Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
the op is posting court documents?
this is what I asked.
pretending I asked something else is dishonest.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the op is posting court documents?
floridas central files prove voters where unfairly axed from the voting rolls.
Florida Central Voter File - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
James Lee's testimony
On 17 April 2001, James Lee testified, before the McKinney panel, that the state had given DBT the directive to add to the purge list people who matched at least 90% of a last name. DBT objected, knowing that this would produce a huge number of false positives (non-felons).[7]
Lee went on saying that the state then ordered DBT to shift to an even lower threshold of 80% match, allowing also names to be reversed (thus a person named Thomas Clarence could be taken to be the same as Clarence Thomas). Besides this, middle initials were skipped, Jr. and Sr. suffixes dropped, and some nicknames and aliases were added to puff up the list.
"DBT told state officials", testified Lee, "that the rules for creating the [purge] list would mean a significant number of people who were not deceased, not registered in more than one county, or not a felon, would be included on the list. DBT made suggestions to reduce the numbers of eligible voters included on the list". According to Lee, to this suggestion the state told the company, "Forget about it".
"The people who worked on this (for DBT) are very adamant... they told them what would happen", said Lee. "The state expected the county supervisors to be the failsafe." Lee said his company will never again get involved in cleansing voting rolls. "We are not confident any of the methods used today can guarantee legal voters will not be wrongfully denied the right to vote", Lee told a group of Atlanta-area black lawmakers in March 2001.[8]
notice TM doesn't say jack about the dems who PLEAD guilty to voter fraud
nope...she derails the thread with decades old republican fraud
TM is a fraud
notice TM doesn't say jack about the dems who PLEAD guilty to voter fraud
nope...she derails the thread with decades old republican fraud
TM is a fraud
where is the post on this?
Judge Denies Republicans' Effort To End Voter Intimidation Consent*Decree : Personal Liberty Digest?
Judge Denies Republicans' Effort To End Voter Intimidation Consent Decree
December 9, 2009 by Personal Liberty News Desk
Last week, a federal judge in New Jersey rejected an attempt by the Republican National Committee (RNC) to dissolve a 27-year-old court order that is intended to prevent the intimidation of minority voters.
where is TM complaining about voter fraud?
oh wait...these are dems, so it never happened.
submitted enough legitimate signatures to have legally qualified for the presidential primary ballot.
Read more: Trial begins for officials accused in Obama, Clinton ballot petition fraud | Fox News
TM, what is your take on the OP?
TM, what is your take on the OP?
if someone cheated in this state do you really think it will mean Obama is not president anymore?
where is TM complaining about voter fraud?
oh wait...these are dems, so it never happened.
submitted enough legitimate signatures to have legally qualified for the presidential primary ballot.
Read more: Trial begins for officials accused in Obama, Clinton ballot petition fraud | Fox News
right here.