Those supporting Kim Davis don't really care about Religious Freedom

[PaintMyHouse]

No question she was a Christian
just not THAT kind of Christian

You know...I was raised Lutheran and came from a town with lots of Catholics (mostly Irish, Polish, and Italian) and some Methodists and Presbyterians too...and we all thought we were all Christians. Then I went to college and with a friend went to a Bible meeting one day to check it out. They started talking about being Christian in that, if you weren't with them, you weren't Christian...and the usage of the term was very very exclusionary. Turned me right off to their form of "religion". To me,that "holier than thou" attitude is just outright evil.

And you base all Christians on that alone.makes it easy dosnt it?

Satan will trick anyone anyway he can.
People are also looking for reasons to not believe. If they only knew the comfort and joy....

Including you.

ESPECIALLY Christians!
He wants to destroy our witness!

With people like Davis and Sassy around he hardly needs to...

 

[David_42]

Of course they don't, the authoritarian fundie right wants to impose christian sharia law.

 

[rightwinger]

Absolutely. It works like this:

Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

Guess what she is trying to do, and can't. If she, in GOOD CONSCIENCE, can't do her job as required by the law and the taxpayers that pay her salary then she needs to get another job. All clear now, grasshopper...

I guess you fail ethics...

One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content.

When one conflicts with the other..then a choice must be made....

She did exactly that.....she chose to do the right thing based upon her own conscience.....which is all anyone knowledgeable of ethics can expect...

However, there is no conflict with keeping her job since her moral were not in conflict when she accepted the job and only later have been put to the test...

She if showing the entire world the meaning of integrity......I'll bet you wish you had those kinds of balls.

Being ethical is doing the job you took an oath to do. Integrity is doing it even when it may be difficult to do.

NO...Ethical is doing the right thing, regardless of circumstance...Integrity is holding true to your beliefs and actions with regard to your ethics..

Ethics 101.

ethical

[eth-i-kuh l]

adjective
1.
pertaining to or dealing with morals or the principles of morality; pertaining to right and wrong in conduct.
2. being in accordance with the rules or standards for right conduct or practice, especially the standards of a profession:
the definition of ethical

And what was Kim's profession? Being a clerk, not a priest...

I know you are limited in understanding....but consider this...

1. Pertaining to right and wrong in conduct........

This is what she has done....she is conducting herself as she perceives right and wrong. It does not get any more clear than that.

The standards of profession is NUMBER 2....meaning is is secondary in importance....but setting that aside....

So, if a person has a deeply held personal ethic of doing what they held to be right, and a job had a standard that was in conflict with that ethic, personal ethics always come first

So....if the clerk were Muslim and your wife went in for a drivers license, you would support that clerk refusing to issue a drivers license for religious reasons

After all...personal ethic is NUMBER 1

 

[rightwinger]

Why do you keep saying that? Do you really believe that Christians don't have rules about how to behave and treat other people?

Once again, there is no such thing as Christian Sharia law, it's some idiot term the anti Christian crowd has made up. It's just that simple but being simpleminded fools you can't quite wrap your heads around it

There most certainly is. And you are a big supporter of it. Most of your posts are on what you think the laws should be in this country based on YOUR interpretation of YOUR religious faith. That is sharia pure and simple. Just because you don't like it to be called that because of the muslim connotations doesn't make it any less tru.

You know what? You better hope this nation's Christians don't go Sharia law on you left loons....you'd be sorely outnumbered and YOU may very well find yourself being tossed of a tall building. Think about it, toad.

There it is! Sassy admitting that if her brand of Christian got to make our nation's laws based on their interpretation...they would kill us.

Once again....Christians aren't a threat to homosexuals......Muslims are.

What a totally irrelevant post

 

[Taz]

Religious freedom isn't about denying others theirs, like Kim Davis did, and churches do all the time, it's about everyone being able to live their own religion freely, like homosexuals want to do.

 

[mudwhistle]

Religious freedom isn't about denying others theirs, like Kim Davis did, and churches do all the time, it's about everyone being able to live their own religion freely, like homosexuals want to do.

The homosexual agenda is purely sectarian. They have nothing to do with religions or spirituality. As a matter of fact, they clearly state that they are anti-religion in every way.

Why do Democrats support same-sex marriage and sanctuary cities?

Because Democrats support the breakdown of societies.

If you hate America you're more prone to be a Democrat than a Republican. But these days, we're wondering if they aren't both on the same team, because candidates like Jeb Bush are trying to sound like Democrats. It's no small wonder that he's in single digits and Trump is pulling away. Looks like there are still Americans that love this country. If Kim Davis has any brains at all she'll stop voting for Democrats....because they created this issue and literally threw her in jail.

 

[rightwinger]

Religious freedom isn't about denying others theirs, like Kim Davis did, and churches do all the time, it's about everyone being able to live their own religion freely, like homosexuals want to do.

The homosexual agenda is purely sectarian. They have nothing to do with religions or spirituality. As a matter of fact, they clearly state that they are anti-religion in every way.

Why do Democrats support same-sex marriage and sanctuary cities?

Because Democrats support the breakdown of societies.

If you hate America you're more prone to be a Democrat than a Republican. But these days, we're wondering if they aren't both on the same team, because candidates like Jeb Bush are trying to sound like Democrats. It's no small wonder that he's in single digits and Trump is pulling away. Looks like there are still Americans that love this country. If Kim Davis has any brains at all she'll stop voting for Democrats....because they created this issue and literally threw her in jail.

You caught them

The "homosexual agenda" the whole time was to pretend they wanted to get married so they could lock up Kim Davis

Sneaky bastards

 

[Taz]

Religious freedom isn't about denying others theirs, like Kim Davis did, and churches do all the time, it's about everyone being able to live their own religion freely, like homosexuals want to do.

The homosexual agenda is purely sectarian. They have nothing to do with religions or spirituality. As a matter of fact, they clearly state that they are anti-religion in every way.

Why do Democrats support same-sex marriage and sanctuary cities?

Because Democrats support the breakdown of societies.

If you hate America you're more prone to be a Democrat than a Republican. But these days, we're wondering if they aren't both on the same team, because candidates like Jeb Bush are trying to sound like Democrats. It's no small wonder that he's in single digits and Trump is pulling away. Looks like there are still Americans that love this country. If Kim Davis has any brains at all she'll stop voting for Democrats....because they created this issue and literally threw her in jail.

Homosexuals are anti-religion? You just make that up?
And what I said has zero to do with politics. Please try again.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[bodecea]

Doesn't surprise me that many here do not want to acknowledge Kim Davis' religious tyranny towards her clerks.

 

[Taz]

Plus, Kim Davis is really ugly.

 

[rightwinger]

Plus, Kim Davis is really ugly.

In more ways than one

 

[bodecea]

Plus, Kim Davis is really ugly.

Her looks are irrelevant.

 

[Taz]

Plus, Kim Davis is really ugly.

Her looks are irrelevant.

And she's fat.

 

[rightwinger]

Plus, Kim Davis is really ugly.

Her looks are irrelevant.

She is ugly on the inside

 

[Taz]

If Kim Davis wants to live by the bible, she should be stoned for adultery.

 

[bodecea]

If Kim Davis wants to live by the bible, she should be stoned for adultery.

Not if she belongs to the Church of St. Luby's....cafeteria christianity.