Trump Campaign was prepared for a guilty verdict

"An openly crooked judge and a jury of Manhattan moonbats was never not going to convict him."
"Openly crooked judge"?

OK, amigo....prove it.
Show the forum you got game.
That you are not just a juvenile loudmouth who can't back up his mouth.
If you can.....great. Educate us.
You said he is "openly crooked" so the burden, the responsibility, is upon you as a serious adult with gravitas to show the forum you can be trusted, can be relied upon.

Go!

--------------------------------

And then your "jury of Manhattan moonbats".....well, mein freund, do you understand the function of voir dire in trials?

Competent, experienced, accomplished attorneys hired by a defendant with money to hire the best....well, they sorted, sifted, filtered that jury pool. They got who they chose. Duh!!

And you now say those high-priced hired-guns chose "moonbats"?
What does that say about the guy who hired 'em?

But, rehabilitate yourself here, poster Oddball, tell the forum how you would have beaten those high-dollar attorneys that Don Trump hired....beat them in their voire dire selections.

Go!
 
Trump Campaign was prepared for a guilty verdict.
This was sent out within minutes of the verdict.
Good to see they were prepared.


View attachment 954329
1717290723675.png
 
Trump Campaign was prepared for a guilty verdict.
This was sent out within minutes of the verdict.
Good to see they were prepared.


View attachment 954329
Numbnuts only an idiot wouldn't have known it was going to happen. A hostile judge, leftist jury. Not allowing evidence and expert witnesses
It's going to be overturned
 
"Openly crooked judge"?

OK, amigo....prove it.
Show the forum you got game.
That you are not just a juvenile loudmouth who can't back up his mouth.
If you can.....great. Educate us.
You said he is "openly crooked" so the burden, the responsibility, is upon you as a serious adult with gravitas to show the forum you can be trusted, can be relied upon.

Go!

--------------------------------

And then your "jury of Manhattan moonbats".....well, mein freund, do you understand the function of voir dire in trials?

Competent, experienced, accomplished attorneys hired by a defendant with money to hire the best....well, they sorted, sifted, filtered that jury pool. They got who they chose. Duh!!

And you now say those high-priced hired-guns chose "moonbats"?
What does that say about the guy who hired 'em?

But, rehabilitate yourself here, poster Oddball, tell the forum how you would have beaten those high-dollar attorneys that Don Trump hired....beat them in their voire dire selections.

Go!
There's no evidence you'd accept....Go piss up a rope, moonbat.
 
I don't believe that is true.

However, am willing to read any responsible informed sourcing the poster 1775 can provide the forum.

Thanx in advance. (if he can provide it.)
Why was the Federal Election Commission chair Bradley A. Smith limited in what he could say?
 

Forum List

Back
Top