Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't know why she would lie about her age. That seems ridiculous. I think they lied about her age...or just didn't ask and made something up. Because they didn't want anyone else talking to her, because they already knew that she wasn't going to help their case.
I think she's a druggie.
A prosecution team or its investigators would have a lot more to lose for lying than she would. I cant rationalize anyone lying about their age or someone else lying about someones age...what gives?
What gives is they didn't want her interviewed, because they know anyone who talks to her is going to know that Martin is a thug, and she's a liar.
Which, in the case of special prosecutors and sech, is strong, strong motivation.
And I suspect that she knew exactly what Trayvon was up to that night, and that is why she lied about their conversation, and her location, and that is why the prosecution wants her hidden from view.
They didn't lie to the judge. They lied to reporters.
And I suspect that she knew exactly what Trayvon was up to that night, and that is why she lied about their conversation, and her location, and that is why the prosecution wants her hidden from view.
I have a strong feeling that, no matter how much coaching she gets, the defense will take her testimony apart. The problem with lying is that you have to remember EVERYTHING you say.
They didn't lie to the judge. They lied to reporters.
Sorry...I shoudnt have said judge. But it is the judge that could ultimately hold them responsible for lying to the media about a witnesses age....not worth it, imo.
There is a conflicting account of what happened.
TM's girlfriend was on the phone when TM and GZ made contact.
Her story (under oath), is the opposite of what GZ says.
She says that GZ approached TM, asked what he was doing, and then she heard a bump (contact), and then the phone went dead.
Now, why haven't any of you explained your position from HER testimony as opposed to GZ's perspective?
Thanks.
I'll explain my position in 1 hour and 5 minutes, OK Aaron?There is a conflicting account of what happened.
TM's girlfriend was on the phone when TM and GZ made contact.
Her story (under oath), is the opposite of what GZ says.
She says that GZ approached TM, asked what he was doing, and then she heard a bump (contact), and then the phone went dead.
Now, why haven't any of you explained your position from HER testimony as opposed to GZ's perspective?
Thanks.
I'll explain my position in 1 hour and 5 minutes, OK Aaron?There is a conflicting account of what happened.
TM's girlfriend was on the phone when TM and GZ made contact.
Her story (under oath), is the opposite of what GZ says.
She says that GZ approached TM, asked what he was doing, and then she heard a bump (contact), and then the phone went dead.
Now, why haven't any of you explained your position from HER testimony as opposed to GZ's perspective?
Thanks.
They didn't lie to the judge. They lied to reporters.
Sorry...I shoudnt have said judge. But it is the judge that could ultimately hold them responsible for lying to the media about a witnesses age....not worth it, imo.
No, the judge doesn't give a rat's ass if they lie to the media. It's not a crime to lie to the media, as far as I know. They aren't a part of the court system.
I'll explain my position in 1 hour and 5 minutes, OK Aaron?There is a conflicting account of what happened.
TM's girlfriend was on the phone when TM and GZ made contact.
Her story (under oath), is the opposite of what GZ says.
She says that GZ approached TM, asked what he was doing, and then she heard a bump (contact), and then the phone went dead.
Now, why haven't any of you explained your position from HER testimony as opposed to GZ's perspective?
Thanks.
You crack me up, Ernie. Remind me to never make you mad at me.![]()
Ok, so everyone thinks the girl was telling a lie about why she missed TM's funeral?
Therefore, you think nothing she says is credible?
Well, GZ lied under oath to a judge in a murder case!!
Why aren't y'all looking at him as a liar, dishonest, etc?
Thanks.
Sorry...I shoudnt have said judge. But it is the judge that could ultimately hold them responsible for lying to the media about a witnesses age....not worth it, imo.
No, the judge doesn't give a rat's ass if they lie to the media. It's not a crime to lie to the media, as far as I know. They aren't a part of the court system.
Well I dont know what is technically legal, but it seems unethical for a person of the court to lie or deceive anyone...especially to the media on a national news story.
We are all familiar with The Zimmerman Case. Yet often, I think we forget that a kid was killed. A kid doing nothing wrong. Now, NORMALLY in America, this would be a cause for outrage! Lynch mobs have been formed for less!
But for some reason, there is unprecedented support for GZ's killing of an unarmed kid doing nothing wrong.
Why is that?
Let's look at this subtle treachery on behalf of the Justice Department of Florida...
1. Florida charged Zimmerman with Murder2. Ok, Florida already knew they had a law called "Stand Your Ground". In SYG, a person may kill you if you feel they are threatening your life. So WHY charge GZ with something that YOU ALREADY KNOW is going to tough as hell to prosecute? When you also ALREADY KNOW that the kid was innocent, and was killed by an adult who was asked not to engage the KID!
Why not MAKE SURE the killer doesn't slip through your slippery state laws, and charge him with something YOU KNOW you can convict him on?
Let's look at this odd phenomenon called The Sanford Police Department...