Tomorrow Republicans will pretend to laugh and say it's not as bad as liberals thought!

[Dale Smith]

Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.

So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.

While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.

Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.

It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

 

[BULLDOG]

Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.

So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.

While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.

Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.

It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

 

[Dale Smith]

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

Clinton Foundation Lawyers Thought Non-Profit Was Shady Too

A big slush fund for the Clinton Foundation

http://nypost.com/2016/11/17/how-mitt-romneys-campaign-manager-took-down-hillary/
Clinton Foundation Spent Barely 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

 

[BULLDOG]

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

Clinton Foundation Lawyers Thought Non-Profit Was Shady Too

A big slush fund for the Clinton Foundation

http://nypost.com/2016/11/17/how-mitt-romneys-campaign-manager-took-down-hillary/
Clinton Foundation Spent Barely 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

You got a credible link that shows the Clintons were enriched from the Clinton Foundation?

 

[Dale Smith]

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

Clinton Foundation Lawyers Thought Non-Profit Was Shady Too

A big slush fund for the Clinton Foundation

http://nypost.com/2016/11/17/how-mitt-romneys-campaign-manager-took-down-hillary/
Clinton Foundation Spent Barely 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

You got a credible link that shows the Clintons were enriched from the Clinton Foundation?

You mean from the fake news media that attempted to carry the Hildebeast over the finish line????

 

[BULLDOG]

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

Clinton Foundation Lawyers Thought Non-Profit Was Shady Too

A big slush fund for the Clinton Foundation

http://nypost.com/2016/11/17/how-mitt-romneys-campaign-manager-took-down-hillary/
Clinton Foundation Spent Barely 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

You really need to read the links you give, thinking they support your position. specially the first one.

 

[BULLDOG]

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

Clinton Foundation Lawyers Thought Non-Profit Was Shady Too

A big slush fund for the Clinton Foundation

http://nypost.com/2016/11/17/how-mitt-romneys-campaign-manager-took-down-hillary/
Clinton Foundation Spent Barely 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

You got a credible link that shows the Clintons were enriched from the Clinton Foundation?

You mean from the fake news media that attempted to carry the Hildebeast over the finish line????

Right. come back when you have a rational argument.

 

[Dale Smith]

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

The approval to sell the Uranium was first made by the Canadian government, however it did require US approval. That approval came from the inter-agency, Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States composed of Dept. of Defense, Homeland Security, State, Commerce, and Treasury as well as the Office of the US Trade Representative. Their decision could have been overridden by the president, but he agree with the decision.

At the time, there was little controversy over the decision. Only when Clinton ran for president did the 2009 Uranium deal get in the headlines, that is in Breitbart News. Trump charged that Clinton sold Uranium to our enemies which of course was not true but it got lots of attention. First, Clinton did not have the authority to do it, and second the decision was made by CFIUS and approved by the president. The fact that several investors in Uranium One contributed to the Clinton Foundation over a period of years was construed as a payoff.

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

Clinton Foundation Lawyers Thought Non-Profit Was Shady Too

A big slush fund for the Clinton Foundation

http://nypost.com/2016/11/17/how-mitt-romneys-campaign-manager-took-down-hillary/
Clinton Foundation Spent Barely 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

You really need to read the links you give, thinking they support your position. specially the first one.

No, the holes and concerns pointed out by this article that was written last year has proven to be correct. Why did the Clinton Global Initiative ceased operations???


Clinton Inc exposed for what it was

 

[Dale Smith]

Yeah, but there is this pesky little fact that the Hildebeast got a handsome pay-off.......

Yet nobody has been able to show that Clinton Foundation money enriched the Clintons. You found something that nobody else has?

Clinton Foundation Lawyers Thought Non-Profit Was Shady Too

A big slush fund for the Clinton Foundation

http://nypost.com/2016/11/17/how-mitt-romneys-campaign-manager-took-down-hillary/
Clinton Foundation Spent Barely 6 Percent On Charitable Grants In 2014

You got a credible link that shows the Clintons were enriched from the Clinton Foundation?

You mean from the fake news media that attempted to carry the Hildebeast over the finish line????

Right. come back when you have a rational argument.

Come back when you can detach your lips from the fat ass of the Hildebeast and see her for what she truly is.

 

[Avatar4321]

So has manaforts indictment changed anyone's life?

 

[BULLDOG]

So has manaforts indictment changed anyone's life?

Changed his.

 

[Freewill]

Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.

So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.

While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.

Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.

It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.

So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.

While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.

Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.

It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?

We knew that would be the case.
This case is a big nothing burger.

It was started under false pretenses because you have to state what the crime is before you appoint a special prosecutor.
There is no evidence of a crime.
Not even probable cause.
All you have is a setup hatched from the Hillary camp in a blatant attempt to get even for her loss in the election.
The guilty parties are running this fishing expedition.
Crimes that led up to this fishing expedition were swept under the rug and people's rights to due process and protections from illegal search and seizure were totally ignored.

Let me remind you, Mueller, a republican was hired by the Deputy AG, a republican, not a democrat to investigate any coordination between the 2016 Trump campaign and the Russian government as a part of the Russian interference in the presidential campaign and other related matters.

There is no requirement to state the specifically crime to start the investigation. The purpose of the investigation is to determines if there is a crime and if there is sufficient evidence to prosecute. The only requirement put on the special prosecutor is that the investigation focus on the purpose. However, wrong doing uncovered in the course of the investigation can not be ignored which is why Manafort has been indicted and arraigned. He may or may not be invoked in the Russian interference in the election but judging from the indictment, he is certainly guilty of violating the law.

The only reason a special prosecutor was appointed was because the idiot in the White House lost his temper and fired the FBI Director who was in charge of the investigation. Did Trump think the whole mess would just go away if he fired the guy running the investigation. Politically, firing Comey was huge mistake for Trump.

Dude, wake the fuck up.
This isn't about which political party you claim to be a member of. Everyone involved in this is suspect.

Everyone is suspect EXCEPT Russia and Trump who have a paper trail of lying. Gotcha! That same excuse worked when you were a kid and had all D's. "but Mom they all hate me!"

No, you're just a dumbass

Hillary and Obama were colluding with Russia, shitforbrains.

No, you're the puppet.

Wont fly here pal

 

[ClosedCaption]

Watch for it. Tomorrow no matter who is indicted and no matter for what reason Republicans will construct that tried and true strawman where they claim that liberals thought it would be much worse.

So an actual indictment isn't bad because liberals thought...blah blah you get the point.

While I have your attention isn't it funny how they seem to care more about how the indictment was leaked MORE than they care about someone within the Trump camp being indicted? And the total reason for the investigation is because Trump helped Russia fuck our democracy in the ass.

Oh but they want to tell you that what's really important is anything but Russia and Trump.

It's all fake news until someone gets indicted. Right?

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

But heres the thing you have to understand. The reports that said its weapon grade are wrong.

Anything else?

 

[Freewill]

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

But heres the thing you have to understand. The reports that said its weapon grade are wrong.

Anything else?

Do you have a link to that claim? I read articles and there is nothing I have read that said the uranium is anything but uranium, which can be weaponized. It is easy to say stuff but I ain't gonna prove what you say, you need to back it up.

 

[Dale Smith]

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

But heres the thing you have to understand. The reports that said its weapon grade are wrong.

Anything else?

If it was such an innocent thing? Why did the Hildebeast take some hefty donations for signing off on it? Just something to ponder, weigh and consider. Right now the Hildbeast has to be seething with anger after she was tossed under the bus by Donna Brazile. How do you feel about her about right now?

(snicker)

 

[ClosedCaption]

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

But heres the thing you have to understand. The reports that said its weapon grade are wrong.

Anything else?

If it was such an innocent thing? Why did the Hildebeast take some hefty donations for signing off on it? Just something to ponder, weigh and consider. Right now the Hildbeast has to be seething with anger after she was tossed under the bus by Donna Brazile. How do you feel about her about right now?

(snicker)

Hey listen, you said it was weapon grade. Its not and no amount of silly questions will change that. Of you want to talk about other things that's fine but its not weapon grade.

9 members of Cifus signed off on it and Hillary didn't. Anything else?

 

[Freewill]

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

But heres the thing you have to understand. The reports that said its weapon grade are wrong.

Anything else?

If it was such an innocent thing? Why did the Hildebeast take some hefty donations for signing off on it? Just something to ponder, weigh and consider. Right now the Hildbeast has to be seething with anger after she was tossed under the bus by Donna Brazile. How do you feel about her about right now?

(snicker)

Hey listen, you said it was weapon grade. Its not and no amount of silly questions will change that. Of you want to talk about other things that's fine but its not weapon grade.

9 members of Cifus signed off on it and Hillary didn't. Anything else?

Since you are making this such a point, can it be made into weapon grade?

 

[BULLDOG]

You watch it, no matter what the left wing liberals on the board will compare the indictments to Watergate, you watch. The liberals are already foaming at the mouth waiting in grand expectation. Sad little people who won't accept the will of the people.

My opinion of what happens is exactly what you say because that is what is going to happen. The indictments are floated out there to try and pressure someone into admitting something about someone. They will be all indictments directed at low level flunkies in an attempt to get at Trump. Trump hasn't been even been questioned yet, so don't get your hopes up.

Watergate was about a President using illegal and unconstitutional methods, indeed, criminal ones, to get dirt on perceived enemies. This is about treason to the United States of America.

You really are a blithering idiot, Old Fuck........"treason"? If we are going to go there wouldn't you say that the selling of uranium to an alleged enemy qualifies???? OH! Wait! Russia wasn't an enemy back then!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

But heres the thing you have to understand. The reports that said its weapon grade are wrong.

Anything else?

Credible link to any of those reports?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Selling uranium? You have to explain why this is a bad thing. And go!

As I read the reports it was weapon grade or could be made into weapon grade. The Russians are apparently now the arch enemies of the liberal left. So you don't see a problem selling Uranium to our enemies? Really?

But heres the thing you have to understand. The reports that said its weapon grade are wrong.

Anything else?

If it was such an innocent thing? Why did the Hildebeast take some hefty donations for signing off on it? Just something to ponder, weigh and consider. Right now the Hildbeast has to be seething with anger after she was tossed under the bus by Donna Brazile. How do you feel about her about right now?

(snicker)

Hey listen, you said it was weapon grade. Its not and no amount of silly questions will change that. Of you want to talk about other things that's fine but its not weapon grade.

9 members of Cifus signed off on it and Hillary didn't. Anything else?

Since you are making this such a point, can it be made into weapon grade?

Sit down, it's not weapon grade period. We have to settle on what is true and what is false.