you lack the objectivity to see the lack of it in your own words .
put another way, it's a discipline you'll never acquire.

Mmm, and what do you base that assumption of your on? I ask again.

it not an assumption. you yourself have proven it to be fact.

All you just did there to "support" your opinion was to state it more strongly.

That you think that can work, shows that you are the one who is "lacking objectivity" here.

false ! I stated a fact .

 

[daws101]

The Most Biased Name in News
The Most Biased Name in News
Fox News Channel's extraordinary right-wing tilt
By Seth Ackerman


“I challenge anybody to show me an example of bias in Fox News Channel.”–Rupert Murdoch (Salon, 3/1/01)
Years ago, Republican party chair Rich Bond explained that conservatives’ frequent denunciations of “liberal bias” in the media were part of “a strategy” (Washington Post, 8/20/92). Comparing journalists to referees in a sports match, Bond explained: “If you watch any great coach, what they try to do is ‘work the refs.’ Maybe the ref will cut you a little slack next time.”

 

[Correll]

That's my point.

You claimed the media was motivated by money.

Yet, they were ignoring half the freaking country, putting ideology ahead of making money.

false ! they were ignoring no one they were crafting a strategy and programing to exploit that myth ..
you don't understand the first thing about show business,
what's happening is called playing to the house or you might know it as give the people what they want , even thought it's bullshit .

Except they were not doing that.

They were not giving conservatives what they wanted.

Thus Fox got to move in on a large and long ignored market. Money that could have been made, that was left lying on the ground for decades by the media that you claim is not biased.

That was my point. That you still have not addressed, because you insist on not understanding it.

bullshit ! conservatives got just what they wanted .
the media all of it left or right is bias but only for profits.
the supposed philosophical differences are an illusion own it.
fox moved in on nothing they created a market.

Sure. After decades of being ignored.

And were was the supposedly profit driven media before FOx that was ignoring such a huge audience?

This is a very simple point that you are some how missing.

And yet you accuse me of being biased.

LOL!

they were not ignored and the audience was not huge at all. and still isn't
fox news was for a niche audience and still is
as I said you have no point .

Self Identified conservatives were 36% of the population in 1992 compared to 43% liberals.

And you dismiss that as "not large" and a "niche audience"?

And you claim that I am the one who is not objective?