🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Tillerson responds live at 2 pm

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

Pay?

Pay?

Oh yeah, Barnum nailed it. There's a sucker born every minute and two to take him/her/it.

that's why Donald is able to get you all to say the stupidest things for him. :cuckoo:

how does he get you, and your ilk, to say stupid things about him?
 
I am aware of that aspect, but Tillerson was also capable of diplomacy, something Trump sorely lacks

Let's take actual diplomatic accomplishments. Meaning someone did what they didn't want to do. I get Trump. You get Obama.

Trump: He got NK to the negotiating table. SK gave him direct credit for that.

Your turn ...
 
Will he torch the place on the way out, or do Trump’s goons have something on him so that he’ll praise Trump on his way out?

I wonder what vlad told him to do?
:cuckoo:

*yawn*

Russia praises possible Trump pick Rex Tillerson's 'highly professional manner'

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

Or in the future? I'm sure he didn't burn any bridges.
 
Will he torch the place on the way out, or do Trump’s goons have something on him so that he’ll praise Trump on his way out?

I wonder what vlad told him to do?
:cuckoo:

*yawn*

Russia praises possible Trump pick Rex Tillerson's 'highly professional manner'

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

Or in the future? I'm sure he didn't burn any bridges.

in the future?

He didn't work FOR them in the past, he doesn't work FOR them in the present, but you expect him to work FOR them in the future?

Watching too much MSNBC?
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

and what's your paygrade. i can't imagine trolling your board members every day pays much, eh dearie?

I'm also going to guess you're uninformed as to the belief that vlad chose tillerson.

reading is above your paygrade.

and feel free to troll others. :thup:
He trolls you cuz you're such an idiot. Everybody know that.
He's a mod. He ought not to be trolling anyone. Everybody knows that.
 
I am aware of that aspect, but Tillerson was also capable of diplomacy, something Trump sorely lacks

Let's take actual diplomatic accomplishments. Meaning someone did what they didn't want to do. I get Trump. You get Obama.

Trump: He got NK to the negotiating table. SK gave him direct credit for that.

Your turn ...

Wrong. He got NK to AGREE to meet, but the meeting still hasn't happened. And, in light of Tillerson getting the boot, I don't think that there is going to be a meeting with N. Korea by May.

And, if Pompeo actually ends up being the SoS like is planned, there is a good possibility for military action instead of diplomacy taking place.
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

and what's your paygrade. i can't imagine trolling your board members every day pays much, eh dearie?

I'm also going to guess you're uninformed as to the belief that vlad chose tillerson.

reading is above your paygrade.

and feel free to troll others. :thup:
He trolls you cuz you're such an idiot. Everybody know that.
He's a mod. He ought not to be trolling anyone. Everybody knows that.


When I post in red, I'm a mod.

if I'm NOT posting in red, I'm not.

are you able to tell the difference?
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

Or in the future? I'm sure he didn't burn any bridges.

in the future?

He didn't work FOR them in the past, he doesn't work FOR them in the present, but you expect him to work FOR them in the future?

Watching too much MSNBC?

It was your assertion, fool.

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

and what's your paygrade. i can't imagine trolling your board members every day pays much, eh dearie?

I'm also going to guess you're uninformed as to the belief that vlad chose tillerson.

reading is above your paygrade.

and feel free to troll others. :thup:
He trolls you cuz you're such an idiot. Everybody know that.
He's a mod. He ought not to be trolling anyone. Everybody knows that.


When I post in red, I'm a mod.

if I'm NOT posting in red, I'm not.

are you able to tell the difference?

You're a mod in either color.
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

Or in the future? I'm sure he didn't burn any bridges.

in the future?

He didn't work FOR them in the past, he doesn't work FOR them in the present, but you expect him to work FOR them in the future?

Watching too much MSNBC?

It was your assertion, fool.

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

maybe you should try rereading my post?
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

Or in the future? I'm sure he didn't burn any bridges.

in the future?

He didn't work FOR them in the past, he doesn't work FOR them in the present, but you expect him to work FOR them in the future?

Watching too much MSNBC?

It was your assertion, fool.

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

maybe you should try rereading my post?

Or reread mine. I never said he worked for them.
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

and what's your paygrade. i can't imagine trolling your board members every day pays much, eh dearie?

I'm also going to guess you're uninformed as to the belief that vlad chose tillerson.

reading is above your paygrade.

and feel free to troll others. :thup:

Wow, you're lucky to have the Democrat party to tell you what to think. Otherwise you'd just sit and drool all day
she still drools all day, but she thinks she's drooling with a purpose.
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

and what's your paygrade. i can't imagine trolling your board members every day pays much, eh dearie?

I'm also going to guess you're uninformed as to the belief that vlad chose tillerson.

reading is above your paygrade.

and feel free to troll others. :thup:

Wow, you're lucky to have the Democrat party to tell you what to think. Otherwise you'd just sit and drool all day
she still drools all day, but she thinks she's drooling with a purpose.
Vlad vetoed Mitt for State, lads.
 
I am aware of that aspect, but Tillerson was also capable of diplomacy, something Trump sorely lacks

Let's take actual diplomatic accomplishments. Meaning someone did what they didn't want to do. I get Trump. You get Obama.

Trump: He got NK to the negotiating table. SK gave him direct credit for that.

Your turn ...
Iran.
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

and what's your paygrade. i can't imagine trolling your board members every day pays much, eh dearie?

I'm also going to guess you're uninformed as to the belief that vlad chose tillerson.

reading is above your paygrade.

and feel free to troll others. :thup:

Wow, you're lucky to have the Democrat party to tell you what to think. Otherwise you'd just sit and drool all day
she still drools all day, but she thinks she's drooling with a purpose.

say dead from the neck up losers.

cool!
 

and?

just because he worked with them in his previous job, doesn't mean he works for them, then, OR now.

Or, is that kind of thinking above your paygrade?

and what's your paygrade. i can't imagine trolling your board members every day pays much, eh dearie?

I'm also going to guess you're uninformed as to the belief that vlad chose tillerson.

reading is above your paygrade.

and feel free to troll others. :thup:

Wow, you're lucky to have the Democrat party to tell you what to think. Otherwise you'd just sit and drool all day
she still drools all day, but she thinks she's drooling with a purpose.
Vlad vetoed Mitt for State, lads.
Can't be. CNN said that Tillerson and Putin were in cahoots, and CNN is real news, right?

In 2013, Vladimir Putin awarded ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson the Order of Friendship, one of the highest honors Russia gives to foreign citizens.
The silver badge underscores the close ties that have existed for many years between Russia and Tillerson, the leading candidate to be President-elect Donald Trump's secretary of state.

The 64-year-old Tillerson, a lifetime Exxon employee, came up through the ranks by managing the company's Russia account.

In fact, his close relationship with Russia is one of the major reasons Tillerson was selected to succeed Lee Raymond as CEO of Exxon (XOM) in 2006, according to Steve Coll's book "Private Empire: ExxonMobil and American Power."

Behind the deep ties between Exxon's Rex Tillerson and Russia
 
I am aware of that aspect, but Tillerson was also capable of diplomacy, something Trump sorely lacks

Let's take actual diplomatic accomplishments. Meaning someone did what they didn't want to do. I get Trump. You get Obama.

Trump: He got NK to the negotiating table. SK gave him direct credit for that.

Your turn ...

Wrong. He got NK to AGREE to meet, but the meeting still hasn't happened. And, in light of Tillerson getting the boot, I don't think that there is going to be a meeting with N. Korea by May.

And, if Pompeo actually ends up being the SoS like is planned, there is a good possibility for military action instead of diplomacy taking place.

So you can't think of any Obama diplomacy achievements either, huh?
 

Forum List

Back
Top