Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Who the hell said that would be the only ones going against Gov't, should they try and take the guns away.........which is the wet dream of the leftist in this country.....................Who the hell says the military would be on the side of gov't should it come down to that?
This country has more weapons in private possession than most countries in the world.
Who the hell says the military would support the Cliven Bundy Irregulars?
From extensive exposure to military science and US Army War College lectures.Where do you get your military expertise? From old Gomer Pyle or F Troop reruns?This is a big lie.Look up why the Russian General Staff said they considered invading America during the cold war but changed their minds over an overlooked fact. And the American military would not obey orders to shoot Americans. Ever heard of illegal orders or the Nuremburg Trials?The military will most CERTAINLY support an unconstitutional operation, because loyalists will execute or arrest dissenters and deserters.There are approximately 300,000,000 privately owed firearms in the hands of over 100,000,000 gun owners.
Total military personnel in the United States comes to about 1,300,000.
Assuming the military would support such an unconstitutional operation, which I strongly believe they would not, if even a quarter of civilian gun owners resisted they would overwhelmingly outnumber military personnel, and it is equally unlikely the military would sanction major destruction within America to support such unconstitutional nonsense by would-be kings.
Also keep in mind that many seceding states would gain possession of nuclear weapons.
You have a lot to learn about "Military Terrorism" and are very naive if you believe the US Military will disobey orders from their "High Command" the Pentagon.
Chin also has stated that invading America is not an option. "They have the largest army on the planet, and they are not the military forces."
China never has stated that ever. China doesn't wish to invade the US at all, and doesn't even have an official white paper contingent for it.
Are you saying you're privy to classified Chinese military documents pertaining to grand strategy?
Some of us served punk...............If given the order to slaughter our own..........a lot if not most would turn their weapons on the Gov't..............The military will most CERTAINLY support an unconstitutional operation, because loyalists will execute or arrest dissenters and deserters.There are approximately 300,000,000 privately owed firearms in the hands of over 100,000,000 gun owners.
Total military personnel in the United States comes to about 1,300,000.
Assuming the military would support such an unconstitutional operation, which I strongly believe they would not, if even a quarter of civilian gun owners resisted they would overwhelmingly outnumber military personnel, and it is equally unlikely the military would sanction major destruction within America to support such unconstitutional nonsense by would-be kings.
Also keep in mind that many seceding states would gain possession of nuclear weapons.
You have a lot to learn about "Military Terrorism" and are very naive if you believe the US Military will disobey orders from their "High Command" the Pentagon.
Those serving would be firing at their own dang families STUPID.
The question is simple, Hitler could not be stopped by partisans (which is essentially what pro 2nd Amendmenters claim they are), the French Resistance (well organized and supported by allied governments with financing, command and control, and weapons) could not defeat the Nazis in France and in analysis did almost nothing to defeat the Nazis in France.
The German armies were almost entirely defeated by Armies of enormous scale backed by governments of enormous wealth with the ability to marshal and organize resources on a scale never before seen.
But somehow, Republicans are going to defeat tyranny?
How can you with your semi-automatic rifle defeat drone-strikes, and command and control?
You think the Tyrannical Feds will go easier on you than they do on ISIS? Or the Taliban?
Can you live in hole the rest of your life, blow yourself up with explosives to kill civilians and hit tanks or armored vehicles?
Where will you get artillery? Or tanks? Or fighter jets?
How will you, with your 2nd Amendment, take over Air Craft Carriers, Attack Submarines, cruise missiles, fight against special forces, etc.
All these tools the Feds already have?
Let's face it, your 2nd Amendment is a pipe-dream.
It only serves now to enable psychos to shoot preschools and for conservatives to pretend they will stop it if it happens to them in a movie theater.
Like we'd line up an say kill me please for those bombs..................Your thinking of static lines..............Hopeful fake-constitutionalists, that's who.Who the hell says the military would be on the side of gov't should it come down to that?
This country has more weapons in private possession than most countries in the world.
Who the hell says the military would support the Cliven Bundy Irregulars?
Idealists, naive persons who think that the Confederacy was fueled by a desire to defend their homes.
The Confederate Army collapsed in 1861, something these people don't know anything about, Jefferson Davis instituted a Draft, and sent out loyalilsts called the "Home Guard" to force people into the Confederate Army or "Hang them on the spot" if they refused.
This homeguard never saw front line battle, they became the scoundrels of the Confederacy, if you didn't want to fight in the Confederate Army, you joined the Homeguard and bullied others to fight for you, and for the Slave owners.
These people have no idea how militaries actually work, how force works, how governments coerce people.
They have no clue what war actually does.
So they believe fantasies like a single-action rifle will defend freedom from a tyrannical government armed with 2,000 pound bombs falling from robotic drones.
Yes you are.From extensive exposure to military science and US Army War College lectures.Where do you get your military expertise? From old Gomer Pyle or F Troop reruns?This is a big lie.Look up why the Russian General Staff said they considered invading America during the cold war but changed their minds over an overlooked fact. And the American military would not obey orders to shoot Americans. Ever heard of illegal orders or the Nuremburg Trials?The military will most CERTAINLY support an unconstitutional operation, because loyalists will execute or arrest dissenters and deserters.
You have a lot to learn about "Military Terrorism" and are very naive if you believe the US Military will disobey orders from their "High Command" the Pentagon.
Chin also has stated that invading America is not an option. "They have the largest army on the planet, and they are not the military forces."
China never has stated that ever. China doesn't wish to invade the US at all, and doesn't even have an official white paper contingent for it.
Are you saying you're privy to classified Chinese military documents pertaining to grand strategy?
Don't mind me, I'm the idiot
Oops................thought he was the Crusader poster.............This guy is nothing but a troll. Signed up today and first post at 8:46 tonight, with over 60 posts now.Some of us served punk...............If given the order to slaughter our own..........a lot if not most would turn their weapons on the Gov't..............The military will most CERTAINLY support an unconstitutional operation, because loyalists will execute or arrest dissenters and deserters.There are approximately 300,000,000 privately owed firearms in the hands of over 100,000,000 gun owners.
Total military personnel in the United States comes to about 1,300,000.
Assuming the military would support such an unconstitutional operation, which I strongly believe they would not, if even a quarter of civilian gun owners resisted they would overwhelmingly outnumber military personnel, and it is equally unlikely the military would sanction major destruction within America to support such unconstitutional nonsense by would-be kings.
Also keep in mind that many seceding states would gain possession of nuclear weapons.
You have a lot to learn about "Military Terrorism" and are very naive if you believe the US Military will disobey orders from their "High Command" the Pentagon.
Those serving would be firing at their own dang families STUPID.
I think a reasonable policy would be hunting lodges where you can rent the use of guns and are held accountable.Who the hell said that would be the only ones going against Gov't, should they try and take the guns away.........which is the wet dream of the leftist in this country.....................Who the hell says the military would be on the side of gov't should it come down to that?
This country has more weapons in private possession than most countries in the world.
Who the hell says the military would support the Cliven Bundy Irregulars?
Irregardless as you say you don't want to.
You're welcome to explain how a bunch of irregulars, no training or haven't been in the military for years, now old and out of shape, no command and control, no access to communication, no procedure, no rally point, no mustering what-so-ever, no recruitment tool, are going to spontaneously organize into an elite fighting force.Yes you are.From extensive exposure to military science and US Army War College lectures.Where do you get your military expertise? From old Gomer Pyle or F Troop reruns?This is a big lie.Look up why the Russian General Staff said they considered invading America during the cold war but changed their minds over an overlooked fact. And the American military would not obey orders to shoot Americans. Ever heard of illegal orders or the Nuremburg Trials?
Chin also has stated that invading America is not an option. "They have the largest army on the planet, and they are not the military forces."
China never has stated that ever. China doesn't wish to invade the US at all, and doesn't even have an official white paper contingent for it.
Are you saying you're privy to classified Chinese military documents pertaining to grand strategy?
Don't mind me, I'm the idiot
I think a reasonable policy would be hunting lodges where you can rent the use of guns and are held accountable.Who the hell said that would be the only ones going against Gov't, should they try and take the guns away.........which is the wet dream of the leftist in this country.....................Who the hell says the military would be on the side of gov't should it come down to that?
This country has more weapons in private possession than most countries in the world.
Who the hell says the military would support the Cliven Bundy Irregulars?
Irregardless as you say you don't want to.
Otherwise we don't need private ownership of them.
The question is simple, Hitler could not be stopped by partisans (which is essentially what pro 2nd Amendmenters claim they are), the French Resistance (well organized and supported by allied governments with financing, command and control, and weapons) could not defeat the Nazis in France and in analysis did almost nothing to defeat the Nazis in France.
The German armies were almost entirely defeated by Armies of enormous scale backed by governments of enormous wealth with the ability to marshal and organize resources on a scale never before seen.
But somehow, Republicans are going to defeat tyranny?
How can you with your semi-automatic rifle defeat drone-strikes, and command and control?
You think the Tyrannical Feds will go easier on you than they do on ISIS? Or the Taliban?
Can you live in hole the rest of your life, blow yourself up with explosives to kill civilians and hit tanks or armored vehicles?
Where will you get artillery? Or tanks? Or fighter jets?
How will you, with your 2nd Amendment, take over Air Craft Carriers, Attack Submarines, cruise missiles, fight against special forces, etc.
All these tools the Feds already have?
Let's face it, your 2nd Amendment is a pipe-dream.
It only serves now to enable psychos to shoot preschools and for conservatives to pretend they will stop it if it happens to them in a movie theater.
The question is simple, Hitler could not be stopped by partisans (which is essentially what pro 2nd Amendmenters claim they are), the French Resistance (well organized and supported by allied governments with financing, command and control, and weapons) could not defeat the Nazis in France and in analysis did almost nothing to defeat the Nazis in France.
The German armies were almost entirely defeated by Armies of enormous scale backed by governments of enormous wealth with the ability to marshal and organize resources on a scale never before seen.
But somehow, Republicans are going to defeat tyranny?
How can you with your semi-automatic rifle defeat drone-strikes, and command and control?
You think the Tyrannical Feds will go easier on you than they do on ISIS? Or the Taliban?
Can you live in hole the rest of your life, blow yourself up with explosives to kill civilians and hit tanks or armored vehicles?
Where will you get artillery? Or tanks? Or fighter jets?
How will you, with your 2nd Amendment, take over Air Craft Carriers, Attack Submarines, cruise missiles, fight against special forces, etc.
All these tools the Feds already have?
Let's face it, your 2nd Amendment is a pipe-dream.
It only serves now to enable psychos to shoot preschools and for conservatives to pretend they will stop it if it happens to them in a movie theater.
Neither does defense against Tyranny.I think a reasonable policy would be hunting lodges where you can rent the use of guns and are held accountable.Who the hell said that would be the only ones going against Gov't, should they try and take the guns away.........which is the wet dream of the leftist in this country.....................Who the hell says the military would be on the side of gov't should it come down to that?
This country has more weapons in private possession than most countries in the world.
Who the hell says the military would support the Cliven Bundy Irregulars?
Irregardless as you say you don't want to.
Otherwise we don't need private ownership of them.
Hunting has no connection to the 2nd Amendment.
There is no choice, all you do is give criminals easy access to firearms. See my OTHER thread I just posted about gun prohibition.The question is simple, Hitler could not be stopped by partisans (which is essentially what pro 2nd Amendmenters claim they are), the French Resistance (well organized and supported by allied governments with financing, command and control, and weapons) could not defeat the Nazis in France and in analysis did almost nothing to defeat the Nazis in France.
The German armies were almost entirely defeated by Armies of enormous scale backed by governments of enormous wealth with the ability to marshal and organize resources on a scale never before seen.
But somehow, Republicans are going to defeat tyranny?
How can you with your semi-automatic rifle defeat drone-strikes, and command and control?
You think the Tyrannical Feds will go easier on you than they do on ISIS? Or the Taliban?
Can you live in hole the rest of your life, blow yourself up with explosives to kill civilians and hit tanks or armored vehicles?
Where will you get artillery? Or tanks? Or fighter jets?
How will you, with your 2nd Amendment, take over Air Craft Carriers, Attack Submarines, cruise missiles, fight against special forces, etc.
All these tools the Feds already have?
Let's face it, your 2nd Amendment is a pipe-dream.
It only serves now to enable psychos to shoot preschools and for conservatives to pretend they will stop it if it happens to them in a movie theater.
A better question would be, why would you want to be left defenseless, having the choice?
You're welcome to explain how a bunch of irregulars, no training or haven't been in the military for years, now old and out of shape, no command and control, no access to communication, no procedure, no rally point, no mustering what-so-ever, no recruitment tool, are going to spontaneously organize into an elite fighting force.Yes you are.From extensive exposure to military science and US Army War College lectures.Where do you get your military expertise? From old Gomer Pyle or F Troop reruns?This is a big lie.Chin also has stated that invading America is not an option. "They have the largest army on the planet, and they are not the military forces."
China never has stated that ever. China doesn't wish to invade the US at all, and doesn't even have an official white paper contingent for it.
Are you saying you're privy to classified Chinese military documents pertaining to grand strategy?
Don't mind me, I'm the idiot
Who the hell said that would be the only ones going against Gov't, should they try and take the guns away.........Who the hell says the military would be on the side of gov't should it come down to that?
This country has more weapons in private possession than most countries in the world.
Who the hell says the military would support the Cliven Bundy Irregulars?
Neither does defense against Tyranny.I think a reasonable policy would be hunting lodges where you can rent the use of guns and are held accountable.Who the hell said that would be the only ones going against Gov't, should they try and take the guns away.........which is the wet dream of the leftist in this country.....................Who the hell says the military would be on the side of gov't should it come down to that?
This country has more weapons in private possession than most countries in the world.
Who the hell says the military would support the Cliven Bundy Irregulars?
Irregardless as you say you don't want to.
Otherwise we don't need private ownership of them.
Hunting has no connection to the 2nd Amendment.
Your rifle in the house isn't going to defend anyone from a tyrannical government.
If in the preposterous scenario the US was invaded by China or Russia or something, you won't stand a chance against hybrid warfare supported with close air support, drones, and heavy armor, plus artillery.
Have you ever felt an artillery barrage? You...you the person who barely goes to the Gym, and is probably way out of shape, is going to stand-up to a rain of 1 million tons of ordinance an hour?
Stop lying to EVERYONE.
There is no choice, all you do is give criminals easy access to firearms. See my OTHER thread I just posted about gun prohibition.The question is simple, Hitler could not be stopped by partisans (which is essentially what pro 2nd Amendmenters claim they are), the French Resistance (well organized and supported by allied governments with financing, command and control, and weapons) could not defeat the Nazis in France and in analysis did almost nothing to defeat the Nazis in France.
The German armies were almost entirely defeated by Armies of enormous scale backed by governments of enormous wealth with the ability to marshal and organize resources on a scale never before seen.
But somehow, Republicans are going to defeat tyranny?
How can you with your semi-automatic rifle defeat drone-strikes, and command and control?
You think the Tyrannical Feds will go easier on you than they do on ISIS? Or the Taliban?
Can you live in hole the rest of your life, blow yourself up with explosives to kill civilians and hit tanks or armored vehicles?
Where will you get artillery? Or tanks? Or fighter jets?
How will you, with your 2nd Amendment, take over Air Craft Carriers, Attack Submarines, cruise missiles, fight against special forces, etc.
All these tools the Feds already have?
Let's face it, your 2nd Amendment is a pipe-dream.
It only serves now to enable psychos to shoot preschools and for conservatives to pretend they will stop it if it happens to them in a movie theater.
A better question would be, why would you want to be left defenseless, having the choice?
