trump begs Florida judge to restore his Twitter account

Do you think trump should have his Twitter account reactivated?

  • No, he'll just call for more violence

    Votes: 21 52.5%
  • Yes, trump has learned his lesson and will behave in the future

    Votes: 1 2.5%
  • Other, specify below

    Votes: 18 45.0%

  • Total voters
    40
As it should be since Twitter did not say it.

AzogtheDefiler would argue that if the paperboy delivers a newspaper with a slanderous article about you in it. That you should be able to sue the paperboy, and let the courts decide if it's frivolous.
 
One problem is that Twitter isn’t saying that Hunter Biden isn’t a cannibal. Someone else is.
But Twitter can allow those posts non stop and ban all those that state otherwise so many will think he is a cannibal. Or Twitter may just police violence, vulgarity and pornography and leave the rest as is. Then users may just block content they don't like. You know how you put people on ignore because you want an echo chamber.
 
AzogtheDefiler would argue that if the paperboy delivers a newspaper with a slanderous article about you in it. That you should be able to sue the paperboy, and let the courts decide if it's frivolous.
Nope. The paperboy doesn't care what he delivers. He is just dropping off the paper. False conflation.

Try again, leftist. And again you don't get to decide what is and isn't frivolous.
 
Trump could easily file hundreds of lawsuits, and thousands of motions, thus clogging the court for months or years with frivolous lawsuits, that delay justice for people with proper causes of action.

Yep as could George Soros. Correct? So change the system if you don't like it.

The difference is that you're defending somebody abusing the court system, where if Soros tried doing the same, democrats wouldn't be defending it.
 
Or the forums won't ban people unless they post explicit content like violence, vulgarity and pornography? To me it is pretty simple. Don't ban anyone unless they they post what I just stated they should not post. People always have the right to block posters they disagree with.

as soon as you ban one person, going by what you want, you are now responsible for anything ever posted on your forum. I ban you for vulgarity and someone else comes along and post child porn on my site and I am now liable if we go your route.
 
Immune except if I say vaccines don't work they do ban me but if I say they do they won't. So to me now they are pushing a narrative that makes them a publisher for all intents and purposes. I could be 100% wrong and would like the courts to opine and will live with their decisions.
No different than if you say that injecting bleach cures COVID would result in a ban, where saying injecting bleach doesn't work, they won't.
 
No different than if you say that injecting bleach cures COVID would result in a ban, where saying injecting bleach doesn't work, they won't.
But Trump never said it....CNN did. Trump said "disinfectant".....and everyone knows that he meant antibiotic.
Why don't we attack Obama for saying that a person with asthma uses a breathalyzer....HOW DARE THAT SOB FUCK UP THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
 
Last edited:
Twitter may just police violence, vulgarity and pornography

Even that is still subjective and dependent upon the views of the ones doing the policing, which you are against.

Someone might think saying shit is vulgarity while someone else might think that saying fuck is just fine.

In the end nothing has changed
 
Now you're on topic.


#6. Control the media. The debate can now turn to Americans insulting each other and hurling profanities, in an attempt to blame the other side.

But whatever side wears the fascist label the most appropriately will deserve to own it.

(see reference to divorce, abortion, and homosexuality)
The progs wear it firmly and proudly. Only the progs are trying to censor anyone. Only the progs want to put people in jail for disputing Biden's received wisdom.
 
But Twitter can allow those posts non stop and ban all those that state otherwise so many will think he is a cannibal. Or Twitter may just police violence, vulgarity and pornography and leave the rest as is. Then users may just block content they don't like. You know how you put people on ignore because you want an echo chamber.
Twitter can’t possibly police ever post. There’s just too much content. It’s impossible. Asking them to would fundamentally change the platform.
 
But Trump never said it....CNN did. Trump said "disinfectant".....and everyone knows that he meant antibiotic.
Why don't we attack Obama for saying that a person with asthma uses a breathalyzer....HOW DARE THAT SOB FUCK UP THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE.
Grow up. Trump was reading a chart of common "disinfectants" and suggesting injecting one of them into people.

BTW: For your "antibiotic" argument to be true, that antibiotic would have be work in less than a minute. Which of course if completely impossible. Hence Trump could NOT have meant antibiotic, when describing injecting a disinfectant that works in a minute.
 
Yes it was Trump's deal. It was called the Doha Agreement.
Learn something - ANYTHING! :rolleyes:

Xiden didn’t abide by that deal, so your bullshit is just that. Pathetic deflection to avoid the Taliban and their call for violence. Explain how Death to America is not calling for violence. This ought to be good.......for a laugh.
 

Forum List

Back
Top