Pedro de San Patricio
Gold Member
- Feb 14, 2015
- 2,061
- 272
I've always been puzzled by this doctrine. Supposedly it's about healing and repairing the world to a perfect state that never actually was. The words themselves translate exactly to that - to repair, improve, renew. The words themselves have been meaningless though. The concept they name has been used to justify many, many harmful attempts to do so, from the creation and nurturing of Communism and the Bolshevik regime to legalizing post-birth abortion to fighting for the destruction of the nuclear family. It even played a role in quite a few of the atomic spies at Los Alamos (you know, the ones the left still refuses to admit happily gave the KGB nuclear weapons data) deciding to betray their country. Is this doctrine really even about its alleged "healing and improving" at all, or is it just one of those ideas that sound great in theory but tend to lead people to supporting the most evil shit for the imagined greater good?