- Aug 4, 2018
- 63,306
- 27,953
Wrong because Twitter can say Azog is a gay cannibal and now people will think that about me because Twitter at the same time may ban those who post otherwise. So now they are a publisher of content. To me it is pretty clear. Muddy to you? Sounds like a "you problem"...for those in the gray area Twitter may just do a semi block. They block it but allow a user to unblock with the warning that material could be deemed explicit. Problem solved. Did Trump incite violence? IDK. I do not believe so as other news outlets play his speech and such. Twitter can certainly do the semi block methodology that I discussed earlier.All 3 of which are 100% in the eye of the beholder. Shit, most people think that Trump broke the violence rule, so I guess Twitter is safe under your view.
Here is the FCC definition: It must appeal to an average person's prurient interest; depict or describe sexual conduct in a "patently offensive" way; and, taken as a whole, lack serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.
That is about as clear as mud.
How about this, if you do not like that way a platform is controlling it content, you move to a different one. Problem solved and we do not even need the courts, just for people to be adults.