Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

rat accuses Newsweek of lying but has no other independent source identifying the core structure of the Twins.

divvie pretends its text is meaningful.

I post evidence and independent authority for verification. The west core wall of WTC 1 on the left, the spire on the right. Far left, the empty core area of WTC 1.

wtc1spirecorewall.jpg

you delusional lies are meaningless.

find any pictures of a concrete core yet?
find any documentation to your claim of "elevator guide rail support" that you pulled out of your ass?
find any documentation to support your claim that the cores were radically different?
find any pictures of the concrete core getting constructed?
find any building plans for a concrete core?

corecloseupbest.jpg



Image194Resized.jpg



nocore.jpg



d5.jpg



im958lguq5.jpg



im_652_lg.jpg



im_612_lg.jpg



im_580_lg.jpg



im534lgwo5.jpg



im_853_lg.jpg



[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dB6xdCS9NJU]YouTube - 9/11: Why They Fell pt 2[/ame]


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EqDTEZIdg7g&feature=PlayList&p=A6382FD1025BACE9&index=62]YouTube - WTC 1&2 UNIQUE DESIGN.[/ame]


"For a combination of historical, cultural and economic reasons, tall, concrete-core buildings dedicated to office use are unusual in New York, where builders prefer the wallboard-enclosed cores with steel frames that Mr. Robertson pioneered in the trade center."
New York Timeshere


"Engineers are still debating whether the Twin Towers' unique structure should be credited for surviving the initial crashes, or blamed for collapsing in the subsequent fires, or both. But the point is that it was unique, utilizing closely spaced columns connected to a steel core by relatively lightweight floor trusses. "
Newsweek. Newsweek.com


"Each of the towers, more than 200 ft. wide on each side, contained a central steel core surrounded by open office space. Eighteen-inch steel tubes ran vertically along the outside, providing much of the support for the building"
Time Magazine.TIME.com


"The twin towers were the first supertall buildings designed without any masonry. Worried that the intense air pressure created by the building's high speed elevators might buckle conventional shafts, engineers designed a solution using a drywall system fixed to the reinforced steel core. "
engineering.comENGINEERING.com


"Like many high-rises built in the 1960s, the Twin Towers were constructed with their weight distributed between a hollow steel core (containing services like elevators) and steel columns around the perimeter, maximizing open floor space. Many believe the older high-rise design, in which steel columns are often encased in concrete, is more fire resistant.

“A lot of people have told me, ‘You should have used more concrete in the structure,’” said Robertson. However, his chart plotting the strength of steel vs. concrete at various temperatures showed that at the incendiary levels that raged in the towers, the two materials become similarly weak."
Berkeley 04.17.2002 - World Trade Center remembered


"Yamasaki has switched from concrete, his favorite medium, to steel because of the sheer height of the towers, and instead of having the weight of the structure carried by the frame and the elevator core, the great steel columns of the exterior walls will support it."
Time Magazine article from 1964!! Art: Onward & Upward - TIME

im_837_lg.jpg


9689d1268553338-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-screencaptureinsidewtc.jpg

9983d1271115398-fema-deceives-nation-about-twin-towers-core-5712.jpg
 
Your reference does not agree with itself in a fashion very relative to the "core" issue.
ways.Comparing 2 Sets Of Twin Towers - Malaysian Buildings Offered as Model - NYTimes.com

Leveling a criticism at the assertion that the Petronas Towers would have stood longer than the World Trade Center towers did, Dr. Nordenson said, ''If you're claiming that such and such a building would have performed better than the World Trade Center, then the answer is, 'Well, you're an engineer; show me the calculations.' ''

If they both knew the Twin Towers had a concrete core, and one was trying to promote his designs using a concrete core, rather than exposing secret methods of mass murder, he could just say "his Towers would be stronger. And since they do have a concrete core, and the world the infiltrators with the help of their agents tries to cultivate believes the Towers had steel core columns, the fearful engineer can promote his work without risk.

The other engineer sees this and says, "Show me the calculations." Subtly challenging the horn tooting engineer to either divulge the truth about the core OR produce calculations for a steel core that did not exist.

The core was concrete.

southcorestands.gif
 
This one has no substance connecting it to independently verified evidence and simply repeats what FEMA says. No details of any kind. Vry generic.

High Time - Newsweek.com

There is no reason to assume (particularly without corroborating evidence) that the articel written by Newsweek in May of 2002 is correct when on September 13, 2001 the engineer of record states the Twins had a concrete core. In fact, since the info is from the engineer of record, and is also corrborated by images from 9-11,

southcorestands.gif


AND Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 THEN there is every reason to believe the later Newsweek article is erroneous.
 
dipshit agents of al qaeda keep posting their delusional bullshit as if it hasnt already been exposed as delusional bullshit
 
delusional rantings removed.

words from a proven liar are worthless. you have no images of any concrete core anywhere. you have no building plans for a concrete core. you continually show pictures of steel and say there is none.:cuckoo:

null post.
 
this is what a concrete core looks like....
comcast-12-14-062.jpg


and this is what the steel core of the WTC looks like.
trident3_1.jpg
 
Traitor fiz is trying to misrepresent the elevator guide rail support steel as "core columns".

Here the joint between the guide rail support steel is seen. Far too weak for "core columns".

panel_5.jpg


Only a 100% deep fillet weld like is seen on this I beam will suffice for a "core column",

fillet.diagram.gif
 
Reasonably, text cannot debunk evidence that has logical corroboration so your use of "null", is null. Evidence and reason rule.

The engineer of record and Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology, of 1992 are consistent with 9-11 images. showing a concrete core.

A portion of the top of the WTC 2 concrete core. The brownish object inside the perimeter columns.

wtc2coreonto3.jpg





Finniston, Monty; Williams, Trevor; Bissell, Christopher, eds (1992). "Skyscraper". Oxford Illustrated Encyclopedia of Invention and Technology. Oxford University Press. p. 322. ISBN 0-19-869138-6, both identify a concrete core.
 
This reference of the agents is an outright error. The buildings were 208 feet on a side and had 14" square tube perimeter walls.

"Each of the towers, more than 200 ft. wide on each side, contained a central steel core surrounded by open office space. Eighteen-inch steel tubes ran vertically along the outside, providing much of the support for the building"
Time Magazine.TIME.com
 
move along folks, you've seen this all before, and you'll see it again, so what's the point of hanging around here?
 
Robertson NEVER identifies "stee3l core columns" in the video agents present as if it does.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dB6xdCS9NJU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dB6xdCS9NJU&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xd0d0d0&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
 
By the way, does anyone here have a good coleslaw recipe? I'm tired of the store-bought stuff, and the recipe I found on a cooking website was not very good.

We prefer the creamy kind, but would try vinegar based if it was good.

Thanks for the help.
 

Forum List

Back
Top