Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/——/ Your analysis is flawed. How do you know food stamp users in those states voted for Trump in the first place? How do you know how any of them voted? Did you consider the possibility that they voted for Trump in 2016 to turn the economy around so they wouldn’t need food stamps? And did you consider the possibility that they are no longer on food stamps and will vote for him in 2020, or is that above your pay grade?Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million
8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump
Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.
Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump
/——/ You mean like in Socialist nirvana Venezuela or in DemocRAT controlled San Fransisco? Move to either one and find out.I wonder what it will be like to live in those places when the moochers get really really hungry. Like starving hungry.How do you know the welfare moochers in those states voted for him?
You might need more ammo. And more guns.
/——/ No. there are legitimate cases where people who physically or mentally can’t fend for themselves. They need the help.How about throw everybody off of food stamps
Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
/——/ I earn a great living and I’m neither a doctor or lawyer. When I got my first part time job in 1968 it was for $1.40 an hour. I wanted to buy my first car and minimum wage wasn’t enough so I got experience, improved my skills and found a job for about $2.25 and by 1969 I was making over $3 an hour. I bought my first car, a used VW Karman Ghia.Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
Millions of jobs have to be done and they simply do not pay much. The argument for raising minimum wage? SOCIALISM!!!
I see your argument as talking out of both sides of your mouth. No, tens of millions of people can not become engineers or doctors. They still have to eat.
/——/ I earn a great living and I’m neither a doctor or lawyer. When I got my first part time job in 1968 it was for $1.40 an hour. I wanted to buy my first car and minimum wage wasn’t enough so I got experience, improved my skills and found a job for about $2.25 and by 1969 I was making over $3 an hour. I bought my first car, a used VW Karman Ghia.Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
Millions of jobs have to be done and they simply do not pay much. The argument for raising minimum wage? SOCIALISM!!!
I see your argument as talking out of both sides of your mouth. No, tens of millions of people can not become engineers or doctors. They still have to eat.
I have even a better idea Moon Bat.
I'll chose when I want to be compassionate and help people that need it when I think they deserve it and the fucking government can stay out of it. It is called "Liberty" Moon Bat. Go look it up.
Bingo that's exactly it.The Citizens of the United States of America want America placed first not second behind other countries. They want to be left only to live their lives without government regulations telling them what to eat, who to love, where to go to church. Basically they want to be left alone.we need a democrat candidate who speaks to what american are feeling in their guts and kick Trump out of the white house and into jail!
I don't see it as a race. People don't seem to understand that we do better when others do better also. You don't have to knock others down to do well yourself. When people have something to lose, they are less likely to want to see it destroyed.
The Citizens of the United States of America want America placed first not second behind other countries. They want to be left only to live their lives without government regulations telling them what to eat, who to love, where to go to church. Basically they want to be left alone.we need a democrat candidate who speaks to what american are feeling in their guts and kick Trump out of the white house and into jail!
the problem is you steal money from us to pay for your poor friends,,,and no where in the constitution does that authority exist,,,
/——/ Your analysis is flawed. How do you know food stamp users in those states voted for Trump in the first place? How do you know how any of them voted? Did you consider the possibility that they voted for Trump in 2016 to turn the economy around so they wouldn’t need food stamps? And did you consider the possibility that they are no longer on food stamps and will vote for him in 2020, or is that above your pay grade?Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million
8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump
Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.
Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump
/—-/ They got on food stamps and were struggling under Obozo. They see the economy turning and improving but they are sooooooo stupid they are going to vote for the democRAT president to continue their misery with no hope of relief. Sure Spanky./——/ Your analysis is flawed. How do you know food stamp users in those states voted for Trump in the first place? How do you know how any of them voted? Did you consider the possibility that they voted for Trump in 2016 to turn the economy around so they wouldn’t need food stamps? And did you consider the possibility that they are no longer on food stamps and will vote for him in 2020, or is that above your pay grade?Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million
8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump
Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.
Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump
The people who needed food stamps in 2016, haven't changed. The bottom 40% didn't get a raise, or a much of a tax cut. They got tariffs on almost everything they buy, and a lot of them lost their health insurance.
The economy is strong, but doing little to bolster President Trump's support, survey says
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...5c382e-99b5-11e9-916d-9c61607d8190_story.html
If the rising tide doesn't lift all boats, the ones who get swamped will not be voting Trump in 2020.
/—-/ No dumbass, it means I took matters into my own hands and worked hard to do better. Today I’d take the $10 an hour job and work my way up. Same theory, just different numbers./——/ I earn a great living and I’m neither a doctor or lawyer. When I got my first part time job in 1968 it was for $1.40 an hour. I wanted to buy my first car and minimum wage wasn’t enough so I got experience, improved my skills and found a job for about $2.25 and by 1969 I was making over $3 an hour. I bought my first car, a used VW Karman Ghia.Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
Millions of jobs have to be done and they simply do not pay much. The argument for raising minimum wage? SOCIALISM!!!
I see your argument as talking out of both sides of your mouth. No, tens of millions of people can not become engineers or doctors. They still have to eat.
It doesn't matter what you did. When you did it there were millions of well paying factory jobs that one could get with absolutely no experience. That is no longer the case.
That's like arguing, I could buy a loaf of bread for 19 cents, I don't understand why everyone can't do that today.
Socialists want everyone dependent on the government. Socialists believe in Government as their provider and savior.Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
/—-/ No dumbass, it means I took matters into my own hands and worked hard to do better. Today I’d take the $10 an hour job and work my way up. Same theory, just different numbers./——/ I earn a great living and I’m neither a doctor or lawyer. When I got my first part time job in 1968 it was for $1.40 an hour. I wanted to buy my first car and minimum wage wasn’t enough so I got experience, improved my skills and found a job for about $2.25 and by 1969 I was making over $3 an hour. I bought my first car, a used VW Karman Ghia.Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
Millions of jobs have to be done and they simply do not pay much. The argument for raising minimum wage? SOCIALISM!!!
I see your argument as talking out of both sides of your mouth. No, tens of millions of people can not become engineers or doctors. They still have to eat.
It doesn't matter what you did. When you did it there were millions of well paying factory jobs that one could get with absolutely no experience. That is no longer the case.
That's like arguing, I could buy a loaf of bread for 19 cents, I don't understand why everyone can't do that today.
Socialists want the people as their provider, and in turn to provide back the people. Government would only enter into the picture if they represent the people.Socialists want everyone dependent on the government. Socialists believe in Government as their provider and savior.Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
/—-/ They got on food stamps and were struggling under Obozo. They see the economy turning and improving but they are sooooooo stupid they are going to vote for the democRAT president to continue their misery with no hope of relief. Sure Spanky./——/ Your analysis is flawed. How do you know food stamp users in those states voted for Trump in the first place? How do you know how any of them voted? Did you consider the possibility that they voted for Trump in 2016 to turn the economy around so they wouldn’t need food stamps? And did you consider the possibility that they are no longer on food stamps and will vote for him in 2020, or is that above your pay grade?Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million
8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump
Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.
Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump
The people who needed food stamps in 2016, haven't changed. The bottom 40% didn't get a raise, or a much of a tax cut. They got tariffs on almost everything they buy, and a lot of them lost their health insurance.
The economy is strong, but doing little to bolster President Trump's support, survey says
https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...5c382e-99b5-11e9-916d-9c61607d8190_story.html
If the rising tide doesn't lift all boats, the ones who get swamped will not be voting Trump in 2020.
/—-/ You have a defeatist attitude, you gave up without trying. Swifthires - Job Results/—-/ No dumbass, it means I took matters into my own hands and worked hard to do better. Today I’d take the $10 an hour job and work my way up. Same theory, just different numbers./——/ I earn a great living and I’m neither a doctor or lawyer. When I got my first part time job in 1968 it was for $1.40 an hour. I wanted to buy my first car and minimum wage wasn’t enough so I got experience, improved my skills and found a job for about $2.25 and by 1969 I was making over $3 an hour. I bought my first car, a used VW Karman Ghia.Why would you want people who vote for you to be on food stamps? Wouldn't you want them to have the opportunity to get off of them? I'm not sure why Democrats view government dependency as desirable. Instead of getting as many people on foodstamps as possible(Obama), wouldn't you want to provide as much opportunity as possible so people wouldn't need them?
Millions of jobs have to be done and they simply do not pay much. The argument for raising minimum wage? SOCIALISM!!!
I see your argument as talking out of both sides of your mouth. No, tens of millions of people can not become engineers or doctors. They still have to eat.
It doesn't matter what you did. When you did it there were millions of well paying factory jobs that one could get with absolutely no experience. That is no longer the case.
That's like arguing, I could buy a loaf of bread for 19 cents, I don't understand why everyone can't do that today.
Just for future reference, if you think name calling is a proper rebuttal, I will ignore you.
Yes, you can take a $10 an hour job and move up BUT there are a limited number of jobs one can move up to.
I note this over and over, please tell me in decent language if you can where I am wrong.
Your solution will work for an individual. It will not work for tens of millions. This is a country of tens of millions.
/—-/ You have a defeatist attitude, you gave up without trying. Swifthires - Job Results/—-/ No dumbass, it means I took matters into my own hands and worked hard to do better. Today I’d take the $10 an hour job and work my way up. Same theory, just different numbers./——/ I earn a great living and I’m neither a doctor or lawyer. When I got my first part time job in 1968 it was for $1.40 an hour. I wanted to buy my first car and minimum wage wasn’t enough so I got experience, improved my skills and found a job for about $2.25 and by 1969 I was making over $3 an hour. I bought my first car, a used VW Karman Ghia.Millions of jobs have to be done and they simply do not pay much. The argument for raising minimum wage? SOCIALISM!!!
I see your argument as talking out of both sides of your mouth. No, tens of millions of people can not become engineers or doctors. They still have to eat.
It doesn't matter what you did. When you did it there were millions of well paying factory jobs that one could get with absolutely no experience. That is no longer the case.
That's like arguing, I could buy a loaf of bread for 19 cents, I don't understand why everyone can't do that today.
Just for future reference, if you think name calling is a proper rebuttal, I will ignore you.
Yes, you can take a $10 an hour job and move up BUT there are a limited number of jobs one can move up to.
I note this over and over, please tell me in decent language if you can where I am wrong.
Your solution will work for an individual. It will not work for tens of millions. This is a country of tens of millions.
Many jobs for immediate hire paying $15 an hour. No experience necessary.
/—-/ Nowhere in the constitution does it say we must subsidize murdering babies in abortion mills, but here we are.the problem is you steal money from us to pay for your poor friends,,,and no where in the constitution does that authority exist,,,
Nowhere in the constitution does it say we have to give big tax subsidies to big corporations, but you guys do that shit, too.
Hey, here's why I am all for taking money and giving it to poor people. It's preferable to them breaking into my house at night and trying to take it.
