TemplarKormac
Political Atheist
- Mar 30, 2013
- 50,184
- 13,573
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
You're moving the goalposts.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
You're moving the goalposts.
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
Hmm, no. See, Hitler was responsible for killing millions of people.
His "murder" would have been nothing but another casualty of war. A casualty that would have ended the war almost instantaneously.
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
You're moving the goalposts.
No, I'm asking you a question, in the hopes that it will inspire you to think about your position that joking about assassinating anyone is always "morally wrong".
Do you need a safe space to process your feelings, snowflake?
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Do you need a safe space to process your feelings, snowflake?
Nope, but you didnt feel that way when people wanted to lynch a ******
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Is this what moral relativism looks like?
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
Hmm, no. See, Hitler was responsible for killing millions of people.
His "murder" would have been nothing but another casualty of war. A casualty that would have ended the war almost instantaneously.
You seem to be confusing joking about assassinating someone with assassinating someone.
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
Hmm, no. See, Hitler was responsible for killing millions of people.
His "murder" would have been nothing but another casualty of war. A casualty that would have ended the war almost instantaneously.
You seem to be confusing joking about assassinating someone with assassinating someone.
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Oh so if uts joking uou can tjreaten the president, maybe toss in some **** and ****** joke, its all ok then?
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
Hmm, no. See, Hitler was responsible for killing millions of people.
His "murder" would have been nothing but another casualty of war. A casualty that would have ended the war almost instantaneously.
You seem to be confusing joking about assassinating someone with assassinating someone.
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Oh so if uts joking uou can tjreaten the president, maybe toss in some **** and ****** joke, its all ok then?
I'm having a hard time understanding your posts.
But no one "threatened" the President.
Is joking about travelling back in time to murder Hitler morally wrong?
Hmm, no. See, Hitler was responsible for killing millions of people.
His "murder" would have been nothing but another casualty of war. A casualty that would have ended the war almost instantaneously.
You seem to be confusing joking about assassinating someone with assassinating someone.
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Oh so if uts joking uou can tjreaten the president, maybe toss in some **** and ****** joke, its all ok then?
I'm having a hard time understanding your posts.
But no one "threatened" the President.
Joking about killing is a threat. Watch a mafia movie sometime.
Or threaten to kill someone on this forum in a joking way, lets see what happens.
Hmm, no. See, Hitler was responsible for killing millions of people.
His "murder" would have been nothing but another casualty of war. A casualty that would have ended the war almost instantaneously.
You seem to be confusing joking about assassinating someone with assassinating someone.
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Oh so if uts joking uou can tjreaten the president, maybe toss in some **** and ****** joke, its all ok then?
I'm having a hard time understanding your posts.
But no one "threatened" the President.
Joking about killing is a threat. Watch a mafia movie sometime.
Or threaten to kill someone on this forum in a joking way, lets see what happens.
The tweet she made was "Why hasn't the assassination happened yet?"
How exactly is that a "threat"?
You seem to be confusing joking about assassinating someone with assassinating someone.
I didn't ask if assassinating Hitler would be morally wrong, I asked about joking about it.
Oh so if uts joking uou can tjreaten the president, maybe toss in some **** and ****** joke, its all ok then?
I'm having a hard time understanding your posts.
But no one "threatened" the President.
Joking about killing is a threat. Watch a mafia movie sometime.
Or threaten to kill someone on this forum in a joking way, lets see what happens.
The tweet she made was "Why hasn't the assassination happened yet?"
How exactly is that a "threat"?
Its an implied threat, i could say to her why arent you dead yet....there is an implication there.
It's a mean joke.
Oh so if uts joking uou can tjreaten the president, maybe toss in some **** and ****** joke, its all ok then?
I'm having a hard time understanding your posts.
But no one "threatened" the President.
Joking about killing is a threat. Watch a mafia movie sometime.
Or threaten to kill someone on this forum in a joking way, lets see what happens.
The tweet she made was "Why hasn't the assassination happened yet?"
How exactly is that a "threat"?
Its an implied threat, i could say to her why arent you dead yet....there is an implication there.
No, in neither case is it an "implied threat". It's a mean joke.