P@triot
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #61
And remember the 1999 Columbine attack in Colorado. Few appreciate that Dylan Klebold, one of the two Columbine killers, was following Colorado legislation that would have let citizens carry a concealed handgun. Presumably, he feared being stopped during his attack by someone with a weapon. In fact, the Columbine attack occurred the very day that final passage was scheduled.
Gun-free zones are a magnet for those who want to kill many people quickly.
Even the most ardent gun control advocate would never put Gun-Free Zone signs on their home. Lets stop finally putting them elsewhere.
]
There were two armed guards at Columbine. They didn't stop the rampage.
VA Tech had a full out police force. That didn't stop Cho's rampage.
Ft. Hood is an army base. That didn't stop Hasan's rampage.
Guns don't stop rampages. Because a crazy person with murder on his mind is going to be faster than a sane person trying to react.
The way to fix it is to get the weapons out of everyone's hands.
Easy Peasy. The rest of the world has ALREADY FIGURED THIS OUT.
But Americans, we are kind of the retards of the industrialized world. "Doy, Founding Father Say we can have gun, derpa-derp!"
Don't forget Chris Kyle, possibly the most dangerous American with a gun getting gunned down at a shooting range. Previous to that I'm sure the pro-gunners would have said he was as safe as can be at a shooting range. Definitely not a gun free zone.
JoeB. is so "bright" - that's why we should follow his suggestions and disarm the Secret Service, right?
But liberals, we are kind of the retards of the industrialized world. "Doy, Chris Matthews Say we should give up guns, derpa-derp!"