Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[Fizz]

The below do not constitute images of the FEMA core.

liar.

 

[Christophera]

This image constitutes verification of the core described by the engineer of record for the Twin Towers.

Agents have NEVER reasonably described what it is IF NOT concrete.

 

[DiveCon]

This image constitutes verification of the core described by the engineer of record for the Twin Towers.



Agents have NEVER reasonably described what it is IF NOT concrete.

there are no fucking agents here, dipshit
just because someone doesnt agree with your moronical delusions does not make them an agent

you are too fucking delusional
seek out professional help


btw, that image you posted doesnt have any proof of concrete any more now than it did the first fucking time you posted it
to keep posting that image over and over and think that somehow it will make someone change their mind and see your invisicrete on the 1000th time when they didnt see it the FIRST time is proof enough that you are totally fucking batshit crazy insane

 

[Fizz]

delusional bullshit removed

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

 

[DiveCon]

delusional bullshit removed

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

dont forget, anyone that doesnt agree with his delusional bullshit is an agent

 

[Christophera]

YThere is no way high density steel columns were cut over 1,300 times within the imagery we saw. There was absolutely not enough access to the columns to load charges on all 4 sides of the supposed steel core columns.

After I made that point, you and stan opposed the concrete core.

So how does the top of WTC 1 fall south when 61% of the perimeter columns were cut by flight 11?

thanks for proving explosives weren't used, you fucking moron.

The reverse of what agents is most often closer to the truth.

Note the billowing shapes in the "I" beam. Any idea of how much force it takes to do that? Any notion of what part of a collapse can do that to a single "I" beam?

 

[DiveCon]

YThere is no way high density steel columns were cut over 1,300 times within the imagery we saw. There was absolutely not enough access to the columns to load charges on all 4 sides of the supposed steel core columns.

After I made that point, you and stan opposed the concrete core.

So how does the top of WTC 1 fall south when 61% of the perimeter columns were cut by flight 11?

thanks for proving explosives weren't used, you fucking moron.

The reverse of what agents is most often closer to the truth.



Note the billowing shapes in the "I" beam. Any idea of how much force it takes to do that? Any notion of what part of a collapse can do that to a single "I" beam?

when it has been heated, not very much
you really show how fucking STUPID you are on a regular basis

 

[Gamolon]

How did you screw this up Chris? I circled your "crane diagonal" with a red circle in this next photo.

How can you be so stupid as to claim that the above diagonal (which was attached to the core columns) is the same as this diagonal that I circled in red in the next photo?

You fucked up yet another photo analysis. When are you going to realize that your track record for identifying objects in photos and making things up is leaving you with no credibility? I've never seen someone screw up so much and still think people hold his evaluations to be true.

So again, how did you screw THIS photo analysis up?

 

[Christophera]

How did you screw this up Chris? I circled your "crane diagonal" with a red circle in this next photo.

How can you be so stupid as to claim that the above diagonal (which was attached to the core columns) is the same as this diagonal that I circled in red in the next photo?

You fucked up yet another photo analysis. When are you going to realize that your track record for identifying objects in photos and making things up is leaving you with no credibility? I've never seen someone screw up so much and still think people hold his evaluations to be true.

So again, how did you screw THIS photo analysis up?

The opposite of what agents post is most often true.

You fail to see that your circle is upon the sawtooth diagonal and the diagonal in PANEL 5 is of the opposing type, much heavier also.

This image you posted is the same diagonal.

Add that error to the fact that you have not posted an image of the FEMA core from 9-11 and your act is supporting secret methods of mass murder.

There are many people that are going to seek your prosecution for felony and treason misprision stan.

FEMA

You posts are the evidence that will convict you.

MISPRISION OF FELONY: U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:

‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.

Section 4 states “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States” such language is clear in that a citizen is allowed and required under law to disclose if such disclosure is “cognizable by a court of the United States”


TITLE 18, PART I , CHAPTER 115, §2382 U.S. Code as of: 01/19/04
Section 2382. Misprision of treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

 

[Gamolon]

How did you screw this up Chris? I circled your "crane diagonal" with a red circle in this next photo.

How can you be so stupid as to claim that the above diagonal (which was attached to the core columns) is the same as this diagonal that I circled in red in the next photo?

You fucked up yet another photo analysis. When are you going to realize that your track record for identifying objects in photos and making things up is leaving you with no credibility? I've never seen someone screw up so much and still think people hold his evaluations to be true.

So again, how did you screw THIS photo analysis up?

The opposite of what agents post is most often true.

You fail to see that your circle is upon the sawtooth diagonal and the diagonal in PANEL 5 is of the opposing type, much heavier also.

This image you posted is the same diagonal.

Caught in another lie I see. Here is your post from the other thread.

And the agent has never shown that it knows what the structureal elements shown actually are. Name the m as they are numbered here if this is not true.

Oh, I just saw your little contest. Here are the answers to your little quiz.

#1) Steel core column at the corner of the core.

#2) Steel core columns being used to support the cranes during construction of yet more steel core columns.

#3) Diagonally cross-braced steel core columns.

I win.

For my prize, I request you give up your repeatedly debunked bullshit theory, and also that you get current on your child support & court filing fees.

Wrong on all three. There are no steel core columns shown. The elevator guide rail support steel, the only steel inside the core are seen in these closer photos.

#1 Is an interior box column which is NOT located in the core area. That is obvious.

#2 Is a crane tower which was part of a tool used to build the towers. It can be seen much closer in the photo of elevator guide rail support linked above. It could be placed in various sockets of the crane platform seen in the linked image of elevator guide rail supports.

#3 Are the diagonals which are part of the crane platform also shown in the linked image of elevator guide rail supports.

You have demonstrated you are clueless regarding the core structure of the Twin Towers.

Now post an image of the core columns you attempt to support.

From 9-11 in the core area.

Pay close attention Chris because you've been caught in another screw up and then you lie to try and make it right. Read #3 in the post just above that you wrote. I'll help you. It says:

#3 Are the diagonals which are part of the crane platform also shown in the linked image of elevator guide rail supports.

#3 is in this next photo that you annotated the particular diagonal with a yellow number 3. It's the only diagonal even CLOSE to the yellow 3. There are no diagonals shown BETWEEN THE CORE COLUMNS in that photo close to the yellow number 3. That makes it part of the "sawtooth" you later claim it was. You can clearly see that the diagonal is NOT attached to the core columns as they aren't even erected up to that height yet.

Then you go on to say that in the same quote that the diagonals you call out with the yellow number 3, are ALSO SHOWN IN THE LINKED IMAGE OF THE ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL SUPPORTS, which links back to this photo:

YOU THOUGHT THEY WERE THE SAME DIAGONALS!!!!!!

What a friggin' moron. Then you lie and try to cover it up?! Yeah, you really are about the truth!!!

 

[Fizz]

==delusional bullshit removed==

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.

3. A picture of a silhouetted object covered in smoke is a concrete core. debunked

4. No pictures exist of a steel core on 9/11 (accompanied by FEMA drawing). debunked

5. Butt plates are used to join steel core columns and are too weak. debunked

6. Diagonal bracing of steel core columns is actually part of the crane structure. debunked

7. Anyone that disagrees with the concrete core hoax is a secret government agent. (totally delusional. needs no debunking)

 

[Christophera]

You bogus link is a page produced by a poster from scholars fro 9-11 truth. William, I think was its handle. I caught it and another poster,a foriegner, discussing an image showing an unraveled piece of flexible electrical conduit which they thought was "det cord".

Why haven't you, or them ever at scholars, posted an image from 9-11 of the core FEMA said existed?

Since you are an agent supporting secret methods of mass murder, you only use text ad hominum and lies.


F+obvious image
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2117758-post842.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1966323-post158.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1992513-post3708.html

F+
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068719-post4238.html

F+photo lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2093387-post4486.html

F+photo lie 2
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2094648-post4499.html

F+photoshop lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2097563-post650.html

F+plans lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290147-post1829.html

F+plan lie confirm
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290723-post1832.html

F+buckling north tower
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2379590-post2345.html

F+buckling
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2380272-post2348.html

 

[Gamolon]

You bogus link is a page produced by a poster from scholars fro 9-11 truth. William, I think was its handle. I caught it and another poster,a foriegner, discussing an image showing an unraveled piece of flexible electrical conduit which they thought was "det cord".

Why haven't you, or them ever at scholars, posted an image of the core FEMA said existed from 9-11?

Since you are an agent supporting secret methods of mass murder, you only use text ad hominum and lies.


F+obvious image
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2117758-post842.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1966323-post158.html

F
http://www.usmessageboard.com/1992513-post3708.html

F+
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068719-post4238.html

F+photo lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2093387-post4486.html

F+photo lie 2
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2094648-post4499.html

F+photoshop lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2097563-post650.html

F+plans lie
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290147-post1829.html

F+plan lie confirm
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2290723-post1832.html

F+buckling north tower
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2379590-post2345.html

F+buckling
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2380272-post2348.html

Figures this is all you can post as a rebuttal.

You got caught red handed fucking up big time and then try to cover your ass by lying about what you meant. The sad part is that this isn't the first time you've been caught doing this. there have been MANY times.

You're fucking pathetic you know that?

 

[Christophera]

You've been busted red handed using gamolons account stan. Agents work together and share resources, as fradulent as they may be. gumjob can't cuss like cheney, that is your specialty.

Post an image of the core on 9-11 that FEMA said existed if this is not true.

 

[Christophera]

Then you go on to say that in the same quote that the diagonals you call out with the yellow number 3, are ALSO SHOWN IN THE LINKED IMAGE OF THE ELEVATOR GUIDE RAIL SUPPORTS, which links back to this photo:

They may not be the same, but they are still diagonal and you've NEVER posted an image of them in the core area on 9-11. The reason for this is they did not exist, as well as the steel core columns.

 

[DiveCon]

<delusional bullshit removed>

seek out professional help, you are seriously delusional

 

[Christophera]

Another agent with no evidence. The concrete core is proven with independently verified evidence.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

 

[Christophera]

Your credibility as a decent human being and America is destroyed. Not to mention the fact you refuse to recognize the violations of law that invaildate the cause of death determination of 3,000 people in 20 seconds.

D
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068183-post334.html

D-agent
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104806-post4606.html

D-rebar & plan links
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2331142-post6209.html


F+D slam
http://www.usmessageboard.com/2104963-post4610.html

 

[DiveCon]

i'm a dipshit with no evidence of a concrete core

<paranoid delusions removed>

seek out professional help

 

[Modbert]

Four red stars? Oof.