Those supporting Kim Davis don't really care about Religious Freedom

[Darkwind]

An illicit move that will be nullified on appeal. These others are issuing invalid licenses. A judge cannot overturn the vote of the people. Even congress people continue to server in jail until they are removed from office.

Nope...care to make a wager on this?

It is the law...

You remember...you are trying so hard to defend the law being upheld come hell or highwater...

Do you even look at the signature of the licenses issued by government?

Care to make a wager on this? (2nd time asking)

I don't make wagers with losers....I suppose you think you have some kind of link that will show that others can sign these licenses too.

You mean you don't make losing wagers. I get it. You can't put your money (or sig or avatar or time off the board) where your mouth is. So much for YOUR conviction in what you say.

I make no wagers with losers......period...

AS for time off the board....The forums have already won that....You people are so toxic I'm going leave before the end of the week.....this incident was just the last straw...when I get to the point when I see just how stupid and hate-filled you people have become...Its time to move on and do some real good in the world....

Besides...if you lost, you'd just ignore it like the rest of the progressives do....You have no credibility or integrity.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No, they know the law, and the law rules here, not Kim's God...

People and their rights rule here.....the right to be secure in your own conscious rules......Not even the King of England could make a true American change their conscious...A few gays aren't going to make much of a dent.

Conscience, dumbass...

conscience

[kon-shuh ns]


noun
1.
the inner sense of what is right or wrong in one's conduct or motives, impelling one toward right action:
to follow the dictates of conscience.

Good for you....

Now, do you understand it?

Absolutely. It works like this:

Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

Guess what she is trying to do, and can't. If she, in GOOD CONSCIENCE, can't do her job as required by the law and the taxpayers that pay her salary then she needs to get another job. All clear now, grasshopper...

I guess you fail ethics...

One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content.

When one conflicts with the other..then a choice must be made....

She did exactly that.....she chose to do the right thing based upon her own conscience.....which is all anyone knowledgeable of ethics can expect...

However, there is no conflict with keeping her job since her moral were not in conflict when she accepted the job and only later have been put to the test...

She if showing the entire world the meaning of integrity......I'll bet you wish you had those kinds of balls.

She doesn't have balls, she has gall. Learn the difference.

And who in God's name told you this total BS? "One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content."

Balls, BTW, would have been resigning when she could no longer do her duty. Times change, and so do job requirements, but it takes balls to walk away from 80K a year in the shithole. Balls she doesn't have...

 

[Bonzi]

Good for you....

Now, do you understand it?

Absolutely. It works like this:

Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

Guess what she is trying to do, and can't. If she, in GOOD CONSCIENCE, can't do her job as required by the law and the taxpayers that pay her salary then she needs to get another job. All clear now, grasshopper...

I guess you fail ethics...

One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content.

When one conflicts with the other..then a choice must be made....

She did exactly that.....she chose to do the right thing based upon her own conscience.....which is all anyone knowledgeable of ethics can expect...

However, there is no conflict with keeping her job since her moral were not in conflict when she accepted the job and only later have been put to the test...

She if showing the entire world the meaning of integrity......I'll bet you wish you had those kinds of balls.

Yes, she chose...(but cowardly tried to have her cake and eat it too) and FORCED her clerks to go by HER interpretation of religion. Again, you are no supporter of Religious Freedom.....why don't you admit it. You are a supporter of Religious Tyranny.

Again...your statement has been proven false....
She FORCED no one....Because they lacked the courage to opposer here does NOT equate to her forcing them...

Even a 2 year old would understand that.

She's their boss. She has the authority to allow or disallow. Unlike her, who can not be fired - they can.

No, she went to jail and has a permanent record.

 

[Darkwind]

Have to love the false equivalencies made the the left.

 

[Darkwind]

People and their rights rule here.....the right to be secure in your own conscious rules......Not even the King of England could make a true American change their conscious...A few gays aren't going to make much of a dent.

Conscience, dumbass...

conscience

[kon-shuh ns]


noun
1.
the inner sense of what is right or wrong in one's conduct or motives, impelling one toward right action:
to follow the dictates of conscience.

Good for you....

Now, do you understand it?

Absolutely. It works like this:

Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

Guess what she is trying to do, and can't. If she, in GOOD CONSCIENCE, can't do her job as required by the law and the taxpayers that pay her salary then she needs to get another job. All clear now, grasshopper...

I guess you fail ethics...

One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content.

When one conflicts with the other..then a choice must be made....

She did exactly that.....she chose to do the right thing based upon her own conscience.....which is all anyone knowledgeable of ethics can expect...

However, there is no conflict with keeping her job since her moral were not in conflict when she accepted the job and only later have been put to the test...

She if showing the entire world the meaning of integrity......I'll bet you wish you had those kinds of balls.

She doesn't have balls, she has gall. Learn the difference.

And who in God's name told you this total BS? "One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content."

Balls, BTW, would have been resigning when she could no longer do her duty. Times change, and so do job requirements, but it takes balls to walk away from 80K a year in the shithole. Balls she doesn't have...

LMAO

She has balls.

You have gall just posting here...

 

[Bonzi]

Nope...care to make a wager on this?

It is the law...

You remember...you are trying so hard to defend the law being upheld come hell or highwater...

Do you even look at the signature of the licenses issued by government?

Care to make a wager on this? (2nd time asking)

I don't make wagers with losers....I suppose you think you have some kind of link that will show that others can sign these licenses too.

You mean you don't make losing wagers. I get it. You can't put your money (or sig or avatar or time off the board) where your mouth is. So much for YOUR conviction in what you say.

I make no wagers with losers......period...

AS for time off the board....The forums have already won that....You people are so toxic I'm going leave before the end of the week.....this incident was just the last straw...when I get to the point when I see just how stupid and hate-filled you people have become...Its time to move on and do some real good in the world....

Besides...if you lost, you'd just ignore it like the rest of the progressives do....You have no credibility or integrity.

No...

 

[TheOldSchool]

Have to love the false equivalencies made the the left.

I bet you do.

 

[Darkwind]

Good for you....

Now, do you understand it?

Absolutely. It works like this:

Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

Guess what she is trying to do, and can't. If she, in GOOD CONSCIENCE, can't do her job as required by the law and the taxpayers that pay her salary then she needs to get another job. All clear now, grasshopper...

I guess you fail ethics...

One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content.

When one conflicts with the other..then a choice must be made....

She did exactly that.....she chose to do the right thing based upon her own conscience.....which is all anyone knowledgeable of ethics can expect...

However, there is no conflict with keeping her job since her moral were not in conflict when she accepted the job and only later have been put to the test...

She if showing the entire world the meaning of integrity......I'll bet you wish you had those kinds of balls.

Yes, she chose...(but cowardly tried to have her cake and eat it too) and FORCED her clerks to go by HER interpretation of religion. Again, you are no supporter of Religious Freedom.....why don't you admit it. You are a supporter of Religious Tyranny.

Again...your statement has been proven false....
She FORCED no one....Because they lacked the courage to opposer here does NOT equate to her forcing them...

Even a 2 year old would understand that.

Yes she did and they admitted it to the judge when he polled them.....but feel free to keep showing us that you are a supporter of Kim Davis' religious tyranny towards those she had authority over.

you understand that simply because you say it, that does not lend it any credibility or truth...

 

[bodecea]

Nope...care to make a wager on this?

It is the law...

You remember...you are trying so hard to defend the law being upheld come hell or highwater...

Do you even look at the signature of the licenses issued by government?

Care to make a wager on this? (2nd time asking)

I don't make wagers with losers....I suppose you think you have some kind of link that will show that others can sign these licenses too.

You mean you don't make losing wagers. I get it. You can't put your money (or sig or avatar or time off the board) where your mouth is. So much for YOUR conviction in what you say.

I make no wagers with losers......period...

AS for time off the board....The forums have already won that....You people are so toxic I'm going leave before the end of the week.....this incident was just the last straw...when I get to the point when I see just how stupid and hate-filled you people have become...Its time to move on and do some real good in the world....

Besides...if you lost, you'd just ignore it like the rest of the progressives do....You have no credibility or integrity.

You mean you make not losing wagers. You know you would lose and you have no convictions in your own beliefs..not even for a avatar, sig, or time off board bet.

And I like your excuse saying that people ignore bets. You apparently haven't been on this board enough to know that all the welchers to a person are RWrs. I actually lost a bet once a few years back and faithfully stayed off the board for 30 days. I don't believe you are made of enough honest stuff to stick by your own beliefs.

 

[bodecea]

Absolutely. It works like this:

Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

Guess what she is trying to do, and can't. If she, in GOOD CONSCIENCE, can't do her job as required by the law and the taxpayers that pay her salary then she needs to get another job. All clear now, grasshopper...

I guess you fail ethics...

One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content.

When one conflicts with the other..then a choice must be made....

She did exactly that.....she chose to do the right thing based upon her own conscience.....which is all anyone knowledgeable of ethics can expect...

However, there is no conflict with keeping her job since her moral were not in conflict when she accepted the job and only later have been put to the test...

She if showing the entire world the meaning of integrity......I'll bet you wish you had those kinds of balls.

Yes, she chose...(but cowardly tried to have her cake and eat it too) and FORCED her clerks to go by HER interpretation of religion. Again, you are no supporter of Religious Freedom.....why don't you admit it. You are a supporter of Religious Tyranny.

Again...your statement has been proven false....
She FORCED no one....Because they lacked the courage to opposer here does NOT equate to her forcing them...

Even a 2 year old would understand that.

Yes she did and they admitted it to the judge when he polled them.....but feel free to keep showing us that you are a supporter of Kim Davis' religious tyranny towards those she had authority over.

you understand that simply because you say it, that does not lend it any credibility or truth...

^ and now, Darkwind is talking to himself.

 

[Bonzi]

It is the law...

You remember...you are trying so hard to defend the law being upheld come hell or highwater...

Do you even look at the signature of the licenses issued by government?

Care to make a wager on this? (2nd time asking)

I don't make wagers with losers....I suppose you think you have some kind of link that will show that others can sign these licenses too.

You mean you don't make losing wagers. I get it. You can't put your money (or sig or avatar or time off the board) where your mouth is. So much for YOUR conviction in what you say.

I make no wagers with losers......period...

AS for time off the board....The forums have already won that....You people are so toxic I'm going leave before the end of the week.....this incident was just the last straw...when I get to the point when I see just how stupid and hate-filled you people have become...Its time to move on and do some real good in the world....

Besides...if you lost, you'd just ignore it like the rest of the progressives do....You have no credibility or integrity.

You mean you make not losing wagers. You know you would lose and you have no convictions in your own beliefs..not even for a avatar, sig, or time off board bet.

And I like your excuse saying that people ignore bets. You apparently haven't been on this board enough to know that all the welchers to a person are RWrs. I actually lost a bet once a few years back and faithfully stayed off the board for 30 days. I don't believe you are made of enough honest stuff to stick by your own beliefs.

I hope you are right about that!

 

[bodecea]

Have to love the false equivalencies made the the left.

I bet you do.

 

[Darkwind]

It is the law...

You remember...you are trying so hard to defend the law being upheld come hell or highwater...

Do you even look at the signature of the licenses issued by government?

Care to make a wager on this? (2nd time asking)

I don't make wagers with losers....I suppose you think you have some kind of link that will show that others can sign these licenses too.

You mean you don't make losing wagers. I get it. You can't put your money (or sig or avatar or time off the board) where your mouth is. So much for YOUR conviction in what you say.

I make no wagers with losers......period...

AS for time off the board....The forums have already won that....You people are so toxic I'm going leave before the end of the week.....this incident was just the last straw...when I get to the point when I see just how stupid and hate-filled you people have become...Its time to move on and do some real good in the world....

Besides...if you lost, you'd just ignore it like the rest of the progressives do....You have no credibility or integrity.

You mean you make not losing wagers. You know you would lose and you have no convictions in your own beliefs..not even for a avatar, sig, or time off board bet.

And I like your excuse saying that people ignore bets. You apparently haven't been on this board enough to know that all the welchers to a person are RWrs. I actually lost a bet once a few years back and faithfully stayed off the board for 30 days. I don't believe you are made of enough honest stuff to stick by your own beliefs.

So, that makes you a double liar...

Of course, for you...anything that you don't like is a RW's fault.....

BTW...I've been on this forum longer than you have.....

Or would you care to wager on that?

LMAO....

worthless wagers....by people who think that a person has to meet THEIR criteria on what a christian is, in order to meet the definition of a Christian...

Too fucking funny.

 

[bodecea]

Conscience, dumbass...

conscience

[kon-shuh ns]


noun
1.
the inner sense of what is right or wrong in one's conduct or motives, impelling one toward right action:
to follow the dictates of conscience.

Good for you....

Now, do you understand it?

Absolutely. It works like this:

Matthew 6:24
"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money."

Guess what she is trying to do, and can't. If she, in GOOD CONSCIENCE, can't do her job as required by the law and the taxpayers that pay her salary then she needs to get another job. All clear now, grasshopper...

I guess you fail ethics...

One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content.

When one conflicts with the other..then a choice must be made....

She did exactly that.....she chose to do the right thing based upon her own conscience.....which is all anyone knowledgeable of ethics can expect...

However, there is no conflict with keeping her job since her moral were not in conflict when she accepted the job and only later have been put to the test...

She if showing the entire world the meaning of integrity......I'll bet you wish you had those kinds of balls.

She doesn't have balls, she has gall. Learn the difference.

And who in God's name told you this total BS? "One has the right and permission to do as needed to survive in life....they can follow a path of enrichment to their hearts content."

Balls, BTW, would have been resigning when she could no longer do her duty. Times change, and so do job requirements, but it takes balls to walk away from 80K a year in the shithole. Balls she doesn't have...

LMAO

She has balls.

You have gall just posting here...

Oh look....

 

[TheOldSchool]

Have to love the false equivalencies made the the left.

I bet you do.

 

[Darkwind]

It is the law...

You remember...you are trying so hard to defend the law being upheld come hell or highwater...

Do you even look at the signature of the licenses issued by government?

Care to make a wager on this? (2nd time asking)

I don't make wagers with losers....I suppose you think you have some kind of link that will show that others can sign these licenses too.

You mean you don't make losing wagers. I get it. You can't put your money (or sig or avatar or time off the board) where your mouth is. So much for YOUR conviction in what you say.

I make no wagers with losers......period...

AS for time off the board....The forums have already won that....You people are so toxic I'm going leave before the end of the week.....this incident was just the last straw...when I get to the point when I see just how stupid and hate-filled you people have become...Its time to move on and do some real good in the world....

Besides...if you lost, you'd just ignore it like the rest of the progressives do....You have no credibility or integrity.

You mean you make not losing wagers. You know you would lose and you have no convictions in your own beliefs..not even for a avatar, sig, or time off board bet.

And I like your excuse saying that people ignore bets. You apparently haven't been on this board enough to know that all the welchers to a person are RWrs. I actually lost a bet once a few years back and faithfully stayed off the board for 30 days. I don't believe you are made of enough honest stuff to stick by your own beliefs.

Oh wait...that must make you honorable....

Oh..wait...

No, it doesn't......

a few years back which cannot be proven...have to take your word for it..

Go spend some time in jail.....then get back to Me about living up to your beliefs.

 

[TheOldSchool]

OMG this one! bodecea

 

[bodecea]

Care to make a wager on this? (2nd time asking)

I don't make wagers with losers....I suppose you think you have some kind of link that will show that others can sign these licenses too.

You mean you don't make losing wagers. I get it. You can't put your money (or sig or avatar or time off the board) where your mouth is. So much for YOUR conviction in what you say.

I make no wagers with losers......period...

AS for time off the board....The forums have already won that....You people are so toxic I'm going leave before the end of the week.....this incident was just the last straw...when I get to the point when I see just how stupid and hate-filled you people have become...Its time to move on and do some real good in the world....

Besides...if you lost, you'd just ignore it like the rest of the progressives do....You have no credibility or integrity.

You mean you make not losing wagers. You know you would lose and you have no convictions in your own beliefs..not even for a avatar, sig, or time off board bet.

And I like your excuse saying that people ignore bets. You apparently haven't been on this board enough to know that all the welchers to a person are RWrs. I actually lost a bet once a few years back and faithfully stayed off the board for 30 days. I don't believe you are made of enough honest stuff to stick by your own beliefs.

So, that makes you a double liar...

Of course, for you...anything that you don't like is a RW's fault.....

BTW...I've been on this forum longer than you have.....

Or would you care to wager on that?

LMAO....

worthless wagers....by people who think that a person has to meet THEIR criteria on what a christian is, in order to meet the definition of a Christian...

Too fucking funny.

Wager you've been here longer? Fool, I can see your join date. So you know all about the Election 2012 welchers then. To pretend you don't will just show that you have no credibility.

So.. you are leaving this board forever by the end of this week? Ok....see you next week.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

This has turned into a Romper Room thread

 

[Bonzi]

Have to love the false equivalencies made the the left.

I bet you do.

You realized she did not become a Christian until AFTER her divorces... ignorant!