Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Christophera]

You honor me with your JREF tactic of changing the subject or prompting your false social group to pretend to capitulate.

JREF was so unable to oppose facts and so obsessed with protecting their secret masters and the secret methods of mass murder that they honored me with a video.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/christopheraKICKSjref.mov

 

[Rat in the Hat]

You honor me with your JREF tactic of changing the subject or prompting your false social group to pretend to capitulate.

JREF was so unable to oppose facts and so obsessed with protecting their secret masters and the secret methods of mass murder that they honored me with a video.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/christopheraKICKSjref.mov

Pipe down, unless you have a coleslaw recipe.

 

[Fizz]

delusional bullshit removed.

your text is meaningless including your text written on pictures.

null post.

 

[Fizz]

Robertson NEVER identifies "stee3l core columns" in the video agents present as if it does.

robertson never identifies a concrete core.

null post.

 

[stannrodd]

OMG They are standing on the top of what looks to be

THE CONCRETE CORE !!

Hey delusional Chris was right all along !!

FFS !!!

Stann

 

[stannrodd]

Aright alright calm down ... it was a joke .. !!

It's actually a bit too close to the perimeter columns and is at the top of the building.

Stann

 

[Christophera]

Robertson does provide information to Newsweek 2 days after 9-11, and that article has never been corrected if it is wrong.

The later article from May of 2002 is derived from the same sources you get your information from obviously, and is verifiably wrong.

If this is not true then produce an image of steel core columns in the core area on 9-11.

And not that Zafar image that is zoomed way in so it is difficult to tell that the vertical steel is falling out of the line of the wall. Something quite obvious equal to this solid and uniform remnant of the WTC 2 core.

 

[DiveCon]

<lies and delusions removed>

pay your child support, dipshit

 

[Fizz]

Robertson does provide information to Newsweek 2 days after 9-11, and that article has never been corrected if it is wrong.

this bullshit was debunked already. anyone can follow your link and see robertson said no such thing. once again you lie.

null post

 

[Rat in the Hat]

**** drivel, nonsense & crap****

Move along, good people. Nothing new to see here, just the usual garbage. Don't waste your time.

 

[Christophera]

The above post by fiz is a blatent lie, follow the link. Newsweek could feasibly infiltrated after time to provide misinformation, but 2 days after 9-11 the candid interview of the engineer of record would be accurate.

The concrete core has independent verifications.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with

interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall[/url], consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Christophera]

The above post by fiz is a blatent lie, follow the link. Newsweek could feasibly infiltrated after time to provide misinformation, but 2 days after 9-11 the candid interview of the engineer of record would be accurate.

The concrete core has independent verifications.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with

interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall[/url], consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Fizz]

The above post by fiz is a blatent lie, follow the link. Newsweek could feasibly infiltrated after time to provide misinformation, but 2 days after 9-11 the candid interview of the engineer of record would be accurate.

ALREADY DEBUNKED CRAP REMOVED

paranoid delusional rants are not evidence. no proof of concrete core posted.

null post.

 

[Christophera]

A post without evidence cannot declare another post "null". the logic behind that will not be recognized by agents.

Here are facts. This is the concrete tubular core of WTC 2.

If it were steel core columns with gypsum, there would be columns protruding out the top. They would be bent with ragged ends of diagonals silhouetted. The hundreds of thousands of tons of steel crashing over the core area would have destroyed most of the drywall inside and outside of the core. Light would be shining through.

This is logic and agents will not conduct logic if it exposes the secret methods of mass murder their masters direct them to protect.

Agents will not recognize the violation of NYS FOIL laws by the ex mayor that deprives the public of the building plans of the Twin Towers.

 

[DiveCon]

A post without evidence cannot declare another post "null". the logic behind that will not be recognized by agents.

a post with delusional rantings is a NULL post

 

[Fizz]

delusional rant and pic with debunked claim removed

your words are meaningless. you show a picture of a steel structure and claim its concrete with no proof.

null post.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

A post wit...

Move along folks, nothing here but things you've seen before. We'll let you know if something new happens.

Sir! Sir! Please stop feeding the troll. You'll only disrupt his natural feeding habits. We don't want the troll hanging around here, now do we sir?

 

[Christophera]

Disinfo agent rat thinks that he can dismiss evidence because the psyops has been able to get Americans to respond to social fears in the past.

Wake up fool, . . . people needs their rights and freedoms and there is no way they are going to mistake you and your fellow agents lies, deceptions, collusions and misrepresentations for some kind of authority.

Those rand think tank sessions where the delphi technique was documented were inconclusive. They were wrong. However the infiltrators have an agenda, so they get you fools to try it for them.

Agents are impotent with knowledge. Nothing means anything to them except for the masters approval.

For example. You fools could not explain why the top of the north tower fell south when the north side perimeter shear wall was 61% destroyed by flight 11.

That is called impotence with knowledge.

On the other hand, with a concrete core,

Many things are possible because concrete can be easily fractured to fall freely by a small amount of properly placed explosive.

 

[Liability]

* * * *

The hopelessly dishonest plodding bullshit NULL POST by NULL POSTER is snipped above to underscore its nullity.

 

[Fizz]

delusional rantings removed.

no evidence of a concrete core.

null post.