Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So we have to make massacres easier so you don’t have to reload at the rangeWhat I need or don't need is none of your business.
Do cops carry 50 round magazines? Does the US military?
My preferred handgun has a 15 round magazine, is that more than I "need"
Very true
If a mass killer needs a 50 round magazine, it is none of my business
What sized magazine do you find optimum for shooting young children?
There's a reason 50 round mags aren't common.
Can you figure out what that reason is?
And it seems you certainly think about shooting kids but I have never once thought about it
Why else would you ever need a 50 round magazine ?
While shooting young children it is annoying to have to continually reload
Some might get away
I've used them at the range. I don't go shooting people either.
Wouldn’t want to inconvenience you
The civil right to massacre school children ?Oh, quit whining. All of this over the possibility of limiting the number of bullets in your killing machine?What do you have to defend yourself should the need arise?You're truly out there on this one. I can't even begin to follow your argument, and it is not because I'm stupid; it is because this is insane nonsense. You start by saying we should have as many guns with as many bullets as we want, because we might need to defend ourselves against the government. Then you say we outnumber the combat troops in our military. THEN you say the military won't attack us.You do know what guerilla warfare is right?
Think afghanistan and vietnam....
The military would have to bomb indiscriminately,which of course means dead civilians.
Another fact for you, there anywhere from 150 million gun owners to around 100 million. No one really knows for sure.
Our standing army has 1.3 million troops of which only 20% are combat soldiers.
Do the math.
And do you really believe our military is going to fire on their own families and friends?
If the shit ever happens you can bet it will be due to a grave violation of the Constitution,which the military is sworn to defend.
I know you're not a deep thinker like most liberals but a little common sense goes along way.
And you think there's something wrong with me. LOL
Almost as crazy as saying we should be able to go anywhere we like, without asking permission from our rulers, or say anything we like, even ideas that oppose our rulers.
What's wrong with you is that you're a statist thug openly hostile to civil rights.
You're all sick.
This is about your desire to crush the civil rights of those in the country south of you. This is about you thinking you know how to run my life better than I do.
No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
Believe me when I say I have no wish whatsoever to have anything to do with your life. Saying that there are certain types of guns you are not allowed to own is not "running your life," nor is it crushing your civil rights, you loon.
You an anarchist?Oh, quit whining. All of this over the possibility of limiting the number of bullets in your killing machine?You need high capacity magazines to defend yourself? If so, you are either in the wrong profession or you need to move.
What do you have to defend yourself should the need arise?You're truly out there on this one. I can't even begin to follow your argument, and it is not because I'm stupid; it is because this is insane nonsense. You start by saying we should have as many guns with as many bullets as we want, because we might need to defend ourselves against the government. Then you say we outnumber the combat troops in our military. THEN you say the military won't attack us.Our government is NOT going to stand down because we've got AR's and pistols. They've got missiles, drones, tanks, etc. etc.
You do know what guerilla warfare is right?
Think afghanistan and vietnam....
The military would have to bomb indiscriminately,which of course means dead civilians.
Another fact for you, there anywhere from 150 million gun owners to around 100 million. No one really knows for sure.
Our standing army has 1.3 million troops of which only 20% are combat soldiers.
Do the math.
And do you really believe our military is going to fire on their own families and friends?
If the shit ever happens you can bet it will be due to a grave violation of the Constitution,which the military is sworn to defend.
I know you're not a deep thinker like most liberals but a little common sense goes along way.
And you think there's something wrong with me. LOL
Almost as crazy as saying we should be able to go anywhere we like, without asking permission from our rulers, or say anything we like, even ideas that oppose our rulers.
What's wrong with you is that you're a statist thug openly hostile to civil rights.
You're all sick.
If you call weapons, "killing machines", then why would you allow police and the military to have them?
Clearly the average population is more restrained and less likely to kill than the paid police and military.
And in fact, many of the police and military are way out of hand, and actually enjoy abusing their power, it seems to me.
When we spend 75% of our annual federal income on weapons for the military, why don't we call that "killing machines" then?
When these weapons are in the hands of average citizens, they are much more defensive than when the military has them.
It is when average people who are supposed to be responsible but instead refuse and hire unknown surrogates to do their duty with weapons for them, that these weapons become machines of murder instead of machines of defense.
So if you do NOT have a weapon and instead rely on mercenary police and the military, then it is YOU who are allowing these to be weapons of murder instead of peace.
Sulk all you want; when you live in a civilized society, sometimes your behavior will be checked. It happens to all of us. It is called socialization. And this is off topic.Believe me when I say I have no wish whatsoever to have anything to do with your life. Saying that there are certain types of guns you are not allowed to own is not "running your life," nor is it crushing your civil rights, you loon.
No more than saying there are certain ideas you are not allowed to have, certain words and phrases you are not allowed to say.
You are quite simply a totalitarian thug waging war to end civil rights, you thug.
Sulk all you want; when you live in a civilized society, sometimes your behavior will be checked. It happens to all of us. It is called socialization. And this is off topic.
View attachment 253277No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
The 2nd was written with people like you in mind - thank you for validating its purpose.View attachment 253277No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
So civilians don't have the right to protect themselves from the same criminals?Police are apprehending criminals. Quite a bit different than defense obviously.DO you feel this way about the police as well?
Mark
And the police have no legal obligation to render aid to the public so if you think the police will save your sorry ass you're an idiot
Do you need a 50 round magazine to protect yourself from criminals?
Do you plan on missing 49 times
What I need or don't need is none of your business.
Do cops carry 50 round magazines? Does the US military?
My preferred handgun has a 15 round magazine, is that more than I "need"
Very true
If a mass killer needs a 50 round magazine, it is none of my business
What sized magazine do you find optimum for shooting young children?
That is Dragon Lady, not me.View attachment 253277No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
Lovely, a Canadian attacking the United States Constitution.
Fuck you.
Yeah and someone shooting up a school would have multiple magazines ready to go...…..when you are a criminal you can have multiples because YOU KNOW its going to happen, most people probably dont want to have 10 fully loaded clips in their house....God you people are stupidSo we have to make massacres easier so you don’t have to reload at the rangeWhat I need or don't need is none of your business.
Do cops carry 50 round magazines? Does the US military?
My preferred handgun has a 15 round magazine, is that more than I "need"
Very true
If a mass killer needs a 50 round magazine, it is none of my business
What sized magazine do you find optimum for shooting young children?
There's a reason 50 round mags aren't common.
Can you figure out what that reason is?
And it seems you certainly think about shooting kids but I have never once thought about it
Why else would you ever need a 50 round magazine ?
While shooting young children it is annoying to have to continually reload
Some might get away
I've used them at the range. I don't go shooting people either.
Wouldn’t want to inconvenience you
So civilians don't have the right to protect themselves from the same criminals?
And the police have no legal obligation to render aid to the public so if you think the police will save your sorry ass you're an idiot
Do you need a 50 round magazine to protect yourself from criminals?
Do you plan on missing 49 times
What I need or don't need is none of your business.
Do cops carry 50 round magazines? Does the US military?
My preferred handgun has a 15 round magazine, is that more than I "need"
Very true
If a mass killer needs a 50 round magazine, it is none of my business
What sized magazine do you find optimum for shooting young children?
There's a reason 50 round mags aren't common.
Can you figure out what that reason is?
And it seems you certainly think about shooting kids but I have never once thought about it
Why else would you ever need a 50 round magazine ?
While shooting young children it is annoying to have to continually reload
Some might get away
Yes it is, start a new thread.....but in a civilized society you dont have parents feeding 5 year olds hormones to stop their gender maturation......only evil sick people would do thatSulk all you want; when you live in a civilized society, sometimes your behavior will be checked. It happens to all of us. It is called socialization. And this is off topic.Believe me when I say I have no wish whatsoever to have anything to do with your life. Saying that there are certain types of guns you are not allowed to own is not "running your life," nor is it crushing your civil rights, you loon.
No more than saying there are certain ideas you are not allowed to have, certain words and phrases you are not allowed to say.
You are quite simply a totalitarian thug waging war to end civil rights, you thug.
The 2nd was written with a militia in mind because they had just finished a war for independence and because we had no standing army.The 2nd was written with people like you in mind - thank you for validating its purpose.View attachment 253277No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
Fact remains - we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them, and there's nothing you can do about it.
The 2nd was written with a militia in mind because they had just finished a war for independence and because we had no standing army.The 2nd was written with people like you in mind - thank you for validating its purpose.View attachment 253277No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
Fact remains - we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them, and there's nothing you can do about it.
If it wasn't all about a militia, that clause about the militia would not have been in there.
The need for a militia is no longer necessary. We have the largest military in the world. Joe Schmoe and his six shooter is no longer a necessity leading to a "right."
View attachment 253277No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home - and was written with people like you in mind.The 2nd was written with a militia in mind....The 2nd was written with people like you in mind - thank you for validating its purpose.View attachment 253277No. We don't.But you've got to find some reason why civilians can have such serious weapons as AR's etc. when to you they are nothing more than a toy.
The 2nd Amendment protects our right to own them and use them for traditionally lawful purposes -- we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them.
Fact remains - we are not, and in fact cannot be, in any way in any way shape or form required demonstrate a need for them, and there's nothing you can do about it.
Stop trying to fuck with the 2nd Amendment...….we have a right to own guns...….focus on executing criminals not citizens..
Judge blocks California's ban on high-capacity magazines over 2nd Amendment concerns
and for those of you trying....he's what you need to do
