This will go to the USSC

[CrusaderFrank]

Amazing how partisan our court system has become

It's like how gerrymandering (redistricting) was cool when it helped the Left

 

[rightwinger]

It's like how gerrymandering (redistricting) was cool when it helped the Left

I don’t support it regardless of who does it

Candidates should not get to choose their voters

 

[jc456]

Well, yes they did because the proposition was in violation of the FEDERAL constitution, according to SCOTUS.

So, what part of the federal constitution does act 77 violate? If none, then point us to a case where SCOTUS has ruled a state law was in violation of a state constitution. AFAIK, there is none because GG is correct, SCOTUS does not involve itself with state laws violating state constitutions, it involves itself where state laws and state constitutions violate federal laws and the US Constitution.

The push back here surprises me, jurisdiction is a pretty clear cut concept. The feds simply do not have a say when there are no federal laws whatsoever involved.

it's a federal election.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Because the SCOTUS ruled differently when they got read it of it.

Ruled DIFFERENTLY?

You mean they found FLAWS in the constitutional logic of earlier courts - that the earlier rulings were UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

That does not mean that while it was in force it was against the Constitution.

That is exactly what it means, you drooling moron.

In the landmark 1954 case "Brown v Board of Education", the Dred Scott ruling was specifically and directly cited as unconstitutional

Oh, spoiler alert - you democrats lost the Brown case.

1954: Brown v. Board of Education (U.S. National Park Service)

An overview of the landmark school desegregation court case.

www.nps.gov

You really cannot be this stupid



They rule differently, they do not rule that the previous ruling violated the Constitution, because it did not until the new ruling.

I guess you can be stupid

You may be a Marxist, and clearly you yearn for dictatorship. But you don't know a fucking thing about how case law or the Constitution works.

You just want a "daddy" dictator to care for you and punish you when you're bad.

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is one Republican judge.

This is one democrat ballot box stuffer;



Thanks to the United States Marshal Services.

 

[jc456]

Age of Electors. The age at which a citizen is entitled to vote was changed from 21 to 18 years of age. See Amendment XXVI to the Constitution of the United States and section 701

federal law?

 

[The Original Tree]

Court finds Pennsylvania mail-in voting law unconstitutional, appeal anticipated

(WHTM) – The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has found the commonwealth’s no-excuse mail-in voting law, Act 77, is unconstitutional. According to court documents, 14 members of the P…

www.abc27.com

PA mail voting unconstitutional. About time. Vote in person or by absentee ballot, period.

They are trying to take over America one Institution, one law at a time. Patriots will have to fight them at every turn and in every court.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Ruled DIFFERENTLY?

You mean they found FLAWS in the constitutional logic of earlier courts - that the earlier rulings were UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

No, that is not what I mean. The court has never found that a previous ruling was UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Find me one ruling from SCOTUS where this claim is made

 

[jc456]

Because Bush v Gore involved federal constitutional issues.

like? Bad ballots?

 

[Uncensored2008]

No, that is not what I mean. The court has never found that a previous ruling was UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Find me one ruling from SCOTUS where this claim is made

According to you, there is no Constitution - just 9 dictators whose word is law, the constitution means only what they want it to mean at any second.

But even in this you are just a moron.

When ruling on constitutional questions of earlier cases, the court is specifically determining the constitutionality of the earlier ruling.

Your abject and astounding ignorance doesn't alter reality.

 

[FA_Q2]

it's a federal election.

And the federal law it violates?

 

[FA_Q2]

federal law?

What is that supposed to mean?

Act 77 does not violate the required age set by any federal law. Are you just throwing shit at the wall? Did you even bother to read the act?

 

[Uncensored2008]

What is that supposed to mean?

Act 77 does not violate the required age set by any federal law. Are you just throwing shit at the wall? Did you even bother to read the act?

False.

It violates Article I, section 4 of the Constitution by having the state court, rather than the elected legislature, determine the state election laws.

 

[Faun]

False.

It violates Article I, section 4 of the Constitution by having the state court, rather than the elected legislature, determine the state election laws.

Fruitcake, Act 77 was a bipartisan bill that was passed into law by Pennsylvania's state legislature.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Fruitcake, Act 77 was a bipartisan bill that was passed into law by Pennsylvania's state legislature.

Stupid fuck, the law was challenged on Constructional grounds and the PASC overruled the state Constitution.

Do try and keep up.

Oh, and for allahs sake, go clean your cab.

 

[Faun]

Stupid fuck, the law was challenged on Constructional grounds and the PASC overruled the state Constitution.

Do try and keep up.

Oh, and for allahs sake, go clean your cab.

Poor, Fruitcake.

That's how our government operates. Laws gets challenged. Still, Act 77 was passed by the state legislature. No court determined that law. They only determined it was constitutional.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Poor, Fruitcake.

That's how our government operates. Laws gets challenged. Still, Act 77 was passed by the state legislature. No court determined that law. They only determined it was constitutional.

Aw, IslamoNazi Farouk got his ignorant ass kicked again. Facts aren't your forte' - nor is cab cleanliness.

{
Fourteen Republicans in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives sued last year, arguing that the law was unconstitutional. Eleven of those GOP lawmakers voted for Act 77 in 2019.

In its decision, the court noted that the law has expanded access to the ballot, but the majority said that any changes to mail voting laws would require a constitutional amendment.}

Pennsylvania court strikes down no-excuse mail voting law

Shortly after the court's decision, a notice of appeal was filed with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which leans Democratic.

www.cbsnews.com

Wow stupid fuck, so their saying that they passed ONE law, and the court MODIFIED it to change the nature? in direct violation of the state constituion, and in violation of the US Constitution.

Hey, you may be stupid and not know anything about the facts, but at least you can drive a cab...

 

[bendog]

Court finds Pennsylvania mail-in voting law unconstitutional, appeal anticipated

(WHTM) – The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania has found the commonwealth’s no-excuse mail-in voting law, Act 77, is unconstitutional. According to court documents, 14 members of the P…

www.abc27.com

PA mail voting unconstitutional. About time. Vote in person or by absentee ballot, period.

Well, first it has to go to the PA Sup Ct. Federalism, which used to be a conservative principle, used to mean that State voting laws were state issues, be that in GA or PA or even AZ .... unless a protected class of people were singled out for discrimination. It shouldn't matter (under federalism) that more blacks, or less blacks, would vote so long as the intent of the law was to help, or hurt, dems.

 

[Indeependent]

Aw, IslamoNazi Farouk got his ignorant ass kicked again. Facts aren't your forte' - nor is cab cleanliness.

{
Fourteen Republicans in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives sued last year, arguing that the law was unconstitutional. Eleven of those GOP lawmakers voted for Act 77 in 2019.

In its decision, the court noted that the law has expanded access to the ballot, but the majority said that any changes to mail voting laws would require a constitutional amendment.}

Pennsylvania court strikes down no-excuse mail voting law

Shortly after the court's decision, a notice of appeal was filed with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, which leans Democratic.

www.cbsnews.com

Wow stupid fuck, so their saying that they passed ONE law, and the court MODIFIED it to change the nature? in direct violation of the state constituion, and in violation of the US Constitution.

Hey, you may be stupid and not know anything about the facts, but at least you can drive a cam...

Faun is a spoiled brat Silver Spooner who feels for the under privileged from a distance.

 

[Indeependent]

Well, first it has to go to the PA Sup Ct. Federalism, which used to be a conservative principle, used to mean that State voting laws were state issues, be that in GA or PA or even AZ .... unless a protected class of people were singled out for discrimination. I theory, it shouldn't matter (under federalism) that more blacks, or less blacks, would vote so long as the intent of the law was to help, or hurt, dems.

Until Whitey starts burning down some city blocks, the court won't look at anything.