Thread for Zionists who Deny the Existence of the Palestinian Christians and Muslims

Of course. Wiki, the Hasbara tool, must be accurate. LOL


Is the Catholic Church a "Hasbara tool" as well, moron?

Growth of Jerusalem 1838-Present

....... Jews Muslims Christians Total
1838 6,000 5,000 3,000 14,000
1844 7,120 5,760 3,390 16,270 ..... ..The First Official Ottoman Census
1876 12,000 7,560 5,470 25,030 .... .....Second """"""""""
1905 40,000 8,000 10,900 58,900 ....... Third/last, detailed in CathEncyc above
1948 99,320 36,680 31,300 167,300
1990 353,200 124,200 14,000 491,400
1992 385,000 150,000 15,000 550,000

http://www.testimony-magazine.org/jerusalem/bring.htm

What Crap
 
Nothing was erased, the adjoining pages were aligned as they should be. The link is there, you can read the scanned census document and align the rows yourself. You are atypical Hasbara troll. The facts are the facts you lying piece of crap.

You come back again with Your straightforward lies...
when just a week ago You've tried to cut Jews out of a document:
post #308

Montelatici said:
"Yes, Jerusalem should be 100% Christian. We have the power, why should we allow non-believers to have any authority in Jerusalem? Why do we need to be fair or accommodating? Throw out the troublemakers. Deus Vult." :uhh:


But then again manipulation and hatred is ALL YOU HAVE Monte.
:dig:

Yes, a Christian Jerusalem would certainly be better.

A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
 
Nothing was erased, the adjoining pages were aligned as they should be. The link is there, you can read the scanned census document and align the rows yourself. You are atypical Hasbara troll. The facts are the facts you lying piece of crap.

You come back again with Your straightforward lies...
when just a week ago You've tried to cut Jews out of a document:
post #308

Montelatici said:
"Yes, Jerusalem should be 100% Christian. We have the power, why should we allow non-believers to have any authority in Jerusalem? Why do we need to be fair or accommodating? Throw out the troublemakers. Deus Vult." :uhh:


But then again manipulation and hatred is ALL YOU HAVE Monte.
:dig:

Yes, a Christian Jerusalem would certainly be better.

A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?
 
Nothing was erased, the adjoining pages were aligned as they should be. The link is there, you can read the scanned census document and align the rows yourself. You are atypical Hasbara troll. The facts are the facts you lying piece of crap.

You come back again with Your straightforward lies...
when just a week ago You've tried to cut Jews out of a document:
post #308

Montelatici said:
"Yes, Jerusalem should be 100% Christian. We have the power, why should we allow non-believers to have any authority in Jerusalem? Why do we need to be fair or accommodating? Throw out the troublemakers. Deus Vult." :uhh:


But then again manipulation and hatred is ALL YOU HAVE Monte.
:dig:

Yes, a Christian Jerusalem would certainly be better.

A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?

You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
 
Nothing was erased, the adjoining pages were aligned as they should be. The link is there, you can read the scanned census document and align the rows yourself. You are atypical Hasbara troll. The facts are the facts you lying piece of crap.

You come back again with Your straightforward lies...
when just a week ago You've tried to cut Jews out of a document:
post #308

Montelatici said:
"Yes, Jerusalem should be 100% Christian. We have the power, why should we allow non-believers to have any authority in Jerusalem? Why do we need to be fair or accommodating? Throw out the troublemakers. Deus Vult." :uhh:


But then again manipulation and hatred is ALL YOU HAVE Monte.
:dig:

Yes, a Christian Jerusalem would certainly be better.

A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?

You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate.
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.
 
You come back again with Your straightforward lies...
when just a week ago You've tried to cut Jews out of a document:
post #308

Montelatici said:
"Yes, Jerusalem should be 100% Christian. We have the power, why should we allow non-believers to have any authority in Jerusalem? Why do we need to be fair or accommodating? Throw out the troublemakers. Deus Vult." :uhh:


But then again manipulation and hatred is ALL YOU HAVE Monte.
:dig:

Yes, a Christian Jerusalem would certainly be better.

A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?

You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate.
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.

Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
 
Yes, a Christian Jerusalem would certainly be better.

A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?

You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate.
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.

Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
 
A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?

You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate.
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.

Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.

Such a goofy plagiarist.
 
A Christian Jerusalem colonized by Christian supremacists (as opposed to Islamist supremacists), would not be better.
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?

You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate.
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.

Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
The Turks kicked out the Palestinians out and moved their own people in?

Link?
 
And how well has European Jewish supremacists' presence in Palestine boded for peace?

You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate.
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.

Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
The Turks kicked out the Palestinians out and moved their own people in?

Link?
The Turks were invited in after conquest and colonization by Arabs-Moslems and European Christian crusaders?


Link?
 
You haven't memorized your koranology lessons or understood contingent history. Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate. That has nothing to do with your typically ignorant claims of Jewish supremacists. As usual, you're simply and mindlessly plagiarizing my comments without any understanding of the core argument.

As you know, your politico-religious ideology which was invented by an Arab warlord maintains the concept of waqf, meaning that any lands conquered and colonized by muhammedans becomes muhammedan lands in perpetuity. This is delineated in the Hamas charter wherein they explicitly reference the entirety of the geographic area of Pal'istan as an Islamist waqf.

You should know at this point that the kuffar has a much greater knowledge of islamism and Islamist fascism than you possess.

As with so many things, you're inept.
Jewish people were encouraged to immigrate to the area subject to the mandate.
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.

Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
The Turks kicked out the Palestinians out and moved their own people in?

Link?
The Turks were invited in after conquest and colonization by Arabs-Moslems and European Christian crusaders?


Link?
That is not what I said.
 
Indeed, Britain and the Zionists had mutual colonial interests in Palestine. That did not make it legal.

Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
The Turks kicked out the Palestinians out and moved their own people in?

Link?
The Turks were invited in after conquest and colonization by Arabs-Moslems and European Christian crusaders?


Link?
That is not what I said.

Nice duck™
 
Indeed, the Turkish and Arab colonists also had self-serving interests in the area of your invented "country of Pal'istan".

Indeed, as an Islamist, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
The Turks kicked out the Palestinians out and moved their own people in?

Link?
The Turks were invited in after conquest and colonization by Arabs-Moslems and European Christian crusaders?


Link?
That is not what I said.

Nice duck™
Duck what? That is not what I said.
 
Indeed, the European Jewish colonists had self-serving interests in the area of Palestine.

Indeed, as a Jew, you simply presume an entitlement to conquest and colonization.
The Turks kicked out the Palestinians out and moved their own people in?

Link?
The Turks were invited in after conquest and colonization by Arabs-Moslems and European Christian crusaders?


Link?
That is not what I said.

Nice duck™
Duck what? That is not what I said.

Nice dodge™
 
When Palestinian Martyrs were Christians. Until late into the fourth century, when Christianity became the state religion of Rome, Palestinians (as were Christians throughout the Empire) were often executed by the authorities for practicing their Christian faith.

Eusebio of Caesarea, born in Caesarea Maritima, Palestine wrote about these Christian Palestinian martyrs in his work "De martyribus Palestinae" (Palestinian Martyrs) written in the 4th century. Kind of puts the Zionist propaganda in perspective.


Martiri palestinesi nell’Occidente latino. I casi della Passio Theodosiae virginis (BHL 8090) e della Passio Romani monachi (BHL 7298)
 
When Palestinian Martyrs were Christians. Until late into the fourth century, when Christianity became the state religion of Rome, Palestinians (as were Christians throughout the Empire) were often executed by the authorities for practicing their Christian faith.

Eusebio of Caesarea, born in Caesarea Maritima, Palestine wrote about these Christian Palestinian martyrs in his work "De martyribus Palestinae" (Palestinian Martyrs) written in the 4th century. Kind of puts the Zionist propaganda in perspective.


Martiri palestinesi nell’Occidente latino. I casi della Passio Theodosiae virginis (BHL 8090) e della Passio Romani monachi (BHL 7298)

Besides the fact that this is in Latin so we can't read it, what does this have to do with the price of tea in China? What point are you trying to make?
 
Besides the fact that this is in Latin so we can't read it, what does this have to do with the price of tea in China? What point are you trying to make?
How dumb are you ForeverDumb436?

The point cannot be more obvious. If you can't reply to your own question, then you are either a zionist shill or have been brainwashed so heavily since childhood, that any further posts from you are rendered useless.
 
When Palestinian Martyrs were Christians. Until late into the fourth century, when Christianity became the state religion of Rome, Palestinians (as were Christians throughout the Empire) were often executed by the authorities for practicing their Christian faith.

Eusebio of Caesarea, born in Caesarea Maritima, Palestine wrote about these Christian Palestinian martyrs in his work "De martyribus Palestinae" (Palestinian Martyrs) written in the 4th century. Kind of puts the Zionist propaganda in perspective.


Martiri palestinesi nell’Occidente latino. I casi della Passio Theodosiae virginis (BHL 8090) e della Passio Romani monachi (BHL 7298)

No. It does nothing of the kind.

Actually it kind of puts your pompous blathering into perspective.

What you did achieve was to identify that a largely illiterate, uneducated and superstitious population can be manipulated. Historically, totalitarian ideologies and especially religious totalitarian ideologies have worked to cohere large numbers of people to effect a compliant population, focused on the aims and goals of those at the top of the pyramid. With a longer term view, we see the invention of Islamism and how an uneducated, superstitious tribal population can be convinced of almost anything. Interestingly, that uneducated, superstitious tribal population / mentality still exists in the Islamic Middle East today. The last century has seen the rise and fall of many totalitarian / authoritarian regimes, and many (Islamist ideology) still remain. We've seen dystopian nightmares from Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, al Qaeda, ISIS, and Hamas, Fatah and so many second tier Islamist wannabes. Today we have religious fascism in such places as Iran, a very many failed or failing states in the Middle East and a retreat to Islamic fascism in the Philippines.
 
The Zionists believe that there were no Palestinians before 1967. Since we now know that there were Palestinian martyrs before the fourth century from reading manuscripts discussing these Palestinians how about more recently, during Ottoman rule. Well, there was a manual for Palestinian Arabic written in 1909. If there was a Palestinian Arabic, isn't it absurd to think there were no Palestinians to speak the language?

upload_2017-6-13_19-55-16.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top