Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

Why was it bucking? You cannot show us an image with fire intense enough to do that.


sorry jackass. i just linked to proof it was buckling before the collapse. if you want to call the NYPD a bunch of liars then please show your proof.

otherwise, you are talking out of your ass again. :cuckoo:
 
Oh gee agent . . . I missed that link. Can you post it again?

you cant even remember a post you replied to earlier today but you expect us to believe you remember every detail from a documentary you saw 25 years ago??!! :lol:

you really are a retard!! :cuckoo:
 
It is very clear you have no such link. I did not expect that you did. Just testing so you can fail . . . again.

In that case, fail again to post an image of this core structure on 9-11.

femacore.gif


And fuz cannot provide a link to the response he states I made earlier. Agents, lying to protect the secret methods of mass murder. Lying to protect the infiltrators of the US government. Lying to assist in the destruction of the US Constitution. Typical.
 
Liar supporting liars in effort to make a lie seem true.

Pitiful. Agents protecting death and destruction seeking support for ignorance of how it is done. Sick.

The truth is that the Twin Towers had a concrete core and the indepednety verified evidence proves it.

Robertson is verified by Oxford, verifying Domel who describes a concrete core verified by the image of WTC 2 core, verifying the top of WTC 2 core falling onto WTC 3, the WTC 1 rebar, just after the WTC 1 west core wall is seen in an end view, then, the WTC 1 east shear wall toppling, consistent with interior box columns silhouetted on WTC 1 north core wall, consistent with ground zero showing the WTC 1 north concrete core base wall, 12 foot thick, all supported as clarification of the many confused statements that do mention concrete in the core including the latest revised NIST contracted analysis of free fall by Bazant et. al 6/21/2007, which actually provides an equivalent amount of high explosives needed to create the rate of fall they are attempting to justify with physics. It doesn't work, but at least they won't go down in history as totally supporting the deceptions.

No agent has even gotten close to proving any other core than a concrete core . . . ever.
 
On the right is a column NOT INSIDE THE CORE AREA. Not a core column. On the left is an end view of the west concrete core wall. The north wall has already fallen.
 
On the right is a column NOT INSIDE THE CORE AREA. Not a core column. On the left is an end view of the west concrete core wall. The north wall has already fallen.

there is no "not inside the core area", jackass.

there are the perimeter walls and the steel core. thats all.

there's no concrete in your picture either, you fucking moron. :cuckoo:
 

The NULL POSTER mindlessly repeats his previously refuted lies and imagines he has made a point. He is wrong, of course. And a liar.

NULL posts get snipped, instead.

Kudos on the 4th RED MEDAL of shame, though, scumbag.

we should start a list of all the delusional bullshit he claims and then just highlight which ever claim he changes the subject to which has already been debunked.....

1. The Spire is outside the core area. debunked

2. Robertson identifies a concrete core. debunked.
 

Forum List

Back
Top