'Transgender' is NOT an actual gender, so the N.C. bill isn't discrimination based on gender

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

There are only two genders, male and female. So how can the feds say the bathroom law is discriminating based on gender? Doesn't matter if you're a dude wearing a dress and acting feminine, you are still MALE. Doesn't matter if you're a butch bull dyke with a short haircut and sporting clothing meant for men, you are still a female.

Thems the breaks, trannies.

 

[TNHarley]

Its not discrimination at all. How can a law requiring ALL people to use their proper sex designated bathroom be discriminatory?
That is equality. Period.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Its not discrimination at all. How can a law requiring ALL people to use their proper sex designated bathroom be discriminatory?
That is equality. Period.

Indeed. But leftist fanatics just can't seem to understand reality.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Its not discrimination at all. How can a law requiring ALL people to use their proper sex designated bathroom be discriminatory?
That is equality. Period.

Indeed. But leftist fanatics just can't seem to understand reality.

That's because Leftists live in an Alternate Reality Bubble.

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Its not discrimination at all. How can a law requiring ALL people to use their proper sex designated bathroom be discriminatory?
That is equality. Period.

Indeed. But leftist fanatics just can't seem to understand reality.

That's because Leftists live in an Alternate Reality Bubble.

This is 100% fact, Lucy. How have you been since my latest ban?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Its not discrimination at all. How can a law requiring ALL people to use their proper sex designated bathroom be discriminatory?
That is equality. Period.

More from The Agenda, another thread, Rainbow Badges to be handed to teachers now, to show they're "Allies" with the LGTB Militants:

So What Happens If One Chooses Not To Wear One?

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Its not discrimination at all. How can a law requiring ALL people to use their proper sex designated bathroom be discriminatory?
That is equality. Period.

Indeed. But leftist fanatics just can't seem to understand reality.

That's because Leftists live in an Alternate Reality Bubble.

This is 100% fact, Lucy. How have you been since my latest ban?

I'm okay thanks.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

They'd be better of pushing it as the mental disease it is and claiming disability

 

[bucs90]

It's a huge can of worms to open. If we end up with case law....probably a SCOTUS ruling....saying a person can choose their gender....then it opens it up to being able to choose ALL previously permanent physical traits. Like race or age.

When how we FEEL overrides what a scientist would clinically say we ARE....it's some twilight zone shit.

Statutory rape?? Nope. The 35 year old who banged your 16 year old daughter "identifies" as a 16 year old high school kid. So....it's not rape.

The African American scholarships? Smart Asian and White kids took them. They "identify" as black.

That racist white cop??? Nope. When he's on duty he identifies as a black female Muslim. So it wasn't a civil rights violation when he stopped all those black people.

 

[Eaglewings]

Simple...

 

[OffensivelyOpenMinded]

Simple...

Then the question of whether a post-op gash they have to stick bags of sand into so it doesn't close up like every other wound qualifies as a vaginer will come up.

 

[NYcarbineer]

There are only two genders, male and female. So how can the feds say the bathroom law is discriminating based on gender? Doesn't matter if you're a dude wearing a dress and acting feminine, you are still MALE. Doesn't matter if you're a butch bull dyke with a short haircut and sporting clothing meant for men, you are still a female.

Thems the breaks, trannies.

That is not what federal law says, whether you like it or not.

 

[Valerie]

Three decades ago, a female employee of a large accounting firm, Ann Hopkins, successfully sued her company for discrimination. Today, her precedent-setting case is being used in a way that Hopkins may never have imagined: to make the argument that discrimination against transgender people is prohibited under federal laws that bar sex discrimination.


That argument — that disparate treatment against transgender people is a form of sex discrimination — is not new. In recent years, state and federal courts, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Obama administration have adopted that position, despite the fact that federal law does not explicitly protect people on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.


But the argument this week has taken center stage in an escalating dispute between the Obama administration and North Carolina, which earlier this year became the first state to require students, state employees and visitors to government buildings to use public restrooms that match their biological sex at birth.


On Wednesday, the U.S. Justice Department issued a letter to North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R), warning that the bathroom restriction violated federal law — and put at risk millions of dollars in federal funding the state receives every year.



“The state is engaging in a pattern or practice of discrimination against transgender state employees,” wrote Vanita Gupta, the head of the civil rights division.


The Hopkins case, which was ultimately decided by the Supreme Court, figured prominently in Gupta’s letter. The justices found that discrimination on the basis of sex could include sex stereotyping — the belief that women ought to look and act stereotypically feminine — as well as other “sex-based considerations.”

Gay and transgender plaintiffs have, in recent years, successfully used that conclusion to win discrimination lawsuits against their employers.


Is discrimination against transgender people a form of sex discrimination?

 

[bucs90]

There are only two genders, male and female. So how can the feds say the bathroom law is discriminating based on gender? Doesn't matter if you're a dude wearing a dress and acting feminine, you are still MALE. Doesn't matter if you're a butch bull dyke with a short haircut and sporting clothing meant for men, you are still a female.

Thems the breaks, trannies.

That is not what federal law says, whether you like it or not.

Then clarify.

Does the federal law recognize 3 genders? Or just 2?

 

[bucs90]

Three decades ago, a female employee of a large accounting firm, Ann Hopkins, successfully sued her company for discrimination. Today, her precedent-setting case is being used in a way that Hopkins may never have imagined: to make the argument that discrimination against transgender people is prohibited under federal laws that bar sex discrimination.


That argument — that disparate treatment against transgender people is a form of sex discrimination — is not new. In recent years, state and federal courts, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Obama administration have adopted that position, despite the fact that federal law does not explicitly protect people on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.


But the argument this week has taken center stage in an escalating dispute between the Obama administration and North Carolina, which earlier this year became the first state to require students, state employees and visitors to government buildings to use public restrooms that match their biological sex at birth.


On Wednesday, the U.S. Justice Department issued a letter to North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory (R), warning that the bathroom restriction violated federal law — and put at risk millions of dollars in federal funding the state receives every year.



“The state is engaging in a pattern or practice of discrimination against transgender state employees,” wrote Vanita Gupta, the head of the civil rights division.


The Hopkins case, which was ultimately decided by the Supreme Court, figured prominently in Gupta’s letter. The justices found that discrimination on the basis of sex could include sex stereotyping — the belief that women ought to look and act stereotypically feminine — as well as other “sex-based considerations.”

Gay and transgender plaintiffs have, in recent years, successfully used that conclusion to win discrimination lawsuits against their employers.


Is discrimination against transgender people a form of sex discrimination?

Yes. That's correct. You can't FORCE a woman to look, dress, act like a stereotypical woman. You cannot mandate that a man talk like a man or dress like a man.

But....can you mandate that a man is, well, a man? Or a woman is a woman?

When a scared 18 year old boy gets on the bus to go to USMC boot camp....and he gets last minute cold feet about the hard standards for PT.....can he just trans himself into a female...and then be put into the women's training and be held to the lower women's standards???

 

[Eaglewings]

Then the question of whether a post-op gash they have to stick bags of sand into so it doesn't close up like every other wound qualifies as a vaginer will come up.

That happens to old ladies too.......

They'd be better of pushing it as the mental disease it is and claiming disability

 

[Valerie]

Yes. That's correct. You can't FORCE a woman to look, dress, act like a stereotypical woman. You cannot mandate that a man talk like a man or dress like a man.

But....can you mandate that a man is, well, a man? Or a woman is a woman?

When a scared 18 year old boy gets on the bus to go to USMC boot camp....and he gets last minute cold feet about the hard standards for PT.....can he just trans himself into a female...and then be put into the women's training and be held to the lower women's standards???

people are what they are and will meet whatever standards they are capable of. *shrug*

 

[FJO]

There are only two genders, male and female. So how can the feds say the bathroom law is discriminating based on gender? Doesn't matter if you're a dude wearing a dress and acting feminine, you are still MALE. Doesn't matter if you're a butch bull dyke with a short haircut and sporting clothing meant for men, you are still a female.

Thems the breaks, trannies.

That is not what federal law says, whether you like it or not.

Then clarify.

Does the federal law recognize 3 genders? Or just 2?

Actually, following the tortured and illogical thinking of left wingers, there are FOUR.

Normal male and female and guys masquarading as gals and women pretending to be guys.

 

[Valerie]

so what, who cares?

 

[bucs90]

Yes. That's correct. You can't FORCE a woman to look, dress, act like a stereotypical woman. You cannot mandate that a man talk like a man or dress like a man.

But....can you mandate that a man is, well, a man? Or a woman is a woman?

When a scared 18 year old boy gets on the bus to go to USMC boot camp....and he gets last minute cold feet about the hard standards for PT.....can he just trans himself into a female...and then be put into the women's training and be held to the lower women's standards???

people are what they are and will meet whatever standards they are capable of. *shrug*

Oh great. Now the left is taking us on a journey to define the word "are".

You "are" a male.

That's a deep philosophical statement apparently that has multiple meanings that cannot be determined as fact by simple physical appearance or genital function, or by medical analysis, but rather by impulsive feeling....... OR....it means you were born with a dick and balls. One of these 2 are fact.