Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
because no one ever actually paid those rates. The tax code in those times was full of loopholes to allow rich democrats to keep their money rather than paying taxes. And who put those loopholes in the code???? Which party has controlled congress for most of the last 80 years? that is your answer.How about we just return to the tax rates before Bush?
But the wealthy paid significantly more than they pay today.because no one ever actually paid those rates. The tax code in those times was full of loopholes to allow rich democrats to keep their money rather than paying taxes. And who put those loopholes in the code???? Which party has controlled congress for most of the last 80 years? that is your answer.
Uh no clearly I said nothing like this so it’s completely stupid20-25% of SNAP recipients are black and another 20-25% of SNAP recipients are Hispanic .. are you saying these demographics of individuals are stupid?
Give you a hint. It wasn't Republicansbecause no one ever actually paid those rates. The tax code in those times was full of loopholes to allow rich democrats to keep their money rather than paying taxes. And who put those loopholes in the code???? Which party has controlled congress for most of the last 80 years? that is your answer.
What Republicans do is slash tax revenue and then claim we can’t afford social programsThe super rich, mostly Democrats, have already fixed the system so that middle class working stiffs get to pay most of the taxes for all their wasteful programs. Rich Democrats can't afford to pay taxes on all their profits from insider trading. If any middle class worker thinks Democrats are looking out for their well being, I recommend that they wake up. MAGA
My taxes never went down until Trumpy. Viva Trump and MAGA.What Republicans do is slash tax revenue and then claim we can’t afford social programs
You might have a point if that were true. But it's not. You can't look for greener pastures if you can't afford the bus ride. Can't get a job if you can't take a shower.
The government has a legitimate role in regulating business. It says so right in the Constitution
Are we talking about breaking the law, violating rules and regulations and otherwise cheating the system, or are we talking about punishing the rich? If a rich person, business, company or corporation are guilty of any of these things then by all means, punish accordingly. But imposing higher taxes and whatnot on legitimate, law-abiding businesses for the illegal actions of a few is simply not right.There is not equal opportunity, that's a myth. Over the years, American business has been engaged in every unequal and thieving trick in the book, including child labor, overt racial and sexual discrimination, and illegitimate payments like credits at the company store.
To some on the left, the thinking seems to be: If you're successful and rich, you cheated, broke the law and engaged in unethical business practices to get there.
Not so long ago, my family was poor when I was a child, and we received help in our poverty. But just as this you have posted spoke to us as well, and in the same form, it was that our help wasn't without difficulty in which always remained as a part of it.Are you playing the fool or are you really a fool? The vast majority, VAST MAJORITY of people do not wish to deny a SAFETY NET. What everyone should fight is a HAMMOCK.
Not so long ago, my family was poor when I was a child, and we received help in our poverty. But just as this you have posted spoke to us as well, and in the same form, it was that our help wasn't without difficulty in which always remained as a part of it.
No words spoken by men on such a subject, were ever more truer than what Franklin had wrote above, and it was being practiced correctly up until I'd say around the 1990's. After that date, along with leftist progressivism taking hold, this country quickly lost it's mind when dealing with the subject, and this loss of control has turned our government into a bunch raving mad thieves in result of.
That's what Trump was all about...Historically increased work increased tax revenues and decreased hand outs.
Dont approve debt ceiling increaeses. Govt cut massively. Turn over responsibility to states and end the massive fed
If there is no government intervention, nothing will ever change.
The “just find a better job” idea is not a viable idea on a macro scale.
If every poor person did that, most of them would be guaranteed to fail because higher paying jobs are in tough competition and shorter supply.
And let’s say pretend every poor person actually did find a better job. Who would be left behind to do those service jobs vital to the economy?
Having the wealthy pay the most in taxes isn’t about what’s fair - it’s about what is ridiculous.
So is everyone else's.Their income is vital to pay for government spending of any kind.
Franklins word's is exactly who he was in spirit of, and in character of, so you're speculation in trying to guess about Franklin's stance outside of his being able to speak on the matter himself, ummmm is you attempting to use his stature to your benefit by attributing such speculation in this way. Questions would arise I'm sure, about what exactly do you mean fully in your words spoken about the job creators and investor's in our modern day society, otherwise before Franklin would address your words as spoken.Franklin wouldn't have supported the government bailing out business, the banks, wall street either.
Your response of “so what?” Isn’t an argument for anything.No one's suggesting no government intervention. At least I'm not.
If you mean it's more of a challenge for some, that's true. But what of it? Every person is different and made the choices to get where they are just as the rich did.
And?
Exactly.
So the wealthy, businesses and corporations should not be taxed fairly?
So is everyone else's.
Franklins word's is exactly who he was in spirit of, and in character of, so you're speculation in trying to guess about Franklin's stance outside of his being able to speak on the matter himself, ummmm is you attempting to use his stature to your benefit by attributing such speculation in this way. Questions would arise I'm sure, about what exactly do you mean fully in your words spoken about the job creators and investor's in our modern day society, otherwise before Franklin would address your words as spoken.
It is why Trump said after being attacked for his wealth accumulation during the campaign - "hey if you all don't like the benefits afforded to the investor class, then change the codes and rules".because no one ever actually paid those rates. The tax code in those times was full of loopholes to allow rich democrats to keep their money rather than paying taxes. And who put those loopholes in the code???? Which party has controlled congress for most of the last 80 years? that is your answer.
Odd but telling that you want to play stupid by not allowing for a balance to occur between both.Odd you are good with corporate welfare but not for the people. I guess, not odd, telling.
Odd but telling that you want to play stupid by not allowing for a balance to occur between both.
