This story is so sad

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Just keep posting old white church lady.

Nope. I don't go to church. Sorry to burst your religious bigot bubble.

And talk about bursting bubbles! I'm only partly white. Guess what the rest is.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

well it is democrats passing laws up until birth,,

Document those laws . What do they accually say

As I showed in the Gosnell case, abortion doctors just ignore the laws, like the DNC will ignore the SCOTUS ruling, like they ignore immigration laws

They are lawless.

Who will report them? The media? Merrick Garland?
Mwahahahaha!!

Over generalization logical fallacy. Gosnell was an aberation. Most abortion provider follow the law. Now, with abortion banned, you will have alot more Gosnells .Hope your happy

 

[otto105]

Nope. I don't go to church. Sorry to burst your religious bigot bubble.

And talk about bursting bubbles! I'm only partly white. Guess what the rest is.

Russian

 

[alang1216]

We could exchange horror stories on both ends of the political spectrum on abortion. In fact, one of the reasons people say we need abortion to be legal is to provide a safe and legal method for abortion. In fact, I in no way favor a ban on all abortion, but the SCOTUS decision does not do such a thing as states will now have to figure things out.

Ever heard of Dr. Kermit Gosnell? No? The hell you say!

What I can tell you is that he was not a frog on the Muppets.

He was an abortion doctor who was labelled America's #1 mass murderer, so why have you not heard of him? It was because he was an abortion doctor who started to practice after Roe vs. Wade. For you see, the health department flagged him for numerous health care violations, but instead of trying to make him comply, or shut him down entirely, they simply stopped coming round. Abortion was as much as a political football back then as it is today, as it was seen that any impediment to abortion was a point for the other team.

Now turn the clock forward some 30 years later. The FBI got word that Gosnell was mixed up in some narcotic discrepancies. Local law enforcement also got involved. And although they could not prove Gosnell was guilty of any narcotic violations, which he was found to be later on, they did see the horrendous working conditions in the abortion clinic. But since the FBI could not link Gosnell to any narcotic violations, they just wanted to move on, but the local law enforcement could not. For you see, even though they were all pro-choice, they were haunted at night by the images and smells from that abortion clinic. In short, they could not sleep at night even though the FBI agents did not seem to have the same problem.

So local law enforcement began to investigate Gosnell. However, when they started, they were all pulled aside and warned about investigating him. The led investigator had political aspirations, as she was told that not only would her political aspirations be threatened, but that she may even lose her job if she persisted. But again, she could not sleep at night, so she pressed on. To make a long story short, they proved a hand full of murders which included one woman and some viable infants, but those are only ones they could prove as this man had been in practice for over 30 years. What he would do was to treat white women well and give them good care, and neglect the black woman and give them subpar care, all because of the almighty dollar. It was just cheaper.

When it went to court, local law enforcement prepared for a media blitz and insanity in the court room, as this man was essentially America's #1 mass murderer now. But to their shock, not one member from the press showed up. In fact, the news of the story was basically buried, which is why those reading this have no inkling as to who he is or what he did. So when they put Gosnell in jail for life, they decided to try and get the story out with a movie, but no one in Hollywood wanted any part of it. So they got actors outside of Hollywood, but when the movie was made, no one wanted to play the movie, but they eventually found a sparse few movie theatres who would play the movie, but no one wanted to advertise for it, etc.

So they proved he was America's #1 mass murderer and the media and political figures don't care, cuz abortion is a political football that must be embraced at all cost, and not even a word from the NAACP about the white women being treated better than the black women. Why? Because the NAACP is more concerned about the power of the DNC than black folk. In fact, in New York City alone there have been more Black abortions than births, and 89% of abortion centers around the country are in black neighborhoods. It is Black genocide 101.

I can only wonder how pervasive these types of abortion facilities operate in poor sections of large cities all across the country.

But thanks to the radical extremism of the Left, we will never know.

And no, I don't believe you care either.

If you're looking for a defense of Gosnell from me, ain't happening. In fact his is a fine example of ideology trumping common sense. While it doesn't appear he was in it for the money, he did some immoral, not to say illegal things, for which he was held accountable. Good, the system worked.

 

[progressive hunter]

Document those laws . What do they accually say

Gosnell was ann aberation. Most abortion provider follow the law. Now, with abortion banned, you will have alot more Gosnells .Hope your happy

why would you lie like that??

 

[otto105]

why would you lie like that??

Because it's not a lie.

Can you name another abortion supplier from the millions which occured.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Russian

Russians are not white? You're so much fun.

 

[alang1216]

where did I say its OK??

You put all the blame on the Left. Is the Right blameless?

 

[Oddball]

Why should it take time? The moral, ethical, and compassionate rout is obvious.

It takes time because you clowns went from "safe, legal, and rare" to parting out late term fetuses like junked Toyotas, and uttering not a peep when Barry the Boiking and Ralph Northam held out the possibility of post-birth abortions (i.e. infanticide).

You ghouls have nobody but yourselves to blame for the backlash.....Suck on it.

 

[progressive hunter]

Because it's not a lie.

Can you name another abortion supplier from the millions which occured.

why make a law if its not happening??

 

[progressive hunter]

You put all the blame on the Left. Is the Right blameless?

not my point,,

 

[alang1216]

not my point,,

So what is your point?

 

[otto105]

Russians are not white? You're so much fun.

View attachment 667850

I can't believe you couldn't find a reactionary a Merican church to fit your views.

Maybe the russian orthodox one?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I can't believe you couldn't find a reactionary a Merican church to fit your views.

Maybe the russian orthodox one?

Sorry to disappoint.

Well, actually not sorry.

 

[otto105]

why make a law if its not happening??

Why use one doctor to undermine a right of medical/family planning privacy?

 

[BlindBoo]

well it is democrats passing laws up until birth,,

Outlawing the procedure without exceptions is cruel and inhumane.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

why would you lie like that??

I think that anyone watching knows who is the liar

 

[Votto]

Example of the Marxist tolerance is?

Tolerance Was A Lie The Left Used To Get Power

Liberals pretend to champion tolerance and diversity, but they’re increasingly intolerant of ideas with which they disagree.

thefederalist.com

When you tear out a man’s tongue, you’re not proving him a liar, you’re telling the world you fear what he might say.” Tyrion Lannister, “Game of Thrones”

For decades, liberals, with the help of the mainstream media, have championed tolerance of people groups and ideas, specifically on race, sexuality, and social welfare programs. Much of their success has been due to their claimed love for tolerance and big-tent pretense.

Yet it’s becoming increasingly clear many liberals don’t actually practice the very tolerance they advocate. They hold a double standard for one set of progressives—the elite media and politicians—and another for the rest of society, which undermines the Left’s credibility. That once-banner statement for liberalism—“I disagree but will defend to the death your right to say what you think”—is now dead, replaced with a naked, de-principled thirst for power. Those slogans were useful bait while they lasted. Now for the reality show.

Some Lives Matter​

One of the most persuasive ways the Left has garnered votes is to repeatedly chide the Right for supposedly leaving minority groups out in the cold, insisting they will pick up the slack and offer a helping hand to those ostracized. They claim that, whether through social programs, advocacy groups, or even Hollywood storytelling, they will help minorities through difficult times.

In his speech last week at the memorial in Dallas for five police officers killed by a black man, President Barack Obama addressed himself African Americans in this spirit.

And so when African Americans from all walks of life, from different communities across the country, voice a growing despair over what they perceive to be unequal treatment; when study after study shows that whites and people of color experience the criminal justice system differently, so that if you’re black you’re more likely to be pulled over or searched or arrested, more likely to get longer sentences, more likely to get the death penalty for the same crime; when mothers and fathers raise their kids right and have ‘the talk’ about how to respond if stopped by a police officer – ‘yes, sir,’ ‘no, sir’ — but still fear that something terrible may happen when their child walks out the door…we cannot simply turn away and dismiss those in peaceful protest as troublemakers or paranoid. We can’t simply dismiss it as a symptom of political correctness or reverse racism.’

Much of the mainstream media applauded Obama’s speech as timely and on-point. But how does the media feel about another black man, who is a medical doctor, conservative, and former candidate for president? Then his race is not good enough to overcome the evils of his beliefs. Ben Carson’s “minority” status becomes irrelevant, and GQ doesn’t hold back from attacking this “bad black person.” It’s clear it’s not enough to be African American: one must be liberal, perhaps with a chip in your shoulder, to be heralded by a mainstream magazine.

Fuck Ben Carson http://t.co/PGZfkwsT4L pic.twitter.com/ynxBq40d4s

— GQ Magazine (@GQMagazine) October 8, 2015

So much for diversity. It appears the Left only wants to celebrate and tolerate different races when they can exploit them.

The recent racial strife between cops and minorities and the cop murders that have followed show such a bias against law enforcement it’s unbelievable. These same people will praise law enforcement if it behooves them—say, at a televised ceremony—or if said member of law enforcement is a minority, but in reality, mainstream media has little respect for the men and women who are police officers or members of our military, who daily put their lives on the line for our collective safety.

Zack Ford, an editor at Think Progress, tweeted about the recent cop killings, “Given how police haven’t been held accountable for murdering black people, it’s no surprise some are taking justice into their own hands.” (The original tweet has since been deleted.) Jesse Benn, a writer at Huffington Post, recently wrote about the same killings:

Last week five Dallas cops were killed by Micah Xavier Johnson, a Black man who was allegedly motivated to take such drastic action after continually watching the US legal system refuse to hold killer cops to account. Naturally, bootlickers across the globe are unquestioningly celebrating the slain officers as heroes, innocents, and protectors. But what if one of those dead cops was a white supremacist—is he still a hero?

After Pat Smith, the mother of one of the men killed in the Benghazi attack, spoke at the Republican National Convention, GQ writer Bethlehem Shoals tweeted, “I don’t care how many children Pat Smith lost I would like to beat her to death.” After being called out for inciting violence against a grieving mother, Shoals has since deleted and apologized for the tweet.

Liberals often view families of blacks, veterans, or cops with disdain and zero tolerance if they are conservative, a stark contrast from the messaging from any liberal political candidate or mainstream media outlet. This undermines their credibility, especially on the campaign trail. Their relationship is selectively beneficial based on political gain or media hits. As a friend of mine, Nick Short, said on Twitter, “They practice marcuse repressive tolerance: intolerance against movements from right and tolerance of movements from the left.”

Progressives, especially during elections, advertise they welcome all minorities, that they support law enforcement and our military, yet in reality they do nothing of the sort. Those are empty words to garner votes. If liberals really cared about free speech, diversity, or tolerance, they would speak out against illiberal behavior like this, and against bigger expressions of it such as government efforts to silence churches and small businesses based on ideas about sexuality.

Twitter Bans Milo​

Similarly, Twitter, a platform that claims to encourage free expression and exchange of ideas, is increasingly proving it will tolerate ideas coming from the Left, but not tolerate ideas coming from the Right side of the political aisle.

Last Tuesday, Twitter banned Milo Yiannopoulos, the Breitbart tech editor and outspoken gay libertarian whose tweets are a mix of politics, photos of himself, and jokes about liberals, feminists, or anyone else with whom he disagrees. A self-proclaimed friend to the “alt-right” movement, Yiannopoulos’ narcissism and provocateur attitude can be egregious and annoying. Still, he’s outspoken against the dangers of feminism, the Left’s hypocritical stance on gays, and “social justice warriors.” Although his behavior is over the top, he’s never outright threatened a person online.

After engaging in several contentious tweets with Ghostbuster actress Leslie Jones, Twitter deemed Yiannopoulos’s comments harassment and banned him from the site. A company spokesman told Buzzfeed News, “People should be able to express diverse opinions and beliefs on Twitter. But no one deserves to be subjected to targeted abuse online, and our rules prohibit inciting or engaging in the targeted abuse or harassment of others.” However, upon reading the tweet that put Yiannopoulos over the edge, it’s unclear how it constitutes harassment, much less anything worse than the string of examples on Twitter that include death threats, race-baiting, and misogyny.

No, seriously this is the Tweet that got @Nero suspended. Feel the hate. #freemilo pic.twitter.com/h0SjGDggwy

— THE Chris Coon (@Coondawg68) July 20, 2016

And compare it to Leslie’s tweets:

Twitter banned @nero for "targeted harassment" of @Lesdoggg, but why hasn't she been banned too? #FREEMILO pic.twitter.com/9xUem4qm8n

— ariana rowlands♛ (@IamQueenAri) July 20, 2016

Here are just a few examples of truly offensive and outrageous tweets whose users seem to remain unbanned and active:

And let's not forget THIS guy. Feel free to read his TL. This is an old tweet. Double Standards.#FreeMilo https://t.co/LieDoRXSpI

— Leah the Boss (@LeahRBoss) July 20, 2016

This guy still has an account….but @Nero said "mean things" to people so he's banned. #FreeMilo pic.twitter.com/8fX4UI8944

— Leah the Boss (@LeahRBoss) July 20, 2016

I reported a liberal who encouraged child molesters to target my kids to @Support. He's still on @Twitter, @Jack. But @Nero?#FreeMilo

— Dr. Milton Wolf (@MiltonWolfMD) July 20, 2016

Get off @Jack’

WTF? @jack you ban @nero from @twitter but not this douchebag? Why is his tweet OK about @DonaldJTrumpJr? #FreeMilo https://t.co/zM6NpHF85w

— Saltwater Patricia (@muzikgirl11) July 20, 2016

Known jihadists were using Twitter to recruit UK brides via Kik. I reported to top terror cops. Accounts not closed for weeks #freemilo

— Martin Daubney (@MartinDaubney) July 20, 2016

This aspiring cop killer still has @twitter….but @Nero said "mean things" to people so he's banned. #FreeMilo pic.twitter.com/MRo6VnE0tz

— LucidHurricane™✘ (@LucidHurricane_) July 20, 2016

Intolerance Is Hypocritical​

Let’s face it: Everyone struggles with hypocrisy, flawed humans that we are. However, in the political realm (as is sometimes true personally) double standards like these should come with consequences. If a political party and a slew of media outlets continue to say one thing yet do the opposite, they should lose credibility, at least on those issues. Instead of gaining power, Americans should be voting these guys out of office, or at least questioning their decisions via petitions, legislation, and the like. We should not live under a government set up by progressives who live by one standard set for themselves yet force the rest of us to live by another completely different standard.

These examples show just how hypocritical the Left is and how far they will go to increase their own political power. Like Jekyll and Hyde, liberals and much of the mainstream media express tolerance, affection, and open-mindedness toward people who will vote for them, pay their salary, or otherwise boost their cause. Yet these same progressives will mock the very groups they claim to support, if those groups happen to embrace conservative ideas.

It’s so blatantly obvious it’s actually quite surprising minorities and other groups seldom call them out for it. This very hypocrisy has given us both our first black president and movements of people who believe they are so ostracized they must lash out in violent protests. While this hypocrisy may do progressives good in the short term, it does no one or this country any good long term.

---

After working in Republican politics in Minnesota, Nicole Russell moved near Washington, DC and began her journalism career. Her work has appeared in the The Atlantic, The New York Times, National Review, Politico, The Washington Times, The American Spectator, and Parents Magazine. She was the 2010 recipient of the American Spectator's Young Journalist Award and she resides in northern Virginia with her four kids. Follow her on Twitter @russell_nm.

s back. He is doing just fine #FreeMilo pic.twitter.com/1dA2eqXyFU

— Liars Never Win (@liars_never_win) July 20, 2016

 

[BlindBoo]

So killing humans who are not viable, that is, not able to care for themselves outside the womb

Terminating a fetus that is not able to sustain life itself with or without an incubator. No infant can care for themselves. Ordinary care is required

How many welfare recipients will the state then kill?

None. However at the end, when life is no longer sustainable they do offer excellent end of life services. Palliative care, Hospice.....

 

[otto105]

Tolerance Was A Lie The Left Used To Get Power

Liberals pretend to champion tolerance and diversity, but they’re increasingly intolerant of ideas with which they disagree.

thefederalist.com

When you tear out a man’s tongue, you’re not proving him a liar, you’re telling the world you fear what he might say.” Tyrion Lannister, “Game of Thrones”

For decades, liberals, with the help of the mainstream media, have championed tolerance of people groups and ideas, specifically on race, sexuality, and social welfare programs. Much of their success has been due to their claimed love for tolerance and big-tent pretense.

Yet it’s becoming increasingly clear many liberals don’t actually practice the very tolerance they advocate. They hold a double standard for one set of progressives—the elite media and politicians—and another for the rest of society, which undermines the Left’s credibility. That once-banner statement for liberalism—“I disagree but will defend to the death your right to say what you think”—is now dead, replaced with a naked, de-principled thirst for power. Those slogans were useful bait while they lasted. Now for the reality show.

Some Lives Matter​

One of the most persuasive ways the Left has garnered votes is to repeatedly chide the Right for supposedly leaving minority groups out in the cold, insisting they will pick up the slack and offer a helping hand to those ostracized. They claim that, whether through social programs, advocacy groups, or even Hollywood storytelling, they will help minorities through difficult times.

In his speech last week at the memorial in Dallas for five police officers killed by a black man, President Barack Obama addressed himself African Americans in this spirit.

And so when African Americans from all walks of life, from different communities across the country, voice a growing despair over what they perceive to be unequal treatment; when study after study shows that whites and people of color experience the criminal justice system differently, so that if you’re black you’re more likely to be pulled over or searched or arrested, more likely to get longer sentences, more likely to get the death penalty for the same crime; when mothers and fathers raise their kids right and have ‘the talk’ about how to respond if stopped by a police officer – ‘yes, sir,’ ‘no, sir’ — but still fear that something terrible may happen when their child walks out the door…we cannot simply turn away and dismiss those in peaceful protest as troublemakers or paranoid. We can’t simply dismiss it as a symptom of political correctness or reverse racism.’

Much of the mainstream media applauded Obama’s speech as timely and on-point. But how does the media feel about another black man, who is a medical doctor, conservative, and former candidate for president? Then his race is not good enough to overcome the evils of his beliefs. Ben Carson’s “minority” status becomes irrelevant, and GQ doesn’t hold back from attacking this “bad black person.” It’s clear it’s not enough to be African American: one must be liberal, perhaps with a chip in your shoulder, to be heralded by a mainstream magazine.



So much for diversity. It appears the Left only wants to celebrate and tolerate different races when they can exploit them.

The recent racial strife between cops and minorities and the cop murders that have followed show such a bias against law enforcement it’s unbelievable. These same people will praise law enforcement if it behooves them—say, at a televised ceremony—or if said member of law enforcement is a minority, but in reality, mainstream media has little respect for the men and women who are police officers or members of our military, who daily put their lives on the line for our collective safety.

Zack Ford, an editor at Think Progress, tweeted about the recent cop killings, “Given how police haven’t been held accountable for murdering black people, it’s no surprise some are taking justice into their own hands.” (The original tweet has since been deleted.) Jesse Benn, a writer at Huffington Post, recently wrote about the same killings:


After Pat Smith, the mother of one of the men killed in the Benghazi attack, spoke at the Republican National Convention, GQ writer Bethlehem Shoals tweeted, “I don’t care how many children Pat Smith lost I would like to beat her to death.” After being called out for inciting violence against a grieving mother, Shoals has since deleted and apologized for the tweet.

Liberals often view families of blacks, veterans, or cops with disdain and zero tolerance if they are conservative, a stark contrast from the messaging from any liberal political candidate or mainstream media outlet. This undermines their credibility, especially on the campaign trail. Their relationship is selectively beneficial based on political gain or media hits. As a friend of mine, Nick Short, said on Twitter, “They practice marcuse repressive tolerance: intolerance against movements from right and tolerance of movements from the left.”

Progressives, especially during elections, advertise they welcome all minorities, that they support law enforcement and our military, yet in reality they do nothing of the sort. Those are empty words to garner votes. If liberals really cared about free speech, diversity, or tolerance, they would speak out against illiberal behavior like this, and against bigger expressions of it such as government efforts to silence churches and small businesses based on ideas about sexuality.

Twitter Bans Milo​

Similarly, Twitter, a platform that claims to encourage free expression and exchange of ideas, is increasingly proving it will tolerate ideas coming from the Left, but not tolerate ideas coming from the Right side of the political aisle.

Last Tuesday, Twitter banned Milo Yiannopoulos, the Breitbart tech editor and outspoken gay libertarian whose tweets are a mix of politics, photos of himself, and jokes about liberals, feminists, or anyone else with whom he disagrees. A self-proclaimed friend to the “alt-right” movement, Yiannopoulos’ narcissism and provocateur attitude can be egregious and annoying. Still, he’s outspoken against the dangers of feminism, the Left’s hypocritical stance on gays, and “social justice warriors.” Although his behavior is over the top, he’s never outright threatened a person online.

After engaging in several contentious tweets with Ghostbuster actress Leslie Jones, Twitter deemed Yiannopoulos’s comments harassment and banned him from the site. A company spokesman told Buzzfeed News, “People should be able to express diverse opinions and beliefs on Twitter. But no one deserves to be subjected to targeted abuse online, and our rules prohibit inciting or engaging in the targeted abuse or harassment of others.” However, upon reading the tweet that put Yiannopoulos over the edge, it’s unclear how it constitutes harassment, much less anything worse than the string of examples on Twitter that include death threats, race-baiting, and misogyny.




And compare it to Leslie’s tweets:




Here are just a few examples of truly offensive and outrageous tweets whose users seem to remain unbanned and active:

Dude, don't hit me with the white wing propaganda bullshit.

It's useless as a bases for any discussion.

BTW didn't milo claim that the Holocaust happened because of gay people? My god man, stop smoking that shit.