Trump administration to propose rule that would cut 3.1 million people from food stamp program

[danielpalos]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

 

[danielpalos]

upgrading infrastructure could put that stuff underground.

 

[basquebromance]

justice is what love looks like in public

we will do justice by the poor by kicking Trump out of the white house in 2020!

 

[Coyote]

How do you know the welfare moochers in those states voted for him?

Because he won WV by 68.5 % of the vote, making a clean sweep in the poorest counties. Bet it isn’t much different in the other red states.

 

[pknopp]

How do you know the welfare moochers in those states voted for him?

Because he won WV by 68.5 % of the vote, making a clean sweep in the poorest counties. Bet it isn’t much different in the other red states.

Sanders beat Hillary in WV. The state elected a (D) governor in the same election.

Coal is not going to last long but Trump won because Hillary said she would put miners out of a job and on welfare.

 

[hadit]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

That doesn't address the question. Try again.

 

[danielpalos]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

That doesn't address the question. Try again.

Yes, it does, since people won't need food stamps if they can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed and use, legal tender for All debts, public and private.

 

[hadit]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

That doesn't address the question. Try again.

Yes, it does, since people won't need food stamps if they can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed and use, legal tender for All debts, public and private.

You're simply swapping one form of welfare for another, and it didn't address the question, because they're taking away things the people don't need.

 

[danielpalos]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

That doesn't address the question. Try again.

Yes, it does, since people won't need food stamps if they can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed and use, legal tender for All debts, public and private.

You're simply swapping one form of welfare for another, and it didn't address the question, because they're taking away things the people don't need.

you miss the economic point, like usual. solving for simple poverty must create a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. one estimate is about a three trillion dollar infusion to our economy on a consistent basis.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

 

[keepitreal]

We all know that Obama was the Food Stamp President. Greatest expansion of food stamps in history. Time to get off the gubmint dole and get a job, America is hiring everywhere.

Greatest recession since the great depression. Without food stamps people would have starved.

Soft Drinks No. 1 Purchase by Food Stamp Recipients;
$357,700,000 From 1 Grocery Chain

That is data from 2016 from ONE business
which I suspect is WalMart

357 MILLION dollars on soda
199 MILLION dollars on bagged snacks
101 MILLION dollars on Frozen handheld and snacks
96 MILLION dollars on candy
90 MILLION dollars on frozen pizzas
86 MILLION dollars on ice cream
82 MILLION dollars on coffee and creamers
78 MILLION dollars on cookies
68 MILLION dollars on cakes
62 MILLION dollars on traditional mexican food

Sorry Bitch, no one would starve
without pepsi, cheetos, cheese sticks,
kit kats, cheese pizzas, vanilla ice cream,
coffee, oreos and cake

 

[hadit]

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

That doesn't address the question. Try again.

Yes, it does, since people won't need food stamps if they can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed and use, legal tender for All debts, public and private.

You're simply swapping one form of welfare for another, and it didn't address the question, because they're taking away things the people don't need.

you miss the economic point, like usual. solving for simple poverty must create a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. one estimate is about a three trillion dollar infusion to our economy on a consistent basis.

Translation: we need to first take three trillion out of the economy so we can spend three trillion on new welfare for those who can work and have access to jobs but won't work. Now, how does that address the question, which is: How is it shafting people to stop giving them stuff they don't need?

 

[Cellblock2429]

We all know that Obama was the Food Stamp President. Greatest expansion of food stamps in history. Time to get off the gubmint dole and get a job, America is hiring everywhere.

Greatest recession since the great depression. Without food stamps people would have starved.

Soft Drinks No. 1 Purchase by Food Stamp Recipients;
$357,700,000 From 1 Grocery Chain

That is data from 2016 from ONE business
which I suspect is WalMart

357 MILLION dollars on soda
199 MILLION dollars on bagged snacks
101 MILLION dollars on Frozen handheld and snacks
96 MILLION dollars on candy
90 MILLION dollars on frozen pizzas
86 MILLION dollars on ice cream
82 MILLION dollars on coffee and creamers
78 MILLION dollars on cookies
68 MILLION dollars on cakes
62 MILLION dollars on traditional mexican food

Sorry Bitch, no one would starve
without pepsi, cheetos, cheese sticks,
kit kats, cheese pizzas, vanilla ice cream,
coffee, oreos and cake

/—/ And food stamp abuse is excused by the same libtards who demand we cut back on junk food and limit the size of sugary soft drinks— and yet they attack anyone who dares question food stamp abuse.

 

[danielpalos]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

 

[danielpalos]

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

That doesn't address the question. Try again.

Yes, it does, since people won't need food stamps if they can apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed and use, legal tender for All debts, public and private.

You're simply swapping one form of welfare for another, and it didn't address the question, because they're taking away things the people don't need.

you miss the economic point, like usual. solving for simple poverty must create a positive multiplier effect upon our economy. one estimate is about a three trillion dollar infusion to our economy on a consistent basis.

Translation: we need to first take three trillion out of the economy so we can spend three trillion on new welfare for those who can work and have access to jobs but won't work. Now, how does that address the question, which is: How is it shafting people to stop giving them stuff they don't need?

Only if you appeal to ignorance of the concepts.

Under Capitalism, there is no "unemployment only underpayment."

 

[danielpalos]

We all know that Obama was the Food Stamp President. Greatest expansion of food stamps in history. Time to get off the gubmint dole and get a job, America is hiring everywhere.

Greatest recession since the great depression. Without food stamps people would have starved.

Soft Drinks No. 1 Purchase by Food Stamp Recipients;
$357,700,000 From 1 Grocery Chain

That is data from 2016 from ONE business
which I suspect is WalMart

357 MILLION dollars on soda
199 MILLION dollars on bagged snacks
101 MILLION dollars on Frozen handheld and snacks
96 MILLION dollars on candy
90 MILLION dollars on frozen pizzas
86 MILLION dollars on ice cream
82 MILLION dollars on coffee and creamers
78 MILLION dollars on cookies
68 MILLION dollars on cakes
62 MILLION dollars on traditional mexican food

Sorry Bitch, no one would starve
without pepsi, cheetos, cheese sticks,
kit kats, cheese pizzas, vanilla ice cream,
coffee, oreos and cake

/—/ And food stamp abuse is excused by the same libtards who demand we cut back on junk food and limit the size of sugary soft drinks— and yet they attack anyone who dares question food stamp abuse.

That program could be abolished with equal protection of the law for unemployment compensation.

 

[Crepitus]

We all know that Obama was the Food Stamp President. Greatest expansion of food stamps in history. Time to get off the gubmint dole and get a job, America is hiring everywhere.

Greatest recession since the great depression. Without food stamps people would have starved.

Soft Drinks No. 1 Purchase by Food Stamp Recipients;
$357,700,000 From 1 Grocery Chain

That is data from 2016 from ONE business
which I suspect is WalMart

357 MILLION dollars on soda
199 MILLION dollars on bagged snacks
101 MILLION dollars on Frozen handheld and snacks
96 MILLION dollars on candy
90 MILLION dollars on frozen pizzas
86 MILLION dollars on ice cream
82 MILLION dollars on coffee and creamers
78 MILLION dollars on cookies
68 MILLION dollars on cakes
62 MILLION dollars on traditional mexican food

Sorry Bitch, no one would starve
without pepsi, cheetos, cheese sticks,
kit kats, cheese pizzas, vanilla ice cream,
coffee, oreos and cake

They didn't eat well.

They did eat.

Plus that's 2016, post recession when most of those who went on during were already off.

 

[hadit]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

 

[danielpalos]

Trump Administration Moves to End Food Stamps for 3 Million

8 out of 10 states with the highest percentage of folks on food stamps voted for Trump

Once again, Trump and his enablers have shafted their own supporters.

Unfortunately they will blame Dems for it and still vote for trump

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

 

[Cellblock2429]

How is it shafting anyone when you stop giving them something they don't need?

unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is more equal and more cost effective and more market friendly.

/——/ I know people who refused to take a job until their UE ran out. They didn’t want to give up the free money and time off until they had to.

Employment is at the will of either party not just the employer. That lack of Individual Liberty and unequal protection of the law for unemployment compensation on an at-will basis in our at-will employment States is harmful to Labor and the Poor under our current regime of capitalism.

Translation: you don't think you should have to work a job to get paid.

Not under Capitalism, only under Socialism. Fundamentals matter under capitalism, not any subjective value of social morals for free.

/---/ Word salad.