Time to give Al Franken the boot - Here's how:

[bripat9643]

We can see the photo. He's not actually touching her.

Hence, there's no groping.

The lesson? Conservative liars need to stop lying.

Not to mention she is wearing a kevlar vest.

Yeah so, now it's OK to molest her. Got it....

You call that molesting? Really? It's sexual harassment... which isn't even close to sexual assault.

It's sexual assault, moron.

 

[bripat9643]

We can see the photo. He's not actually touching her.

Hence, there's no groping.

The lesson? Conservative liars need to stop lying.

Not to mention she is wearing a kevlar vest.

Yeah so, now it's OK to molest her. Got it....

You call that molesting? Really? It's sexual harassment... which isn't even close to sexual assault.

What Franken did on the plane was sexual harassment. What he did backstage to her was sexual assault.

Both were sexual assault. The latter case is clearer since he touched her breasts.

 

[bripat9643]

. Is this how it is, where as if a Dem just apologizes, it is all forgiven, and it will be ok ?? So it will just be business as usual after that ?? Is it that the desensitized public have been conditioned to just look the other way if a Dem does anything crazy or wrong headed, but a Republican man or woman attempting to live a Christian Life (all though not perfect), must be sentenced to the harshest punishment available for their mistaken fowel or mis-deeds ?? The Dems we're working as hard as they could to normalize as much as it could over the past years, and they did this in so that it could withstand or insulate itself from any attacks to be based upon morals or ethics violations in which might be found in an event or in a case brought. Genius is what it is, but very evil in it's intent.

Once AGAIN --- the question is "on what basis does Franken 'need to resign'"? You didn't address that question at all. Neither did the OP.

See where we're going with this yet?

Do a little research, read the allegations and get back to us when you have a fricken clue.

Oh I know exactly what the allegations are. Heard them all day on the road in my travels.

The question STILL REMAINS ---- on what basis does Franken need to "resign"?

That's seven times I've posted that question. Got zero answers.

Well for one thing, the entire Democrat Party's credibility on sexual harassment is at stake here.This is a test of the Democratic Party’s consistency, honesty, and decency. If Democrats wish to preserve whatever moral standing they have today, they must exhort Franken to leave the Senate, with no hesitation or reservations.
The sheer hypocrisy of Franken's meager apology is galling. Following the Harvey Weinstein scandal, Franken wrote an impassioned Facebook post declaring that saxual harassment is "appaling" and "far too common".

Al Franken who is a self-proclaimed defender of women’s rights has revealed himself to be a misogynistic fraud. Franken’s ardent promotion of gender equality on the Senate floor is rendered meaningless in the face of his disgusting conduct. If the Democrat party wishes to retain an ounce of credibility, it must demand Franken’s swift resignation.

And here we go again ...
---- on the basis of what?

On the basis that he committed sexual assault, you fucking dumbass.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Al Franken: Misogynist Female sexual assaulter.

Seriously, if rubes believe that, it lowers my hope for humanity in general.

Al Franken is a flaming faggot.

You never knew? Wtf?

Does he need "I'm a faggot" tattooed on his forehead? Seriously.

I'm from the land of reality.

No, he never sexually assaulted/harassed any women.

 

[bripat9643]

Do a little research, read the allegations and get back to us when you have a fricken clue.

Oh I know exactly what the allegations are. Heard them all day on the road in my travels.

The question STILL REMAINS ---- on what basis does Franken need to "resign"?

That's seven times I've posted that question. Got zero answers.

Well for one thing, the entire Democrat Party's credibility on sexual harassment is at stake here.This is a test of the Democratic Party’s consistency, honesty, and decency. If Democrats wish to preserve whatever moral standing they have today, they must exhort Franken to leave the Senate, with no hesitation or reservations.
The sheer hypocrisy of Franken's meager apology is galling. Following the Harvey Weinstein scandal, Franken wrote an impassioned Facebook post declaring that saxual harassment is "appaling" and "far too common".

Al Franken who is a self-proclaimed defender of women’s rights has revealed himself to be a misogynistic fraud. Franken’s ardent promotion of gender equality on the Senate floor is rendered meaningless in the face of his disgusting conduct. If the Democrat party wishes to retain an ounce of credibility, it must demand Franken’s swift resignation.

And here we go again ...
---- on the basis of what?

If a human piece of shit like Franken grabbed you by the back of the neck and forced its tongue down your throat in the name of comedy, would you ask "on the basis of what"?

I would ask what the fuck it's got to do with the Senate.

But gimme Amy Klobuchar at least.

The longer you idiots deny it, the longer it will remain an issue and the more your filthy party will suffer.

 

[bripat9643]

We can see the photo. He's not actually touching her.

Hence, there's no groping.

The lesson? Conservative liars need to stop lying.

Not to mention she is wearing a kevlar vest.

Great excuse, right?

It's not exactly a rape if you wear a condom.

Wrong, not even close to the same, and sadly, I'm not sure if you are smart enough to realize it or not.

You're not smart enough to realize you're trying to exuse sexual assault purely because Franken is a Dim.

 

[bripat9643]

Overwhelm him with complaints:

https://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=email_al

Senator Franken:

The irrefutable photographic evidence of your groping of Ms. Leeann Tweeden is vile and disgusting.

To have done this during a tour to entertain our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines raises the disgusting extent of your actions by orders of magnitude.

Members of the U.S. Senate on both sides of the aisle, the media, and a large swath of the public are demanding Judge Roy Moore withdraw from the race for a Senate seat representing Alabama based on accusations with little in the way of hard evidence. Your case, however, clearly and irrefutably shows the same behavior on your part.

You must resign your Senate seat immediately.

You must do this as one part of atonement for your repulsive behavior. Other elements would be to publicly apologize to Ms. Tweeden during a speech from the Senate floor, a speech where you accept full responsibility for your actions, beg her forgiveness, and announce your resignation.

Resign or be branded a unrepentant sexual predator just like Mr. Harvey Weinstein and so many others.

I cannot stand Al Franken. I hated his humor, and I hate his far left beliefs.

That photo of him groping a sleeping woman thoroughly disgusted me.

However, his behavior does not rise to the level of a Trump, much less a Weinstein.

If a pussy grabbing molester who walks into underaged girls dressing rooms to catch them naked can be elected President, then Franken should not resign.

Anyone who voted for Trump is a hypocrite for demanding Franken resign.

How is grabbing someone's pussy any worse than grabbing someone's breasts? Furthermore, Trump said they consented. There's no denying that Franken's victim didn't consent.

 

[bripat9643]

I would like to see the Senate launch an investigation into the charges against Al Franken

Then they would have no excuse for not investigating the more severe charges against President Trump

Lets make it a package deal

A Franken investigation is just a stalling tactic. There's nothing to investigate. It's open and shut. Furthermore, that certainly isn't a basis for investigating Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

Once AGAIN --- suppose he fully acknowledges and takes responsibility and apologizes (and I believe he already has) for poor taste for actions taken while he was a comedian ---- why would it then be necessary to "resign" from a completely different gig?

. Is this how it is, where as if a Dem just apologizes, it is all forgiven, and it will be ok ?? So it will just be business as usual after that ?? Is it that the desensitized public have been conditioned to just look the other way if a Dem does anything crazy or wrong headed, but a Republican man or woman attempting to live a Christian Life (all though not perfect), must be sentenced to the harshest punishment available for their mistaken fowel or mis-deeds ?? The Dems we're working as hard as they could to normalize as much as it could over the past years, and they did this in so that it could withstand or insulate itself from any attacks to be based upon morals or ethics violations in which might be found in an event or in a case brought. Genius is what it is, but very evil in it's intent.

Once AGAIN --- the question is "on what basis does Franken 'need to resign'"? You didn't address that question at all. Neither did the OP.

See where we're going with this yet?

You do realize that you're going way out on a limb here, in order to defend a sexual predator. Right?

That speaks volumes about your own morality or lack thereof.

Once AGAIN --- the question is "on what basis does Franken 'need to resign'"?

That's nine now.

Franken should resign if only to continue to prove that Democrats now hold the moral high ground on these affairs.

You lost any claim to that when you defended Slick Willy and nominated Hillary.

 

[Mac1958]

The Democrats are playing the same hypocritical game on this stuff as are the Republicans.

However, let's take a sane moment, just for fun, on that Franken photo.

1. Was he being really, really, really childish and sophomoric doing that? Yes.
2. Was he most likely just playing to the testosterone-filled crowd in a stupid, light-hearted moment? Yes.
   
3. Is there a guy here who hasn't seen something pretty similar, or maybe even a bit dumber, in real life? No.
4. Was he groping her? No.
5. Was he only pretending to grab her tits, because he knew he might wake her if he touched them? Yes.
6. Did he quickly take his hands away and move back after the photo was taken? Most likely.
7. Would he have deserved a slap in the face if she had woken up? Sure, you bet.
8. Would this merit intervention by the law in any way, in real life? No.

This feigned outrage is silly.
.

 

[bripat9643]

The Democrats are playing the same hypocritical game on this stuff as are the Republicans.

However, let's take a sane moment, just for fun, on that Franken photo.

1. Was he being really, really, really childish and sophomoric doing that? Yes.
2. Was he most likely just playing to the testosterone-filled crowd in a stupid, light-hearted moment? Yes.
   
3. Is there a guy here who hasn't seen something pretty similar, or maybe even a bit dumber, in real life? No.
4. Was he groping her? No.
5. Was he only pretending to grab her tits, because he knew he might wake her if he touched them? Yes.
6. Did he quickly take his hands away and move back after the photo was taken? Most likely.
7. Would he have deserved a slap in the face if she had woken up? Sure, you bet.
8. Would this merit intervention by the law in any way, in real life? No.

This feigned outrage is silly.
.

Wrong on 4: He was groping.

On 8: If she called the police and asked to have him arrested, they would have arrested him.

 

[Mac1958]

The Democrats are playing the same hypocritical game on this stuff as are the Republicans.

However, let's take a sane moment, just for fun, on that Franken photo.

1. Was he being really, really, really childish and sophomoric doing that? Yes.
2. Was he most likely just playing to the testosterone-filled crowd in a stupid, light-hearted moment? Yes.
   
3. Is there a guy here who hasn't seen something pretty similar, or maybe even a bit dumber, in real life? No.
4. Was he groping her? No.
5. Was he only pretending to grab her tits, because he knew he might wake her if he touched them? Yes.
6. Did he quickly take his hands away and move back after the photo was taken? Most likely.
7. Would he have deserved a slap in the face if she had woken up? Sure, you bet.
8. Would this merit intervention by the law in any way, in real life? No.

This feigned outrage is silly.
.

Wrong on 4: He was groping.

On 8: If she called the police and asked to have him arrested, they would have arrested him.

Let's get this on the record, then.

If that were your son in the photo instead of Franken, you would have executed a citizen's arrest on the spot or would have had him arrested when you landed.

Is that correct?
.

 

[bripat9643]

The Democrats are playing the same hypocritical game on this stuff as are the Republicans.

However, let's take a sane moment, just for fun, on that Franken photo.

1. Was he being really, really, really childish and sophomoric doing that? Yes.
2. Was he most likely just playing to the testosterone-filled crowd in a stupid, light-hearted moment? Yes.
   
3. Is there a guy here who hasn't seen something pretty similar, or maybe even a bit dumber, in real life? No.
4. Was he groping her? No.
5. Was he only pretending to grab her tits, because he knew he might wake her if he touched them? Yes.
6. Did he quickly take his hands away and move back after the photo was taken? Most likely.
7. Would he have deserved a slap in the face if she had woken up? Sure, you bet.
8. Would this merit intervention by the law in any way, in real life? No.

This feigned outrage is silly.
.

Wrong on 4: He was groping.

On 8: If she called the police and asked to have him arrested, they would have arrested him.

Let's get this on the record, then.

If that were your son in the photo instead of Franken, you would have executed a citizen's arrest on the spot or would have had him arrested when you landed.

Is that correct?
.

That's a stupid question. Most parents wouldn't turn their kids in if they had committed murder. That's how parental love works. It's not objective.

The bottom line is that what he did is a crime for which he could have been arrested.

 

[Mac1958]

The Democrats are playing the same hypocritical game on this stuff as are the Republicans.

However, let's take a sane moment, just for fun, on that Franken photo.

1. Was he being really, really, really childish and sophomoric doing that? Yes.
2. Was he most likely just playing to the testosterone-filled crowd in a stupid, light-hearted moment? Yes.
   
3. Is there a guy here who hasn't seen something pretty similar, or maybe even a bit dumber, in real life? No.
4. Was he groping her? No.
5. Was he only pretending to grab her tits, because he knew he might wake her if he touched them? Yes.
6. Did he quickly take his hands away and move back after the photo was taken? Most likely.
7. Would he have deserved a slap in the face if she had woken up? Sure, you bet.
8. Would this merit intervention by the law in any way, in real life? No.

This feigned outrage is silly.
.

Wrong on 4: He was groping.

On 8: If she called the police and asked to have him arrested, they would have arrested him.

Let's get this on the record, then.

If that were your son in the photo instead of Franken, you would have executed a citizen's arrest on the spot or would have had him arrested when you landed.

Is that correct?
.

That's a stupid question. Most parents wouldn't turn their kids in if they had committed murder. That's how parental love works. It's not objective.

The bottom line is that what he did is a crime for which he could have been arrested.

Okay, sure.
.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Once AGAIN --- the question is "on what basis does Franken 'need to resign'"? You didn't address that question at all. Neither did the OP.

See where we're going with this yet?

Do a little research, read the allegations and get back to us when you have a fricken clue.

Oh I know exactly what the allegations are. Heard them all day on the road in my travels.

The question STILL REMAINS ---- on what basis does Franken need to "resign"?

That's seven times I've posted that question. Got zero answers.

Well for one thing, the entire Democrat Party's credibility on sexual harassment is at stake here.This is a test of the Democratic Party’s consistency, honesty, and decency. If Democrats wish to preserve whatever moral standing they have today, they must exhort Franken to leave the Senate, with no hesitation or reservations.
The sheer hypocrisy of Franken's meager apology is galling. Following the Harvey Weinstein scandal, Franken wrote an impassioned Facebook post declaring that saxual harassment is "appaling" and "far too common".

Al Franken who is a self-proclaimed defender of women’s rights has revealed himself to be a misogynistic fraud. Franken’s ardent promotion of gender equality on the Senate floor is rendered meaningless in the face of his disgusting conduct. If the Democrat party wishes to retain an ounce of credibility, it must demand Franken’s swift resignation.

And here we go again ...
---- on the basis of what?

If a human piece of shit like Franken grabbed you by the back of the neck and forced its tongue down your throat in the name of comedy, would you ask "on the basis of what"?

/----/ Funny how Libs twist themselves into pretzels to make excuses for their bad boys while they demand Conservatives be clean as the wind driven snow.

 

[Lewdog]

We can see the photo. He's not actually touching her.

Hence, there's no groping.

The lesson? Conservative liars need to stop lying.

Not to mention she is wearing a kevlar vest.

Great excuse, right?

It's not exactly a rape if you wear a condom.

Wrong, not even close to the same, and sadly, I'm not sure if you are smart enough to realize it or not.

You're not smart enough to realize you're trying to exuse sexual assault purely because Franken is a Dim.

I hate to tell you this, but you can't think for other people, and define what they view something, that is counter to what something is defined as.

 

[Lewdog]

Overwhelm him with complaints:

https://www.franken.senate.gov/?p=email_al

Senator Franken:

The irrefutable photographic evidence of your groping of Ms. Leeann Tweeden is vile and disgusting.

To have done this during a tour to entertain our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines raises the disgusting extent of your actions by orders of magnitude.

Members of the U.S. Senate on both sides of the aisle, the media, and a large swath of the public are demanding Judge Roy Moore withdraw from the race for a Senate seat representing Alabama based on accusations with little in the way of hard evidence. Your case, however, clearly and irrefutably shows the same behavior on your part.

You must resign your Senate seat immediately.

You must do this as one part of atonement for your repulsive behavior. Other elements would be to publicly apologize to Ms. Tweeden during a speech from the Senate floor, a speech where you accept full responsibility for your actions, beg her forgiveness, and announce your resignation.

Resign or be branded a unrepentant sexual predator just like Mr. Harvey Weinstein and so many others.

I cannot stand Al Franken. I hated his humor, and I hate his far left beliefs.

That photo of him groping a sleeping woman thoroughly disgusted me.

However, his behavior does not rise to the level of a Trump, much less a Weinstein.

If a pussy grabbing molester who walks into underaged girls dressing rooms to catch them naked can be elected President, then Franken should not resign.

Anyone who voted for Trump is a hypocrite for demanding Franken resign.

How is grabbing someone's pussy any worse than grabbing someone's breasts? Furthermore, Trump said they consented. There's no denying that Franken's victim didn't consent.

He didn't grab her breasts. He acted like he was grabbing her breasts...

 

[Lewdog]

The Democrats are playing the same hypocritical game on this stuff as are the Republicans.

However, let's take a sane moment, just for fun, on that Franken photo.

1. Was he being really, really, really childish and sophomoric doing that? Yes.
2. Was he most likely just playing to the testosterone-filled crowd in a stupid, light-hearted moment? Yes.
   
3. Is there a guy here who hasn't seen something pretty similar, or maybe even a bit dumber, in real life? No.
4. Was he groping her? No.
5. Was he only pretending to grab her tits, because he knew he might wake her if he touched them? Yes.
6. Did he quickly take his hands away and move back after the photo was taken? Most likely.
7. Would he have deserved a slap in the face if she had woken up? Sure, you bet.
8. Would this merit intervention by the law in any way, in real life? No.

This feigned outrage is silly.
.

Wrong on 4: He was groping.

On 8: If she called the police and asked to have him arrested, they would have arrested him.

Let's get this on the record, then.

If that were your son in the photo instead of Franken, you would have executed a citizen's arrest on the spot or would have had him arrested when you landed.

Is that correct?
.

That's a stupid question. Most parents wouldn't turn their kids in if they had committed murder. That's how parental love works. It's not objective.

The bottom line is that what he did is a crime for which he could have been arrested.

Now THAT is a stupid thing to say. Parents turn their kids in ALL the time when they know they did something wrong, especially something like murder.

You LOVE to speak in these absolutes, and it makes you look like a fool.

 

[bripat9643]

We can see the photo. He's not actually touching her.

Hence, there's no groping.

The lesson? Conservative liars need to stop lying.

Not to mention she is wearing a kevlar vest.

Great excuse, right?

It's not exactly a rape if you wear a condom.

Wrong, not even close to the same, and sadly, I'm not sure if you are smart enough to realize it or not.

You're not smart enough to realize you're trying to exuse sexual assault purely because Franken is a Dim.

I hate to tell you this, but you can't think for other people, and define what they view something, that is counter to what something is defined as.

The problem is that you can't think. I can look at a photo and see that Franken is touching the woman's breasts. Your opinion of the matter doesn't change what the photo actually shows.

 

[bripat9643]

The Democrats are playing the same hypocritical game on this stuff as are the Republicans.

However, let's take a sane moment, just for fun, on that Franken photo.

1. Was he being really, really, really childish and sophomoric doing that? Yes.
2. Was he most likely just playing to the testosterone-filled crowd in a stupid, light-hearted moment? Yes.
   
3. Is there a guy here who hasn't seen something pretty similar, or maybe even a bit dumber, in real life? No.
4. Was he groping her? No.
5. Was he only pretending to grab her tits, because he knew he might wake her if he touched them? Yes.
6. Did he quickly take his hands away and move back after the photo was taken? Most likely.
7. Would he have deserved a slap in the face if she had woken up? Sure, you bet.
8. Would this merit intervention by the law in any way, in real life? No.

This feigned outrage is silly.
.

Wrong on 4: He was groping.

On 8: If she called the police and asked to have him arrested, they would have arrested him.

Let's get this on the record, then.

If that were your son in the photo instead of Franken, you would have executed a citizen's arrest on the spot or would have had him arrested when you landed.

Is that correct?
.

That's a stupid question. Most parents wouldn't turn their kids in if they had committed murder. That's how parental love works. It's not objective.

The bottom line is that what he did is a crime for which he could have been arrested.

Now THAT is a stupid thing to say. Parents turn their kids in ALL the time when they know they did something wrong, especially something like murder.

You LOVE to speak in these absolutes, and it makes you look like a fool.

Some do, but most don't. Can't you list any recent cases where the parents turned in the perp? I can't.