Why don't you provide a link to that "testimony" you say exists?
It's nebulous, at best. Initially, the prosecution said she was 16 and they wouldn't release information about her because she was so young..then it turned out hey, she's not 16, she's 18...I don't think she is going to make a very good "witness" and I doubt her "testimony" has any value except perhaps to make Zimmerman's defense for him.
one would expect the defense to question
why her written statement is so obviously different from her
deposition with crump
Is it possible that she was 16 at the time and is now 18 due to the length of time before trial?...I dont know, just asking.