Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More gay talk from conservatives. Dispute anything that has been said here with documented facts.You faggots always use the term "conservative" loosely. You wouldn't know a conservative if he walked up and kicked you in the pussy.
Are you maga fuckups that sexuality repressed that your feelings need to be in every single post?You faggots always use the term "conservative" loosely. You wouldn't know a conservative if he walked up and kicked you in the pussy.
HilariousScroll up then shut up
Well it is nice that you get to insults before page 3.You faggots always use the term "conservative" loosely. You wouldn't know a conservative if he walked up and kicked you in the pussy.
Can the people who support Trump and want to criticise Wharton or the Labour Bureau, please post with actual evidence...
Who said you're an American?Labour? Lol you don't count
Who said you're an American?
Well it is nice that you get to insults before page 3.
You are given plenty of opportunities to conter their arguments with actual evidence and we can see the validity of your evidence.
But seems that you are upset and need a time out because you are hearing the bad voices again..
You lie about everything else. So where is the polling data you use? You never provided it in the other conversation. And you're again providing no data here either. Seems to be a pattern here.I know I am, sock puppet
You lie about everything else. So where is the polling data you use? You never provided it in the other conversation. And you're again providing no data here either. Seems to be a pattern here.
You mad bro?BTW, that was one hell of a trick your own party pulled on you, wasn't it? I mean like tossing all 14 million of you Democrat's primary election votes in the shitcan, giving Pedophile Joe the boot, and shoving Kamala in your face.
How 'bout that Democracy?![]()
I know way too much about you. So you'll once again provide nothing to back up how you say this data is wrong. Duly noted.You don't know the first thing about me. Just shut up
Well of course that's assuming that we continue to blow trillions of dollars on stupid shit.... Like European wars or poisonous vaccines. Harris's plan is just like all the other Democrat plans.... constantly increasing taxation on the working class. So yeah it totals out to be less of a deficit assuming they haven't had another 25 stupid shit expenditures by then.Former President Donald Trump’s economic proposals would increase federal deficits by $5.8 trillion over the next decade, almost five times more than those of Vice President Kamala Harris, which would add $1.2 trillion, according to a new pair of studies from the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Budget Model.
The Trump report found that his plan to permanently extend the 2017 tax cuts would add over $4 trillion to deficits over the next 10 years. His proposal to eliminate taxes on Social Security benefits comes with a $1.2 trillion price tag, while his pledge to further reduce corporate taxes would add nearly $6 billion.
The Harris analysis showed that her plan to expand the Child Tax Credit, the Earned Income Tax Credit and other tax credits would raise deficits by $2.1 trillion in the coming 10 years. And her proposal to create a $25,000 subsidy for all qualifying first-time homebuyers would add $140 billion over a decade.
But the Harris report found that raising the corporate tax rate to 28% from its current level of 21%, as the vice president has floated, could partially offset the costs of her spending by $1.1 trillion.
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/trump-harris-budget-deficit-economy-election.html
Don lives for the now. He wants the kind of adulation associated with a strong economy (the kind Biden never got) coming from the stimulative affect of a tax cut. Just like in his first term. One wonders if he'll claim a tax cut will cause a reduction in the deficit as he did last time. It's a promise Repubs frequently make, never coming to fruition.
Note to Don's minions: don't assassinate the character of the guy who authored the study. If you can find fault with his methodology, fine. Just don't waste time with ad hominem attacks.
Who said you're an American?
You wake up and decide to be gay again? I'm happy Harris is the nominee. Obviously you aren't so much. See you in November, loser.At least her primary election vote was counted. Yours was tossed in the trash, nutless faggot.
And the funniest part is you don't even have the balls to be pissed off about your vote being disenfranchised by your own party.
![]()
I know way too much about you. So you'll once again provide nothing to back up how you say this data is wrong. Duly noted.
Harris is not increasing taxes on the working class.Well of course that's assuming that we continue to blow trillions of dollars on stupid shit.... Like European wars or poisonous vaccines. Harris's plan is just like all the other Democrat plans.... constantly increasing taxation on the working class. So yeah it totals out to be less of a deficit assuming they haven't had another 25 stupid shit expenditures by then.
So where is your data you used as a basis to say another posters data was false?You don't know shit and stop pretending you do, sock
Reasonably small adjustment considering the number of jobs created per month is averaging at 550k.Scroll up then shut up