Too Many Republican Candidates


would you believe me if i told you that ALL libertraitors support a fucking liar who has fucked over our system of justice filled with so many crimes and scandals they all can not be counted on this page or even the entire forum ?


If you make that like 9 point and double bolded, maybe you could scream a little louder...
 
I agree that there are two many, however look at it this way.
the republicans run so many because they want the voters to have an actual say in who gets the nomination
the democrats as a political party realize that their voting base is pretty much without any intellectual ability to know whats best for them, so the party decides early on who will run and who will not run.
Just makes it easier for the socialists to make sure they get the candidate that will do exactly what the party tells them.


Well, actually, they are running so many because they are hoping that the historical trend of just two terms per party before a change in the winds will hold for 2016. Power allures.

1953-1961 R (8 years)
1961-1969 D (8 years)
1969-1977 R (8 years)
1977-1981 D (4 years)
1981-1993 R (12 years)
1993-2001 D (8 years)
2001-2009 R (8 years)
2009-2017 D (8 years)

The only time span in the last soon to be 64 years where it wasn't 8 and 8 was between 1977 and 1993. Instead, it was 4 and 12.

However, with the USS Hillary out at high Sea, if I were an Elephant, I would not be betting on an automatic win in 2016...

What breaks the trend of 4 or 8 year party holds on the White House is a major political catastrophy

The Depression under Hoover led to 20 years of Democratic rule
Iran Hostage and Inflation led to 12 years of Republican rule

Will the Bush wars and economic collapse lead to extended Democratic rule?
 
It will the same as last time - the knee jerk RWs will fall madly in love with each one. Then, as the "gaffes" pile up, the RWs will move on to the next one.

Then we'll elect a Dem.

Some of the failed R candidates will end up where all failed Rs eventually go - Fox. Speaking of failed Rs, I read that fox didn't renew $arah Palin's contract.

Meanwhile, the more the merrier but the Rs will have to trade in the Clown Car for a bus.
 
It will the same as last time - the knee jerk RWs will fall madly in love with each one. Then, as the "gaffes" pile up, the RWs will move on to the next one.

Then we'll elect a Dem.

Some of the failed R candidates will end up where all failed Rs eventually go - Fox. Speaking of failed Rs, I read that fox didn't renew $arah Palin's contract.

Meanwhile, the more the merrier but the Rs will have to trade in the Clown Car for a bus.

The only credible candidates Republicans have are Jeb Bush, Rand Paul and Scott Walker. They are the only candidates capable of pulling significant delegates out of the primaries.
Others like Cruz and Rubio are capable of pulling a few delegates here and there
The rest are strictly clown car and the quicker they pull out, the better it will be for the party
 
Why are there so many Presidential candidates that flood the Republican pool?

Yet another person has thrown their hat in the ring, but, that doesn't seem to happen in the Democratic party.

Why?
Democrats don't believe in differing policies or discussion of ideas. They aren't fond of elections. They prefer appointment.
 
13-15 is a cozy number.

:D


:popcorn:
yep. The more the merrier.
devil2.gif
It will force the Establishment-types with all the dark corporate money backing to discuss things they would rather not have to discuss like "who they will be working for" for instance :eusa_whistle:
 
Why are there so many Presidential candidates that flood the Republican pool?

Yet another person has thrown their hat in the ring, but, that doesn't seem to happen in the Democratic party.

Why?
Democrats don't believe in differing policies or discussion of ideas. They aren't fond of elections. They prefer appointment.
That would explain Bush in 2000 you predictable rw hack :thup: Tipsycatlover
 
Breaking News:

Putin is defecting and announcing his candidacy for the GOP nomination.

"Glasnost is good. Elephants are better".

Pravda!
If Putin were to defect and run for President, he would without a doubt run on the democrat ticket.


Uhm, no. It's the repugs who are oogling over his manly muscles, not the smart people out there.
Thats just because the U.S has no leadership right now, all we have is a Anti American homosexual prick that is more concerned with his golf game than he is the well being of the citizens.
 
Why are there so many Presidential candidates that flood the Republican pool?

Yet another person has thrown their hat in the ring, but, that doesn't seem to happen in the Democratic party.

Why?

Why not? Is it better to have your choices limited to a clown car holding a seventy year old white woman, a socialist and a nutter?
 
Why are there so many Presidential candidates that flood the Republican pool?

Yet another person has thrown their hat in the ring, but, that doesn't seem to happen in the Democratic party.

Why?

Why not? Is it better to have your choices limited to a clown car holding a seventy year old white woman, a socialist and a nutter?
Its only because nobody else wanted to get in the clown car with her. people have a bad habit of dying around the clintons.
 

Forum List

Back
Top